Culture My unexpected Pride icon: Pokémon, small fluffy monsters battling in a gender-fluid world - Pikachu is now a queer icon

My unexpected Pride icon: Pokémon, small fluffy monsters battling in a gender-fluid world​

IMG_2343.webp
Pikachu costumes are a popular choice at Pride parades.Composite: Guardian Design; PR
As a queer child in the early 2000s, I never fitted in with the hyper-masculine world of Action Man. But in the gender-nonconforming Pokémon universe, I found safety

Jordan Page
Sat 14 Jun 2025 08.00 EDT
Woolworths, Woking, Surrey. I’d walk up to the till, place my Barbie or Britney Spears CD player on the counter, and before the cashier had the chance to ask if we wanted a bag, I’d blurt out: “This is a present for my sister, it’s not for me!” Sharing a smirk with my mum, they’d offer replies such as, “Wow, she’ll love it!” and “Aren’t you a kind brother?” (If you hadn’t already guessed, I do not have a sister.)


This was a regular occurrence in my childhood in the early 2000s. I was acutely aware, even as early as the age of five or six, that these were not the usual toys a little boy should be playing with. Where was my Action Man or Scalextric track? Why were my bedroom walls covered in posters of pop stars wearing crop tops and not footballers with muddy knees?

Barbie and Britney may have been my secret vices, but there was another phenomenon I, and a lot of other children my age, quickly became wrapped up in: Pokémon. The Japanese media franchise – currently the highest-grossing in the world – reached its “Pokémania” peak around this time.

Video games, trading cards, figurines, and an anime TV series – the Pokémon universe had them all. I was obsessed. My parents were left dumbfounded when I could name all the original 151 species by heart, and less than happy when I drew a huge pokéball on my bedroom wall in crayon.

IMG_2344.webp
Jordan Page in Pikachu costume. Photograph: Courtesy of Jordan Page
As a queer child, I could love Pokémon freely. Unlike other children’s media and toys of the time it wasn’t strictly gendered. While my badge maker and Polly Pockets were clearly marketed towards girls (and my short-lived possession of them was mixed with shame), nobody had a problem with my love of Pokémon, because anyone could be a Pokémon trainer, and for a while everyone wanted to be one.

There were singing, dancing Pokémon that were fluffy and cute, and that – shock! – I was drawn to. Nobody cared which one was your favourite, because everyone had the same goal: to become the ultimate Pokémon master. Looking back, in what was incredibly ahead of its time, there were gender-neutral and gender non-conforming Pokémon. There was even one slightly resembling a drag queen.

The human villains in the original TV show, Jessie and James of Team Rocket, regularly dressed in clothes associated with the opposite sex and subverted gender roles, and this never attracted the kind of frivolous concern about “confusing” children that it would today. Longtime Pokémon fans have debated their queerness in online forums, even if queerness is never mentioned in the show. For that matter, aside from the odd crush, heterosexual relationships weren’t central to the show’s storylines, either.

IMG_2345.webp
Team Rocket … Jessie and James (left), carrying his trademark rose. Photograph: Everett Collection Inc/Alamy
Pokémon “battled”, but it was hardly violent enough to make me squirm or put me off in the way that hyper-masculine, weapon-wielding characters from other TV series and video games did. I felt excluded for not liking shows with these attributes, but in the Pokémon universe, I fitted in.

In 2016, the augmented reality game Pokémon Go catapulted the franchise back into public consciousness. By the end of the year, it had been downloaded more than 500m times. A community of LGBTQ+ fans – whether teenagers fresh to the franchise or adults who grew up with the original series – formed, and now it’s common to see Pikachu at Pride or get-ups resembling Ash Ketchum (the show’s original protagonist) in drag bars. The franchise has since embraced this community, introducing more visibly gender-fluid human characters.

Though my relationship with Pokémon remains firmly in the early 2000s, I’m grateful that it provided me with a world free of gender norms that I didn’t relate to, a world that shielded me from being judged for what I really liked.

Feeling a pang of nostalgia as I began writing this, I searched for the soundtrack of the first Pokémon movie on YouTube, only to discover that none other than a teenage Britney Spears sings a song on it. It’s made for children and it’s called Soda Pop, so obviously it’s awful. But if anything, discovering it is a full-circle moment for me, and in my mind, cements the fact that Pokémon has a place in queer culture through and through.

Link (Archive)
 
In the manga they get married and have a baby. The rose James brandishes is a Tuxedo Mask reference. He is also not gay.
That's in Electric Tale of Pikachu. Don't think Pokemon Special/Adventures(what people usually mean when referring to Pokemon manga) has Jessie or James. The volume of Electric Tale of Pikechu where they marry used to be pretty expensive on the used market. Take a guess why.
Duh, that's how Golbat evolves into Crobat.
Don't call my man Silver gay. Not abusing your Pokemon is completely heterosexual.
 
All jokes aside it is actually kinda cool and unique that Pokemon can be enjoyed by kids of both genders and nobody bats an eye over it. Me and my sister were both Pokemon crazy growing up and it was fun to have a franchise we both liked equally.
Digimon was kinda this to a lesser extent, too. Really anything involving raising animals is pretty unisex in terms of appeal.
 
Those stories are fashioned after folklore traditions of spirits disguised as animals tricking humans. You can find these types of stories in east asia and europe and everywhere else. These tales are in-universe myths in pokemon. The only reason anybody thinks otherwise is because of perverts intentionally misinterpreting things and tricking people like you into believing them.
Are we still trying to cope-splain away Nintendo franchise developers actively going out of their way to write not just one, not just two, not just three but several interspecies rape stories? In a game mostly played by kids?
If you look at the deep lore in the leaks that was never actually made public, they had a whole plan on how to build this setting going forward, not some random one-off folklore that can easily be overlooked
arceus circle.webp
Take a look at this, the only way you will ever see this circle is if you got an event Arceus all the way back(or hacked the game today) and got a special event in Heartgold/Soulsilver. Nobody knew what autistic deep lore was behind it until the leaks. If they included something like this, what makes you think those folklore stories weren't supposed to play a larger point in the setting that was never(thankfully) fleshed out?
Somebody clearly had a vision, and that vision involved a lot of rape. Nobody put a gun to their head and forced them to write this, there is so many ways to make a same point without explicitly making them sexualized(which is exactly what the final Diamond and Pearl games went with, and even there it strongly implies bestiality and marriage between Pokemon and people in the ancient times. This was just a bad idea to include all around.)
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised they picked Pikachu. Maybe it's just the popularity. Or the fact that female Pikachu looks like an easy gender swap at the Pokecenter. You are just a pair of scissors away from being a true and honest pokewoman.
1750064015749.webp
There's tons of fan art like this. (Female Pikachu have the heart tip tail)
 
These faggots really want everything to be about them.
That has always been the case. Everything they are allowed to parasitize they hollow out from within and then wear as a skinsuit to bring more attention to themselves.

The only thing these degenerate sodomites are interested in is feeding their own narcissism, and any faggot that tries to say otherwise is lying.
 
I was acutely aware, even as early as the age of five or six, that these were not the usual toys a little boy should be playing with. Where was my Action Man or Scalextric track? Why were my bedroom walls covered in posters of pop stars wearing crop tops and not footballers with muddy knees?
But who cares? Little boys can like Britney Spears, and play with Barbies. Most little boys don’t after 5-6 but who cares? Play with what you want to. I liked Lego, and had many a scalextric battle with my brothers on our second hand track. I’m a girl, the toys I liked were indicative of my PERSONALITY not my sex. I disn’t like dolls or makeup very much, I preferred construction toys. Kids generally like a specific ‘schema’ to play (role play toys, toys that allow movement, or building, or drawing etc.) it’s the action of the toy that is what kids tend to gravitate towards.
You’re a boy. You remain a boy whether you like action man or Barbie. Stop retconning your childhood to say you’ve always been gay. Kids don’t have a sexuality, they just like ‘stuff.’ Like toys, or music.
It’s so fucking depressing.
1978: girls and boys love Lego! The toy that lets them build whatever they like and express their imaginative and creative side!
2025: your daughter likes the lego blacktron revival, so she’s a boy we need to spay and neuter her and cut her tits off
 
Yeah, funny how all of these children's things keep getting appropriated by groomers
Those freaks can only "appropriate" an intangible concept to you if you let them. If you continue to think of Pikachu as not being an "icon" of "genderfluid", then he is not one to you. But hopefully Pikachu does not become readily associated with Tumblr types to the average person: character has been around and well known for over 25 years now.
 
Back