- Joined
- May 25, 2024
They managed to lose to a power that three decades previously were fighting with matchlocks and longbows; if anything, "not great" is underselling it.Also the surface fleet of Russia has always been not great.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They managed to lose to a power that three decades previously were fighting with matchlocks and longbows; if anything, "not great" is underselling it.Also the surface fleet of Russia has always been not great.
post some of his stuff i'll check it outDoes anyone like Asianomitry? I quite love his dry and matter of fact about mostly industrial and economic history in the East. Even if he likely might lean slightly left with his takes, he's quite balanced and even goes over topics most wouldn't think about like the massive Soviet fishing fleet
Yeah i stopped watching pretty quickly and just did my own research.When I was writing the thread, me and the collaborators struggled to try to get through his videos. At least 60% of the time in the videos are just pointless filler about him being insufferably gay. Plus a good chunk of information is either exaggerated, missing the point of design, or just flat out wrong.
To be fair to the Japanese, they did beat the Chinese twice about a decade prior to curb stomping the Russian fleet. They weren't exactly spring chicken to this whole industrial war thing.They managed to lose to a power that three decades previously were fighting with matchlocks and longbows; if anything, "not great" is underselling it.
One of the biggest gripes that I had was him saying the M3 Grant shared the exact same engine as a different Australian tank even though cursory research shows that is untrue.Yeah i stopped watching pretty quickly and just did my own research.
In addition to the above about the Japanese having some experience with industrial warfare, the Russians also had some absurd logistical requirements.They managed to lose to a power that three decades previously were fighting with matchlocks and longbows; if anything, "not great" is underselling it.
So basically there was someone being stabbed in the back but it was Austria by Hungary.Here is a video that explores a lesser part but a more important part of why the Austro Hungarian Empire went tits up. And it's quite easy to draw parallels to the EU as it is today.
It wasn't touched in the video but I wonder did the Romanian harvest of 1918 also go to Hungary or just Germany or something because while not as big as Ukraine that would have provided some food. And couldn't Bulgaria have sold some food as well. There was something a bit more dysfunctional than just back stabbing.So basically there was someone being stabbed in the back but it was Austria by Hungary.
Nukes in Belarus is pointless as long as there are Russian nukes in Kaliningrad.Lukaschenko will not be around forever and there is potential for even bigger shitshow than Ukrainian one.
View attachment 7501297
Anyway back to the topic.
Closest thing to modern day Ukrainian monarch is this guy.
He briefly ran the show in Ukraine during WW1 .
You could do multiple 3 hour videos on the July Crisis. This was very well done. Hadn't heard of this channel but I liked this one so far.Old Britannia released his video on WW1 — 3 hours long.
So basically there was someone being stabbed in the back but it was Austria by Hungary.
I thought this was a very interesting video on how India developed nuclear weapons.post some of his stuff i'll check it out
He seems to do more socialist history style videos with one about North Korean Vinalon.Thoughts on Ceramic? I like the way he edits his videos a lot, it's as if you were watching a video from 10+ years ago but made now, he also always cites easily-digestible sources on his description, which I like