Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[A. G. Peak]

Can someone clip that bit near the beginning where they're watching a safety video and he looks like he's tweaking out in his chair? It would just be funny to have.

He always says "it's not meth jaw!!! I only shake my jaw to control my lisp!!! " but he constantly shakes his jaw around even when he's not talking. He's so weird, lmao.

 

[Sodom And Gomorrah]

He's feeding narratives to his rabid fanbase once again, still trying to paint AbbyMC as a false witness. His evidence is a picture she allegedly took of his setup.

Spoiler: the imgur link

destiny is using two different standards for the burden of proof between Pxie and himself. He wants Pxie to have concrete evidence: the exact DM he sent to AbbyMC containing 'The Video' (despite admitting that he wiped all his messages, and AbbyMC's statement corroborating that)

But for him, because AbbyMC took a picture of his setup at a distance that also means she snooped around all his files, emails, google drives, etc -- he wants people to extract all that from this photo he shared. This isn't destiny's first run in with the 'paranoia of possibilities' it's the same Atlas+Denims situation; He provides no direct evidence that any snooping was done, just that there was a potential for snooping to have occurred, that was enough for him w/ Atlas and it's enough for him now with AbbyMC.

from the discussion w/ Denims that he secretly&illegally recorded: https://youtu.be/M78mCz6E_1s?t=3844 "dont bring atlas into my apartment for him to have FREE-REIGN in here for a day" ... "i dont know if he's like i need to get a few more logs, or pictures off destiny's computer" -- he's right, he doesn't know; but he acts upon that as if it were the case. Denims at the end of the clip willy shares talks like a person who is being gaslight, everything she thought she knew about Atlas and her ability to read people's intentions in general were called into question because destiny's interpretation must reign supreme. After all Destiny was just being a nice guy giving her an out to seek refuge in his apartment so that the guy she ended up having consensual sex with in said apartment didn't rape her...??? such benevolence from tiny steve

The evidence that AbbyMC and Pxie do have shits all over Destiny, the DM she sent to her friend has so many things going for it: the date it was sent, the context, it being unedited, the wording, the specific victim names, it's truly a perfectly crafted killshot and that's why destiny needs to go to great lengths to try and discredit it. (his previous attempts at discrediting it were cartoonishly bad, tried saying it was a lucky guess that AbbyMC said all those very specific things 2 years prior to the leaks)

 

[Lonjil]

I was thinking today of what Destiny's end game could possible be here? Even if he wins this case his reputation is perma fucked and no one "serious" is going to want to be with him, so his entryway into mainstream politics is dead. Will he forever just be known as that sex pest who makes mid content? I remember him saying for years that he could walk away any moment because hes so wealthy, its only his passion that keeps him. But he seems so hellbent on convincing his fans that he is innocent, it makes me think he always has lied about his wealth.

 

[chilly like a villy]

Spoiler: Yuge webfelcher post

I'm going through and gathering through. This is their first conversation I will update with the second. link to vod on Darius' channel

Spoiler: HUGE IMAGES

View attachment 7404118
View attachment 7404117
View attachment 7404116

Tldr of first combo, Darius is encouraging her (allegedly on behalf of DGG) to stop the lawsuit and contact Destiny for private hush money.
I already downloaded the entire VOD (get fucked destiny) but I'm not really an advanced clipper so I'm going to hold off unless the vod gets taken down before someone else gets to it.

EDIT: also the messages read from the bottom up

EDIT2: Here is the second conversation, it ended up being pretty short.

Spoiler: MoreBigImage

View attachment 7404131

Fun bonus points, right after this Darius switched over to gooning to some random instagram chick
View attachment 7404130
BTW in the above images Darius and his crew were yucking it up while a RAPE victim was expressing her confusion and distress in light of being outed to thousands of people ALL WHILE they are further exposing her. The only small grace is they're so STUPID they don't realize the grand irony in what they are doing. This is honestly sick. The dregs of dgg. Pray for the girly pops now in their hour of need.

Somewhere in these screenshots, Abby says she did see "all the drives" with the recordings. She doesn't claim to have evidence of that. Edit: as @Handsome and Cool points out, she could be referring to google drives. I could not find her saying she saw them on his PC.


Leaving the lawsuit to get out of Darius' life. Wonder what Darius' life has to do with tiny's case.


Would be a complete shame to learn tiny had any influence over Darius' decision to give Abby the shake down. Maybe tiny has the sort of sway over Darius that Darius has over Abby.

Here Darius accuses Abby of showing him the sex videos of Abby and tiny. She never did. She asked him if he wanted to see them and he said no, so she didn't show it. But he continues to act in assumption of some false equivalency.

So crazy that this second pic reads kind of like Erudite talking to Pxie. Who needs enemies indeed.

 

[hobbit_sniffer]

legal eagles?

 

[Solar]

Holy shit she's only 30. I thought she was in her mid to late 30s at least. She bogged way too quickly.

When you look 45 as a mid 20’s woman there’s not much hope for you.

It truly is embarrassing when he makes content like this. He desperately wants his fans to think he's cool lmao.

The 2 times a year he participates in a hobby he has to make content out of it. Desperate to prove he leaves his house outside of picking up the homely dredges of his DMs from the airport.

View attachment 7512962

He must have seen something that reminded him of cum. He reflexively unhinged his jaw near the end, getting ready to catch it.

 

[chilly like a villy]

legal eagles? View attachment 7513852

@A. G. Peak *bats eyelashes*

 

[Handsome and Cool]

Abby says she did see "all the drives" with the recordings.

This is not evidence that she went through his computer in my opinion. It's entirely possible (probable, at this point) that the buttplug bandit was sharing Google Drive links to entire folders of his consent violation collection.

 

[Frederica Bernkastel]

manlet Destiny at the range pretending to be a man.

Same energy

 

[Code Cave]

destiny is using two different standards for the burden of proof between Pxie and himself.

Yeah, he is intentionally misrepresenting what Abby has said. But I guess his excuse is that Pxie's lawyers made her commit perjury, so he can say what he wants and the footsoldiers will slurp it up.

It's very well established at this point that Destiny sends sex tapes to people he barely knows. What is more likely, that Abby jumped on one of his unlocked computers (remember he has 2), that specific PC was logged into his google drive, she browses to the right URL and folder and sticks around long enough to listen to the Chaeiry audio and also notice that Pxie is in some of the videos too, or that Destiny sent her a link to a google drive with a bunch of random sex tapes in it?

I also don't think he's talked about Abby saying he did the same shit to her:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.49.2.pdf

We know the videos of Abby exist because he was desperately asking wes if she had ever showed him them. Another implied consent scenario perhaps?

Speaking of which, someone on twitter posted a compilation of him talking about "enthusiastic consent":
(volume is low)

https://x.com/androgon69/status/1892905725862551918

Pxie's lawyers have until July 10 to amend the complaint. Ideally they would add Abby and Stasia to the case, but it feels like Abby has been manipulated into fucking off, and I have no idea where Stasia is at.

I was thinking today of what Destiny's end game could possible be here? Even if he wins this case his reputation is perma fucked and no one "serious" is going to want to be with him, so his entryway into mainstream politics is dead.

I don't think he's fucked, regardless of what happens. Destiny himself is planning on using the case to rehabilitate himself:

This will probably work imo, a legal case is a bigger deal than a bunch of twitlongers or a 3 hour video essay. The lack of mainstream coverage has really, really helped him, the only people that know what has happened are regulars of the thread.

 

[Napoleon III]

legal eagles?

BOOOOOOO I'd get it on Pacer but my registration is not complete yet and won't happen until July.

 

[Solar]

I remember him saying for years that he could walk away any moment because hes so wealthy, its only his passion that keeps him. But he seems so hellbent on convincing his fans that he is innocent, it makes me think he always has lied about his wealth.

He is extremely traumatized. If he walked away, he would be alone with his thoughts, and he would surely kill himself. I don’t think it has to do with money.
Without something to occupy him, everything from the past 36 years of his life will hit him like a ton of bricks (like it does when he shuts his eyes at night to go to sleep and there’s no distraction feet or buttplug in the bed with him).

This will probably work imo, a legal case is a bigger deal than a bunch of twitlongers or a 3 hour video essay. The lack of mainstream coverage has really, really helped him, the only people that know what has happened are regulars of the thread.

Agree to disagree. Looking at comments outside of his echo chamber, the normie crowd is already clued in. The most charitable take you'll find is, "Yeah, he's a disgusting freak, but he's not wrong here."

Regardless, whenever he breaks into a new corner of the internet, new viewers, new creators to work with, the clock starts ticking.
Eventually, one of three things happens (and all three always do):
1) They find out about his past.
2) If they hand-wave it or buy the redemption arc, they eventually realize he's just a terrible person in real time.
3) And if they don't mind that either, he ends up fucking them over personally.

It reminds me of this fable:

 

[Preacher ✝]

Jesse is interviewing Destiny's son.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Here are Destiny's latest filings.

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order Governing Public Commentary by Trial Participants

Spoiler: Document 99

Spoiler: Document 99-1

Spoiler: Document 99-2

Spoiler: Document 99-3

Spoiler: Document 99-4

Spoiler: Document 99-5

GPT-4.1 Summary:

This is Steven K. Bonnell II’s official legal response to Jane Doe’s request for a court order that would restrict what people involved in their lawsuit can say publicly. Jane Doe wants to prevent Bonnell from making public statements about the case, arguing this is necessary to protect her and the fairness of the process.

Bonnell’s response makes four main points:

1. Plaintiff is also speaking publicly, while trying to silence the Defendant.

• Jane Doe is actively posting about the lawsuit on Substack, Twitter/X, and fundraising sites, often criticizing Bonnell and asking for support.
• Bonnell argues it’s unfair for Jane Doe to spread her side of the story publicly, while asking the court to “muzzle” him and prevent him from defending himself in public.

2. Jane Doe hasn’t shown there’s a real or serious risk of harm if Bonnell speaks publicly.

• The law only allows such “gag orders” in rare situations where there’s a real risk of prejudicing the court case. According to Bonnell, Jane Doe hasn’t given any evidence that his public statements would actually harm the case or scare witnesses.
• Her concerns are described as vague, speculative, and unsupported by actual examples.

3. The proposed restrictions are too broad and not the least restrictive option.

• Jane Doe’s requested order would ban speech described as “derogatory,” “intimidating,” or “mischaracterizing,” which Bonnell argues is vague and could be enforced arbitrarily.
• Bonnell points out traditional court procedures (like questioning jurors about publicity during jury selection, or using jury instructions) are already available to prevent unfair influence.
• Existing confidentiality orders already protect certain information, making a broader ban unnecessary.

4. The right to publicly defend oneself is protected by the First Amendment.

• Bonnell argues everyone has the right to respond publicly to accusations, especially when the other side is making statements in public.
• He cites case law emphasizing how hard it is for courts to justify restricting speech, especially outside criminal cases or grand jury matters.
• He also points out that Jane Doe’s continued public campaign undercuts her claim of needing protection from publicity.

Conclusion:
Bonnell’s legal team argues the court should deny Jane Doe’s motion and allow both parties to speak about the case, within the bounds of existing court rules.

Summary in a Sentence:
Bonnell opposes Jane Doe’s request to restrict what he can say publicly about the lawsuit, arguing she’s speaking out herself, hasn’t shown real harm, and that such a gag order would violate his free speech rights.

---

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to File Redacted Evidence in Support of the Declaration of Abbymc [ECF No. 49-2], and for Leave to File Under Seal

Spoiler: Document 100

GPT-4.1 Summary:

This document is Steven K. Bonnell II’s formal legal response opposing Jane Doe’s recent request to file redacted (partially hidden) evidence, and also opposing her request to file certain materials under seal (i.e., confidentially), in support of her ongoing attempts to get a preliminary injunction against Bonnell.

Key Points:

1. Timing and Tactics:

• Bonnell’s lawyers argue that Doe is trying to submit new evidence after all the main arguments have already been made (“fully briefed”), the evidentiary hearing has already taken place, and the parties are now waiting for a decision.
• They say this is “last minute” and unfair, since Bonnell would not have a real chance to respond or to question the witness behind the new evidence in court.

2. Nature of the Evidence:

• The new material Doe wants to submit is a message from "Abbymc" that allegedly shows Bonnell sent her a video of Doe after the date when a relevant law (CARDII) went into effect.
• Bonnell’s team points out that Abbymc did not appear or testify at the hearing, so they could not cross-examine her about the claim.
• They also say that Doe could and should have introduced this evidence much earlier if it was important.

3. Legal Standards:

• Bonnell’s side cites case law saying courts usually should not consider last-minute or late-submitted evidence, especially if the other side doesn’t get a chance to respond.
• They argue this is especially true for an injunction hearing, where fast and fair proceedings are important.

4. Problems with the Evidence Itself:

• Bonnell’s team argues that the new Abbymc message is weak: it’s not authenticated (the court can’t confirm who sent or received it), is hearsay (a secondhand statement, not direct evidence), and doesn’t clearly establish that the alleged video was sent after the relevant law took effect.
• They say the message doesn’t actually prove that a video of Doe was sent, when it was sent, or that it was even sent by Bonnell.
• In their view, even if accepted, the evidence doesn’t establish the court has authority (“subject matter jurisdiction”) to decide under the new law.

5. Request to the Court:

• Bonnell asks the court to reject Doe’s request to file this new evidence, to not consider it, and to strike it from the record.

In short, the response is focused on blocking Doe from using this new piece of evidence (the Abbymc text), arguing it is both unfairly submitted at the last minute and legally inadequate or irrelevant even if considered. Bonnell’s attorneys maintain that Doe had plenty of opportunity to present all her evidence earlier and that her attempt to add more now should be denied.

 

[chilly like a villy]

Is he retarded or am I? This last minute evidence bullshit - wasn't Abby included early on in disclosure? Can't they collect evidence until December? @SchizoNerd420 @Napoleon III @GarlicFragment @do ut des

Seeing this lunatic's ramblings from stream in a legal document is surreal

 

[A. G. Peak]

Destiny talked about the case for a bit on stream today. Here it is without the dead air.

[00:00:00]
(sighs) When this qu- case is over, this will be my, hopefully, my last manifesto ever. But, um, when I d- when I do the manifesto, when I read through everything, I'm gonna take... Is there, like, a drug that makes you cry? I need to, like, watch the saddest movies (keyboard clicking) of animals and cats dying. What's that one with the, the anime with the little girl that's dead at the end and the war shit or whatever? Oh, Grave of the Fireflies. (keyboard clicking) Just because, um, feel like I deal with way too many really disgusting violations, okay?

[00:00:44]
I need to cry to show how serious and horrible these are. Sorry, hold on, I'm just... I did some, um, asking around, uh, just to see what was up. (keyboard clicking) And I understand more now how some of this worked. So for... We're not spending too much time on this today. For those that haven't kept up, um, uh, I can't show you the transcript or read from it directly, I think, because, uh, the opposition m- moved to seal the transcript immediately, because they didn't want it to be publicly available. Uh, because stuff that you say under oath matters, and she would rather spam tweets and stuff about me, where she can lie with impunity, or just say random shit, I guess.

[00:01:32]
(keyboard clicking) One of the things that came out, a lot of things came out during the hearing we had, and one of the things that came out was she admitted that her and her lawyers had seen absolutely no evidence from the Abby person that I'd ever sent her any material relating to Pxie ever. Uh, which tracks with what I, when I went back and I checked my DMs, I go, "I've never sent this person anything of her ever." So, I'm pretty sure she was just lying. But one thing I didn't even factor in or think of is she might not actually be lying in that way, 'cause I didn't know this at the time. I didn't figure this out or I didn't learn of this until a few months ago. And now I've learned (laughs) a little bit more.

[00:02:15]
This person was, um, this person was the a- the Abbymc, whoever that is. This person was at my house, and it is possible that they might have known about stuff on my computer? Because when they were at my house, apparently when I was away from my computer, they were going through my shit. (laughs) And, um, now I've had people send me a few things, and I can see that that was in fact (laughs) the case. That she was sending people pictures and stuff of, like, my desktop when I, I don't know where I was or I don't even know what the fuck I was doing at the time. But apparently she was, so I don't know. I actually have no idea what she has or hasn't seen on my computer or if she found a way to download this or send it to herself or some bullshit.

[00:03:01]
I, just in my mind, I wouldn't even factor that (clears throat) somebody would do anything. And then, um, I missed this initially, but in her messages to Darius, "I don't even want the money. What he's doing/has done seems fucked. I've seen all the drives and all the tapes." So this makes it sound like she just went through, I guess, all of my folders, and I don't know what she thinks she saw or what she did see or whatever. But this is, um... I, I understand I guess better now, I guess, where her testimony comes from, how she could've sent any messages a long time ago. But the... So it's funny because this entire lawsuit is only kept alive because of this one person, who I don't think I ever sent anything to, and who was probably on my computer without permission, like, s- scrolling through or going through, like, anything that I had there.

[00:03:48]
So, (laughs) that's, uh, pretty, uh, pretty unhinged, pretty fucking insane. But if that's the case, she won't be able to provide proof of you sending it to her. She can't. The opposing counsel already admitted... Not opposing counsel. Pxie already admitted under oath to the judge and my attorney that they had not seen any evidence whatsoever, they had never seen d- um, a DM or anything between me and Abby, that she wasn't able to provide anything of me sending her anything. Which I don't think I have. I, I don't think I've ever done that in relation to this. So, I'm, I... so I think they know this is all bullshit. Because you would, you would think that when you're collecting affidavits, when you're collecting declarations of people trying to prove something, that you would ask them, "You're sure this happened, right?" Like, "Can you prove this?" But I don't know if the goal is, um...

[00:04:34]
I don't know if the goal is to just try to push it all the way to trial to try to humiliate me or something, so that they can keep like saying random stupid shit. Um, yeah, I have no idea. Um, I don't even know what these are in response to. I don't even know if I care. (laughs) I think these are just our responses to try to block the motions to seal stuff and everything. Nah, fuck it. I don't have to. It's gonna be boring. You can go read it in your own time. I don't... there... I, I doubt there'll be anything juicy or anything in here. "So she snooped on your computer, violating your privacy, looking at the stuff you have saved for personal reasons, and is making an assumption that all that stuff was not proper?" That's been the assumption that every single person has basically read with.

[00:05:15]
It's been some of the justifications that, um, for a- and again, I don't know how... I don't know how I've, like, hooked up with people and done stuff for like the past decade, and it was only in the past year that I've had so many, like, insanely disgusting and unhinged women who have just decided that apparently I'm a rapist or everything I've done is, like, non-consensual who have just started dumping a ton of my not safe for work content online. Which is why you have a bunch of, um, people like Kelly or Jstlk or anything else, um, who are now saying like, "Oh, like where is the proof that, like, this was cons-" or "Where is the proof..." it's like, why, why am I gonna answer any questions relating to my personal life? Like, for a lot of the stuff that's been dumped, like nobody's even making an a- like, any accusations here. This is just stuff that these disgusting women have decided to dump online and are now like, like...

[00:05:55]
I'm sorry. Fuck you. (laughs) Like, off yourself in a video game. Quit your video game, but..."How'd you know your PC password? Was it already unlocked?" I doubt it was locked. I just, I don't know when I left that person at my house alone. I don't know. I don't... It's, that was a long time ago. It was, like, two years ago, so I'm not even trying to remember. "You know why you need PACER for those filings, but not for anything else?" Uh, I don't know how court reporter works. Maybe they automatically pull something if enough people click it or something? I'm not sure. "You're an idiot for only reading her stuff and not yours. Why would you not read the counterarguments?" Wha- Because, one, I've probably already read it, because generally they send me motions and everything to sign off on before they send it to make sure there's nothing missing.

[00:06:37]
And, two, I'm the one giving them a lot of the information for, 'cause, like, personal information for a lot of the motions and counterarguments. Like, wha- Okay. "Why not go with the implied consent from the start of the drama?" Um, let me think of... I think I already admitted as much under, uh, under when we were doing the hearing. The 100% the honest valid truth and, ah, if I get to ever read the testimony, uh, Pxie yaps so much. It, it was, ho- honestly, that was so helpful for me. Um, the honest truth is, like, these are conversations that happened, like, over five years ago. Right? I don't remember exactly the conversations that we had at the time.

[00:07:19]
There's just no way I'm gonna be able to honestly say like, "Oh, yeah. We said this and this and this and this," when there's no, like, text log or anything. There's no fucking way. Um, but the, the way that she talked about it and the way that she explained it, actually tracked really well for me. Um, but it's hard to recount all of that without just reading it entirely. So hopefully one day the, uh, the transcript becomes, um, available. We'll see, I guess, when they finally roll him out. "So what happens now with the court stuff?" Um, well, I, it's just, um, it's just, uh, the same as before. Just waiting and waiting and waiting for summary judgment. Technically discovery ends in December, so there's a question of, like, will we wait until December to file a summary judgment?

[00:08:00]
I doubt we'll wait that long. Hopefully not. Um, we could file for summary judgment after the first round of discovery, I guess, 'cause, uh, they're not gonna get anything from me. At this point, I don't even know what my obligations are to turn anything over, because I, to be honest, I don't trust them to turn anything honestly over. I don't trust Pxie. I fully believe that her and Lauren and anybody else that is, like, scheming with her would lie about what they turn over, and I don't think I would get everything. I actually have really good reasons to believe this that I can't reveal right now. Um, but I will after the end of the trial. Um, but the, um... Yeah, I don't think they're gonna turn over anything, uh, that would be relevant to me that, that I would be asking for anyway, so... Um, I don't know. So ideally, I guess if, like, nobody's really requesting anything else for discovery and if nobody else is, um, like, subpoenaing anything, there's no other information coming out, then you basically can file for a summary judgment hopefully, but...

[00:08:51]
There's also the, um, there's also hopefully the chance this, I think this is slimmer, but there's a chance that the magistrate judge dumps the, um, whole case because of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction. But that's, it's not technically his role, and that's not technically a question before him, but the subject matter jurisdiction question was coming up a lot in our last hearing, and now it's showing up in motions. So hopefully he makes some statement about that basically. "ETA on trial ending?" The, um, trial date I think is set for May or March of next year if it goes all the, if it goes all the way to trial, which is incredibly rare and probably still won't happen, but... "What do you think they'll try to request from you?" Um, it's just, like, logs and shit or whatever.

[00:09:35]
But, like, the stuff they're looking for just doesn't exist is the problem. Like, they want, like, what they really wanna desperately see is the idea that I'm, like... They're praying for me ha- having, like, sent, you know, her video or other stuff around to a bunch of people, but, like, it just, it doesn't exist. They're, they're praying for some kind of evidence to, to keep the case alive because the case is basically h- has been, like, dead on arrival and then dead for quite a while, but yeah. But pretty annoying. "Did Brett Lester have a good chance of recuperating her lawyer costs?" Um, I don't know. We haven't really had that conversation yet. But who knows? I don't know how egregious their behavior has to be for that to become a thing, but hopefully. "Are you nervous about if it goes to trial, the jury feeling sympathy for..." Not that much. It would just be just more lawyer costs and then more time.

[00:10:18]
"Have you seen how they are framing your opposition to the motion to order KF to take down the videos as you fight me to keep them up? Kelly was saying that last night and representing the court order is also taking down your other vids, which I believe it explicitly wasn't asking." Kelly lies about almost everything. Um, Kelly and just people like them are... Like, remember they talk about me almost every single day, and they constantly lie about basically everything having to do with this case. Um, but the, um, the issue that I had with the court order is one, it's th- the QIWI Forms is not related to our case, so there's, like, almost no incentive for me to even let that court order go through 'cause why? Why are you trying to court order a non-party? Number one. And number two, um, they were asking me for lawyers fees for their court order.

[00:10:58]
And number three, they wouldn't agree to add all of my explicit content to that court order. They only wanted to take down videos of Pxie. They wouldn't even, they wouldn't even ask to take down videos of other women involved. Like, it was the most disgusting, like, morally bankrupt, unhinged, gross request I've ever seen in my entire fucking life. So no, no, absolutely fuck no. "If the magistrate judge tosses the case for lack of jurisdiction or whatever, does that mean plaintiff can refile?" Um, well, she couldn't refile on the federal claims, so she'd have to refile a state case, but all of their underlying state charges are retarded and unhinged. They, like, require malicious intent to humiliate or demean and it's, it's stupid.

 

[Handsome and Cool]

And number three, they wouldn't agree to add all of my explicit content to that court order. They only wanted to take down videos of Pxie. They wouldn't even, they wouldn't even ask to take down videos of other women involved. Like, it was the most disgusting, like, morally bankrupt, unhinged, gross request I've ever seen in my entire fucking life.

It's absolutely insane that anyone could listen to this bullshit after knowing he sent these videos around indiscriminately in the first place. Literally handing it out like candy to any 17 year old discord groyper kitten who didn't even ask for it. After you LIED about retaining specialized counsel to get it taken down (Null confirmed he only ever received a single email from Destiny himself, no communication from any law firms).

Drown in a lake of fire you meth jawed fucking midget. Send all of dgg to Guantanamo Bay.

 

[jasmp]

Is he retarded or am I? This last minute evidence bullshit - wasn't Abby included early on in disclosure? Can't they collect evidence until December?

Yeah, he's coping hard. His audience will eat it up because "they didn't show the evidence!!!" sounds really good but from the very beginning, Abbymc has alleged that Destiny deleted all their messages, so she doesn't have access to the videos anymore. Hope you preserved those messages properly, tiny, because they're going to pry them from your hands as discovery continues.

He knows exactly what he's doing. This is the freak who secretly records conversation to have a paper trail he can use against people. When he deleted all his messages, he knew it would impede women's ability to provide evidence.

 

[GarlicFragment]

Here are Destiny's latest filings.

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order Governing Public Commentary by Trial Participants

"Vitriolic attacks on Bonnell and his attorneys"?! Here are the three exhibits they included:

Horrific stuff, really! Funny that the only person attacking someone in the defense's exhibits is a browbeating sycophant.

---

Uhm, I don't know but he apparently got Abbymc to drop off the face of the earth, which could cause a "risk to the fairness of trial proceedings"? [1, 2]

"Plaintiff has made no attempt to identify which [...] specific statements from Bonnell [...] caused her harm," is of course a lie. Ex:

---

---

Spoiler: Destiny mentioning Pxie by name stuff

Destiny claims the clip of him using Pxie's first name was posted before the order was issued. Here is what Courtlistener shows:

The motion asking to proceed with a pseudonym was made 16:25 EST February 19, but there is no timestamp for the paperless order which was also on February 19. The protective order was filed 7:13 EST the next day. I couldn't find the original stream, but this seems to be the timestamp:

So I guess he was barely in the clear when he said it on stream (even if the original complaint, filed February 18, was filed as "Jane Doe").
The video, however, was published February 20 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbP83RJMZ94&t=479s) 02:29AM:

So I guess it depends, does the paperless order not carry any weight?

---

What they're going with regarding Abbymc:

- "She didn't mention Destiny by name, maybe it was some other silly gooner that sent her recordings of Pxie and Chaeiry having sex with Destiny!" (Forget that she specifies that it was Destiny in her declaration)
- I guess she doesn't specify when Destiny sent the videos in the text message.. However, since CARDII's effective date is October 1, 2022, remember:

- Perhaps she could have provided proof if your client didn't delete the evidence?

On their opposition to Abbymc's declaration:

"Unauthenticated," you say? I am guessing Abbymc probably still has her verifiable, original Discord logs that can be produced come trial.. Destiny doesn't. Happy to hear the defense shine light on the skepticism that should be shown to unauthenticated Discord logs, though!

Does this really constitute inadmissible hearsay? The evidence is a combination of the screenshot and her statement made under penalty of perjury; it is a firsthand account of what Destiny sent her?

Edit:

It's absolutely insane that anyone could listen to this bullshit

Note, they didn't refuse. They just wanted Destiny to pay for it. What's "the most disgusting, like, morally bankrupt, unhinged, gross" thing is that Destiny wouldn't even pay (likely some modest amount) to have the videos removed. He wanted one of his victims to pay, instead of himself, to remove the videos of her and his other victims! Insane.

 

[Solar]

Destiny talked about the case for a bit on stream today. Here it is without the dead air.

"so, I'm pretty sure she was just lying"
"who I don't think I ever sent anything to"
"Which I don't think I have. I, I don't think I've ever done that in relation to this."

Pretty shameless that he's willing to admit he doesn't even know for sure if Abby is lying. He believes it's possible he could have sent her the Pixie video and Chaeiry audio in 2023.
He absolutely sent Pixies' video to people other than Rose, because he can't even remember who he sent it to. If he truly only ever sent it to one singular person, it would be pretty easy to remember that.

"I doubt it was locked. I just, I don't know when I left that person at my house alone. I don't know. I don't... It's, that was a long time ago. It was, like, two years ago, so I'm not even trying to remember"
"I don't know where I was or I don't even know what the fuck I was doing at the time. But apparently she was, so I don't know"

He has said multiple times during this vod and others that he's confused about how she accessed his computer, as he never left her alone with it.
I don't know which vods include him speaking about Abby, but he has repeatedly expressed bewilderment over how she even had time to access his PC, because he never left his apartment.
He's a retard for admitting this.


He's really leaning on the fact that she doesn't have the DM of him sending it to her, despite admitting he wiped all of his DM's with Abby when the case dropped.
He's going to shit himself when he finds out Discord can recover that shit with a court order, which Pixie's team will collect (or have collected?) during discovery.
Discord is not a fully secure platform, wiping his logs does not protect against retrieval via a court order.