- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023
You could at least link directly to itSince everyone says how bad the new SCPs are I decided to check the last one on the list and while it's an okay concept, it's completely ruined by the shitty MSPaint pictures.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could at least link directly to itSince everyone says how bad the new SCPs are I decided to check the last one on the list and while it's an okay concept, it's completely ruined by the shitty MSPaint pictures.
And people wonder why I'm "such a bigot."You don't hate them enough.
Surprisingly enough, this one plagues the Russian branch, too. At least 3 active trannies as staff/chat mods. You'll get threatened with a ban for saying "schizo" in the official chat (and given an obligatory lecture on ableism). Of course, if you dislike trannies, you're immediately alt right. Someone was already whining they can't change the logo to a pride one (cause LGBT was put on the list of extremist groups in Russia, and "propaganda" is prohibited) (I have no idea why they're whining, the RU branch has never changed the logo in June).the tranny jannies
Eh, I feel like this is more accurate to LGBTSCP.
Not entirely SCP-related, but I found it funny. Clef's author coming out as a man without a dick? Cause I think it would explain a lot.
View attachment 7469121
Would be pretty funny if it was self aware about it.Here's another bad one, I found it because it was featured on their main page.
An asexual lizard that only serves as an excuse for the author to whine about people not believing asexuality is real. In the comments he's still whining, as if people hadn't noticed the first time.
There have been numerous evil men in history who were sexist, one I can name off the top of my head is Dr. James C. Burt. If you have the stomach for it, you could look into his story, the difference between real sexists and those written on the SCP wiki (among other modern media) is that sexism can come in many forms, be it misogyny or truly disgusting acts like altering a woman's bodily function to satiate one's desires.Number one, the villain being le sexist and doing things like assuming female doctors can only be nurses. For you see, if you have a stereotypically evil guy, he has to be sexist
I have no doubt that there is an abundant number of sexist evil men in history! Targeting women as a serial killer is pretty sexist, for instance. But we don't remember Ted Bundy for being sexist - we remember him for being evil. My issue is more like... just heaping on the stereotypes. The whole, "nurse-- I mean doctor," thing, for instance. Yes, sexism can come in many forms, which is why I rolled my eyes at the most stereotypical ones the SCP-8980 resorted to. Like, "Gee, I want to write this guy as evil, so how can I show that efficiently? By piling on room temperature IQ feminist talking points of course!"There have been numerous evil men in history who were sexist, one I can name off the top of my head is Dr. James C. Burt. If you have the stomach for it, you could look into his story, the difference between real sexists and those written on the SCP wiki (among other modern media) is that sexism can come in many forms, be it misogyny or truly disgusting acts like altering a woman's bodily function to satiate one's desires.
Also yeah the sex and gender identity thing is stupid as shit.
The issue is that any man slighting a women in any circumstance is automatically classified as misogyny, thereby dumping an unfalsifiable scapegoat of collective responsibility onto men, as if it happens because of the system and not despite it. Men are far more likely to kill other men than women, and there are plenty of motives more complex than "lol he just hates all women" otherwise.I have no doubt that there is an abundant number of sexist evil men in history! Targeting women as a serial killer is pretty sexist, for instance. But we don't remember Ted Bundy for being sexist - we remember him for being evil. My issue is more like... just heaping on the stereotypes. The whole, "nurse-- I mean doctor," thing, for instance. Yes, sexism can come in many forms, which is why I rolled my eyes at the most stereotypical ones the SCP-8980 resorted to. Like, "Gee, I want to write this guy as evil, so how can I show that efficiently? By piling on room temperature IQ feminist talking points of course!"
There is no functional difference between "asexuality" and chastity/abstinence.Here's another bad one, I found it because it was featured on their main page.
An asexual lizard that only serves as an excuse for the author to whine about people not believing asexuality is real. In the comments he's still whining, as if people hadn't noticed the first time.
Are you being obtuse on purpose or are you just retarded? Nowhere in his post did he say that evil men couldn't hate women. No shit they exist, it just doesn't fit this one in particular.There have been numerous evil men in history who were sexist, one I can name off the top of my head is Dr. James C. Burt. If you have the stomach for it, you could look into his story, the difference between real sexists and those written on the SCP wiki (among other modern media) is that sexism can come in many forms, be it misogyny or truly disgusting acts like altering a woman's bodily function to satiate one's desires.
Also yeah the sex and gender identity thing is stupid as shit.
That's SCP-231. And it's still the same as it ever was: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-231Speaking of these faggots re-writing history, does anyone have the original SCP-000 or SCP-001, whatever it was, before it was censored? It's the one where it was heavily implied that the foundations has to keep raping a girl to prevent the end of the world, and of course they kept editing the article due to "modern sensibilities" until it was unrecognizable. I just want to know if the original is lost to time or not, I remember hearing it might be, lord knows with the edit-happy troons in charge now.
Are you thinking of SCP-231?Speaking of these faggots re-writing history, does anyone have the original SCP-000 or SCP-001, whatever it was, before it was censored? It's the one where it was heavily implied that the foundations has to keep raping a girl to prevent the end of the world, and of course they kept editing the article due to "modern sensibilities" until it was unrecognizable. I just want to know if the original is lost to time or not, I remember hearing it might be, lord knows with the edit-happy troons in charge now.
It's kind of funny that other than the trigger warning, the one old school SCP they're totally fine with involves child rape. Hmm.That's SCP-231. And it's still the same as it ever was: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-231