2025 Israel vs Iran War

NYT: The slowdown in Iran’s missile fire may indicate that Israeli strikes have significantly damaged Tehran’s ability to launch projectiles. But it could also suggest that Iranian leaders are preparing for a conflict that may stretch on for weeks or even months
That's how you win wars right?
By reducing the number of missiles you fire?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood
So just to be clear Russia preemptively attacking someone who wanted to ally with their enemies and get weapons=literal the most evil thing ever, condemned by everyone

But jews preemptively attacking (9 different people) so they don't get illegal weapons (illegal weapons the jews illegally have)=self defense and Iran needs to "deescalate" and negotiate immediately?

Huh I wonder what the (big, crooked shaped) difference is
 
He's supported anti-BDS laws and made no secret of how super pro-Israel he is since Hamas' opening blow on 10/7, which has left his former supporters on the far-left end of the Democratic camp (who I guess were previously hoping the stroke would change his mind or something?) sneeding hard ever since.

Fetterman & Oz's campaign for that seat combined cost 500 million dollars. That money came from {{{somewhere}}}.
 
If Iran gets regime changed (although I doubt it will go that far even if the US gets directly involved), it will be pretty funny seeing the vast majority of the larger pro-Iran propagandists on social media sudden go silent overnight since now nobody is paying the bills and now they have to find a real job. Although I'd be hoping for a complete tard rage worthy meltdown similar to what happened with Syrian Girl when Assad's regime completely collapsed in the span of a week.
It's really hard to judge that because I'm fairly certain most western pro-Iran/Hamas/Hezbollah propagandists made their buck through various USAID funds. There is still billions and bilions of dollars flowing through those progressive networks, not including the funds from people like Soros, Bezo's ex wife, Gates, etc. USAID gave Hamas money for like 20 years, now you see all the Ivy league mouth pieces starting to blossom.
 
BBC - There is a Split in Trumps Advisors

note there was also a split of the advisor for the Houthi bombing campaign and that went ahead

I'm glad there's a split. Groupthink does no one any good. I am glad we have a president who will keep people in the room who say "this is a terrible idea and it's a betrayal if you make this decision." This is how you make strong decisions, not by scaring everyone into a lockstep position but by taking in all the perspectives, realizing no solution will make everyone happy, and being the executive who makes the call.
 
Yes.

Israel has developed nuclear weapons to prevent a second Holocaust.
Iran wants nuclear weapons to commit a second Holocaust.
I havent seen an argument against this yet other than autistic screeching. They are actively and desperately trying to kill as many civilians as possible. The only thing holding them back is the ability not the desire. Its hard to imagine if they had nukes they wouldnt immediately launch them into israel. Which would be funny but pretty easy to see this.
 
Israel never signed the NPT. There is nothing illegal about it having nukes
And Iran doesn't have any so there would be nothing illegal about them having any when they leave it. We're supposed to think like jews however. We've also seen signatures and agreements mean nothing to jews with their chemical weapons, lying about not have nukes and wouldn't be the first, complete confusion about how borders (and self defense), etc. work
 

The New York Times, citing US officials: If an attack occurs, Iran may begin planting mines in the Strait of Hormuz to surround US ships.​

That worked out so well for Iran last time :story:
And Iran doesn't have any so there would be nothing illegal about them having any when they leave it. We're supposed to think like jews however
If Iran withdrew from the NPT there would be no legal restriction on it making nukes, yes. But the reaction to that withdrawal would be severe. You Jew spergs are always whining like 4 year olds about unfairness, grow up already mommy isn't going to bring you chimken nuggies and choccy milk and protecc you from the real world forever
 
I'm glad there's a split. Groupthink does no one any good. I am glad we have a president who will keep people in the room who say "this is a terrible idea and it's a betrayal if you make this decision." This is how you make strong decisions, not by scaring everyone into a lockstep position but by taking in all the perspectives, realizing no solution will make everyone happy, and being the executive who makes the call.

Won't matter who is in the room if he isn't taking any advice or information from anyone inside America anyway.
 
Back