Not too mad about it. We will have to spend to turn course and it's not going to be an overnight thing. With tariffs, and business coming back hopefully it will take some of the sting out. If the debt ceiling wasn't raised how much could Trump accomplish? How much would he have to not do because of the constraint? Especially with how expensive even just mass deportations is going to be if they want to ramp it up. The spending is clearly in the context of a larger course correction, not spending for no reason on shit I don't care about
Kirsche went over some articles recently showing the housing market is dying everywhere. Too many boomerfags think their houses are worth more than they are, and prices are PLUMMETING.
I'm someone who fucks around with ChatGPT (and no, not as a gf, that's sad as fuck) as kind of a second Google Assistant (it's pretty good at parsing data). Whenever it fucks up I actually ask it why it fucked up, and sometimes it gives an explanation. I want to learn how these fucking things work so I can actually argue with faggots online who's never touched one (and knowing this loser he never touched anyone but himself). If someone says x it responds with y, and it uses the billions of examples it was "trained on" to reply based off of what it thinks a "normal human" would say.
You and I know that no matter how many houses and apartments are built, the prices will never go down.
if mass deportations actually happen, they might actually go down.
When she isn't waging war on cows, Googly Eyed Hochul continues to flush New York down the vortex of the Democrat Death Spiral by proclaiming that she will confiscate another $50 million from taxpayers and spend it protecting their illegal replacements from deportation:
>cites Vtuber
The law of supply and demand disagrees.
I watched the clip. Ted Cruz should have had an answer even if he lied. He didn't. He looked terrible and it made him look like a stooge. Also the AIPAC gunt guarding was unreal.
Short term pain for long term gain. As long as the language changing the definition of NFA items are still in there, I'm happy with that. Suppressors and short barreled rifles for everyone. The reality is that the vast majority of spending is entitlements and those will be easier to deal with if we can actually get the funding to ICE that will allow for the infrastructure we need for actual mass deportations. We're working on expanding, but ICE can only hold 48kish people and they're already past capacity. Literally everything will be easier to fix once we've dealt with the people who shouldn't be here.
I couldn't agree more.
The market prices will go down - what won't is the county's assessed value of my home. Bought it for $119,000 in 2019. They think it's worth $250,000 now. They aren't going to let me return to my pre-Covid tax rate, not a chance.
Unrestrained by a sense of shame or any hope of achieving self-respect, Democrat pols submerse themselves ever deeper into a morass of normal people’s contempt for them. The party has reached so low a level that clowns like Alex Padilla - who also doubles as the spawn of illegal aliens - serve as senators.
But what was the end goal? To prove that monkeys hate fake monkeys and prefer something similar to themselves? To prove racism is a thing?
There needs to be cuts. But it never.. fucking happens. Ever.
Prices will never go down so long as demand doesn't, which would require less people to generate it. Since immigration artificially pumps pop numbers, the state creates demand in perpetuity. A lot of countries in the West aren't at replacement rate levels in terms of births, so in theory there might have been a situation in the present day where demand was much lower and the supply was more abundant, keeping housing prices more tolerable. There was a big issue in my country where the current party in charge wants to build 1.5 million houses, but current immigration figures are 700k+ a year, which means by the end of their term the population would've already been inflated by the excess of people coming in. Lower those numbers, actively deport people, and then the perceived market demand for housing will go down. In theory.
Yep, and then it's flagged for the next round of "shit users asked the LLM to do but we absolutely cannot let it do that" and your LLM freedom gets restricted even further. It can be fun though, I showed my son that I couldn't get an LLM to narrate a death battle between people, but it had absolutely no issues if I told it the death battle took place in a video game. It even described Big Smoke taking a shotgun blast to the chest lmao
Thing thing is....the US could survives a default if it really came too it.
Houses are not built on supply and demand anymore. They are built on infinite economic growth since 2008. Real Estate investors would rather sit on unsold houses then sell at a loss.
The problem is there is immigration on two fronts in the US. Immigration from liberal states. You literally can't stop that. And illegals. You can deport those, but you're back at square one once the libtards keep coming. Housing is all we can do in the long term.
