- Joined
- Dec 23, 2023
Wow, history really does rhyme like pottery. Enrico Weigelt's situation is like Keith Packard's 20+ years ago in more ways than one. The current authors of the X server consider it obsolete, and in need of a replacement with a different architecture. So did XFree86 founder and board member David Wexelblat back in 2003.This, basically. Keith Packard more or less faced the same dilemma Enrico Weigelt is facing today, with precisely the same result: Wanting to build a new fork not controlled by obstructive retards, he was summarily booted. However, on first reading at least, the resulting discussion was more or less civil (even the shit on Slashdot). No fireworks here.
See what happens when you don't have faggots and trannies running everything? It's almost like if you let white people run things... shit gets done.
On The Future Of X
------------------
A number of people has questioned the relevence of X in general. To be perfectly honest, I'm one of them. I've even pissed off Keith and many others on the Core Team by pointing out that X is obsolescent. I've been working in the Windows world for years now, and client-server display systems are utterly irrelvent to the majority of real-world computer users. X needs to be replaced by a direct-rendered model, on which a backwards-compatible X server can be reasonably trivially implemented.
@Lady Ivlia de Nîmes, kudos for finding this archive.
Last edited: