UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
I am not entirely convinced that Shipman's Charter will become law, yet. The Lords have plenty of scope to fuck it with amendments or assist it to die altogether.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Made In Wales
I just think it's absolutely insane how Labour, currently polling third and the most unpopular ruling party for decades is able to pass so much destructive legislature, despite knowing that 70% of their MPs wouldn't be MPs if there was a vote tomorrow.

At this point I'm convinced they've already given up and are going full non-compliance for the next government.
 
  • Late
Reactions: Morethanabitfoolish
or stick a big ass fan on the windowsill and have it bring cool air into the room
To be honest this isn't an issue for me. I work nights and sleep in the day. Most homes are excessively warm at night because they've a whole days worth of heat stored up. My place is nice and cool in the day when I'm trying to sleep. I've still got a 10.5 tog duvet on the bed.
 
I've admittedly had very few interactions with the RAF, but I can say that the reputation of the RAF Regiment among the other branches is especially poor and while inter-service banter is naturally very pointed, I've literally never seen a unit get more consistent flak for being filled with brain-dead retards that couldn't pass phase 1 at Catterick if their lives depended on it.
The rock apes are thick as fuck and usually jumped-up mongs who couldn't join the army. But, I'll give them credit where it's due; they know their shit about NBC and they do keep the camps secure. After all, they've got fuck all else to do other than that and run the ranges.
They don't even have a volleyball court like the firefags do.
And the idea it could be a bit of an inside job is interesting, the RAF is the same service that was explicitly discriminating against White English men, so there's definitely a very "civil service" ethos going on there, definitely among the officer ranks at the very least.
I think fed might be right that some simp was convinced to bring some fags on camp on the promise of getting laid and it back fired.
All concerned should be sent collie.
 
I've been looking at locrating.com for fun since one of you posted about it. It's easy enough to find very white, or very not white schools of course, so I've been having some more fun trying to find the most libertarian paradise school there is - with at least one race represented, and with as little difference between the represented races as possible.
 
I've been looking at locrating.com for fun since one of you posted about it. It's easy enough to find very white, or very not white schools of course, so I've been having some more fun trying to find the most libertarian paradise school there is - with at least one race represented, and with as little difference between the represented races as possible.
Would a school with representatives of every race be better known as Noah's Ark or the UN?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Whoopsie Daisy
I'm sure there is an innocent explanation for this. Possibly a Nigerian in a deeply uncharacteristic fit of shame realised that this being the aesthetic peak of all your races achievements is nowt to brag about:
1000050375.webp
And threw them in a skip, where they belong
 

Attachments

  • 1000050375.webp
    1000050375.webp
    162 KB · Views: 9
Like others have said, I don't know if the heat is frying my brain but I thought the tweet was something by Warwick Davis and I got unimaginably angry for about three seconds until the full image loaded. Crisis averted.

Anyone else just sickened by the pro-death legislation being debated and passed this week? Approving people to kill themselves and then the baby killer legislation in the same week.

What is it about liberals, when the first time they take power, they immediately allow as many people to die as possible?
 
Bets on this assisted dying bill ending very badly very quickly? Again, lolbertarian pinko liberal knobhead here who thinks if you want to off yourself it's not the business of the state but I also know very evil people exist who are plotting to have tax payers fund the deaths of their parents so they can get a house.
Considering the MP that proposed it and the laughable committee stage then honestly I think it will end up going badly in a future court case.

Demonstrates the complete ineptitude of the current government
 
What is it about liberals, when the first time they take power, they immediately allow as many people to die as possible?
They're a eugenics party. They're putting into place the means to begin a population cull.

It likely won't be used for that this decade or even the next but they're doing groundwork now.
 
Demonstrates the complete ineptitude of the current government
The current government is so batshit that a part of me wonders if some of the secret powers behind the throne haven't got tired of all the BAMEs instead and have instructed Starmer to wind up the natives so far that we finally snap drive all the browns into the sea.

That makes more sense to me than what is currently going on.

They're a eugenics party.
they are a dysgenics party. they are doing the same shit as the Nazis but the goal is a sub-human mutt slave race
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The current government is so batshit that a part of me wonders if some of the secret powers behind the throne haven't got tired of all the BAMEs instead and have instructed Starmer to wind up the natives so far that we finally snap drive all the browns into the sea.

That makes more sense to me than what is currently going on.
No idea, there was a poll yesterday with Labour in third.

I do wonder if Starmer is a secret fan of Nige and has a mission to make the Labour party enter a death spiral
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kane Lives
Like others have said, I don't know if the heat is frying my brain but I thought the tweet was something by Warwick Davis and I got unimaginably angry for about three seconds until the full image loaded. Crisis averted.

Anyone else just sickened by the pro-death legislation being debated and passed this week? Approving people to kill themselves and then the baby killer legislation in the same week.

What is it about liberals, when the first time they take power, they immediately allow as many people to die as possible?
Their mentality is literally that of M. Bison in Street Fighter:

'Anybody who opposes me must be destroyed!'

They just want it be legal to have it their way.

Now, when they lose power and those self same laws are used against them...

'You're a Woke person? Sorry, you must die now for the sake of OUR tolerance, inclusion and diversity.'
 
No idea, there was a poll yesterday with Labour in third.

I do wonder if Starmer is a secret fan of Nige and has a mission to make the Labour party enter a death spiral
That thought has crossed my mind a few times.

In spite of the jostling and 'banter' between them at PMQ, Starmer's never really hammered Farage or Reform UK personally, Moreover, he's said that he understands why people support them and he himself has voiced concerns about Whitey being a stranger in his/her own land.

Starmer IMO wants power and glory but doesn't want all the hard work that goes with it - he's not a Thatcher in that he'll put up a fight, but he's also not a Blair internationally who can at least use charisma and try to win people over to his way of thinking.

If he has indeed 'had enough' then yes death spiraling the party and riling up both sides is one way to turn the masses against him. He knows, however, that he is the only person who can unite the party in a way that Boris Johnson, despite being a buffoon, actually was the glue which held the Tories together. Look what happened to them after he was sacked - Liz Truss couldn't outlast a lettuce and Rishi was just absolutely godawful. Who else will unite the Labour tribe? Any ideas?

Burnham was possibly their last chance, maybe even Owen Smith, but no Labour can never make good choices - well, certainly not since not electing Benn as leader!

Let's also cast our minds back to when Starmer crossed the floor to speak with Farage a few months back after Trump had been declared POTUS... to be a fly on the wall and know what was said.

My take is that Labour thought that Harris would be POTUS and that they'd have an easy five years of being in charge - November 5th (ironically, Bonfire Night in the UK) proved that wasn't to be and Trump has been the proverbial fly in the ointment for them more so than the MP for Clacton.

Therefore, if Starmer can't win and if 170 Labour MP's are prepared to say no to him when the Disability Bill goes before the Commons next month, the writing will be on the wall. Unlike today's free vote, the Labour MP's will be voting on Government Policy and this will be a three-line whip meaning that any MP who refuses to vote 'yes' will have the whip removed, leaving Labour with (checks notes) 233 MP's and therefore a Minority Government.

Now, it is too late call for a GE before the summer, but there is growing talk of a possible one later this year, possibly after the Conference Season, if Purdah does not instead replace this, and before the planned Budget - therefore October or November which would on current trend see Farage installed as PM with over 40% of the electorate backing him.

Whilst Starmer knows he can't and won't win against Farage, at least he can then hope that all questions about Rent Boys, being a possible nonce etc. will go away once the media have their new target in No. 10 and he can make money with talks and lectures on the international circuit (possibly he'll move out of the UK as well).

I'd say there's a good chance that Starmer has had enough (who can blame him, working day in and day out with retarded inepts) and he may even nuke the Disability Vote (if he knows that a) it won't be passed and b) because of a) that this will lead to a VONC and say 'okay, I am calling a GE for early September as I will not have a leadership challenge and I want to be able to push my policies through, no matter what.'

Now, before I'm bombarded by rainbows, who else called an early GE because she couldn't get Brexit done in 2017? Theresa May - and the gamble is very much the same this time around for Starmer; get the gamble right and stay in as PM and then be able to force through any Bills/changes that you want because no Labour MP elected will dare oppose you, or lose and then say 'oh well, Farage has to carry the can now.' This would then make the current Government and sitting of Parliament one of the shortest on record - in fact it would be the fourth shortest in the last 105 years were it to fall anytime between today and early/mid Autumn, with the nine month gap between the February and November 1974 GE's, the 10 month gap of the 1923 and 1924 GE's and the 13 month gap of the 1922 and 1923 GE's.

With Reform UK still doing very well in the polls, and Labour struggling and likely to drop down to 18/19% after today's vote, the odds are that change is coming and sooner than many expected.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk!
 
Back