Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 98 33.8%

  • Total voters
    290
3 days since he promised to stream his enlightening thoughts on the Karen Read verdict.

Is this the next 5k Locals gift or 20 Locals streams??

I think he wants to hear what others say and craft his opinion based on that. I am not sure he has the cognition for an independently reasoned and insightful opinion, so he will crib from others.
 
So, do you guys think he might abandon his Rekieta Law channel and create a new one? I ask because of the quote above, the whole diddleverse stuff and Nick arguing with his live chat, whittling it down to a-logs and the living dead.
Look, if he had a brain, he'd have cleaned up his shit a long time ago. Would be easy not to violate these laws and rules. But for his personal & internal "reasons" (by which I mean pathology and, even moreso, his assholery), he flagrantly, and knowingly and willfully, flouts all of them.

He is craven.
 
Nick failed the audition with Branca, & now he’s on the outside looking in.
Rekieta presents numerous challenges as a collaborative partner. While he may convince himself that the fault lies primarily with Aaron, the reality is that the responsibility rests on his own shoulders. Audiences might be receptive to a redemption arc if he played his cards right. However, either he is too exhausted to maintain appearances, or he no longer possesses the intellectual capacity to do so.

He frequently exhibits toxic behavior even when appearing as a guest on other shows. This was apparent during his appearances on Coomalot’s and Melton’s streams, where he seemed disengaged from the hosts’ intended format or focus. Instead, he would veer into tangents of his own choosing, often disregarding their relevance to the show. Rekieta has a tendency now to treat others' platforms as outlets for commentary he considers too trash for his own channel—topics he deems beneath his main brand, yet fitting for others.

Moreover, as noted by both Branca and “Good” Lawgic, being a guest on Rekieta’s stream can itself be a toxic experience. His audience—and at times Rekieta himself—will openly mock or disrespect other streamers with whom the guest may have no conflict with. Although guests should not be held accountable for Rekieta’s or his audience’s behavior, such environments place them in an uncomfortable position—particularly if they wish to preserve cordial relations with others in the broader legal commentary or streaming communities for networking purposes.
 
I think he wants to hear what others say and craft his opinion based on that. I am not sure he has the cognition for an independently reasoned and insightful opinion, so he will crib from others.
I don't think so. His dwindling audience doesn't tune in for any well reasoned commentary. He could have opened a stream from his phone and said "IT'S JUST LIKE MY CASE, THERE WAS SOME SERIOUS CORRUPTION!".

Or he could have just asked Grok to formulate a milquetoast opinion based on Twitter reactions.

Either one would have been sufficient for his audience. It likely would have done better than his last 5 streams, at least in terms of viewership.
 
Kurt hasn't worked in several years outside of youtube and even then he did patent law not criminal (still respectable)

I believe Potentially Criminal, Runkle, MLS, and Larry all still practice. Not sure who else...Law & Lumber?
Kurt still does some work, I believe he’s talked Sean about it on stream.
 
He frequently exhibits toxic behavior even when appearing as a guest on other shows.
He ALWAYS does that. You can't just have Nick on your show, because the instant he shows up, he immediately starts seething about his personal issues and completely derails your show. This is why nobody wants this weird, creepy faggot as a guest.

He can't just be a member of a panel of some sort, the weird format that lawtube now takes.

If you have this creepy faggot as a member of your panel, he will start immediately ranting like a lunatic about his personal issues. He is utterly incapable of not doing that.
 
He frequently exhibits toxic behavior even when appearing as a guest on other shows. This was apparent during his appearances on Coomalot’s and Melton’s streams, where he seemed disengaged from the hosts’ intended format or focus. Instead, he would veer into tangents of his own choosing, often disregarding their relevance to the show. Rekieta has a tendency now to treat others' platforms as outlets for commentary he considers too trash for his own channel—topics he deems beneath his main brand, yet fitting for others.
These are signs of a cooked and dead brain from all of that drug abuse. In the past, Rekieta knew how to pretend to be decent, knew what to say and how to behave, concealing his true nasty self. However reprehensible he may be, at least he kept up appearances and that raked in money and respectability.

Now, Rekieta consistently does things to his detriment and can't even pretend or put up appearances. For example, his fried brain is now unable to comprehend how putting up photos of his house and a couple of photos snapped by the cops in response to descriptions of the bodycam runs counter to protecting his privacy which he claims to be concerned about. Neither does it make him look good. The house is still a mess.

A lot of people wonder who is worse. Ethan Ralph or Rekieta? I would answer Ralph but only because Ralph started frying his brains on narcotics before Rekieta did, and with it the scummy behaviour. Rekieta is just trailing behind Ralph, retreading the downward spiral Ralph took. And if you want to know where Rekieta is destined for, how his relationship with his family would end up, what will happen to his finances, his show, etc, just look to Ralph's current situation.
 
Last edited:
I think he wants to hear what others say and craft his opinion based on that. I am not sure he has the cognition for an independently reasoned and insightful opinion, so he will crib from others.
Let's be honest here. Most of Nick's success in Rittenhouse and Depp was due the panel of lawyers he had. It is evident when you take that all away, he has no idea what to say or do. He was always a miserable excuse for a lawyer.

Moreover, he basically took advantage of all of them. He utilized all of their expertise, and kept all the money himself. Then the money went up his nose.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
Rekieta knew how to pretend to be decent, knew what to say and how to behave, concealing his true nasty self. However reprehensible he may be, at least he kept up appearances and that raked in money and respectability.
He still knew how to “act White” since then he has gone full nigger.
IMG_5225.webp
 
I’m not sure how to translate “lawyer” into Quenya - “axanatar”? But a hearty toast to Lawgolas for forsaking the Straight Road and becoming a lawtuber of excellence instead.

If only Nick had cast his Balldo ring into the fire.
Sanyengolmo, apparently.
 
Moreover, as noted by both Branca and “Good” Lawgic, being a guest on Rekieta’s stream can itself be a toxic experience. His audience—and at times Rekieta himself—will openly mock or disrespect other streamers with whom the guest may have no conflict with. Although guests should not be held accountable for Rekieta’s or his audience’s behavior, such environments place them in an uncomfortable position—particularly if they wish to preserve cordial relations with others in the broader legal commentary or streaming communities for networking purposes.
This reminds of when Nick had Ross Scott on his stream to talk about his Stop Killing Games things. He had released that video about games as a services being fraud and was talking to lawyers to confirm if he was right. I don't think I've ever seen Ross say a single mean thing about another person on youtube, only video game executives and even then he's not the kind of guy who likes to name names. So at some point Rekieta got a super chat about someone he was making fun of at the time and I remember how visibly uncomfortable Ross was. After that he stayed the fuck away from Rekieta forever.

Edit: I should add that Nick completely derailed his show to explain to Ross all the edrama around it. I want to say it was about Ron Toye and Nick made sure to talk about how he beats women or something. It was really awkward.

Ross's Game Dungeon is one of the comfiest shows on youtube and one of the few things I rewatch, love that dude.
 
View attachment 7527954
[ X | Archive ]
Chad Zumock, frequent e-fighting sparring partner of Nick Rekieta alleges Patrick Melton has made further fucked up material regarding children. Y'know what they say, you get the friends you deserve.

Calling on our local Dabbleverse experts to elucidate.
Fucking hell Patrick just kill yourself already!
 
As many others have said, Nick is just Ralph with a trust fund. It’s why he’s worse, higher highs and lower lows.

He ALWAYS does that. You can't just have Nick on your show, because the instant he shows up, he immediately starts seething about his personal issues and completely derails your show. This is why nobody wants this weird, creepy faggot as a guest.

He can't just be a member of a panel of some sort, the weird format that lawtube now takes.

If you have this creepy faggot as a member of your panel, he will start immediately ranting like a lunatic about his personal issues. He is utterly incapable of not doing that.
Iirc early on in his “comeback” he went on laidback law (panel show on Fridays, I tune in on occasion if Null is talking about fat women) and insulted Sean and some others in an overt manner. I can only imagine the gay DMs that have been going on and how his defenders have likely thrown their hands up behind the scenes.

Let's be honest here. Most of Nick's success in Rittenhouse and Depp was due the panel of lawyers he had. It is evident when you take that all away, he has no idea what to say or do. He was always a miserable excuse for a lawyer.

Moreover, he basically took advantage of all of them. He utilized all of the their expertise, and kept all the money himself. Then the money went up his nose.
The panel as a whole felt like it wasn’t really Nick giving them exposure as most of them not having confidence to speak to an audience despite most being attorneys who speak at trial or some manner of public speaking. Nick’s greatest gift to all of them was showing them what not to do.
 
These are signs of a cooked and dead brain from all of that drug abuse. In the past, Rekieta knew how to pretend to be decent, knew what to say and how to behave, concealing his true nasty self. However reprehensible he may be, at least he kept up appearances and that raked in money and respectability.

Now, Rekieta consistently does things to his detriment and can't even pretend or put up appearances. For example, his fried brain is now unable to comprehend how putting up photos of his house and a couple of photos snapped by the cops in response to descriptions of the bodycam runs counter to protecting his privacy which he claims to be concerned about. Neither does it make him look good. The house is still a mess.

A lot of people wonder who is worse. Ethan Ralph or Rekieta? I would answer Ralph but only because Ralph started frying his brains on narcotics before Rekieta did, and with it the scummy behaviour. Rekieta is just trailing behind Ralph, retreading the downward spiral Ralph took. And if you want to know where Rekieta is destined for, how his relationship with his family would end up, what will happen to his finances, his show, etc, just look to Ralph's current situation.
Rekieta's worse.
Not only was his drug abuse more extreme scale wise but it's also what he's abusing. Absurd amounts of Cocaine, Ket and DMT. An entire vault of sin. Years of secret drug abuse he fueled with "Daddy's Money".
He entrenched into it more than Ralph ever was. This is the hard stuff and it's the hard stuff every single fucking day without limits. Ralph's worst drug abuse was with Warski and even they couldn't maintain even a forth of the amount, let alone every day.
And now he's hitting a gas that literally starves your brain of oxygen. He'll definitely hit the wall earlier than Ralph now.
 
Last edited:
Nick doesn't even give a shit about his own children. He just pretends he does.

Meanwhile, with regards to other children, he doesn't even pretend anymore.
This is a good reason to have his parental rights terminated, he hates his kids and is a terrible example of a "man" for them.
 
Back