US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think these sorts of people (transplants) make for the worst enemies because at least with your outright enemies you know what you're dealing with. These cowards will stab you in the back though and with just as much, maybe more, good intention than diehard liberals will.

Also, more controversial for this thread: "conservatism" (aka 90s liberalism) has become so performative with the ruses put on by people like Donboi and Elong, that transplants can easily just stick on a red MAGA hat and continue supporting the crazy shit like LGBT etc because well bro why don't you like the gays it's not like it's tranny furries!!!!
Yeah I know the feel; I live in a area that used to be heavily paleocon that is now a very diverse mix of neocon,MAGA, libertarians, centrists and liberal republicans and some old paleocons

In my region tho this has been a thing since like the early 90s

Most countries start out with laws like this. And here’s the funny thing. Every single fucking time, the finance kikes and Globohomo crowd moves in and demands they cut it or regime change them.

Libya had banned foreign ownership of land. Then Ghadafi fell. Ukraine banned it. Then they got couped in ‘14 and now Blackrock is the biggest land owner.

If Trump passed a law like that, he’d be regime changed too.
Mexico has such a law and they haven’t been ACKED, well anymore then they already are by being Mexican
 
My Senator has done his fucking job
View attachment 7528156
View attachment 7528150
Basically most of Utah is occupied by the feds and most of us are stuffed into a small area that the actual State of Utah controls. Trump is giving states like mine more control of our own fucking states. Then these retards:
View attachment 7528165
Are fucking hippies that proably live in states that actually own their own fucking states and aren't cramped in a narrow sliver compared to the rest of the state. Fuck these hippies. Based Trump.

Imagine being stoked that your senator politically sunk the one local issue he was supposed to tackle by arguing it's about selling our pristine and priceless national treasures for pennies on the dollar to whomever to pay a fraction of a percent of the budget instead of opening up the patchwork of federal dirt lots in residential areas. Why would you be happy about that? What would make you think he is doing a good job selling this soo badly that federal lands will probably become more locked down for another generation? Your senator "doing his fucking job" just torpedoes your one local interest for the next decade and this is a success to you?

What is actually wrong with Libertarians that makes them incapable of making a winning move?
 
Tulsi Gabbard says her testimony is being taken out of context regarding Iran. Twitter.


1750519393859.webp

The neocons say Iran *could* develop nukes with the amount of enriched Uranium they have in weeks or months. So we need to bomb the shit out of them until they don't have that capability.

But Iran isn't particularly closer now to making a nuke than it was 3 months ago or 3 years ago, and if we wanted peace, we could keep negotiating, and they'd likely give up their stockpile.

The Russians say Israel's war is about regime change and breaking the Axis of Resistance and this seems more right to me. Bibi might feel like he's at the zenith of his power right now; Trump is his guy at the moment, but won't be president forever, and popular opinion, even among boomer U.S. conservatives, is rapidly turning against Israel. If there was a moment to take out your regional enemy, now might be the best shot he has.

It would be cool to have a Islamic history thread

I want to see the autistic debates on if the Sunni or Shia were right

I like the Shia more. They are more democratic and always cared more about your average Abu and Mohammed.

Outside of the sects, the Persians are a cooler and more stable culture. They've actually ran a functioning mid east democracy for almost 50 years without any coups or civil wars. They respect the rights of their minorities, including their jewish minorities. If you ever meet any Iranians IRL, you will find them educated, earnest, and interested. And you can play Backgammon with them.

Unfortunately we are aligned with the Sauds, who are thug Bedouin gangsters, and Israelis, who are thug Zionist banksters.
 
Imagine being stoked that your senator politically sunk the one local issue he was supposed to tackle by arguing it's about selling our pristine and priceless national treasures for pennies
Because it doesn’t actually do that
on the dollar to whomever to pay a fraction of a percent of the budget instead of opening up the patchwork of federal dirt lots in residential areas.
Because it does actually do that, in Nevada at least.

What is actually wrong with Libertarians that makes them incapable of making a winning move?

Mormons* are retarded, but nobody on Twitter actually read the amendment


If you want to read the actual land amendment, it’s Subtitle C. Thanks @quaawaa

Link


TLDR: There are purchasing limits; national parks, waterways, etc. are excluded; and there is a strict time and area limit on the amount to be sold.
 
Tulsi Gabbard says her testimony is being taken out of context regarding Iran. Twitter.


View attachment 7536233

The neocons say Iran *could* develop nukes with the amount of enriched Uranium they have in weeks or months. So we need to bomb the shit out of them until they don't have that capability.

But Iran isn't particularly closer now to making a nuke than it was 3 months ago or 3 years ago, and if we wanted peace, we could keep negotiating, and they'd likely give up their stockpile.

The Russians say Israel's war is about regime change and breaking the Axis of Resistance and this seems more right to me. Bibi might feel like he's at the zenith of his power right now; Trump is his guy at the moment, but won't be president forever, and popular opinion, even among boomer U.S. conservatives, is rapidly turning against Israel. If there was a moment to take out your regional enemy, now might be the best shot he has.



I like the Shia more. They are more democratic and always cared more about your average Abu and Mohammed.

Outside of the sects, the Persians are a cooler and more stable culture. They've actually ran a functioning mid east democracy for almost 50 years without any coups or civil wars. They respect the rights of their minorities, including their jewish minorities. If you ever meet any Iranians IRL, you will find them educated, earnest, and interested. And you can play Backgammon with them.

Unfortunately we are aligned with the Sauds, who are thug Bedouin gangsters, and Israelis, who are thug Zionist banksters.
if you had to choose who is worst

Saudis?

Qatar

UAE

Open to anyone btw
 
Imagine being stoked that your senator politically sunk the one local issue he was supposed to tackle by arguing it's about selling our pristine and priceless national treasures for pennies on the dollar to whomever to pay a fraction of a percent of the budget instead of opening up the patchwork of federal dirt lots in residential areas. Why would you be happy about that? What would make you think he is doing a good job selling this soo badly that federal lands will probably become more locked down for another generation? Your senator "doing his fucking job" just torpedoes your one local interest for the next decade and this is a success to you?

What is actually wrong with Libertarians that makes them incapable of making a winning move?
This is how much of Utah the federal government controls

1750520425768.webp

They can spare a few acres and still leave plenty of cactuses and rocks for you to look at.
 
This is how much of Utah the federal government controls

View attachment 7536275

They can spare a few acres and still leave plenty of cactuses and rocks for you to look at.
Im sorry man but you never convince me that this won’t be used to house a gorrillion niggers, Indians or Mexicans, especially given the Lee guys voting history and who he gets money from. Sure it sounds great in principle but why trust these people.
 
Imagine being stoked that your senator politically sunk the one local issue he was supposed to tackle by arguing it's about selling our pristine and priceless national treasures for pennies on the dollar to whomever to pay a fraction of a percent of the budget instead of opening up the patchwork of federal dirt lots in residential areas. Why would you be happy about that? What would make you think he is doing a good job selling this soo badly that federal lands will probably become more locked down for another generation? Your senator "doing his fucking job" just torpedoes your one local interest for the next decade and this is a success to you?

What is actually wrong with Libertarians that makes them incapable of making a winning move?
Yes sell the land to Blackrock to make more houses, for Americans? No of course not, we need it to house our H1B workers from India.
 
Because it doesn’t actually do that
Can you fucking read nigger? I didn't say that's what the legislation is actually doing. I said that's what he's selling it as. I didn't make him use this picture to introduce the idea. Nobody did. That retard did. If you want to sell something to people, perhaps you should consider "selling" it instead of making it sound like you're going to sell off national treasures in the middle of nowhere for "affordable housing."
whythatpictureretard.webp

Once again, wtf is wrong with libertarians that they are incapable of making winning moves? This should have been a layup and instead he's one-upping Massie and Rand on the "retards unable to get anything done politically" board.

This is how much of Utah the federal government controls

View attachment 7536275

They can spare a few acres and still leave plenty of cactuses and rocks for you to look at.
Cool, that wasn't how "BasedMikeLee" sold it and continued to retard walk into rakes on xitter though. Which was the entire point of my post. Maybe somebody should get these libertarian types to a marketing seminar or something.

Btw that still ignores that you're not addressing the issue people had with the plan. They were under the impression that we were selling national treasures to fund a tiny portion of the budget and instead of addressing that misconception, they did what you are doing. "We have sooo much land what does it matter?!" Why didn't you clarify what land it is, why are you stuck on this angle of it instead of the one that actually got people up in arms? Why are you allergic to winning moves?
 
Mormons* are retarded
well they follow an obviously false pedophile cult that believes Native Americans are actually Jews
Yes sell the land to Blackrock to make more houses, for Americans? No of course not, we need it to house our H1B workers from India.
I think Feds shouldn't be allowed to just squat massive amounts of land in flyover states, that being said purchases should be made by individuals and not massive corporate entities
 
Im sorry man but you never convince me that this won’t be used to house a gorrillion niggers, Indians or Mexicans, especially given the Lee guys voting history and who he gets money from. Sure it sounds great in principle but why trust these people.
If you actually think that states where the feds don't own > 50% of the land mass are wall-to-wall niggers, spics, and pajeets, then you have never been outside of a major city ever, in your life. It's kind of ironic that you're really passionate about saving the spaces you never go to.
 
If you actually think that states where the feds don't own > 50% of the land mass are wall-to-wall niggers, spics, and pajeets, then you have never been outside of a major city ever, in your life. It's kind of ironic that you're really passionate about saving the spaces you never go to.
Where did I say it was a wall to wall with them now? It’s the risk of it being filled wall to wall after all this new housing is built. That’s what real estate developers tend to do. I don’t think that federal land ownership = more white why would that make any sense.
 
Where did I say it was a wall to wall with them now? It’s the risk of it being filled wall to wall after all this new housing is built. That’s what real estate developers tend to do.

If you think developers in states that aren't mostly federal land fill it with wall to wall housing, you've never driven across America in your life. You probably live in New Jersey or Boston or something. This is a map of federal lands:

1750521601748.webp

Drive across Oklahoma and tell me it's "filled wall to wall" with housing with a straight face. Better yet, try driving from Dallas to Lubbock without dying of boredom from all the nothing you drive through. Drive the length of Tennessee and tell me about all that "wall to wall" housing you drove through.

People who don't know anything about America west of the Appalachians have the strongest opinions about wilderness.
 
If you think developers in states that aren't mostly federal land fill it with wall to wall housing, you've never driven across America in your life. You probably live in New Jersey or Boston or something. This is a map of federal lands:

View attachment 7536359

Drive across Oklahoma and tell me it's "filled wall to wall" with housing with a straight face. Better yet, try driving from Dallas to Lubbock without dying of boredom from all the nothing you drive through. Drive the length of Tennessee and tell me about all that "wall to wall" housing you drove through.

People who don't know anything about America west of the Appalachians have the strongest opinions about wilderness.
All the places you’re talking about also actually have the water supplies to support housing. Mike Lee is on record saying he wants as many h1b Indians as possible, you don’t think he’s going to try to stuff them into the new housing in Utah?

Where did I say Oklahoma or Texas was wall to wall housing? Are you just completely incapable of not strawmanning and assuming I am a north eastern urbanite?

“If you think developers in states that aren't mostly federal land fill it with wall to wall housing, you've never driven across America in your life”

Where did I say this. I never once claimed more federal ownership = lack of wall to wall housing
 
Last edited:
If you think developers in states that aren't mostly federal land fill it with wall to wall housing, you've never driven across America in your life. You probably live in New Jersey or Boston or something. This is a map of federal lands:

View attachment 7536359

Drive across Oklahoma and tell me it's "filled wall to wall" with housing with a straight face. Better yet, try driving from Dallas to Lubbock without dying of boredom from all the nothing you drive through. Drive the length of Tennessee and tell me about all that "wall to wall" housing you drove through.

People who don't know anything about America west of the Appalachians have the strongest opinions about wilderness.
West of the Appalachians? Nigga most of that red in your map is west of the Rockies. It's not the great fuckin' plains. It's beautiful land that has no need for subdivisions full of Somalians. You're not the only person who drives or has seen the country. Why do people insist on powerleveling what part of the country they've seen or not seen. It's an anonymous forum, we're all obviously experts on everything.
 
Back