US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's so cute that you don't believe it because it's true. The US has been top dog for less than 100 years and went from undeveloped to developed in less than 10 years while most Iranians live in commie blocks and can't do anything without the IRGC's say so. Their lives suck and literally all they have is bitching about destroying Israel and the US. They can't even get Qatar to help them because of the Arab League sanctions. It sucks to be Iranian but the people are smart enough to know it.
You know it's funny nobody decided to run trucks through crowds or fly planes into our buildings because of this innate jealousy of our freedoms for over 70 years, and all of a sudden, for no reason at all, they hate us.
 
They wouldn’t have made it if European countries didn’t welcome them en masse and fully support them via welfare. They’re also defending them by denying their crimes and arresting anyone who points this out. Face it when a European stands up on a flight and demands a rapist not be deported because racism there’s a serious issue in the European front. Personally I’m pro taking them out back and shooting them.

The same Jews that dragged France into bombing Lybia ain't gonna let Frontex machine gun the boats buddy. Get rid of Jews and you get rid of refugees.
 
people don't leave their home countries because they just feel like it.
Not entirely true. I'm an immigrant so I feel qualified to say that sometimes you really do just go "I think it would be more fun over there." But even in the specific case you're making with Arabs, while plenty of those particular immigrants are refugees who are fleeing religious persecution or are victims of war, an overwhelming majority are fighting-age men who live off susso (usually while engaging in criminal activity, like selling fraudulent handbags on the street) and just want access to naive, legally-neutered, easily-raped white people.

The other guy was absolutely correct, these programs enable more leeches and criminals than they help those in need. Even if Iran magically became a great place to live full of opportunity for a modest life, you'd still see sand niggers flooding into Europe.
 
oh I don’t doubt it sucks to be Iranian we don’t disagree there kek

Speaking of which kiwis if you had to choose a middle eastern country to live in what would you choose?
Probably Israel because it's the most Western and the least likely to kill me for being Christian.
 
All the africans flooding in to Europe are able to do so because of what was done in Libya. Gaddafi was the dam that was holding all that shit back.
View attachment 7541385
We created a failed state there and made the perfect staging ground for the African invasion in to the EU.
Another regime change success story! :biggrin:
relying on some foreign leader to do the dirty work that libcucks are too soft to do themselves was retarded in the first place. an arrangement like that makes your nation subject to blackmail by said foreign leader, as happened with turkey where erdogan basically coerced europe to pay him off by threatening to funnel more rapefugees across the EU border.
this kind of arrangement is neither desirable nor sustainable. what is needed is simply a clear and uncompromising "no" in the form of closing borders, refusing entry, and turning back boats.
 
That's one side of the equation, and one I'm in total agreement on. But people don't leave their home countries because they just feel like it. If they have decent jobs, a good life, and a sense of security, most people are content with staying where they are, and the US and Israel have been trying their hardest for the last 30 years to make that an impossibility to any country neighboring Israel.
They're 3rd worlders, they never had decent jobs, lives, security, ect. Even when set up for success they throw it all away. I think you're focusing too much on just the muslims and the big players in the ME to realize that war is not the defining factor of """migrants""" coming to the west, access to transport is. War can bring access to transport, yes, but so does industrialization, shipping, food, drugs, ect. All of which we give to 3rd worlders because oh think of the little brown children in the arms of the angels bla bla bla.

It's liberal policies that have not only make it viable in the first place, but make it happen at all, and who are these policies meant to bring support for? I'm not a misogynistic chud who believes women shouldn't have the vote or whatever, but every voting pattern and data point we have supports that nearly half the electorate votes liberal no matter what because it feels good, and it's been that way across every democracy ever.
 
Some of the Gulf Kingdoms seem pretty chill, and Saudi Arabia has liberalized a bit. They could still probably chill out with that whole beheading for weed smokers part of their penal code, though. Maybe just downgrade it to lashings, maybe?
I have said before but the arabs need kings. You could make a list of every arab muslim country that is doing ok-ish and they are all monarchies (Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Kuwait, Oman, Barhain). On the other hand, look at their republics: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Libya... Republicanism simply does not work for them because it leaves a political void and there is no force to oppose the clergy / clerics which is way more potent in the muslim world than it is for us. A king provides a counter-power to the clerics and usually keeps the imams in check (because the king doesn't need this kind of competition).

On that basis I actually believe that bringing back the Shah would stabilize the middle east a little bit. In general, democratic republics are for white only and even so they barely work and sometimes still completely fail (i.e.., Russia - but are Slavs truly white?)
 
The weird thing about Trump bombing Iran is I think it's unpopular with everyone. I have yet to see lefties screech about how bombing Iran is good, actually, while most right wingers are against wars in the middle east.

I'm pretty ambivalent about the whole thing. Surprised that Trump ordered the strikes, unsurprised they were successful, and I'm not against bombing foreign enemies. Doubtful we will see boots on the ground. Why bother? There's no area worth securing, and Trump is against "nation building".

This is basically just Trump bullying a retarded nation for no other reason than to show dominance and maintain order, which is a lot better than funding infinity wars in Ukraine.
Of all people, Brianna Wu is for the bombing. Otherwise it's no one but the biggest Trump nuthuggers who like it
1750611642484.webp
 
some faraway shithole having a war creates a refugree problem in that faraway shithole. importing that problem into the west is 100% the fault of western leadership who refuse to enforce their own borders.
>Foreign power turns your country into an unstable region
>Migrate to next country over
>Foreign power turns that country into an unstable region
>Migrate to next country over
>Foreign power turns that country into an unstable region
>Migrate to the countries that bombed your previous 3 countries into an unlivable condition
>Suddenly you are in a safe and stable place and aren't being bombed

Funny how that works.
 
You know it's funny nobody decided to run trucks through crowds or fly planes into our buildings because of this innate jealousy of our freedoms for over 70 years, and all of a sudden, for no reason at all, they hate us.
This is just dumb. Muslims have been committed to terrorism since the 80's when we were supporting them in Afghanistan. The reason they do this shit is because their religion is violent and the people are literally inbred. You are a Muslim simp.
 
First off, the Epstein files do not exist anymore. The glowniggers most likely already burned all the files more than 4 years ago. Secondly zero normies have any clue what the Sampson option even means, and zero media outlets would be willing to cover the leaks

Just go offline already and then come back when you're sober again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDAo3n054ts&pp=0gcJCb4JAYcqIYzv little tip of ice sort speck prepeper mind set..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmxAVG0utzs other type as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=preb32V-Va8&pp=ygUQYmVhciBpbmRlcGVuZGVudA== few hiny softly moving on.
 
This is just dumb. Muslims have been committed to terrorism since the 80's when we were supporting them in Afghanistan. The reason they do this shit is because their religion is violent and the people are literally inbred. You are a Muslim simp.
And you're a retarded shabbos goy
 
You know it's funny nobody decided to run trucks through crowds or fly planes into our buildings because of this innate jealousy of our freedoms for over 70 years, and all of a sudden, for no reason at all, they hate us.
There were plenty of terror attacks inside the colonies including cities which were basically western beach resorts. Improvements in technology led to ease of transport which allowed jealous Jihadis to attack the western motherlands.
 
The worst part about this news is that if you go on X/Twitter, you can’t seem to criticize both groups on this matter:

1. Thinking that blowing up nuclear reaction sites that were partially controlled by the U.S., but mostly bought for by China means Trump started the war and it was not a proxy war before Trump came in

2. Users thinking that Israel will make us strap up for boots for fighting with them, when reality, the TDS refugees and FREE PALESTINE crowd hate weapons and will be fighting amongst the users that think trans flags emojis and “vibes” are the way on how to win the war

I still don’t believe Trump will get us to war, but when one continues to chant DEATH TO AMERICA! and the end result so far is Iran suing us in court, one needs to question what the end result is?

People just can’t make up their minds and think everything is a Star Wars reference.
 
Does anyone know where I could hear the full context of this? Because, by itself it sounds really bad, a curious mixture of ignorance and arrogance.


View attachment 7541372
"Yeah, we know you're tired of foreign entanglements, but trust us, bros, we're smarter than the average bear, so, no need to worry."

Twatter source.
He's saying it won't be a long engagement where we fight in a quagmire for 20 years. You're just having trouble mentally processing it, but the message is simple.
 
Just gonna leave this here:

IMG_2162.webp

IAEA says Fordow isn’t destroyed.

Looking forward to hearing all the “See!?! Nothing happened!! Just a bombing!!”
Folks in a week or two, when Israel demands that the US does more since the bunker busters didn’t work.

Also: What is this shit:
IMG_2163.webp

Bombing someone and then going: “Hey just chill, let’s all get along!” Is the biggest bitch made boomer move ever.
 
Back