US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump won the presidency by campaigning on mass deportations, a 55-45 issue for. You can easily lose the presidency by tying yourself to a 60-40 issue against.
There comes a point when you take advantage of the time you have vs trying to secure it for another term to do nothing. Democrats spent billions flooding american cities with illegals and it cost them favorability but they accomplished their goal and it will be very hard to undo. Same with these strikes on Iran I guess.
 
Supporting Israel becoming a net-negative issue over two years is still a sizable shift in public opinion, especially when there's no viable way to reverse this trend. If Israel goes from a 60-40 for to 60-40 against issue from 2020 to 2028, guys like AIPAC Watch will have more influence than AIPAC themselves.

Trump won the presidency by campaigning on mass deportations, a 55-45 issue for. You can easily lose the presidency by tying yourself to a 60-40 issue against.

I lost respect for the man when he worked against codifying the DOGE cuts.

That's absolutely true, I just hate seeing insane numbers like "it was 99% and now it's less than 10%" being spread around. The support decrease is significant. It's just not a total collapse from a position of near-perfect approval the way some posters in this thread have claimed.

BTW, almost all of the decline in support seems to have come from Democrats. The "Intifada now!" crowd seems to be making inroads with rank-and-file Dems.
 
There comes a point when you take advantage of the time you have vs trying to secure it for another term to do nothing. Democrats spent billions flooding american cities with illegals and it cost them favorability but they accomplished their goal and it will be very hard to undo. Same with these strikes on Iran I guess.
If you have to do 'unpopular things' early on in a lame duck is the time to do it. Unless this unbelievably blows up bad nobody will remember this by midterms, much less 2028.

The US political memory even on here, which is better than most, is still a few months max. In a few months there could be who knows what going on that'll be the 'big news' then forgotten too by midterms. Doing risky things mid 2026 ok, that could cause problems.

I'm seeing the dems bray about winning some special elections, but that's all there should be for a long time. Are these hodgetwins and so on ranting about this now going to really be saying go for dems later on? I doubt it.
 
Aren't the riots in the US still happening? Aren't there still 50+ million illegals to deport? Is nothing of note at all happening in the US, or should we rename the thread to "Pointless Sandnigger+Kike sperging?"
That was last week, they're not in the news cycle anymore. They're hoping to try and ruin everyone's Fourth of July celebrations (spoiler alert: fireworks makes for great cover for arson or pipe bombs) becuase the "No Kings" was suuuuch a success in their epistemic enclosures. In reality the golem is being left out to rot becuase their masters have other things to worry about (like whipping their pet congresscritters into pushing for a new foreverwar on their behalf), so expect the riots to just fade away for the time being.
 
Thanks to Trump's retardation every item on this list will become reality when Dems take back power. There will be no mercy.
War with Iran has an approval rating of 18%. Very very bad.
The Democrat party has an approval rating of 16%.
I checked to see if there was a recorded approval rating for HIV/AIDS, but couldn't find one. I'm going to put it at 20%.
 
War with Iran has an approval rating of 18%. Very very bad.
The Democrat party has an approval rating of 16%.
I checked to see if there was a recorded approval rating for HIV/AIDS, but couldn't find one. I'm going to put it at 20%.
In a way it shows how bad the dem party is off now. They can't even make anything out of this to help their approval. The thing is harris said she'd do the same thing. I don't care if she would or not, but there's going to be little if any real difference on how this goes no matter who is in power.

I'm not commenting on if they're both ZOG bots, don't care. It's just really something that the dems can't do anything to advance politically and have no leadership. They go from newsom, to aoc, to walz, to crockett for a bit over and over. Everyone laughs and ignores it and moves on.

ETA and lol:
Screenshot 2025-06-23 090141.webp
 
Last edited:
War with Iran has an approval rating of 18%. Very very bad.
The Democrat party has an approval rating of 16%.
I checked to see if there was a recorded approval rating for HIV/AIDS, but couldn't find one. I'm going to put it at 20%.
Most of MAGA supports the bombing, I couldn't find the age groups tho so wouldn't be surprised if it's boomers
 
  • Like
Reactions: KoopsInk
no doubt those wahhabis use saudi money to spread their teachings abroad, but i do not think that this is in service of saudi schemes for expansion. i think the saudis just throw money at the wahhabis to keep them (and by extension their local population) happy, and the wahhabis then use that funding to spread their teachings as much as possible due to religious conviction.
This would be credible if they didn't constantly use those Salafi populations abroad to promote their interests and to counter other regional powers and undermine rivals. Salafists in Iraq were constantly antagonizing and destabilizing any Iranian influence in the country. In Syria they were used to undermine and eventually overthrow the Shia-friendly government. Throughout West Africa Salafi groups regularly compete with Iranian-backed groups for influence. And the main reason that the Uyghers are in camps and the Hui are not is due to their Salafi-jihadism and terror attacks being viewed as the Chinese government as an attempt by foreign powers at interference in their internal affairs. These same Turkic-Salafist groups were seen in Syria fighting on behalf of the Islamic State, and they largely displaced the Turkey-aligned Turkic nationalist groups in Xinjiang, allowing Saudi influence to shoulder aside Turkish influence in Central Asia.

This is an interesting in-depth rundown of the history of that conflict and present conditions:

What you see again and again and again is that the leaders of these movements go to Saudi Arabia on Haj and come back preaching Salafi Jihadism. Of course the Saudis themselves wash their hands of these groups and act as if they have no relation, but I think it strains credulity to think that the concurrence of both Saudi interests with the actions of these groups and the timing of these trips is all just some bizarre coincidence.
 
Ok I do not support the bombing, but this child is retarded. Iran did not threaten anybody... huh? The Iranian government routinely chants "death to America " "death to the Great devil". That does not constitute a threat? If I spammed his comment section screaming he needed to die and I would kill him, that would not be threatening???

You're brainwashed as he says if you believe Iran wants you to die, unless you work for the state; and if you do you may be counted as a baby raping fed yourself. Israel's crimes against humanity makes her a devil, and US support for it makes the US the greater devil. Death to America for Great Justice.

If the US stopped supporting Israel, Iran would not be an enemy of the US anymore. If Iran submitted to Jewish tyranny, then suddenly you would be fed messaging saying Iran Good Now as they recently done with Syria now that CIA agent ISIS has taken control of it.
 
What's stopping a B-2 dropping a GB57U on the three gorges dam?
B2s are not thought to be able to survive against modern anti air systems. Its a 35 year old plane.

Israel had already blown up or sabotaged basically all of Irans anti air in their first strike. And it wasnt modern to begin with.

China almost certainly has all the design documents for the B2 at this point with how compromised DC is and the country we buy our electronics from will in fact have modern radar.

B2s are also slow and large. They are a "beat up someone weaker than you" weapon. Israel used the F35s which are the "they might fight back" weapon already.
 
Appeal went through!



The B2 strike on Furdow was really interesting.

1750687668648.webp

There were 2 packages, a decoy package heading West that was highly telegraphed and that all of the OSINT people (including me) were tracking and discussing. That ended up landing in Guam.

Meanwhile a random guy in Missouri saw the real mission heading east.


1750687821097.webp

Seeing Trump go MIGA, even if it was for Iran, killed me. I was laughing so hard that I was gasping and my son was staring at me like I was retarded.

1750687993707.webp
1750688008660.webp

Trump shitting on Massie directly was just icing on the cake.

At this point we're gonna see Massie drive Randy Fine around the South Lawn on Trump's best golf cart while shouting his praises
 
B2s are not thought to be able to survive against modern anti air systems. Its a 35 year old plane.

Israel had already blown up or sabotaged basically all of Irans anti air in their first strike. And it wasnt modern to begin with.

China almost certainly has all the design documents for the B2 at this point with how compromised DC is and the country we buy our electronics from will in fact have modern radar.

B2s are also slow and large. They are a "beat up someone weaker than you" weapon. Israel used the F35s which are the "they might fight back" weapon already.
Surely we must have something in the MIC spring catalog that could strike the dam?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fetch! and Puff
Back