US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ban women from this site or you'll get your freedoms back.

Cool idea! You should make your OWN free speech website just like that! It'll be easy and fun and profitable. You'll love your life every day after you just get rid of those pesky vagina people. They're why you can't have any fun. They're why that one bad thing happened to you. And that other thing. We know. That's why you should just start your own site, where you can make the rules and decide exactly who's allowed and who isn't.

1751121610251.webp
 
if women say that kids can't type, and women have a firm grip on education, then why are we listening to the people who complain about things they've fucked up anyway?
Buddy, I don't have a firm grip on reality, let alone an entire industry. One, you don't know that I'm a woman. Two (more importantly), I didn't even say I was working with kids in education. I said I've worked with kids and that, in my experience, they have poor computer literacy on average. What got you worked up about this?
 
It's not within the Overton Window to say that White people or Christians are discriminated against.
Nothing is ever within the Overton Window until someone makes it happen. If Whites started to use lawfare to prove they're discriminated against they would shift the window. The window moves by actions, not by waiting for it.
 
Nothing is ever within the Overton Window until someone makes it happen. If Whites started to use lawfare to prove they're discriminated against they would shift the window. The window moves by actions, not by waiting for it.

Yeah but how many average whites have the money and will to sue?
 
The stark, unmediated difference between a social construct and what isn't, is as I stated:

Humans have been in social groups for 100x longer than "antiquity." We have many, many pieces of archaeological evidence that these concepts are extremely variant in a wide range of societies in history and prehistory. We have societies where they don't believe rape is possible if the woman is married to the rapist, for instance. That was nearly all societies until very, very recently. Even when the bride in question was a child. All of antiquity you speak of wouldn't consider marital relations to ever potentially be rape. They could condemn brutality, yes, but it wouldn't be "rape." Today we consider it rape when someone copulates with a 13 year old, and I think that was a good decision as a society. But it isn't a decision most other societies in the span of human history have made, not even close. So I know that it's not just inherent to existence...it's something we decided on, and something people could take from us with immoral politics and policies.

When you say "I can look at that from my perch 1000 years later and say yes, that was always rape because of some ideas we got later on, even if they didn't consider it rape at the time," yes, you're socially constructing a definition of rape. I don't even see how this is controversial.

Social constructs don't mean the construct is unnatural or bad. Social constructs can (and often do) come from observation of society and deliberate, rational observational responses to real situations.

"It's just a social construct" is the stupidest idea the left has.

You can say "animals have this and that and the other thing," but ok, then those are things that unify us with the animals. Even so, the things that you would agree differentiate us from the animals are things you would also agree are socially constructed (e.g. currency)!
 
Wonder how buttmad those three or so cunts continually sneeding against the EOs and injunctioning them are right now
They're lolcows in a position of power, so I'm kinda expecting a Russel Greer style "I find that the thing that just happened didn't happen" ruling soon stating they overrule SCOTUS because the threat Trump brings to our Democracy is just THAT severe. But we'll see.

View attachment 7569677

I'm shocked it took this long but with religious freedom influencing the SCOTUS's decision. Not so shocked that it took Muslims, not Christians, for the LGBTQ+ ideology to buckle down from their own woke religion. So, brown people don't have to comply, but the white people do under the state. Interesting.
No. Technically speaking white people don't have to comply either. But they'll use social pressure and conditioning from that angle, something that absolutely doesn't work against Muslims (and is slowly failing to work on Whites).

For an example of this, look at people who claimed an exemption from retarded COVID Vax mandates from HR Denmothers. I, for example, had to explain to a 85 IQ black woman, while being recorded for review by an anonymous committee of HR people, why my silly iron age religious beliefs overruled her newly gained expertise in [rolls dice] virology and belief that I, a remote worker that doesn't go into an office, should take experimental gene therapy to make her feel "safe." It was all about power. She wanted to codify the right to make medical decisions for me -- and the teachers are much, MUCH further along this batshit mindset. "Your parental rights don't overrule my rights as your child's teacher" is something they openly feel comfortable saying in the fringes.

I fully expect to see a bunch of Christians, especially in red states with blue cities controlling them, pulling their kids out of these classes. I also fully expect to see a whole lot of faggots in the teacher's union try to do end run arounds on this in every possible way imaginable, up to and including demanding you explain what part of your religious beliefs requires you to want to FUCKING KILL POOR INNOCENT TRANS PEOPLE YOU FUCKING BIGOTSO1?!?! and the like.
 
you're socially constructing a definition of rape.
This is the problem and why I'm not bothering further.

You scream about 'leftist lies' then fall for and defend the largest of them all, that the act of naming something and/or defining it makes it a uniquely human construct.

This is the bedrock of the genderspecial bullshit for the most obvious, glaringly negative recent development to come from this retarded and insane misunderstanding of what the world even is, and I've explained to death already why you're just flatly wrong.

Naming rape, defining it, and punishing people for it does not make it a 'construct'. Again, no more than naming laws of physics makes them constructs. This is solipsistic horseshit that is as caustic to society as anything you can think of, and that you persist in this argumentation is not some feature of your intellect but of some strange fixation with the topic as an ideological plank.

Stop being a fucking moron.
 
They could condemn brutality, yes, but it wouldn't be "rape." Today we consider it rape when someone copulates with a 13 year old, and I think that was a good decision as a society. But it isn't a decision most other societies in the span of human history have made, not even close. So I know that it's not just inherent to existence...it's something we decided on, and something people could take from us with immoral politics and policies.
Not having a law against it didn't stop it being punished. If you fucked someone's kid, they got their friends and smashed your skull in. Legal framework doesn't talk about social contracts around them. You didn't need to define fucking 13 year olds as rape until the law became a national thing instead of a local thing. If you crossed the line they would kill you and bury you in the woods. This is a natural human response to someone hurting you or children and holding them accountable. You don't need to socially influence a father to kill someone who abused their child. You have to do the opposite.
From a purely profit-driven mindset that will never happen since the ladies love supporting a website they can call a troon a troon and Null needs his cheese.
They aren't here for the troon name calling. They're all jealous bitches trying to drag others down with them. They all have personal relationships with their cows and they can anonymously snipe at each other here. There's no honour among women.
 
I fully expect to see a bunch of Christians, especially in red states with blue cities controlling them, pulling their kids out of these classes. I also fully expect to see a whole lot of faggots in the teacher's union try to do end run arounds on this in every possible way imaginable, up to and including demanding you explain what part of your religious beliefs requires you to want to FUCKING KILL POOR INNOCENT TRANS PEOPLE YOU FUCKING BIGOTSO1?!?! and the like.
Random realization: This probably allows college students to opt out of DEI classes in school. No more having to take "Intro to Gender Studies" or "The Basis of Race Dynamics: Why Whypyo are Horrible and should Pay Us" classes as part of your STEM degree. You can just say they violate your religious beliefs and there's jack shit the school can do about it but tell you to take an equivalent humanities credit instead.

When THAT hits academia, expect some asspain.
 
They aren't here for the troon name calling. They're all jealous bitches trying to drag others down with them. They all have personal relationships with their cows and they can anonymously snipe at each other here. There's no honour among women.
Okay but again

IMG_3691.webp
Also Null has been clear

4. Don't ask me to pick a side because you will lose.
 
One, you don't know that I'm a woman.
Thanks for making it very clear what gender you are.

Men, wtf, how much more of this abuse do we have to take? They literally are against straight white racist men. Women do not belong in politics. You think of jeeks, muslims, jews, or whoever take over you'll be better of? White men are the ones that gave you rights and white men will take them away you fucking nigger loving whore.
 
SCOTUS just told the district courts to fuck themselves.
6-3 ACB wrote it.


Dissent is the liberal women crying about birthright which ACB says is premature cuz the case wasn’t even about birthright.

“federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too."

“We observe only this:JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em-bracing an imperial Judiciary."
I never understood how it's been tolerated for 60 years the premise that U.S. District Courts somehow had the authority to issue nationwide injunctions when the rulings of U.S. Circuit Courts, which they are subordinate to, have no enforcablity outside of their respective circuit unless expressly adopted by their fellow circuits, it's completely illogical.
 
This is the problem and why I'm not bothering further.

You scream about 'leftist lies' then fall for and defend the largest of them all, that the act of naming something and/or defining it makes it a uniquely human construct.

This is the bedrock of the genderspecial bullshit for the most obvious, glaringly negative recent development to come from this retarded and insane misunderstanding of what the world even is, and I've explained to death already why you're just flatly wrong.

Naming rape, defining it, and punishing people for it does not make it a 'construct'. Again, no more than naming laws of physics makes them constructs. This is solipsistic horseshit that is as caustic to society as anything you can think of, and that you persist in this argumentation is not some feature of your intellect but of some strange fixation with the topic as an ideological plank.

Stop being a fucking moron.

If you're defining it differently with every generation, it's transparently socially created. Rape has been named and defined over and over different ways by different societies. You thinking you have the objective, observationally correct definition in this moment of 2025 defies reason and history. You do not live at the end of history, when we finally have the chance to see things as they are in a way that will never change again.

Trying to act like all societies have these and they're universal, rather than being deliberate and intentional changes to society constructed by the people within it, is insane. And the fact that we have socially constructed these ideas means that yes, they could be dismantled by others. In fact, that's WHY it's worrisome that someone immoral or evil could take over politics: because if currency is socially constructed, they could conceivably get rid of it. Because if the moral and legal idea of "rape" is narrowed, suffering could be the result. Of course, if the idea of "rape" is enlarged, suffering can also be the result. In the year 2300, it'd be possible for the definition of rape that people thought was simply natural and observable to be "well, you need to fill out the Sex Forms in triplicate and upload them to the cloud first, or it's obviously rape," or if society goes a very different way, "well, if she's your woman by right of conquest, she's yours, but if someone tries to take your woman, that's rape and punishable by death."

Now you can say from your 2025 perch "well, the person who didn't fill out the forms in triplicate isn't a rapist even if society says he was, and the person who takes a woman by conquest is obviously a rapist whatever his society says," but that just proves your social vantage point has a serious impact on this. This is literally why some societies are better than others. If it wasn't for social constructs, we'd all be identical. Claims at moral/ethical or lifestyle superiority are all made based on socially constructed discrepancies between places, social classes, races, etc..

That's what it is to be a social construct. Universals don't need to be fought for and legislated about.
 
Projection? Laughing at retards doesn't mean you have a parasocial relationship with them. The BP is full of fat women trying to attack other fat women.
Do you think the internet made CWC one of the most documented individuals in human history out of pure ridicule? Ludicrous. There's a big coin and on one side, there's simps and stans, and on the other side, there's KF, lolcow, 4chan, etc. It's different manifestations of the same impulse.
 
just don't get it, you faggots like reading text written by women? what about womens voice? their voice is as annoying as their text. i think a lot of you are just blind or 12 and can't tell text written by a women, you read it neutrally but you'd...
LOL your writing is abysmal and you sound like a faggot.*

*This text was written by a woman.
 
us-politics-general + women, should be the title of this thread, only women would compain about my gramar, men know what i meant and can mentally fill in the gaps, but a woman always has to open her fucking mouth and complain.

men, how do you feel about yourself not knowing if this place still has any men left?
Man here; if you think the simple presence of women is abuse that means you're a fag.
 
Back