Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 291 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,171 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,462
I hope the defendants totally ignore Dicksucker's advice on getting lawyers who're good with settlements.
I hope they do waste their money on getting a lawyer good at settlements and Ethan makes the settlement terms as Jewish as possible to the point they refuse or accept and torpedo their "careers".
 
Now insists he was just kidding about the SeanDaBlack lawsuit

View attachment 7572476
This rowback has come because yesterday Ethan was offering to drop the SeanDaBlack lawsuit if Hasan donated $75k to the GoFundMes of the other people getting sued, insisting he'd use discovery to specify exactly how much had been donated if Hasan wasn't doing so publicly.
hasandonate.webp
This arguably was starting to tip into extortion as Ethan keeps insisting the GoFundMe will eventually be his money, and SeanDaBlack reacted negatively to it too.
seandablack.webp
So I think this rowback and weirdly written retraction with a date and time is the result of legal advice... in case Hasan still donates $75k, because if that happens after the retraction then Hasan can't claim he was coerced.
You're looking at the scheme more than the "victims".
If someone were to set the most despicable inhumane rat trap ever devised, you will never get me to feel sorry for the rats, because at the end of they day, they are fucking rodents. I don't care who set the trap. I'm not going to say "great job!" then learn who the creator is and say "Oh nevermind booo!!!"
Ends justify the means here.
"No bad tactics, only bad targets" is not a philosophy that generally goes anywhere good.
 
"No bad tactics, only bad targets" is not a philosophy that generally goes anywhere good.
"generally" being the operating term here.
Where is the negative? Oh no, the vindictive petty jew destroys react streamers on twitch THE FUCKING HORROR.
Stop pretending it's going to affect anything outside of twitch it reeks of desperation and again if it destroys reaction faggots then good.. I know you hate the kike but at this point the hate looks more performative than anything else like you're scared if you agree with him on the slightest of topic you'll lose your kike hating badge.
 
Surely there's something.
Emails, phone record, anything.

Mightily unpopular opinion: if all it really took was someone asking for a rushed service and promising to pay later, this company deserved to get fucking scammed. It's not grandpa being gaslit by Kumar Pajeet, it's a company that dominates one niche. What were they thinking?

The more I think about this the less sense it makes. Maybe the gayopping faggotry from Hamas' al-roach brigades really are that psychotic.
the jew lied anyone who thinks it wasn’t ethan who ordered the skulls is a tard
 
This rowback has come because yesterday Ethan was offering to drop the SeanDaBlack lawsuit if Hasan donated $75k to the GoFundMes of the other people getting sued, insisting he'd use discovery to specify exactly how much had been donated if Hasan wasn't doing so publicly.
View attachment 7573172
This arguably was starting to tip into extortion as Ethan keeps insisting the GoFundMe will eventually be his money, and SeanDaBlack reacted negatively to it too.
View attachment 7573176
So I think this rowback and weirdly written retraction with a date and time is the result of legal advice... in case Hasan still donates $75k, because if that happens after the retraction then Hasan can't claim he was coerced.

"No bad tactics, only bad targets" is not a philosophy that generally goes anywhere good.
It's the funniest shit ever that you can completely obliterate Hasan's entire social and political worldview by just asking why he doesn't donate to things.

Anytime it's brought up I've seen he just has a brain malfunction then says flatly "I don't want to" or "I'm not responding to that"
 
The funny thing is, he's been already obliterated by the Jew when he was asked why he keeps paying taxes to the US military industrial complex while he rants at Hila for being in IDF at one point. This also proves his audience is literally braindead if they keep uncritically listening to him after his brain short-circuited then and he admitted it wouldn't change a thing.

Then again, you have to be braindead to start listening to a feminist commie Turkroach who's an openly rich muslim defending Ottoman Empire to begin with.
 
It's the funniest shit ever that you can completely obliterate Hasan's entire social and political worldview by just asking why he doesn't donate to things
Again, it looks like Ethan has specifically posted that story with a time, timezone and date because he was lapsing into criminal extortion and was advised to row it back.
 
Champion this at your own peril, Ethan is the same person he's always been, he's just aiming at people you personally dislike for this brief period.
Nobody is championing them. I'm taking pleasure in watching Lefties attack each other.

Andrew Clifford d'Adesky is jew so of course he going to side with Ethan from his one man law firm in Florida. He's a real estate lawyer with zero experience or understanding of copyright law.
You don't need a super niche understanding when the Defendant's are so blatantly retarded.
 
Nobody is championing them. I'm taking pleasure in watching Lefties attack each other.
Shut the fuck up Sean, if Rekieta set up a legal scheme like this you wouldn't have any problem calling it for what it is. Why should I listen to what you have to say again? Because you called Nick gay and sucked Josh's dick on stream? What a brave stance you took!
 
You can dislike these streamer faggots but you'll never convince me a Jew setting up an elaborate copyright entrapment scheme to settle petty scores by assraping people with legal fees in litigation that is, in Ethan's own words, soley to make them hurt and that he doesn't really care about the principle of.

Champion this at your own peril, Ethan is the same person he's always been, he's just aiming at people you personally dislike for this brief period.
Yeah he set this up as a trap to financially rape them as a "punishment" or something but its not like he made them commit those offenses in the first place so I find it pretty difficult to fault him for it or to feel bad for them.
Ethan is a massive faggot, he is just simply in the right here.
 
You can dislike these streamer faggots but you'll never convince me a Jew setting up an elaborate copyright entrapment scheme

Everybody is talking about this "elaborate copyright entrapment scheme" when really, all he did was file his copyright in advance with the Library of Congress.

That's it.

Ethan didn't make the three retards state during their streams that they were allowing a viewing of Ethan's content "ethically". The "trap" was rightfully predicting these retards will be retarded, and it paid dividends.
 
Everybody is talking about this "elaborate copyright entrapment scheme" when really, all he did was file his copyright in advance with the Library of Congress.

That's it.

Ethan didn't make the three retards state during their streams that they were allowing a viewing of Ethan's content "ethically". The "trap" was rightfully predicting these retards will be retarded, and it paid dividends.
What content creators actually enforce their copyright and go after streamers who watch their videos and react? Outside of large brands or legacy media companies that can afford to throw their weight around, I'd wager not many. And for good reason, react content is fantastic free marketing. The only reason to be opaque and secretive about your registering your video to the Library of Congress (While also begging Hasan to watch it, presumably for the same reason he's suing these bitches) is to ambush people with legal fees and intimidation, while also threatening to do the same thing to other random people
who have criticisized him.

Call me a seething bitch, Idgaf, I'm right that this type of behavior is immoral and self-serving, and the more he accomplishes with it, the bolder he'll become in his Quixotic legal crusades to silence or bankrupt anybody who had shit to say to him. Frankly I don't think Ethan of all people should have that kind of confidence or power. You can call me retarded, you can handwave away my criticisms of this whole situation, and you can ban me from this thread for "Jew-Sperging" (Which I guess is fine to do so long as you're sucking Ethan off judging by all the philo-semetic bullshit that went on unmodderated while I got banned for some bullshit) but you'll see that I was right when Ethan very predictably turns his crooked Jew eye back on this forum and pulls the same crap.

I'm a very patient man, with a good memory, I will be vindicated.
 
What content creators actually enforce their copyright and go after streamers who watch their videos and react?

Isn't part of the issue the "reactions" of the three he's suing uh, be rather lacking? Oh, and you know, the fact that the three brazenly admitted they were being market substitutions, which is a big no-no for fair use

react content is fantastic free marketing

Lol no, it's not. This feels like retreading old ground, but there's no real bump for the "free marketing" of having your video watched by somebody else, especially uncritically. Seriously, why would I watch, say, Hells Kitchen on my own when I just watched it alongside a pair of bouncing tits?

The only reason to be opaque and secretive about your registering your video to the Library of Congress (While also begging Hasan to watch it, presumably for the same reason he's suing these bitches) is to ambush people with legal fees and intimidation, while also threatening to do the same thing to other random people who have criticisized him.

Copyright protections are automatic. The registering of the copyright gets him statutory damages he would otherwise not get. If Ethan didn't register the copyright with the Library of Congress, he'd still have a strong case. The issue is that Twitch has allowed shit like this to go on for a long time, and no doubt Denims, Frogan, and the pothead thought they'd be fine because Twitch wouldn't do anything. They weren't wrong there, but Twitch's lax moderation isn't the arbiter of what is fair use/copyright infringement.

Don't get me wrong, Ethan probably hoped Hasan would pull some lengthy chair reactions, but we all know turkroaches scurry away when exposed, so it took Hasan months, and needing support from Anisa's husband to help him along.
 
If someone were to set the most despicable inhumane rat trap ever devised, you will never get me to feel sorry for the rats, because at the end of they day, they are fucking rodents.
So basically you're admitting to being an animal torture enjoyer like those monkey torture faggots? Kill yourself nerd.
If it was anyone other than Ethan Klein setting these lawsuits you'd be cheering him on.
yes-giga-chad.gif
 
Back