I am fairly certain this is a reference to axing birthright citizenship. I guess the new marching orders are to claim that current citizens who are anchor babies will be rounded up and put in camps.
If anybody's to blame for USAID's death, it's Obama. His administration is the one who replaced the competent people running it with perma-freshmen activists, amoral sycophants, and Hillary fucking Clinton. USAID went from trying to get clean drinking water to the Third World, to turning into an ugly propaganda machine of the worst kind.
It's a funding bill, so removing the tax stamp makes sense, but removing the NFA requirements is something that would be a legislative action. Hopefully the whole NFA gets scrapped by scotus. The remittance thing getting nerfed is bs, and the Medicare thing I'm not sure about. Might be able to do that with an EO, since it would be a classification of existing law.
If it passes in name only it's no different than if it didn't pass even with the meagre amount of red meat for Trump's base it had to begin with. BBB passing metaphorically "in name only" is a fitting outcome for a party that's increasingly right-wing in name only.
It would be based but I expect anchor babies to get grandfathered in. If any group of foreigner gets grabbed after the change it's going to be those who obtained citizenship through shams and scams. A lot of Korean ladies are going to get sent back to their cyberpunk feminist shithole over sham marriages. The supreme gentlemen mutt children will be safe since their Dad was an American.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Yes. It was absolutely acceptable. Why? The Niihau incident.
Unless those Japanese Americans get culturally enriched nowadays if you catch my drift.
Jess Philips? Very rapable.
I personally think the Japanese Interment camps were horrible and a dark moment in US history where we did the wrong thing.
Yes, because it kept the Japanese government from being able to use them as fifth collumnists and also protected the Japanese Americans from being pogromed or otherwise attacked. It was for the best.
I thought he was a dishonest grifter before the left turned on him, and that opinion never changed.
They weren't to prevent him from getting the nomination. They were worse than that. They were to prevent him from getting any delegates so he wouldn't be allowed to make a speech on the convention floor.I'm pretty sure the rules they instituted to prevent Paul from getting the nomination years later ensured Trump got it
I just don't pay close enough attention to the politics of tiny, third-world shitholes to know who's who.
Counterpoint; awful policies completely aside, it's refreshing to see Democrats rally around someone who isn't 75+ years old for once
Should have kept your mouth shut and layed off of the drugs, Elon.
They were the only reasonable option. In a darker age, they would've been executed en masse. The dark moment came when they emerged from the camps to discover the Feds had confiscated and sold their things.
This is just gonna be a monthly thing, it seems like. Elon goes on a coke binge, Tweets something retarded, Trump reminds him that he's the actual president, then Elon slinks back a week later after waking up with a hangover.
Elon's biggest problem is that he boasted too much how much money DOGE was going to save. Should have just gone in there with the claim of cleaning up as much "loose" money as possible and then finding out how many illegals are getting free money from the gov through comparing SS/address with the IRS/HUD/etc. Would have made an alley with Steven Miller for life.
