Community Debate Ethics in VTubing, Model Design and Voice Acting, Loli and Loli-adjacency - Containment zone for third rail enjoyers

There was a part of me that was disappointed when Blackjack wasn't just yeeted off site for getting outted shilling AI generated audio porn of Loli vtubers like FallenShadow in his lolicon forum over on Varis.

But this thread being made instead and basically just getting a bunch more of people to eagerly self report has been good in it's own right.
 
I have been negrated by a lolicon:
3484334.webp
I will keep this as a token to how fucking right I was in what I said.
 
ROFLMAO!!! You ain't a fucking anime character buddy. You hold no thoughts or opinions that can't easily be broken through by even the dumbest of niggers with just a tiny dab of pushback. Anyone can see right through your coping and seething. Keep on fucking trucking on, faggot. You'll convince everyone that your so fucking intelligent and that we have all been fooled.
Life is a comedy, and you're playing the court jester.
 
Can't you just ping a mod and get this faggot raped before this extends into a long and unnecesary slapfight with yet another lolicon account that decided to wake up because Null is being loud on twitter again?
This is a containment thread my nigga the chances of this guy eating a ban for shitting on the designated shitting street is almost zero what's really going to make null angry is that this is likely to be the most active thread on this board in months... not that the competition has been particularly fierce lately.
 
Life is a comedy, and you're playing the court jester.
Genuine question. If you were to show a random person off the street an image of Gura or Saba and asked them "Is this character a child?" or "What age do you think this character is?", what do you expect the most common answers would be?
 
Gun rights are the same as lolicon. That is your argument. You are arguing that you have a right to lolicon.
Thanks for confirming to me that you're room temperature IQ goycattle.

My argument is that the same logic used to restrict access to firearms is being used to restrict lolicon, not that I have a right to firearms or lolicon:

The fact that firearms might potentially cause harm to someone in the future doesn't justify banning them. This is my argument. Replace "firearm" with "lolicon".
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Noticer
Thanks for confirming to me that you're room temperature IQ goycattle.

My argument is that the same logic used to restrict access to firearms is being used to restrict lolicon, not that I have a right to firearms or lolicon:

The fact that firearms might potentially cause harm to someone in the future doesn't justify banning them. This is my argument. Replace "firearm" with "lolicon".
But you DO have a right to firearms. You DONT have a right to lolicon. That's why that logic works on Lolicon but not Firearms. You are fucking retarded and don't know even your basic fundamental rights.
 
What is your line of work?
Retired USMC Pilot currently working at a Wendy's, former piss sommelier.

Genuine question. If you were to show a random person off the street an image of Gura or Saba and asked them "Is this character a child?" or "What age do you think this character is?", what do you expect the most common answers would be?
Genuine answer? Something along the lines of "Is she from a cartoon?"
 
He still got CHARGED for the lolicon you dipshit.
Does not appear in the government's filings on the sentencing, anything else you'd like to hallucinate? The Tranny got nailed for the real stuff. Getting sick of fighting with Pacermonitor's paywall to grab the details if the loli got included in the arrest or initial trial. Also really curious to read the trial transcripts, but that's just academic curiosity.

ITS A FUCKING CRIME YOU DUMBFUCK NIGGER.
Wow, almost as if...
Indeed. Obscenity laws.

Not the laws for CP.

Courts across the country have run into that. They can say it's contrary to the predominant morals, but they have consistently failed to associate ink and paper with actual kids.
WE FUCKING AGREE YOU DUMB SHIT. I'm just pointing out they're not the SAME CRIME.

Also, while I'm swinging against you on this, I do appreciate you having an argument with me, and I hope your day is going great, friend.


The fact that firearms might potentially cause harm to someone in the future doesn't justify banning them. This is my argument. Replace "firearm" with "lolicon".
But you DO have a right to firearms. You DONT have a right to lolicon. That's why that logic works on Lolicon but not Firearms. You are fucking retarded and don't know even your basic fundamental rights.
I mean there's a 1st Amendment argument to be made on artistic depictions if we go with US law, but let me toss you a bone out of appreciation of one of the best exchanges of nigger accusations I've had in years.

There are laws to restrict what kind of guns someone can have too.

what's really going to make null angry is that this is likely to be the most active thread on this board in months... not that the competition has been particularly fierce lately.
Ha ha... whoops.
 
But you DO have a right to firearms
Congrats retard, you somewhat get it. Now here's the kicker: People are using the same type of argument they use to deprive you of your heavenly right to bear arms in blue states. Machineguns? Gone long ago. Standard 30 round mags? Not a chance. A shoestring or rubber band wrapped around the trigger guard? Years in the slammer. And let's not even being talking about the situation in Europe.

The fact that you don't yet grasp how you've lost so much by making thse type of concessions to the government under the pretext of avoiding potential harm that might come in the future is exactly why I call you goycattle. All this grandstanding about rights, yet always giving in because you're actually powerless and do only what you are allowed to do by an increasingly restrictive government.
 
Genuine answer? Something along the lines of "Is she from a cartoon?"
If you woke up tomorrow and lolicon porn was outlawed (law passed and supreme court reviewed). Would this be something you would accept or would you still be making these arguments in defense that it should still be legal?
 
If you woke up tomorrow and lolicon porn was outlawed (law passed and supreme court reviewed). Would this be something you would accept or would you still be making these arguments in defense that it should still be legal?
What if you woke up tomorrow and lolicon porn was legalized (law passed and supreme court reviewed). Would this be something you would accept or would you still be making these arguments in defense that it should still be illegal?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Noticer
Congrats retard, you somewhat get it. Now here's the kicker: People are using the same type of argument they use to deprive you of your heavenly right to bear arms in blue states. Machineguns? Gone long ago. Standard 30 round mags? Not a chance. A shoestring or rubber band wrapped around the trigger guard? Years in the slammer. And let's not even being talking about the situation in Europe.

The fact that you don't yet grasp how you've lost so much by making thse type of concessions to the government under the pretext of avoiding potential harm that might come in the future is exactly why I call you goycattle. All this grandstanding about rights, yet always giving in because you're actually powerless and do only what you are allowed to do by an increasingly restrictive government.
I couldn't give a single fuck if pedophiles get locked up in pound me in the ass prison. None. Your points are sophomoric and gay. Shut up.
 
I'm just pointing out they're not the SAME CRIME.
I would never argue that lolicon is the same as child pornography. I never have. What I argue is that people into lolicon are either pedophiles or are unknowingly conditioning themselves to become pedophiles.

There's no way around this. Exposure therapy is not a meme, it is a science. Your personality is the history of every experience you've ever had combined. People don't wake up one day as very athletic, they are athletic because they train themselves to enjoy sport and physical activity. Pedophilia is not a natural state of being. Half of convicted child molesters report being molested themselves. Pedophilia is a part of the cycle of abuse. It is something you are turned into.

Every time you consume something you are training yourself to enjoy it more. You are carving grooves into your brain like a vinyl record, so that when the needle drops - you behave as comes natural to you - you enter this comfortable, well-tread path and follow it without thinking. You are training yourself to enjoy girls who are small, petite, without developed breasts, with no hip to waist ratio. When you then exit your home and walk around, your brain is trained to find these things attractive. What would draw your eye before no longer does. What draws your eye now would be uncomfortable to you only a few years ago. But in the confines of your brain, and in the isolation of your cunny discord group, it's not taboo. It is encouraged by your friends.

That's how this works. That's why lolicons are so defensive about it. That's why they're so aggressive, loud, and proud about their fetish. That's why they attack you en masse when you talk bad about this. They don't want you to interrupt the grooming process. It's the same as the gays and trannies. They want it in your face, because that's how they recruit. They want it normalized. They want "uohhh child tummy erotic" to be just a meme that everyone is OK with because everyone else is OK with it.

The people I actually want to reach are the ones who are on the edge. "Well, I guess it's weird, but it's not real kids, and I think maybe it's just petite girls...." - you are the mark. You're the one who can get a parasocial relationship with Saba and find himself in a gooner discord jerking off to lolicon of this character.

If it was natural it would not need advertising. It would not need Twitter brigrades hundreds of people strong.

6cb2cibgjk431.webp
 
Last edited:
Back