US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
California banned the BDS movement and Newsom ran to Tel Aviv within days of October 7th.

And you saw Biden refusing to disarm or defy Bibi during his term.

With liberals and zionisms and the ADL and bolshevik Israeli hating kikes in their party, it's quite a melting pot that the Democrats have.
If only somebody could have warned them that importing millions of people who hate you just because they also hate the people you hate is a bad idea.
 
B-b-b-b-b-but MUH SLAVE BEES!!!!!!111!!!

bzzz bzzzz
days never finished
bzz bzz
massah gots me workin'
bzz bzzz
someday massah set bees freeeeeee
bzzzzz

That reminds me: If a man can be a woman, then it stands to reason that a bumblebee can be a fish:
1751488888334.webp

umblebees can be classified as endangered in California — even if that requires defining “fish,” a category of protected creatures under state law, to include bees, a state appeals court ruled Tuesday.


California’s endangered species law protects any “bird, mammal, fish, amphibia or reptile” declared to be endangered. Since bees clearly are not birds, mammals, amphibia, or reptiles, they must be fish.

Environmental groups asked the state Fish and Game Commission in 2018 to classify four bumblebee species as endangered, and the commission agreed in 2019 to consider them as candidates, a decision that immediately barred any actions that would kill the bees or destroy their habitat.

Those restrictions were removed in December 2020 by Sacramento County Superior Court Judge James Arguelles in response to a lawsuit by agricultural organizations, which said the classifications were unauthorized by law and potentially ruinous to farmers, who might refuse to allow beehives on their land.

A fundamental law of California politics under Democrats is that farmers are always wrong and need to be punished.

The Third District Court of Appeal in Sacramento ruled that any imperiled invertebrate can be counted as a fish, despite fish not being invertebrates.

“A fish, as the term is commonly understood in everyday parlance, of course, lives in aquatic environments,” Justice Ronald Robie acknowledged in the 3-0 ruling. But he said state lawmakers, when they approved the current law in 1984, knew that the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, which enforced the law, had found that it protected invertebrates living on land.

You follow the logic, right? Or do you hate the planet? (:_(
 
You can't really start a business on that kind of money, can you?
Making a real, successful business isn't exactly the point... And LLCs are a about dime a dozen, if you'll forgive the hyperbole.
 
No, he won because gas is $3-5 in most of the country, rent for a one bedroom apartment is $2000 or more a month, a two bedroom single story ranch is 500k, a used Honda Civic is 16k.
You didn't understand my message, my point is that he sees these problems and pretends to have a solution which is just him saying he will give people free shit.
 
I fully expect the BBB to keep getting postponed until Democrats take back Congress. No way it has the votes to pass now.
Your track record is absolutely stellar, thanks for your attention to this matter.


Remember when you said none of his apppointments were gonna get the votes.

Remember when you said no way hegseth was gonan get the votes, he was sunk.

Remember when you said 100 other things, and ended up getting forced in the burger suit?
 
California banned the BDS movement and Newsom ran to Tel Aviv within days of October 7th.

And you saw Biden refusing to disarm or defy Bibi during his term.

With liberals and zionisms and the ADL and bolshevik Israeli hating kikes in their party, it's quite a melting pot that the Democrats have.
And that got them into hot water with the Democrat base, many of whom hate Israel.
 
Funny...why hasn't the house voted on it then? Why did they stop the vote to hold more negotiations? Why are congress members encouraging Trump to bring the Senate back so that they can vote on new changes to the bill that was supposed to be passed today?

Cope and seethe. America isn't an economic zone, retard.
I fully expect the BBB to keep getting postponed until Democrats take back Congress. No way it has the votes to pass now.
BUT BUT BUT.. MASSIE HAD THE VOTES TO STOP IT.. HE SAID HE HAD TEN.

What does Foxx's amendment say?
was some shit they were using to delay the vote, this was the vote on the so called foxx amendment
1751489746033.webp
 
I fully expect the BBB to keep getting postponed until Democrats take back Congress. No way it has the votes to pass now.
Democrats have no majorities. At best, they could form a coalition to change some aspects of the bill, but they do not have the power to keep it from passing until midterms. Right now, Democrats are leaderless, and can’t find a unifying message other than “Trump bad,” which has gotten stale after nearly a decade of it. “Trump bad” obviously isn’t enough to win elections now, and the 2024 election proved that, so they need to start actually providing decent solutions over appealing to the lunatics.
 
BUT BUT BUT.. MASSIE HAD THE VOTES TO STOP IT.. HE SAID HE HAD TEN.
View attachment 7590358
lol Massie's such a little bitch. He's made the classic mistake most people who can't meme always make: 1) your memes have to be funny, not forced, and 2) you have to be correct and/or in a position to do what you're flexing you can do.

I hope people endlessly rub this in his fucking face.
 
Since then, Miller has held the view that America’s top schools have become too focused on diversity, sex, politics and religion and were not acting in the nation’s best interests, say Trump allies. He wrote a critique of liberal professors for the Duke newspaper in 2007, titled “A Portrait of Radicalism.”
Said critique:

A portrait of radicalism​

By Stephen Miller
January 29, 2007 | 5:00am GMT

While there are many good, decent and commendable professors on our campus, there are also a number of professors that are unethical, unbalanced and out of control. The lacrosse scandal has made this shameful reality all too apparent. And it is students who pay the price for their radical behavior.

Consider the case of Kyle Dowd, a Duke lacrosse player who graduated last year with an above-average GPA. Last spring, his professor, Kim Curtis, signed the abominable "social disaster" ad, which pointed the finger of guilt at the lacrosse team, praised the protesters who rushed to judgment and slandered our student body as racist.

It seems Curtis, however, did not limit herself to merely using words to unleash her contempt at the lacrosse team and to issue her warped brand of justice. No, it seems she decided to give Dowd an F in her course simply because he was a member of the lacrosse team.

"In a class of approximately 40 students, only two final papers received an 'F', and a professor who has publicly aligned herself with the false accuser in the criminal investigation gave those two grades of 'F' to the only two lacrosse players in the class," according to a letter from the player's attorney to Assistant Duke University Counsel Kate Hendricks in September.

Moreover, she also failed Dowd in participation even though his attendance had been almost perfect until he had to miss some class sessions because of meetings with attorneys. Dowd gave Curtis advanced notice of these utterly excusable absences and Curtis registered no complaint.

The amazing thing is, when one calculates all of his grades in the class-including her sinister decisions to fail him in participation and on his final paper-his grade still equals a D and not an F. Thus, Curtis gave Dowd two F's he wholly did not deserve and then an overall F in the course that wasn't even his mathematical mark.

Countless hours and thousands upon thousands of dollars in legal fees later, the school, under the dismal leadership of President Brodhead, will not budge beyond giving Dowd a D-thus accepting the two unjustifiable F's-even though it's clear to any objective observer that Dowd's performance merits the P that he and his attorneys are demanding.

Justice is evidently a foreign concept to our administration.

Indeed, it truly is stunning to consider some of the disturbed people Duke hires to teach its students. Houston Baker, who was kind enough to leave us for Vanderbilt, taught for both the African and African-American Studies and English departments during his time at Duke. Also a member of the group of 88, he wrote a particularly vitriolic open letter in the wake of the lacrosse allegations, writing that the team, "may well feel they can claim innocence and sport their disgraced jerseys on campus, safe under the cover of silent whiteness. But where is the black woman who their violence and raucous witness injured for life? Will she ever sleep well again?"

But it gets worse. What follows is the text of an e-mail Baker sent to Kyle Dowd's mother, in response to a polite and thoughtful letter she authored to the group of 88:

"LIES! You are just a provacateur [sic] on a happy New Years Eve trying to get credit for a scummy bunch of white males! You know you are in search of sympaathy [sic] for young white guys who beat up a gay man in Georgetown, get drunk in Durham, and lived like 'a bunch of farm animals' near campus.

"I really hope whoever sent this stupid farce of an email rots in.... umhappy [sic] new year to you ... and forgive me if your [sic] really are, quite sadly, mother of a 'farm animal.'"

Then of course there's Karla Holloway, chair of the Campus Culture Initiative subcommittee on race and another member of the group of 88, who resigned her post in protest over the decision to allow our demonstrably innocent peers to return to campus.

AAAS Professor Mark Anthony Neal also signed the ad and spoke out against the team, claiming that, "regardless of what happened inside of 610 N. Buchanan Blvd, the young men were hoping to consume something that they felt that a black woman uniquely possessed."

Here is how Neal described his own intellectual approach in an interview with Duke Magazine this summer:

"I have an alter ego-my intellectual alter ego. My intellectual alter ego is thugniggerintellectual-one word.... I wanted to embody this figure that comes into intellectual spaces like a thug, who literally is fearful and menacing. I wanted to use this idea of this intellectual persona to do some real kind of 'gangster' scholarship, if you will. All right, just hard, hard-core intellectual thuggery."

Then there's Wahneema Lubiano and Diane Nelson and William Chafe and.

Will Brodhead ever have the courage and integrity to condemn those who defame and persecute his students? Will professors on this campus ever be held accountable?

Stephen Miller is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Monday.
Source (Archive)

Despite being Jewish, he loves Christmas:

The case for Christmas​

By Stephen Miller | Monday, December 4 2006

It's the most wonderful time of year-but you wouldn't know it looking around Duke's campus.

You'd probably find more Christmas decorations at your local mosque.

A pretty sad showing for a university that boasts a Divinity School and a Trinity College-and which is in the heart of a nation where 96 percent of citizens celebrate Christmas, a federal holiday.

There is absolutely no single logical reason why we shouldn't have a Christmas tree on the quad and a Nativity scene in the Bryan Center. Eighty-five percent of our nation is Christian and every single one of us, Christian or not (I'm a practicing Jew myself), is living in a country settled and founded by Christians and benefitting daily from the principles of Christian philosophy on which our forebears relied.

Christianity is embedded in the very soul of our nation.

Yet its presence is visibly absent from our campus.

As a service to its students and staff, Duke should take it upon itself to recognize this crucial American holiday. Of course, the messiah is likely to come before that happens, so the burden falls on student groups.

I urge every group of Christian faith on campus to do whatever it can to bring the Christmas spirit publicly and passionately to Duke. There are sure to be many roadblocks, and I know the secular left has tried very hard to make you feel ashamed to broadcast your beliefs (while they so irritatingly broadcast theirs), but bringing Christmas to our campus is something that desperately needs to be done.

Sadly, there is nothing exceptional about Duke ignoring Christmas. It's symptomatic of the larger anti-faith movement sweeping across our country. Somehow, a small group of bitter atheists and secularists have convinced otherwise sane people to call trees that are bought for Christmas, decorated for Christmas and displayed on Christmas, not Christmas, but holiday trees; have purged Nativity scenes from public spaces even as courts have consistently upheld their constitutionality; have removed Christmas songs, Christmas displays and all things Christian from many of our nation's schools; have scared major national retailers from permitting the words "merry Christmas," to be shown or spoken on their premises; and have done this while launching no attack on the religious activities or symbols of other faiths.

Now I'm sure some of you are saying, what does it matter? Why is it so important that our society acknowledge and celebrate Christmas?

Christmas has come to represent and embody all that is good and righteous about the people of this country; it celebrates the values of charity, compassion and goodwill. In contrast to the brutally cold hedonism of the atheist view, Christmas is a time filled with warmth and spirit.

It reminds us of the need to be good and caring, and to look to our creator for strength and courage. From the founding of our country to the earliest abolition movement to civil rights to our recovery and resolve in the wake of Sept. 11, it is faith and religion on which our society has depended to become and to stay the world's most free and just nation.

As our country celebrates debauchery and debasement more and more, it is vitally important at this time of year to celebrate the values that have made our nation great and call upon everyone in society, whatever their faith, to renew their commitment to uphold in their lives what is just and good.

I'll let the facts speak for themselves: New polling data shows religious Americans donate four times more than secular Americans, and those who attend church are a staggering 23 times more likely to volunteer.

Atheists may talk about humanism and justice, but when you don't believe in a soul or the ultimate truth of goodness and morality, then why live your life except in whatever fashion most plainly and immediately benefits you?

No just society can survive which abandons God.

It's of course up to you where you stand on the Christmas issue, so I'll end with two representative proclamations about what this time of year means and you can decide which one speaks for you:

The first was placed by the Freedom from Religion foundation in the Wisconsin state capitol as part of the Christmastime displays: "At this season of winter solstice may reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds."

The second is a letter from our 22nd President, Calvin Coolidge: "To the American People: Christmas is not a time or a season, but a state of mind. To cherish peace and good will, to be plenteous in mercy, to have the real spirit of Christmas. If we think on these things, there will be born in us a Savior and over us will shine a star sending its gleam of hope to the world."

Where do you think hopes lies?

Stephen Miller is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Monday.
Source (Archive)

He wrote a similar article the year prior:

Attack of the secularist Scrooges​

By Stephen Miller
December 6, 2005 | 5:00am GMT

Christmas is being banned. Whether it's holiday trees, holiday parties, holiday concerts or "Happy Holidays," the word Christmas is slowly being exiled from society. I, for one, am offended. And I'm Jewish.

Of course, one of the worst transgressions you can commit at this time of year is to immediately precede the word Christmas with the word "merry." Realizing this, some of America's largest retailers-Target, Sears, Costco, Kmart, Wal-Mart-have all decided to ban Christmas from their store advertising this year. So much for inclusiveness.

Let's get to the numbers. Eighty-five percent of America is Christian. To put that in perspective, 80 percent of Israel is Jewish. Ninety-two percent of Americans admit to the guilty pleasure of enjoying the words "Merry Christmas," and a whopping 96 percent actually go so far as to celebrate it, according to a recent Gallup poll. Oh, and nearly 100 percent of Americans will have the day off. America was settled, founded and pioneered by people who celebrated Christmas. Get ready to cringe, secularists-Christmas is an American holiday.

Now, before any card-carrying members of the ACLU start screaming about the separation of church and state, let me enlighten you. What I am speaking of has nothing to do with government establishment of religion. I am speaking of American culture. Wishing people "Merry Christmas" at Wal-Mart and calling an evergreen covered with ornaments what it actually is (hint: not a holiday tree), isn't a violation of any amendment. It's about acknowledging the simple fact that most Americans celebrate the birth of Jesus (no, Christmas is not the celebration of Santa Claus) and that for them, this is a truly special time of year.

So why the act? We don't want to offend the small number of people who don't celebrate Christmas so we pretend it doesn't exist? Doesn't that seem a little extreme? For one thing-and pardon my bluntness-but anyone who is offended by seeing or, heaven forbid, being wished a merry Christmas is an idiot. Does it really make sense to insult the intelligence of the vast majority of Americans for the sake of those who don't have any?

By contrast, when I was in Mexico one December, everywhere I went people were wishing me a merry Christmas. That I'm not Christian didn't matter. I still appreciated the spirit and kindness of the gesture and the genuine atmosphere of warmth it created. Being wished a wonderful winter just doesn't have the same effect. For my winter concerts in middle school, to avoid offending people's ever-so-sensitive-sensibilities, the events were decorated with neutral colors. One year they went with black. It felt like I was in a Tim Burton movie.

Before anyone accuses me of forgetting the Maccabees, I of course realize that Chanukah, depending on the lunar cycle, occurs around the same time as Christmas. "Happy Holidays" could perhaps be interpreted as shorthand for "Happy Chanukah" and "Merry Christmas." But let's not be deceptive. As much as I love Chanukah and rejoice in our miraculous defeat of the Assyrians (we really showed them how Jews take care of business), it's just not that important when compared to our other holidays. Plus, we make up only 2 percent of the country's population.

While I welcome and enjoy wishes for a happy Chanukah, there is no reason why our holiday should preclude stores from putting up Christmas banners or extending Christmas greetings to their customers. I would absolutely hate Chanukah to be used as a tool to interfere with the celebration and recognition of one of Christianity's holiest days, and I resent the efforts of secularists to do just that. Maybe they're worried too many mentions of Christmas will inspire religion in others. Or maybe they're just jealous because they don't have anything to celebrate. Whatever it is, I know most Americans want a stop to the madness.

What's next? Requiring Christmas carolers to sing holiday-neutral carols? Making the silver stars on Christmas trees six-pointed instead of five?

From Bing Crosby singing "White Christmas" to Jimmy Stewart in "It's A Wonderful Life," Christmas is a major part of American culture. It represents our values of family, compassion and charity. In the spirit of Christmas, I say we all get together and ask Duke to put up a "Merry Christmas" banner and a beautiful Christmas tree in the Bryan Center. Now wouldn't that be a miracle?

To everyone-the best of luck with finals, and of course, have a merry Winter Break.

Stephen Miller is a Trinity junior. His column runs every other Tuesday.
Source (Archive)

He was also pissed off when an international student told him America has no culture:

America: the forgotten campus culture​

By Stephen Miller | Monday, November 20 2006

I was having a conversation with an international student the other day who informed me America had no culture of its own. What we had instead, this student explained, were many distinct, separate cultures that existed within our borders and not a unifying national identity. Those things I might claim as our own, I was told, were simply stolen.

These words are not an isolated irritation, but express a pervasive and dangerous lie.

America without her culture is like a body without a soul-yet many of today's youth see America as nothing but a meeting point for the cultures of other nations.

How can America survive if many don't acknowledge, let alone embrace, the very culture that gives it life?

We must come to the defense of our heritage. And for us, that fight begins right here, on our campus.

It's easy to understand how the student I spoke with arrived at her deeply misguided conclusion. Duke, in lockstep with the modern American university, worships at the altar of multiculturalism. As we obsess over, adulate and extol the non-American cultures we ignore the culture we all hold in common.

Every year Page Auditorium is packed to celebrate Indian and Asian culture, while crucial American cultural events like Thanksgiving, Christmas, President's Day and Veterans Day are ignored and forgotten.

Duke requires every student engage in cross-cultural inquiry to graduate, yet there is no requirement to learn about America or larger Western civilization.

Our peers have assembled a litany of cultural groups from the Bulgarian Student Association to the Taiwanese Student Association, as though a college campus were a place not to congregate together under one flag but rather to retreat back to the nationalities our ancestors eagerly shed in exchange for a greater, freer life.

We are watching a generation of youth enter into society without the ability to appreciate-and in turn sustain-the very culture we inhabit and which has blessed a tormented world with a refuge for dignity, opportunity and hope.

Doubtless some of you reading this column are among those who deny the existence of a unique and cohesive American culture. In advancing this view, chances are you employ the predictable argument that America simply inherited, borrowed or stole what appear to be elements of its culture from other peoples and nations.

The utter shallowness of this argument can be revealed by showing how when faithfully applied as a test it demonstrates not that America is lacking a unique and cohesive culture but rather that this is so for many of the cultures the multiculturalists herald and embrace.

Take, for instance, Mexico. Here the multiculturalists and I would be in complete agreement in saying that Mexico has a distinct and identifiable culture.

Yet, applying the argument they use against America, Mexico can be said to have no such thing. Two defining features of culture-language and religious values-were foisted upon Mexico's indigenous peoples by the Spanish empire. In America, by contrast, our language and religious values were brought to us by those who settled and founded our nation.

Mexico's national pastime, soccer, has been traced by some back to ancient Rome and as it is known today was first played in Britain. The first official game of America's national pastime, baseball, was played in Hoboken, N.J. in 1846. As for our other two most popular sports, American creativity transformed rugby into the sport of football, and basketball was born at a YMCA.

The traditional music of Mexico is played on instruments exported from the West and recorded with technology made possible by American inventors. The modern music of Mexico is largely influenced by America and uses instruments, such as the electric guitar, that we created.

In my trips to Mexico I noticed that blue jeans were a very popular clothing choice. But these too are not Mexican in origin, instead hailing from the United States.

I think you get the point.

Yet many have bought into the myth of America being a multicultural nation without a culture of its own. In reality, America has enjoyed a cultural output of unprecedented depth and unparalleled greatness.

Our rich culture has been exported all over the world, mimicked, copied and reproduced. We are the nation of cinema and radio, crooning and jazz, convertibles and diners, the Old West and New York City. Our culture includes Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne, Frank Sinatra, Bing Crosby, Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Jackie Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Douglas Macarthur, Milton Friedman, Edgar Allen Poe, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Thomas Edison and again, for emphasis, Elvis Presley.

Most importantly, we have shared with the world the cultural value of individualism and liberty-a value rooted in our unique and glorious history of settlers, pioneers and frontiersman.

Continue to worship at the alter of multiculturalism and we may come to see that we are participating in the sacrifice of the one culture which binds us all.

And that is a sacrifice the world cannot afford to make.

Stephen Miller is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Monday.
Source (Archive)

Him putting a racist black woman in her place:

Paranoia​

By Stephen Miller
September 25, 2006 | 5:00am GMT

"You're a racist." She spat out the words with a loud, gleeful disdain, making sure everyone around was aware of her discovery. "I am?" I wasn't surprised by her accusation. It had already come to my attention that this had been a favorite topic of hers. This was just the first time she gave me the courtesy of saying it to my face.

"Yes. You hate black people." This should get interesting, I thought.

"Really? I hate black people? What would ever give you that idea?" In similar encounters, I've found this simple question was often enough to render friendly slanderers incoherent.

"I've read your columns." Oh no, she'd found me out.

"Is there anything in particular I've written that is racist?" Perhaps my column about Christmas?

"Most of your columns have been racist." And to think I still have a job.

"I see. So it's your opinion that The Chronicle felt it needed to fill the racist niche on their editorial pages and that's why they hired me?" Maybe we should take it to the next level and host an annual Aryan-Socialist mixer.

"You just think you're better than everyone else don't you?" I can certainly think of someone I've got beat.

"I can certainly think of someone I've got beat." Like I said.

Now my skin, in addition to being somewhat pasty, is also very thick. I wasn't personally wounded by these remarks. On a moral level, I was disturbed by the private and public slander, by an accusation that was so grotesquely false and baseless; but sadly, it was far from the first time someone had created this paranoid illusion out of the simple fact that I'm a conservative. And, as in every case, the person couldn't, for obvious reasons, produce a single example of anything to offer even the remotest support for their fantasy.

In this case, however, I wanted to address a larger problem at Duke-the fact that people like this can, with relative impunity, accuse conservatives of racism and that secondly, their friends or classmates won't call them out on it. Usually, I'd be happy just making the slanderer look like a fool, which I can promise you, doesn't require much effort. But this time I wanted to address head-on this sort of racially delusional behavior which strikes all too many of our peers. Plus, she'd apparently already spread this dangerous fiction around to anyone she could somehow get to listen. So I explained to her:

"You've got a mental disease." In fairness, it was more of a condition than a disease.

"Excuse me?" What an amazing switch from defamatory to indignant.

"That's right, you have a mental disease. You're obsessed with race. You see everything in terms of race, and you see everyone who disagrees with your worldviews as a racist. And guess what? Almost everybody you've been talking to thinks something is wrong with you. They've come up to me and told me. They're just afraid to tell you what they think because they're worried you'll call them a racist." That should give her pause.

She then started asking other people in the class if they shared my view of her. They were tellingly silent.

Again, I share this story to call attention to a serious problem on our campus. I'm sure everyone's heard a friend or a classmate or a peer make the bizarre leap from knowing someone is a conservative to claiming he or she is a racist. Next time this happens, ask the person to support his or her position. They'll usually turn into a stammering mess.

We live in a society where a single accusation can lead to ruin. Indeed, we've seen on Duke's own campus, with the lacrosse scandal, how truly dangerous an environment of racial paranoia is. When people adopt the outrageous assumption that conservatives, or wealthy white people or successful white people have it in for blacks and other minorities, and we let that assumption stand, we not only do a tremendous disservice to our society in general but also very particularly to these minorities themselves.

If, say, a young black kid thinks that no matter how hard they work wealthy white people are going to hold them back, (which could not be more false; companies in fact often go out of their way to achieve diversity) it saps their motivation and has devastating results on their potential for success.

Yet, the Democrats continue to fuel the destructive vision of a powerful, racist white oppressor from which they need to protect black voters in order to keep their lock on that vote. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for instance, speaking to a black audience said that the Republicans ran Congress like a "plantation, and you know what I mean." It's one of a million examples.

Let's each do our own part on Duke's campus to break down this backward lie and not condescend to those who levy the false racist charge by letting it pass.

Anything short of that is a very real racial injustice.

Stephen Miller is a Trinity senior. His column runs every other Monday.
Source (Archive)

Calling out Hollywood for being woke propaganda (in 2006!):

Hollywood and the culture war​

By Stephen Miller | 01/11/2006

Syriana. Munich. Goodnight and Good Luck. Brokeback Mountain. Fun With Dick and Jane (seriously). Notice a trend?

The movie theater is now one of the left's most powerful tools. Just ask Michael Moore if you don't believe me. All sorts of leftist tripe, subtle and glaring, is filling our nation's movie screens. America is in the midst of a huge culture war, and Hollywood has decided to use the assets available to it to take part in the battle-which of course means intelligence will not be a factor.

American cinema is being converted into a propaganda machine. For the doubters, let me flip it around. When was the last time you saw a conservative film? Maybe a movie about the evils of the Islamic holy war, the merits of capitalism, even one about America as a force of good in the world? Or, dare I say it, a movie with a positive take on the Bush administration?

As you know, those movies aren't being made. That's because the Hollywood crowd feels sympathy for the terrorists, detests Republicans and sees America as an obstacle to a better world. Like their frequent beneficiaries in the Capitol, the Hollywood elite are growing increasingly disdainful, and accordingly they are using their medium more and more as a means for advancing their far-left agenda.

Of course this is not limited to the silver screen. Shows like Queer As Folk, The "L" Word, Will & Grace and Sex and the City, all do their part to promote alternative lifestyles and erode traditional values.

When the script writers for The West Wing have Martin Sheen's character say things like the second amendment is a "stupid-ass amendment," they're not just thinking about ratings. Hollywood wants to promote its views-and it knows popular TV shows and movies will do more to change the landscape of America than George Clooney's moronic interviews ever could. (Most recently, Clooney showcased his brilliant analytical skills by explaining to Jay Leno that the Iraq War was all about oil.)

Speaking of late-night entertainment, David Letterman, who's made little effort to hide his contempt for conservatives, recently demonstrated how far leftist entertainers are willing to go. Letterman invited Bill O'Reilly on the show, and right before O'Reilly came out, Letterman surreptitiously stirred his pencil in O'Reilly's drink. He timed it carefully so that O'Reilly had probably just exited the green room. Since the cup was on Letterman's desk, O'Reilly later asked if it was his water, and, snickering, Letterman informed him that it was and then got a good chuckle watching O'Reilly take a few sips. It was a disgusting and transparent display.

Of course, this sick little prank was overlooked by the mainstream media. But can you imagine what the outcry would have been if Letterman did that to someone like, say, Jesse Jackson or Ted Kennedy?

For the entire interview, Letterman attacked and insulted O'Reilly, even telling him that he thought "60 percent of what you say is crap." Unfortunately for Letterman, he knows nearly nothing about politics and he came off as a typical angry, ignorant leftist. To see for yourself, go to O'Reilly's website, where a video of the interview is posted.

By contrast, when Jane Fonda was promoting the inspired film Monster-in-Law, she stopped by Late Night and Letterman fawned over her with such deference it looked as though any moment he'd stoop down and kiss her feet. Maybe he did after the show.

There is no doubt that the left has a monopoly in entertainment and that it's one they guard carefully. It's no coincidence that Michael Moore may be sitting at home right now admiring his Oscar while Mel Gibson didn't even get a nomination for his heralded film, Passion of the Christ. It's also no coincidence that once-fading star Alec Baldwin, who's made a name for himself as an outspoken leftist, has now seen a massive career resurgence, along with fellow Bush-hater Sean Penn. Hollywood is in fact so left that its most prestigious members-the actors, actresses and directors who have won Academy Awards-give approximately 4,000 percent more money to Democrats than to Republicans.

From Jamie Foxx's passionate pleas for the clemency of quadruple-homicide convict and Crips founder "Tookie" Williams to Kanye West's comment during a live Katrina relief concert that "George Bush doesn't care about black people" (I guess he didn't hear that Bush's African AIDS program is the largest in American history, or that it turns out the Katrina victims were disproportionately white) America's entertainers are fighting mightily to promote their leftist agenda. There is a huge ideological war being waged for the future of the country, and after the education system, the entertainment industry is the left's most influential resource. And believe me, they are going to use it.

So next time you go see a movie or watch TV think about who-and what-you may be supporting.

Stephen Miller is a Trinity junior. His colum n runs every other Wednesday.
Source (Archive)

He wrote many more articles for the Duke Chronicle (archive), mostly about the Duke Lacrosse Case. The dude was born based.
 
You didn't understand my message, my point is that he sees these problems and pretends to have a solution which is just him saying he will give people free shit.
I understood you perfectly. He's lying, but American voters are retarded. They will vote for the fraud that pretends to hear their concerns over Republican politicians who's response is "what inflation? The economy is great!"

As Scott Greer pointed out in his recent column the Communist sandnigger in New York received relatively few votes from his co ethnics, most of his supporters were middle class whites concerned about slipping to proletariat status.

People do not like being ignored and having their concerns dismissed.

This is kind of a fucking problem if you don't want Communist browns running the country.
 
Kristi Noem reveals the actual reason shitlibs oppose Alligator Alcatraz:

But there is good news for Democrats. Alligator Alcatraz will house only 5,000 foreign invaders. Biden’s handlers imported millions of them.
The fun asterisk in there is that as far as I'm aware, Alligator Alcatraz is simply a holding/processing pen. Illegals get sent in, their due process finished up (because they do get some due process, it's just that illegals are pretty straight forward to process, and a lot of the criminal ones were already sentenced years ago, it was just delayed), and then they can be sent to whatever third world country will take them! That's what they're doing with Guantanamo as well I believe.
 
View attachment 7570948

IQ spectrum between 2 Blacks
Amusing note: 4 of the top 4 slots for most words used by a new justice are women.

Also:
Jackson - 11,003 words
Thomas - 96 words

The duality of the American black.

Nope!

Max deduction on overtime will be 12.500$ and max deduction for tips will be 25.000$.
There needed to be a cap on this, otherwise it would immediately be abused. "Our software engineers are now hourly and make minimum wage. But our overtime policy is 10x overtime pay and you're on call 24/7. Also, our engineers are now working 80 hours a week. They make 3200 a week (like before) but now only 320 of that is taxable. (7.25 × 40 = 320) + (72.5 × 40 = 2900) Sounds great for the individual, but payroll taxes are 34% of all federal revenue. Individual income tax is 52% of all federal revenue. Combined that's 84% of all federal revenue, so losing 90% of income + payroll taxes means losing 75% of all federal tax revenue. It would add 2.6 trillion PER YEAR to the deficit.
I will not forget this. Buncha traitorous cretins.
See above.
 
lol Massie's such a little bitch. He's made the classic mistake most people who can't meme always make: 1) your memes have to be funny, not forced, and 2) you have to be correct and/or in a position to do what you're flexing you can do.

I hope people endlessly rub this in his fucking face.
I really hope Massie pulls out of this crashout, I did like him before his wife passed and he seems to really REALLY be struggling.

Rumors of him hooking up with Christina Pushaw, and my god I hope that isn't the case.
 
Yes. Did you really expect them to actually obey? Fortunately with SCOTUS ruling the way they did, the administration can safely ignore this kind of shit now.
Not really. The left will never learn a damn thing. They think they're kings and queens of America. on the right side of history. So the end, utopia, justifies the means, breaking laws.
 
Back