- Joined
- May 2, 2020
This is reminding me all over again of the Discord database that I remember mentioning earlier in the thread when furcleaner was brought up. Which means I'm pretty sure this is over furries and the hefty correlation of it to sex pests, but they want immunity for being furries of course. After all the Discord database (the one by H0nda or whatever his name was) was notorious because you would put in a user ID and it would tell you all the servers that H0nda's bot had caught them as a member of by joining and scraping. Countless furries took to spamming @ Discord on twitter yelling at them to do something about it and it was DMCA'd within the week. It went back up on dmca.gripe but eventually disappeared. But you would notice the ONLY people complaining about this were all furry accounts. Because all you had to do to prove furry lies wrong was to put these people in the user lookup and see all the furry fetish porn and erotic roleplaying servers they were a part of.New 'uben 'im 'ideo
Discord is notorious for considering furries a "protected characteristic" to the point of Quackity being immediately banned off of discord for doing a funny video where he goes into furry servers and gawks. That's actually what brought attention to how cub porn was given special immunity from the no shota/loli porn rule and eventually snowballed into discord having to begrudgingly apply the ban to cub porn as well just to try to stop the outrage.
The reason? Well, as known from back in the Quackity incident, the reason is because the near-entirety of Discord's moderation team are all furries that meet each other at local conventions wearing their discord hoodies. The only people that consider furries to be a protected minority ARE furries, this is consistent. If you want to know more about this I'd recommend reading the thread on AllTheFoxes, a furry discord trust & safety team moderator back during the incident.