The 8GB version isn't a "flagship." Your mentioning it doesn't make it so. The flagship product is the one with better specs, not worse ones. That's what "flagship" means. Nigga.
You're very strange. When the cow revolution comes, you will still be spared, but only because you are amusing.
Can you post proof or evidence of this?
No, they haven't. They've been the opposite of up front.
Truth. Any time a vendor refuses to just come right out and say "we know X units have been sold by retailers into consumer's hands, with Y returns and Z warranty replacements or refurbishments," it is guaranteed they're lying. Same with software sales. It's trivial to just say "we sold X copies on Y platform." It doesn't even take any fancy accounting to produce those numbers. They're just automatically available.
I imagine much of this is just the fact that Sony's recent attempts to keep up with what AMD does itself just ends up being a half-baked version of whatever AMD eventually releases. The great technical architects of Playstation have all either retired or are planning to retire soon, and it's a tough sell to Sony higher-ups to track down new people to replace them when you can just lean on AMD who'll do it because it's their core business.
Mark Cerny, the consultant who works for Sony and with AMD, has been sharing techniques, technologies and expertise between the two companies. Cerny's boost-clock method has been adopted by AMD, and he worked with them on some RDNA 3 customisation, which is why the PS5 has in small parts RDNA 2, 2.5 and 3, where as Microsoft has RDNA and RDNA 2 in the Series consoles.
Their last technical expert, Mark Cerny, said a few years back that the PS6 will be the last Sony console he makes, as he plans to retire. However, anyone who knows experts like Cerny, those who love what they do, know that they never retire. My guess is Cerny will uncouple himself from Playstation and their retardationstation 6 and fiddle about in the R+D section at AMD, thinking up weird and wonderful ways to push the industry forward.
The moment has already passed and it was the PS4/Xbone generation.
AMD was wise enough to ditch Bulldozer and bring back Jim Keller to reinvent themselves.
Sony is probably still buttmad over Philips claiming invention over the CD back in the 80s.
Here's the thing, revenue isn't profit. Microsoft swapped profit figures to revenue towards the end of the xbox 360 era.
Make PlayStation All-Stars 2 but it’s a hero shooter with gacha mechanics, and overflow it with references to past games (not just Astrobot memberberries but actual characters with voice acting and everything). You’re welcome, Sony.
If there's an all stars 2, it's probably gonna be 20 astrobots wearing different costumes, not the actual characters.
Revenue is how much money has come in over a set period time. For FY24, it means 12k games brought in the same amount of money as 8k games. I would like to see what the profit was for those two FYs, because pounds to pennies the profit will be lower in '24 than it was in '22, and that's possibly the reason we see revenue and not profit.
intel were also notorious pieces of shit to the point they got slapped with a fine. it also took amd for the consumer market to ever get more than 4 fucking cores.
I wonder why they continue to buy the Switch 1. Aren't they both sold at a similar price compared to the rest of the world?
