US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insanity. You don't like Tucker Carlson while supporting Trump but if anyone else doesn't like him while supporting Trump they're automatically MIGA. You also haven't provided a single reason for why that might make someone MIGA, only alluding to obscure science fiction for whatever reason.
No, I said very specifically:
A simple way to know if someone is MIGA rather than MAGA is by hatred of Tucker but 'support' of Trump.
followed by:
MIGA people fucking hate his existence and cannot, must not allow someone to say or mention that as an identifier unchallenged.
and in the post you quoted:
Note, that's not the same as hating him.
the problem you're running into here Moishe is an argument that is self-contained. I've literally said everything I need to already so, really, all you're doing when saying this stupid shit is showing your ass. You can pretend to be retarded infinitely, my point's been made, and won't be unmade, by you pretending it matters whether or not people trust, like, dislike, or hold any other emotion and/or opinion other than seething fucking hatred for this mildly autistic newsman.

The comparison to Scramblers is due to you not getting this, because the reason you're not getting it - assuming of course you're not just pretending to be mentally handicapped in this specific manner - is because you're acting like there's some semantic follow-on that 'counters' what I said.

There exists no 'counter'. You have already proven my point several times over. I have nothing to 'prove' nor 'argue'. Again, the point of the statement is that it is a closed, self-proving statement that proves itself by being irresistible bait to your ilk.
 
Buddy of mine linked me this, and the moment I saw the thumbnail I had a chuckle:
1751846385053.webp

I have yet to watch it, but the name of Portable Orange with the broccoli haircut is a bit on the nose. Based on the description alone I would reckon this guy is a neocon soyboy who was mad when Romney was destroyed by Trump. He also mentions that his path is unique, but I've heard of his political path being that of a few other folks I know. Here's a Yewtube link (I tried Preservetube, but it's causing issues right now, I'll try it again later and edit this post if it works properly).
Quck Edit: he's a tranny defender
1751846507395.webp
1751847136277.webp
 
Remember when neoliberals screeched that they wanted abortion to be “safe, legal, and rare”? You probably didn’t believe them. You were right:
https://xcancel.com/OliLondonTV/status/1941379200340066344
1751742734939.webp

Breitbart reports on her stylish hat:

Sure it is. Just like sexually mutilating children to turn them into perverts on behalf of LGBT dogma — another policy popular among liberals.
Something conservatards need to understand, but won't (because they're "beautiful losers"), is that this shit - abortion and trannies and child grooming all alike - is evil. Evil and contrary to one of the most basic functions of society: protecting the weak from harm. And a society that actively promotes it is an evil society, regardless of whatever it was before or whatever you hope to make it into.

You don't have to entertain it with debate. You don't have to be polite to those that support it. You don't have to abide by the laws of society where it's concerned.

Those that support it should be treated the way they deserved: with absolute coldness and violence when necessary to prevent it.
 
This may be a stretch, but I genuinely believe that Sam Hyde could start a political party today with whatever cash he can find in his couch cushions, and it would absolutely throttle Elon's Call Center Party in terms of impact and public support. Who the fuck is going to vote for Elon's party other than shit-slurping jeets? Not a rhetorical question, I'm seriously struggling to imagine who this fucking person is. Is it a MAGA boomer who suddenly ditches Trump's political project because he has decided at the 11th hour that Indians are heccin' Americans? They just want to grill, for Pete's sake. They could grill with a spic, but a dot head would rather criminalize beef consumption. Is it a college art hoe who was cheering on Tesla dealerships being torched 3 months ago, suddenly swayed by the faux patriotism of the "America Party" into voting for Elon's stooges rather than voting blue no matter who? Is it a fence-sitting soccer mom who thinks politics has gotten too nasty recently, and so decides to embrace that nice billionaire who she's heard 0 positive things about since the early 2010's if ever? This shit is doomed, I'm confident that the Libertarian candidate would blow their candidate out of the fucking water if they decided to run someone in 2028.
 
the problem you're running into here Moishe is an argument that is self-contained.
Except it can't be. You made a statement, not an argument. You're conflating your statement as the end all to an argument that never happened. It's a very womanly thing to do.

I'll give you an example to show you how retarded you are. I say "Anyone who doesn't like pepperoni pizza is a faggot." Under your rules, this is a complete argument that is self contained.

In reality, there's obvious questions that come up. People ask why do you think that, what about if you eat pineapple or plain pizza, so on. I refuse to answer and accuse anyone who disagrees or has questions about my argument of seething.

What you set up is a Kafka trap where you make a statement and if anyone disagrees with your statement or asks you to clarify, you just accuse them of being MIGA. You're pretending this is some proof that's self proving when it very clearly isn't. You never define what makes the proof true.

It's peak pseudo intellectualism where you think just saying things you think are true is an argument
 
Except it can't be. You made a statement, not an argument.
Semantics again.

If A Then B; Else C is a classical propositional form of presenting an argument.

If anyone's arguing like a fucking woman here, it's you, retard. The rest of your pilpul is similarly retarded screeching.
 
Buddy of mine linked me this, and the moment I saw the thumbnail I had a chuckle:
View attachment 7611015

I have yet to watch it, but the name of Portable Orange with the broccoli haircut is a bit on the nose. Based on the description alone I would reckon this guy is a neocon soyboy who was mad when Romney was destroyed by Trump. He also mentions that his path is unique, but I've heard of his political path being that of a few other folks I know. Here's a Yewtube link (I tried Preservetube, but it's causing issues right now, I'll try it again later and edit this post if it works properly).
Quck Edit: he's a tranny defender
View attachment 7611021
View attachment 7611061
"I joined the far right"

The far right in question was watching some owned SJW clips
 
This may be a stretch, but I genuinely believe that Sam Hyde could start a political party today with whatever cash he can find in his couch cushions, and it would absolutely throttle Elon's Call Center Party in terms of impact and public support. Who the fuck is going to vote for Elon's party other than shit-slurping jeets? Not a rhetorical question, I'm seriously struggling to imagine who this fucking person is. Is it a MAGA boomer who suddenly ditches Trump's political project because he has decided at the 11th hour that Indians are heccin' Americans? They just want to grill, for Pete's sake. They could grill with a spic, but a dot head would rather criminalize beef consumption. Is it a college art hoe who was cheering on Tesla dealerships being torched 3 months ago, suddenly swayed by the faux patriotism of the "America Party" into voting for Elon's stooges rather than voting blue no matter who? Is it a fence-sitting soccer mom who thinks politics has gotten too nasty recently, and so decides to embrace that nice billionaire who she's heard 0 positive things about since the early 2010's if ever? This shit is doomed, I'm confident that the Libertarian candidate would blow their candidate out of the fucking water if they decided to run someone in 2028.
Sam Hyde is ugly and gross. I understand why the edgier parts of the internet worship him like a God but the idea that normie housewives would vote for Hyde is insane.

His affinity for girls in the 15-17 age range would sink him immediately.
 
If I were Elon, I'd just abandon America and relocate everything to India. I mean, why not? It's a country full of highly-qualified individuals ready for any task you give them, not to mention the country's infrastructure is just prime and ready for a power player of his level. Honestly, if America is just going to continually get in his way with all this immigration nonsense and refuse to give him EV credits when New Delhi is probably chomping at the bit to give him government money, it just makes sense for him to move all his ventures to the booming Indian market.
 
Semantics again.

If A Then B; Else C is a classical propositional form of presenting an argument.

If anyone's arguing like a fucking woman here, it's you, retard. The rest of your pilpul is similarly retarded screeching.
It's a statement, not an argument. An argument involves explanation and reasoning. If you wrote:

"People who hate Tucker but support Trump are MIGA because Tucker consistently represents Trump’s populist message better than most conservative media. Disliking him suggests a hidden neocon or establishment agenda, which aligns with MIGA behavior."

That's an argument.

If A then B; Else C doesn't make sense in this context. B has to derive from A in a logical sense while C is stand alone. You're confusing programming logic for formal logic.
 
but I genuinely believe that Sam Hyde could start a political party today with whatever cash he can find in his couch cushions
Funding is important, but 2016 and 2024 Trump and arguably democrats too showed America you don't need a ton of money if you tap into the right ideas, emotions and have a campaign that gets people enthused to vote for you.
'Member how Kamala blew 1 billion dollars on a failed campaign trying to convince people Orange Man bad for a third cycle? I 'member.

I agree with your point. The only ones left I can think of who would support Elon are tech bros who microdosed too much on LSD and ketamine and HB1 foreigners but they obv can't vote. Boomer women hate him from reliving the '60s with the "Stop Elon" protests, Boomer men will stick with Trump. He could reach some lefty edgelords from reddit who just want to own Trump and his supporters with some 'IamVerySmart' posts but they would likely never vote for him. Nothing about the American Party screams broad coalition thats a real threat. If he wants to push space and spending issues, just be a lobbyist. Creating your own gay and retarded party is dumb.
 
Back