Disaster Exclusive: DOJ, FBI conclude Epstein had no "client list," committed suicide - Investigators found "no incriminating 'client list' " of Epstein's, "no credible evidence ... that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals," and no "evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties," the memo adds.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-client-list-trump-administration
https://archive.ph/prOzH
President Trump's Justice Department and FBI have concluded they have no evidence that convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epsteinblackmailed powerful figures, kept a "client list" or was murdered, according to a memo detailing the findings obtained by Axios.


Why it matters: The findings represent the first time Trump's administration has officially contradicted conspiracy theories about Epstein's activities and his death — theories that had been pushed by the FBI's top two officials before Trump appointed them to the bureau.

Zoom in: According to the memo, investigators closely examined footage of Epstein's Manhattan prison cell between around 10:40 pm on Aug. 9, 2019, when Epstein was locked in his cell, and around 6:30 am the next day, when he was found unresponsive.

  • The footage, which was reviewed by Axios but couldn't be verified independently, showed no one entering the area, the administration said.
  • "The FBI enhanced the relevant footage by increasing its contrast, balancing the color, and improving its sharpness for greater clarity and viewability," the memo says.
  • Investigators found "no incriminating 'client list' " of Epstein's, "no credible evidence ... that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals," and no "evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties," the memo adds.
Zoom out: As MAGA influencers, Patel and Bongino had been among the loudest voices touting Epstein conspiracy theories.

  • Since joining the government as Trump appointees they've been more measured in talking about the Epstein investigation, and thrown cold water on the notion he was murdered.
  • "He killed himself," Bongino said on Fox News in May. "I've seen the whole file."
MAGA's media universe and some of its voices on Capitol Hill have expressed frustration with the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case since February, when DOJ released a tranche of Epstein-related files that were already publicly available.

Conservative figures panned the disclosure, saying it lacked new information.

  • "THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment," Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) posted then. "GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!"
The intrigue: When Elon Musk had a falling out with Trump last month, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files."

  • Trump posted on Truth Social a statement from former Epstein lawyer David Schoen, saying Trump wasn't implicated in any crime. Schoen had also represented Trump in his first impeachment trial.
Musk later deleted his accusation and other posts on X, saying he "went too far."
  • Still, the questions about whether Trump's name is in the government's Epstein files have persisted because they had been acquaintances who attended the same parties in the 1990s.
  • In a 2017 interview with author Michael Wolff, Epstein even claimed that at one point he was "Donald Trump's closest friend."
  • Trump, however, said in 2019 that he was "not a fan of Epstein" and hadn't "spoken to him for 15 years." He also said he had barred Epstein from his golf resorts in the early 2000s.
  • Democrats, meanwhile, have demanded to know more about the Epstein-Trump relationship.
What's next: The DOJ and FBI say in the memo that no "further disclosure" of Epstein-related material "would be appropriate or warranted."

  • The memo says much of the material relates to child sexual abuse, details of Epstein's victims, and information that would expose innocent individuals to "allegations of wrongdoing."
  • "Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography," the memo says.
Axios' Marc Caputo contributed to this story.
 
Didn't see this posted here yet. Love him or hate him, this is absolutely on point. I know it gets over-used, but this one really was a "FELL FOR IT AGAIN" contest winner.

1751931238300.webp
 
Much like locking up the Clintons, some deep state official whispered in his ear that it wasn't going to happen, and here's what WILL happen if you try.

I'm not at all suprised that this turned out the way it did. The people in power who did bad things, investigated themselves, and found nothing wrong? Who could have (not) seen that coming?
People that thought that the swamp would somehow release the Tzar Bomba of Kompromat on every major politican and celeberty for the last 50 years. LOL. They are keeping that for them selves. That is the glowniggers 100 megaton nuke to use against its enemies. Nobody gets to take that away. EVER.
 
People that thought that the swamp would somehow release the Tzar Bomba of Kompromat on every major politican and celeberty for the last 50 years. LOL. They are keeping that for them selves. That is the glowniggers 100 megaton nuke to use against its enemies. Nobody gets to take that away. EVER.
Buddy. Who, exactly, do you think they would use this hypothetical Kompromat on? At this point, even if they released a video of [INSERT POWERFUL FIGURE HERE] fucking a kid, it would be out of the news cycle in 12 hours and memory holed as AI because "Why are they just putting this out now?"

What nuclear political figure is still out there that could be harmed by this?
 
Buddy. Who, exactly, do you think they would use this hypothetical Kompromat on? At this point, even if they released a video of [INSERT POWERFUL FIGURE HERE] fucking a kid, it would be out of the news cycle in 12 hours and memory holed as AI because "Why are they just putting this out now?"

What nuclear political figure is still out there that could be harmed by this?
Anyone and everyone they have a problem with that cannot be solved with conventional means. Blackmail is a powerful thing. And just knowing (you) have it is very powerful in of itself. The Democrats have treated Trump with kid gloves this term, i fucking wonder why...
 
Epstein didn't blackmail anyone. He tried to blackmail someone and that's why he was the one who got arrested and "killed himself." You don't try to blackmail extremely rich and powerful people about how they're very active members of the fuck 15 year old girls club. That's a capital offense
 
Buddy. Who, exactly, do you think they would use this hypothetical Kompromat on? At this point, even if they released a video of [INSERT POWERFUL FIGURE HERE] fucking a kid, it would be out of the news cycle in 12 hours and memory holed as AI because "Why are they just putting this out now?"

What nuclear political figure is still out there that could be harmed by this?
We already know all the people that went to Epstein Island. Even if 100% of them are pedos, the names are old news and there is no one earth shattering on the list. I laugh when people say releasing the list would cause social disarray. We already know Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Tom Hanks is on there, and those are the only really exciting names. Maybe Oprah. Everyone else no one cares about or we've already accepted are pedos.
I also don't understand why they can't release a partial list, or give us SOMETHING. Can't they sacrifice Prince Andrew, or one of the less connected literally who's? The whole thing is just so weird. None of the explanations make sense to me.
 
Figure it out dicknips. Who else would be fucking kids on epstien's island? Politicians retard.
LIKE WHAT POLITICIANS STILL MATTER?? Jesus man, that's what I'm asking. You're so up your own ass about your Kompromat Fan Fiction that you can't see that anyone of consequence who might have been diddling kids there is no longer relevant.

We already know all the people that went to Epstein Island. Even if 100% of them are pedos, the names are old news and there is no one earth shattering on the list. I laugh when people say releasing the list would cause social disarray. We already know Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Tom Hanks is on there, and those are the only really exciting names. Maybe Oprah. Everyone else no one cares about or we've already accepted are pedos.
I also don't understand why they can't release a partial list, or give us SOMETHING. Can't they sacrifice Prince Andrew, or one of the less connected literally who's? The whole thing is just so weird. None of the explanations make sense to me.
That's what I'm saying. That generation of power is mostly working its way out of relevency. And this weird fantasy of "keeping blackmail material" around against intense public scrutiny is retarded.
 
That's what I'm saying. That generation of power is mostly working its way out of relevency. And this weird fantasy of "keeping blackmail material" around against intense public scrutiny is retarded.
Yeah, I'm agreeing with you, basically. I wonder how this blackmail is supposed to work anyway. Let's say Tom Hanks fucks up whatever work he's supposedly doing for mossad. Now what? They release the child rape video on YouTube, and expect everyone to pretend he was the only one on epstein island? That wouldn't raise an eyebrow at that point?
How come none of this supposed blackmail ever makes it's way to the public? It's hard to believe that there has been 100% compliance of everyone involved in the scheme. Nobody ever messes up?
It's the same problem as them not releasing Trump files if they existed. Why wouldn't they? If they refuse to release single files under any circumstances, then what exactly are they even for?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CaliforniaRaisin
Yeah, I'm agreeing with you, basically. I wonder how this blackmail is supposed to work anyway. Let's say Tom Hanks fucks up whatever work he's supposedly doing for mossad. Now what? They release the child rape video on YouTube, and expect everyone to pretend he was the only one on epstein island? That wouldn't raise an eyebrow at that point?
How come none of this supposed blackmail ever makes it's way to the public? It's hard to believe that there has been 100% compliance of everyone involved in the scheme. Nobody ever messes up?
It's the same problem as them not releasing Trump files if they existed. Why wouldn't they? If they refuse to release single files under any circumstances, then what exactly are they even for?
Our surveillance state is one of soft blackmail of sorts; the heavy surveillance and data gathering keeps the average person from doing anything unwanted due to them knowing they're constantly being surveilled, so they fall in line and police themselves. Blackmail kind of works the same way.
 
If there was no epstien client list, what did the FBI director and Pam Bondi have put on their desks when they said "we have an epstien client list in our possession"?

And they're saying they don't know who the clients were, even though they have records of everyone who went there?

Even worse, look at the (((posters))) here on the farms that are dismissing or downplaying this event and saying "ackshually, how does this personally affect you?". They're not paid-for plants though.
 
Last edited:
Back