US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay guys let's bet:
- Brown
- Euro
- Doomer

Because I've run into people like you a lot and it's always "oh Americans are fat and won't do anything" who also said "Trump would get cheated out of the election and nobody would do nothing".

"All Americans are lazy" but also you you have all these posts talking about wanting things to be better.
By your own logic, wouldn't that justify companies not hiring Americans?

You want to know who also said similar?
Elon.

I mean the guy has a point.

If they offed Trump you really think there would have been a civil war?

Lol come on man. People are angry and disillusioned but at the end of the day they have a mortgage to pay and kids to feed. (Also laziness lol!)

America isn’t Syria or Burkina Faso or some other shithole where you can coup the government because shit is so dire it doesn’t matter who’s in charge.

If the right REALLY had it in them to go 1861 all over again, you really think Jan 6th would have been more than a rowdy protest, no?

Fuck, if Americans still had it in them, you wouldn’t already have millions of illegals coming across and billions to Israel every year.

At the end of the day, nobody is going to risk their mortgage, livelihood and retirement because they’re angry that the other branch of the uniparty is in charge.
 
local elected officials: "thanks for the free mansion whitey."
This is another issue, programs like I mentioned require prerequisites:
  • Funding from the government that is actually substantial
  • A lack of corruption from the local government
  • Oversight from the Treasury and Department of Education
  • Said departments can't be corrupt either
 
Allocating more funding towards schools in low income areas alongside having teachers who aren't total incompetent faggots is the best way to handle the issue of the school to prison pipeline.
We tried that. It just resulted in expensive broken shit in nigger schools and top teachers quitting because the problem with niggers is they're niggers.
 
Karen Bass wins: Trump can no longer enforce Immigration Law in LA.

We are one ruling closer to a Federal Judge ruling Immigration Law and deportations can no longer be enforced in the US period, and that all immigrants must be given amnesty.

This is where we are. Total Lawfare to stop Trump's agenda and change the laws of the US.
what ground does that judge have to stand on? In actual reality. Not "Trump is doing things we don't like. That's all the reason we need stop him".

The judge made their ruling. now lets see them enact it. Because this will not stop DHS and ICE from doing raids in California.
 
We tried that. It just resulted in expensive broken shit in nigger schools and top teachers quitting because the problem with niggers is they're niggers.
Which is why I believe that we need to try it again and this time have proper security measures in place; the issue the black community faces is that their areas are filled to the brim with drugs, guns, and crackheads.
 
I mean the guy has a point.

If they offed Trump you really think there would have been a civil war?

Lol come on man. People are angry and disillusioned but at the end of the day they have a mortgage to pay and kids to feed. (Also laziness lol!)

America isn’t Syria or Burkina Faso or some other shithole where you can coup the government because shit is so dire it doesn’t matter who’s in charge.

If the right REALLY had it in them to go 1861 all over again, you really think Jan 6th would have been more than a rowdy protest, no?

Fuck, if Americans still had it in them, you wouldn’t already have millions of illegals coming across and billions to Israel every year.

At the end of the day, nobody is going to risk their mortgage, livelihood and retirement because they’re angry that the other branch of the uniparty is in charge.
Paraphrasing Null: "As long as we have unlimited access to food, video games, and porn there will be no civil war in America." I think Null is mostly right in this thought, even if I might have butchered his quote. The only people that are willing to get off their ass with their guns and fight for a change they want in this country are Thomas Crooks leftist types, the types that we saw shoot that ICE member in the neck, and start riots in the streets with Mexicans.
 
Andrew Jackson had two duels, one of which involved both shooting into the air, and the other of which resulted in Jackson's wounding and Dickinson's death; is that what you mean?
In the context of today's world, a duel between two men is the most civilized, albeit, ruthless way to settle a dispute. Bear in mind that civilization has not evolved out of it yet.
I remind you that you are talking to a nigger who has no basic historical foundation or perspective despite a college education.
I bet the next thing you'll tell me is that Theodore Roosevelt's addresses or Andrew Jackson's papers compare to a Donald Trump tweet.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
appointing judges purely based on competence would be cool, but in a system where judges wield significant political power that would be just stupid.
when judges are political players, you have to put political loyalists there, otherwise you're gimping yourself in the eternal power struggle that is politics and putting your interests at a disadvantage.
I think it's brinksmanship. Back in the 60s and 70s, even conservative judges enforced desegregation once it came down from the Supreme Court, because that's just the law at that point. I'm not asking for politically neutral judges—you can take people with a good track record for your ideological beliefs. Just make sure they actually know what they're doing first. You can do that by choosing state court judges with proven track records in complex litigation.

While the left chooses a black woman because they're black and female, the right will choose some guy just because they wrote articles about how Roe v. Wade was bad and needs to be overturned. My sole point is that both are equally bad when it comes to deciding the vast majority of cases, which have zero ideological bent to them. I don't care what the judge thinks about trannies when they're ruling on a motion to vacate an arbitration award. I care about whether they know what the law on review of arbitration is. If you choose someone whose entire life is writing in a university about hating troons or loving troons, they tend not to really know anything about 99% of law.
 
Like I've said before, if biden did this shit you guys would rightfully sperg out. Trump was right when he said that he could shoot someone in broad daylight and he wouldn't lose a single voter.
"Memeing on an obese celebrity from the 80's is definitely comparable with shooting random strangers for fun"
-Kiwifarms User
 
Like I've said before, if biden did this shit you guys would rightfully sperg out. Trump was right when he said that he could shoot someone in broad daylight and he wouldn't lose a single voter.
If Biden started randomly shitting on Rosie McDonalds on Xitter that would probably be the highlight of Biden's entire career let alone his Presidency. It would literally be his shining moment.
 
"Memeing on an obese celebrity from the 80's is definitely comparable with shooting random strangers for fun"
-Kiwifarms User
If Biden started randomly shitting on Rosie McDonalds on Xitter that would probably be the highlight of Biden's entire career let alone his Presidency. It would literally be his shining moment.
You both seem to be ignoring the last part of my statement
 
You both seem to be ignoring the last part of my statement
The fuck are you talking about? My post was entirely focused on the last part of your statement. Clowning on a celebrity is in no way comparable with recreational murder. You've got AIDS in your brain, I'm afraid.
 
The fuck are you talking about? My post was entirely focused on the last part of your statement. Clowning on a celebrity is in no way comparable with recreational murder. You've got AIDS in your brain, I'm afraid.
I mean you're expecting honesty when all of them ignored this point I brought up.
All Americans are lazy" but also you you have all these posts talking about wanting things to be better?
By your own logic, wouldn't that justify companies not hiring Americans?

You want to know who also said similar?
Elon.

In order to keep screeching that Americans are nothing but fat and lazy and would never actually push back.
 
Back