I'm not urbanist, but anyone who disagrees or doesn't like sidewalks is a fat retard whose opinion shouldn't matter. If your urban/suburban planning doesn't account for foot traffic, it has to share the road, and no car driver wants to be stuck behind a 70 year old pedestrian.
Most roads have shoulders large enough to walk on if needed but its usually better to keep on the grass. The third world has sidewalks in places that aren't needed because they waste money on being retarded not because they are intelligent.
A shoulder is not nearly safe or as intentional as a sidewalk, you aren't nearly as safe from vehicles on a shoulder. Don't be contrarian about a good thing just because urbanists like it. I don't want to have to drive around random pedestrians, and as a pedestrian, i don't wanna increase the risk of getting hit by a vehicle. There is no good argument for wanting people and cars on the same stretch of road.
It was really the only way a large family like mine could afford to go see a movie.
Its free. Most of America only sees foot traffic from broken down cars. You are completely safe because people won't intentionally drive on a shoulder except in emergencies, yet will drive on a sidewalk in exponentially more cases.
Lmao.
I don't think you'll have to worry about it in your bedroom in your parents house.
I already made one you absolute retard cuck.
I think the misunderstanding here is the road that the Hohol was complaining about was in the middle of nowhere:
Which is what @Bonesjones was referring to when he said:
Not surprising. Remember when Pete Buttplug made a big deal about cycling to his office, after being dropped off maybe a few blocks away by his big security detail?
Not surprised.
Just like how Al Gore was pro-climate change until it benefitted him. Nothing really changes.
They probably just complain why they won't let them ride in with their bikes and have to sit outside on a lawnchair if they do. Actually I could imagine one of them taking a photo of them sitting on a lawn chair at a drive in posting it to r/fuckcars to make a point how "you don't really need a car".
Its the quintissential reddit-ism of smugging over a very easy to support or logical concept so much it start to sounds retarded, irrational and unfeasible, simply because they want to use it as a vehicle for further faggotry or just the simple fact that they're really fucking annoying about it
It's hilarious how these urbanists and redditors think Elon Musk's visionary ideas like the tunnel or hyperloop are ridiculous (not agreeing or disagreeing), but are OK with this Ponzi scheme of a project that endlessly consumed time and resources and has gone no where.
They can't even draw the obvious conclusions from fucking SNCF withdrawing from the project. Or is that the car/oil companies' fault?
Yeah well the SNCF is a French company. France is in Europe. You know what else is in Europe? That's right, Russia, chud.
