Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[StinkySnack]

View attachment 7647230
Greer trying to turn around Hardin's "empty head, pure of heart" phrase back at him. Par serve, 15 - Love !

Must've really stung for him to try and "no u" Hardin with it after this much time. Bet it's been bouncing around his empty head nonstop ever since Hardin first mentioned it.

 

[obsdj]

He did not. He wrote this on the first of this month, so at most he could have only submitted it 15 days in advance

He says, "As of July 1st, 2025 (the date of the last filing), the ECF file count is now at 345" but I don't think that's an indication that he wrote this on the first, it's just, as he says, the date of the last filing. He still probably didn't follow procedure though. I guess we'll find out soon enough when Hardin replies.

 

[Sneed Force One]

I fail to understand how Exhibit B relates to what he alleges it to be. Its just notice of EFC 276, submitted by himself, not "Court has been catching on to Defendants’ constant delays by denying their motion for extension".?

Unless of course, as usual, I'm being retarded?

 

[HackerX]

Part of his motion seeks relief under Rule 11 which:

1. Requires it to be a separate motion
   
   and
   
   
2. Requires it to be presented to the offending party 21 days in advance

So what's the expected response here? Hardin to file a response that he's doing it wrong (again) or just kinda ignore it and assume the court will sort it out as improper? I assume it's the former because leaving it up to common sense assumptions seems like a bad play, but how many times can Hardin file "Your honor, Plaintiff Greee didn't do it right because he's a retard who was busy with prostitution-related business matters" before it works against him?

Surely he did present it to Hardin, since he already got fucked by this rule once.
Surely

Tho I might be misremembering, he sperged about sanctions a bit too much to remember.

He's plightsperged about sanctions and protection orders countless times, but I think this is the closest he's come to actually follow through.

States he knows he’s not an attorney, but asks for more money than Null/Hardin were awarded

It's Russ's big brain move to get the financial lead on future sanctions, fines, fees, costs, etc. His loss condition is paying a single red cent to Hardin/Null so he's gonna shotgun everything to ensure that doesn't happen.

 

[Fetch!]

That's... like... the nicest thing a lolcow ever said about me. Thanks, Gree!

 

[Lapsus of the bepsus]

russhole, you fucking mongoloid turboretard, there are a number of people who can take care of this problem for you. theyre called lawyers, and at every single point in your lolcase you have been completely 100% free to hire one to manage the case for you and help you take down the farms. why havent you done it? youve paid the filing fee and youre buying property to start a brothel, clearly you can afford litigation

 

[AnOminous]

"Noooo stalker child, it will be YOUuuuu that owes MEeeee attorney's fees! Enjoy Prison!"

He's asking for atttorney's fees. What attorney is he claiming these fees are owed to?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He says, "As of July 1st, 2025 (the date of the last filing), the ECF file count is now at 345" but I don't think that's an indication that he wrote this on the first, it's just, as he says, the date of the last filing.

At any rate, given the date, this could not have been sent out more than 15 days in advance, so my point still stands.

I fail to understand how Exhibit B relates to what he alleges it to be

He never shows an exhibit that shows what he claims it shows. See, for example,

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.341.0.pdf

So what's the expected response here? Hardin to file a response that he's doing it wrong (again) or just kinda ignore it and assume the court will sort it out as improper?

The same as the last two times Greer pulled this.

What attorney is he claiming these fees are owed to?

Himself.

 

[But I Digress]

I'm seeing a whole lot of seething but what I don't see is proof you paid Josh his money.

 

[AnOminous]

Himself.

What's his bar number?

 

[Sneed Force One]

He's asking for atttorney's fees. What attorney is he claiming these fees are owed to?

My favourite part of that is his attempt at setting Tenth Circuit case precedent by citing the Second Circuit and asking the court to pretty please with a cherry on top apply it to this case because he's asking nicely.

I assume Hardin is going to find real cite where this was struck down in 10th, because he actually bothers to check his cites.

 

[Lurking9e9]

He's asking for atttorney's fees. What attorney is he claiming these fees are owed to?

 

[obsdj]

I fail to understand how Exhibit B relates to what he alleges it to be. Its just notice of EFC 276, submitted by himself, not "Court has been catching on to Defendants’ constant delays by denying their motion for extension".?

Unless of course, as usual, I'm being retarded?

You're not, the only thing the exhibit "proves" is that his motion to continue was indeed ECF 276. Greer also has an unfortunate typo there, indicating there's no reason for the Court to sanction Defendants. Oops.

Hardin to file a response that he's doing it wrong (again) or just kinda ignore it and assume the court will sort it out as improper? I assume it's the former because leaving it up to common sense assumptions seems like a bad play, but how many times can Hardin file "Your honor, Plaintiff Greee didn't do it right because he's a retard who was busy with prostitution-related business matters" before it works against him?

Not responding would be foolish. Besides, having to respond racks up yet another billable item for Hardin.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

What's his bar number?

1-800-im-a-skanky-ho

 

[Sneed Force One]

What's his bar number?

Somewhere between 0 & ∞

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 7647288

NOOOOO you can't just use the prevailing precedent in your own Circuit, you have to ignore your own Circuit and apply a universally ignored precedent from another Circuit!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What's his bar number?

NO, CHILD! The second circuit said in 1991 that Greer could get attorney's fees. I'm sorry you're such a hooker. Enjoy Sanctions!

 

[FamicomGorby]

Greer has suffered vexation because Hardin made him actually answer for his bullshit and work on the case that he filed.

I assume Hardin is going to find real cite where this was struck down in 10th, because he actually bothers to check his cites.

More likely it'll just be one page of "Greer didn't follow procedure that he should know since he already fucked up serving a sanctions motion before."

 

[DHugo]

He did not. He wrote this on the first of this month, so at most he could have only submitted it 15 days in advance

If this gets stomped on because he failed to present it, can Hardin try another sanction for this? He knew he had to present it since he failed to do it once already, so he wasted defendant's resources.

 

[obsdj]

I'm seeing a whole lot of seething but what I don't see is proof you paid Josh his money.

Indeed, he takes special care to draw the Court's attention to ECF 345. Twice!


And what is ECF 345? The status report attesting that Greer has not paid his ordered sanctions. Whoopsie-doodle.

I note with some irritation that it still says "Defendant" on the docket instead of "Plaintiff," sigh.