- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
It's got to have insane legs for it to do otherwise. Maybe Gunn fans are doing the MLM scheme and trying to take one other friend to see it every day or something.It's flopping globally.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's got to have insane legs for it to do otherwise. Maybe Gunn fans are doing the MLM scheme and trying to take one other friend to see it every day or something.It's flopping globally.
Probably not a change in Hell she was considered. Gunn would want to put a lot of distance between himself and Snyderverse, even though Flash is Snyderverse adjacent, sort of.She seems like she’d play a good Hawkgirl. Especially since Jason Momoa got recasted as Lobo, I wonder if James Gunn considered it before choosing Isabela Merced.
I know the movie has made less than Superman v Batman. But is $220 million over a weekend considered a flop?It's flopping globally.
Or sticking with the concept that she was sent to help look after Kal and such, to play the role of his wingman, or the Ghislaine Maxwell to his Jeffery Epstein. Actually, no - worse than that. If they're after preserving pure Kryptonian bloodlines, to couple with her cousin and produce as many true Kryptionian brats as possible.Theory:
Supergirl's parents told her to do what Superman's parents told him to do.
Fuck anyone on earth to keep the Krypton blood line going. That's why she's never on earth because she needs to get drunk to forget what her parents want her to be.
A baby machine that makes Bonnie Blue look like Mother Theresa.
It might be due to the National vs. International split.I know the movie has made less than Superman v Batman. But is $220 million over a weekend considered a flop?
Do you think the success or failure of Peacemaker will impact things? I made it two episodes before just turning it off and forgetting it existed. But I'm fussy. More to the point my mate who has execrable taste in media and numbers the Michael Bay Transformer movies amongst his all time greats of cinema, got bored and stopped watching it. And that's newsworthy.It might be due to the National vs. International split.
With a property like Superman paired with the assumed genre of such a film (mindless popcorn action-focused movie), you kind of assume he's going to do gangbusters in overseas markets because he's such a recognizable name and brand, and overseas tends to end up more into 'brainless' Hollywood fare.
There's also the fact I believe the projections where overly enthusiastic then closer to the film's release they got vastly more conservative, and the film ended up debuting somewhere in the middle of the predictions. With the director saying a Superman movie, one of the tentpoles of DC Comics and superhero fiction in general, doesn't need to have a big opening weekend actually.
I don't think it's necessarily a terrible opening but adding more context and weighing reality against expectations the suits likely had sort of paints the film in a lackluster light. It could make good money but it will be with its tail between its legs.
Personal opinion rather than anything concrete but I think people care about DC spin-offs in relation to their films even less than people care about Marvel's spin-offs in the current day. Peacemaker's biggest draw for non-comic books fans is likely John Cena. Unless DC makes a massive push trying to tie the properties together, which would be a little too late, I doubt there'll be a noticeable bump for the film.Do you think the success or failure of Peacemaker will impact things? I made it two episodes before just turning it off and forgetting it existed. But I'm fussy. More to the point my mate who has execrable taste in media and numbers the Michael Bay Transformer movies amongst his all time greats of cinema, got bored and stopped watching it. And that's newsworthy.
So I'm thinking S2 wont be a big success. I never really heard much about it after some initial puff pieces.
They went and used roughly the same budget they did making Man of Steel. At a time where comic book properties were arguably at their peak financially. They thought it was a good idea for their second try at a Superman movie, a little over a decade later (ignoring Cavill's later appearances), probably because Gunn's Guardians film also had roughly the same budget and racked in a surprising amount of dough.220M global gross means around $100M net for WB vs a $225M* budget. It MAY net about $50M more over its theater life.
*blah blah blah, that's the announced production budget, realistically its total is much much higher.
But the budget in and of itself is baffling because yes, Superman is a name brand yada yada, but I do think its value has diminished over the years
Superhero movie budgets have gotten out of hand, but even if this was cheaper than normal Superhero movies...I know the movie has made less than Superman v Batman. But is $220 million over a weekend considered a flop?
disagreedHaving superman laser babies or something does that far more effectively.
The retarded lore change that nobody is talking about is that the Fortress of Solitude is now in Antarctica instead of the North Pole. You can't spit in the fans' face like that and not expect to pay the price at the box office.Or sticking with the concept that she was sent to help look after Kal and such, to play the role of his wingman, or the Ghislaine Maxwell to his Jeffery Epstein. Actually, no - worse than that. If they're after preserving pure Kryptonian bloodlines, to couple with her cousin and produce as many true Kryptionian brats as possible.
This is horrifying. What the Hell were they thinking with this idea? I hate it.
Certainly by WB standards, but anything short of kickstarting an MCU level success would be a flop by those metrics. Arguably by normal standards as well, but a lot depends on its legs.But is $220 million over a weekend considered a flop?
Extremely ugly lookingHow was Jimmy Olson?
I've recently remembered how he was in the Synder movies, a CIA agent who dies really quickly and I wish I didn't.
There was one comic storyline where Luthor has a shot at tapping into a power that will make him omnipotent and allow him to build the sort of utopia he thinks he wants to bring about with the best interests of humanity at heart. He gains this power but one condition of having it is he can't do anything negative with it - and he ends up whiffing it because having such power is useless to him if he can't' use it to finally prove to Superman that he is superior to the Man of Steel, because he just can't let go of his grudge and he loses the power that had, for a brief moment, brought him universal happiness and benevolent vibes and the harder he tries to kill Superman with it, the quicker it goes away.The defining Lex Luthor moment for me is when he builds a computer to figure out who Superman is and when it spits out "Clark Kent" he scraps the computer because it's obviously flawed. He is smart enough to work out something nobody else could but unable to conceive of someone with Superman's power living a humble life.
And that's what makes a classic villain - someone who is undone by their own critical flaw, something that separates them by that one thing from being the hero. To him Superman is a peer, a rival, the one real challenge to his self-identity as the greatest person ever. Such a person who can make Lex secretly doubt himself cannot be an ordinary man. In any aspect.
Of course the other defining moment for Lex Luthor is when he stole forty cakes. That's as many as four tens.