UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
What's Farage going to do to the NHS? Make it run worse? 18 month wait to see an African with barely any English skills can't get much worse. Farage will help the NHS if he keeps his deportation promises and that's more than enough to benefit it more than he would hurt it.
The NHS is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the pension pots are completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the entire benefits system is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers.

So the options are to either make some drastic cuts to the major institutions and force them to make some hard decisions over who will live or who will die (which, via the triage system they already do) or we just import a billion low IQ niggers to rape our kids and work illegal jobs which don't pay tax (making them further net drains)
 
The NHS is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the pension pots are completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the entire benefits system is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers.

So the options are to either make some drastic cuts to the major institutions and force them to make some hard decisions over who will live or who will die (which, via the triage system they already do) or we just import a billion low IQ niggers to rape our kids and work illegal jobs which don't pay tax (making them further net drains)
Remove the Triple Lock
 
  • Late
Reactions: Mound Dweller
Removing the Triple Lock would have done wonders 10 years ago, but now we're in a situation where we've let it linger so badly that we need to do more drastic cuts than that, and no politician has the balls to say "Well actually, your quality of life is going to get significantly worse"
 
....giving 16 year olds the vote IMO isn't too bad a thing - I'd prefer it if it were 16 year old workers only, but there we are.

Don't chidren in England have to attend full time or part time education until they are 18 years old? How many 16 year old workers are there in England?
 
Don't chidren in England have to attend full time or part time education until they are 18 years old? How many 16 year old workers are there in England?
IIRC you can leave school at 16 as long as you have an apprenticeship lined up? Anyway I think he means 16 year olds who work at McDonalds at the weekend and stuff like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amin Yasister
Don't chidren in England have to attend full time or part time education until they are 18 years old? How many 16 year old workers are there in England?
Up to 16 is mandatory. Further and Higher education is voluntary, but the old vocational training schemes were gutted in the 90s, so there's very few opportunities for 16 year-olds to enter the workforce. Not impossible, but most of the jobs they would have had in the past are taken by migrants these days. Another one of the "they do the jobs we won't do" lies.
 
On the condition that you don't have to pay taxes, if you're too young to vote you're too young to be taxed.
And if you're too young to commit a crime and be named publicly for it, you shouldn't be voting. Either make 16 the age at which you become an adult legally and can pay taxes, wed,work,join the armed forces,be liable to pay child maintainence,and be named for your crimes, or keep it as it is with no privileges or responsibilities of being an adult until you're 18.
 
Maaaaybe. It could be that the only effect is for the Daily Mail Online to get another excuse to print photos of 17yo girls. But of the 16-18yos who do vote, which way do you think they will be inclined to? I mean when I was 17 if you'd let me vote I'd have probably gone confidently marching in there and put a big fat tick next to the Green Party. And look at my politics now!

Even though there may only be 1.5m 16+17 year olds in the country, it could tip some seats here and there. Politically it's probably equivalent of removing votes from anybody over 75+. Maybe bit less. And the below is some food for thought, it's voting intention in 2025 by age group.

Of course those who are motivated will bend to the left. You will not find any disagreement from me there.

But to run through the numbers, let's assume that this would enfranchise 1.5m, and that exactly one third of them (500k) go and vote at the next election. 500000/650 = 769.2. So 769 extra voters per seat on average, and each seat sees about 50-60,000 votes in a GE. A little over 1%.

So, yes, there could be a handful of seats where Labour cling on (or Jezbollah\the Greens win) on the basis of this gerrymander. But my honest belief is that even in the most lurid scenario you could count those seats on one hand.

The real problem will come if and when Labour enfranchise foreigners. A much bigger group of people who have practically zero common interest in Britain's prosperity or social wellbeing.
 
The real problem will come if and when Labour enfranchise foreigners. A much bigger group of people who have practically zero common interest in Britain's prosperity or social wellbeing.
They already have. Look at the brown councils around the country and ask who is voting for them. Some seats don't have white people to pick from (not even a jew pretending to be white) because every party knows the local Mosque will never endorse them so they can't win.
 
1752772850882.webp
100% of 16-17 year old muslims will vote because their vote is chosen by the imam's at a mosque. That's just the way it is and how they choose their votes. That's not racism or conspiracy, just a fact.
Even if 100% of white 16-17 year olds vote, they're still out numbered by muslims.

However, the worst part about the changes is this:

  • Expansion of acceptable IDs: UK-issued bank cards will be accepted as voter ID in Great Britain, providing the bank card displays the elector’s name

Migrants, legal, illegal, irregular or otherwise, are given bank cards with their benefits loaded onto them. This makes sense because doing cash-in-hand would be a logistical nightmare. It does mean that you can come here and within 24 hours be voting.

This will be interesting and I believe Labour are being lied to when they think the yewf will vote for them, they won't.

At the local council level there are, according to Labour Muslim Network, over 500 Muslim Councillors across the UK and over 75% them are members of the Labour Party. In the 2019 General Election, over 80% of Muslims voted for the Labour Party.

Contrast that in 2024 :

Muslim voters provided one of the shocks of the 2024 general election.

There was a dramatic Labour collapse in the constituencies with the highest proportions of Muslims. in the 21 seats where more than 30% of the population is Muslim, Labour’s share dropped by 29 percentage points from an average 65% in 2019 to 36% in 2024.

Turnout also fell more steeply than average (down 11.2 percentage points) in these seats, suggesting that some disaffected Muslim electors abstained while others voted for other candidates. In these seats, the total number of Labour votes fell from more than 600,000 in 2019 to just under 300,000 in 2024. That is the equivalent of more than half the total national drop in the Labour vote between the two elections (Labour has lost 537,688 votes compared with 2019).

The muslim vote holds a significant sway and in those areas where labour were contested the strongest, it wasn't the greens or reform but 'independents' who are majority muslim.

Once the order is given that muslims shall vote for X party, that party will gain power.

You will be stuck with labour until 2029, giving the muslims another 4 years for their demographic majority to reach voting age, then things get interesting.
 
Islam is as welcome in Wales as the twats ruining the WRU.

Some mixed news tonight:


Burton Albion signing spree being investigated by FA:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/WMyim



Plans for direct train to Berlin in new UK-Germany treaty (because it's... important?)


Archive: https://archive.ph/V0tBf



Former Wales under-19 footballer filmed on train telling woman 'I'll kill your boyfriend' (another chance to 'guess the race'):


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/aUP6Z



Diane Abbott suspended from Labour Party after doubling down on Jewish racism claims:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/LXUHM
 
That is true, but enfranchising every foreigner would create new issues on top of that. For example, London (and other urban centres, but London in particular) would gain a hatful of extra MPs at the next boundary review by default, as every foreign adult living there would now count towards the electorate count, and so London's quota would go up (and conversely, white areas would go down). Two dozen extra MPs for Labour\Greens\Jezbollah at a stroke, baked into the system.

EDIT: In fact, this will already happen to a degree as a result of something announced today alongside the votes for 16yos - if the system is changed as promised so that everyone eligible is automatically registered to vote, then this will mean more seats in areas where the population is more transient.
 
Last edited:
@Otterly I agree with you on environmental degradation, which is why the half-baked idea for a 'Water Park' at Cosmeston Lakes in the Vale of Glamorgan has angered a lot of people on all sides (bar Labour, of course):


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/GZNMt

There's some poncy knob-heads on the socials going 'well, actually, it was a quarry site 60 years ago...'

Yeah and if my Aunt had two wheels she'd be a bicycle.

The quarry got worked out and was returned to nature - what is not needed there is a 'wanky splashpad'.
 
The NHS is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the pension pots are completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers, the entire benefits system is completely unworkable for a population of this size with not enough taxpayers.

So the options are to either make some drastic cuts to the major institutions and force them to make some hard decisions over who will live or who will die (which, via the triage system they already do) or we just import a billion low IQ niggers to rape our kids and work illegal jobs which don't pay tax (making them further net drains)
If I was PM, I would cut the welfare state entirely, end any type of migration from any country (including marriage and family visas) and deport all first-generation migrants regardless of citizenship status. Watch how quickly healthy 20 year olds will find themselves working at McDonalds after you stop paying them for fake and exaggerated illnesses.

Serious disability reform also needs to take place. PIP needs to disappear completely. My mate is a corporate consultant in a half million pound house but gets higher rate PIP, it's lunacy. If someone is too disabled to work, it's the community and family's responsibility to care for them, not the taxpayer.

My Mum always feels pity when she sees a profoundly disabled child with their Mum and I just think, pity for what? The Mum is probably getting £5,000 per month and endless accommodations and sympathy everywhere she goes. A retarded child being a lifelong benefits mealticket has got to stop.
 
Last edited:
Todays been a busy news day. We've had the voting age drop to 16, mores come out about the Afghan smuggling by the government into the UK and Diane Abbotts finally been kicked out of Labour to name a few.

My personal favourite piece of news today was finding out Kemi Badenwog wasn't actually in the know about the Afghan scheme because she's such a lazy nigger and missed the briefing by being late.
 
Don't chidren in England have to attend full time or part time education until they are 18 years old? How many 16 year old workers are there in England?

Up to 16 is mandatory. Further and Higher education is voluntary, but the old vocational training schemes were gutted in the 90s, so there's very few opportunities for 16 year-olds to enter the workforce. Not impossible, but most of the jobs they would have had in the past are taken by migrants these days. Another one of the "they do the jobs we won't do" lies.

I've got a lad working for me 3 nights a week an 1 day every other weekend helping me out in the workshop, not work shy, enthusiastic, doesnt get under you feet, makes a very decent coffee.

I get help, he get's a bit of extra education an practical work, £600 and if he wants when he finishes his schooling I'd offer to take him on full time as an apprentice.

I think the attitude of a small but significantly sized minority that don't want to work, even if it's just for some extra beer money or stuff they want etc doesn’t matter they want to work, and they do work when they can a bit like how the media would assume all groups of kids are upto no good when most kids are totally harmless an you call tell the difference between the two a fucking mile off if your not retarded.

One big problem is the world of work they are entering isn't great, Depressed Wages, Shit jobs, low potential for development, nothing tangibly productive (this is a big one I'll elaborate on in a sec) and what you can buy is drastically reduced for the most part.

Tangible Productive - Office Work rarely produces something physically tangible, it's why cars have gone back to physical buttons after a flirtation with touch screens we need to hold something or see something we've made to draw satisfaction from it, were a very tactile ape and as a result need to see or feel we have dones something with our labour, that happy feeling was a very emotionally useful as a evolutionary driver.
 
Serious disability reform also needs to take place. PIP needs to disappear completely. My mate is a corporate consultant in a half million pound house but gets higher rate PIP, it's lunacy. If someone is too disabled to work, it's the community and family's responsibility to care for them, not the taxpayer.
It's one of the things that pisses me off. The average person on here could reasonably claim for PIP for some reason or another yet we persist and try our best and work jobs that crush us because we know it's better to be Nicolas (30 ans) and have at least the smallest bit of hope that things will work out, as opposed to being a dole scum lifer who will never accomplish anything of value and will die of a heart attack in a hoarders paradise aged 49.

I absolutely agree there should be a spacker safety net, but ideally I think it should go further. The idea that every child is equal is nonsense and needs stamped out as it's a complete waste of money and resources. If your kid is a wheelchair mong with a life expectancy of 26 then even taking them to school in the first place is performative cruelty. This fucker will never get a job, will never accomplish anything of value and just wants to play with their hot wheels toy and shit themselves. Saying from birth "Here's X money to quit work and give Harvey Price a reasonable life" would cost the taxpayer so much less than sticking them through school (with specialist wheelchair transports). Like what sort of life can someone who doesn't grasp how peekaboo works really achieve? They're just going to watch Peppa Pig and occasionally leave the house for hospital visits.

If I'm PM, anyone on PIP is ineligible to have a driving license (do you really want to share a road with someone with suicidal urges?) and should be barred from all public service jobs. As part of the social contract, for taxpayers to subsidise retards they have to be aware they are a second class citizen. Ideally some sort of retard city will be built so people on PIP could be bussed in from London or Bradford so they can have a cheap life where they can interact with their retarded peers.

Sounds harsh? Imagine how quickly everyone would realise that they're not as disabled as they say they are. The people who are actually disabled wouldn't see a problem with any of this because they're still being helped more than hindered, it only affects the grifters who see PIP as propping up their income.
 
Back