Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 94 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 208 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.2%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 68 10.2%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    668
I think most people here are about as hard as Aaron as he deserves. It's just that what he deserves is nowhere near as hard as what Nick deserves. For some reason there's a small minority that thinks he's as bad, or worse, than Nick, and I think that's just utterly ridiculous. I can't wrap my head around that mentality. Just compare the two.
I understand and generally agree, but then I thought what defense does Aaron have? That he only signed up for the fun parts of homewrecking and drug use in a home with children? That alcoholism, narcotics dependency and swinging could be neatly partitioned from the other aspects of their lives? He's not responsible for the daughter taking cocaine but hedonistic and addictive people make each other worse. Part of Aaron's innocence might be he lacked opportunity.
 
I understand and generally agree, but then I thought what defense does Aaron have? That he only signed up for the fun parts of homewrecking and drug use in a home with children? That alcoholism, narcotics dependency and swinging could be neatly partitioned from the other aspects of their lives? He's not responsible for the daughter taking cocaine but hedonistic and addictive people make each other worse. Part of Aaron's innocence might be he lacked opportunity.
He comes across as having more of a conscience than Nick.

But he is scummy as well, he just isn’t psychotic like Nick or Kayla.
 
View attachment 7655177View attachment 7655179
Rekieta seems entirely uninterested in our supposed privacy-breaching exposure of his unpaid car registration. Instead, he’s fixated on Twitter, arguing with anyone who dares point out the hypocrisy of insisting his invasion of Aaron’s privacy is justified simply because “he’s always lying!”
Screenshot_20250717-115332.webp

He's STILL going BTW.

Nick REALLY wants this to be Aaron admitting to having an addiction to lying and creating a facade so he can discredit Aaron's testimony about the Qover. That combined with his denial about his own cocaine addiction means he can't accept the real obvious interpretation that Aaron's talking about drug addiction.

"My addiction to stimulants that make me feel good is making me ignore my problems" makes way more sense than "I'm addicted to lying about my life." Only a junkie wouldn't understand that.

"But I'm not being honest" 100% makes sense in the context of him talking about his cocaine addiction because he's saying the cocaine is clouding his judgement and preventing him from being honest.

Lettered in writing, btw.
 
View attachment 7655224

He's STILL going BTW.

Nick REALLY wants this to be Aaron admitting to having an addiction to lying and creating a facade so he can discredit Aaron's testimony about the Qover. That combined with his denial about his own cocaine addiction means he can't accept the real obvious interpretation that Aaron's talking about drug addiction.

"My addiction to stimulants that make me feel good is making me ignore my problems" makes way more sense than "I'm addicted to lying about my life." Only a junkie wouldn't understand that.

"But I'm not being honest" 100% makes sense in the context of him talking about his cocaine addiction because he's saying the cocaine is clouding his judgement and preventing him from being honest.

Lettered in writing, btw.
Nick's "creative writing" degree was purely to help him write things to mean whatever the hell he wants, not what they objectively seem to say. And he reads things the same way he writes them - self-servingly.
 
This is like a middle schooler plan.
This is coming from the guy who in his Franks Hearing and failed appeal, kept trying to insinuate Aaron lied to the cops "because he hates me, it was malicious!" yet outright refused to explain as to why, because he didn't want it on the record that he's a cuckold.
 
Nick's "creative writing" degree was purely to help him write things to mean whatever the hell he wants, not what they objectively seem to say. And he reads things the same way he writes them - self-servingly.
Nick reminds me of someone I know who claims she pursued a linguistics degree “so I would know how to win every argument.” Nick is even dumber (and less successful) than she is, but not by much.
 
Nick's ODD, narcissism, and drug holes lead him to hyper fixate on incredibly specific things that he perceives as making him correct.

Its not uncommon with junkies, but usually they've got far more experience in being sly about it. Nick is still learning the trade.

In Nick's mind if you could read one tweet out of context in a way most beneficial to him, that's the only possible way it can be read regardless of context or what any sane person would take from it.

Its the 'you said you owed me a favor, now give me five grand' method.

See: Bossman. Everyone means whatever in the moment is most beneficial to bossman.
 
Nick reminds me of someone I know who claims she pursued a linguistics degree “so I would know how to win every argument.” Nick is even dumber (and less successful) than she is, but not by much.
Nick got a writing degree to argue about Aaron and a law degree to sue Aaron

His entire secondary education was designed around Aaron and he didn't even know it at the time.
 
I think he's saying that he's too superior of intellect to ever become addicted. Not that addiction doesn't happen.
Which is the most addicty of addict things he could ever addict.

There are specific programmes aimed at professionals who have substance misuse issues. Talbott in Atlanta was always the famous one that specialized in doctors/medical professionals/pilots, etc.

People who worked in those programmes invariably took the view that doctors, lawyers, etc. tended to me much harder to treat than the average joe because they were much better at justifying and rationalizing why their drinking/drug use wasn't a problem.

Consequently, they tended to have much more rigorous programmes than you get for the average crackhead. Much stricter, much more intensive, etc. Stanton Peele has made the argument that Talbott's programmes have a ridiculously high rate of suicide among patients and he attributes this to the 'take no prisoners' approach they had towards addiction treatment. (Talbott devised the AMA's programme for addicted physicians, so if you were a doctor with a habit, chances were, if you could afford it, you'd go to the gold standard. I think they went because they were better than regular rehabs at helping doctors get their licence back.)

Anyway, I think Nick needs to go to Talbott for treatment. He wouldn't be able to pull the wool over there eyes, and the chances of him necking himself when he failed would be hugely increased.
 
View attachment 7655224

He's STILL going BTW.

Nick REALLY wants this to be Aaron admitting to having an addiction to lying and creating a facade so he can discredit Aaron's testimony about the Qover. That combined with his denial about his own cocaine addiction means he can't accept the real obvious interpretation that Aaron's talking about drug addiction.

"My addiction to stimulants that make me feel good is making me ignore my problems" makes way more sense than "I'm addicted to lying about my life." Only a junkie wouldn't understand that.

"But I'm not being honest" 100% makes sense in the context of him talking about his cocaine addiction because he's saying the cocaine is clouding his judgement and preventing him from being honest.

Lettered in writing, btw.
The first time I read the text I thought Aaron is referencing a separate addiction.

Coming back the next day and seeing this being Nick’s actual interpretation just makes me think Aaron is acting like a teenage girl. Embarrassing but not particularly damning.

If only Nick had more context to post, maybe then he could more decisively prove his point.
 
Nick sharing Aaron's text message as some sort of own is a true testament to his character. A former friend (lover?) says "hey man I think I have a problem and I need to get out of this" and Nick thinks this is some sort of embarrassing self-own rather than necessary introspection and self-reflection.
Nick thinks this text shows 2 things:

1. Aaron knows that he's a loser and that the Steel Toe show isn't popular, which is humiliating

2. If Aaron's addicted to lying then the interviews he gave to the Kino Casino can be ignored and that Nick's recollection of events is correct

Unfortunately:

1. Yeah, no shit. The guy that averages like 200 views a show isn't popular. No one cares.

2. Nick's a self admitted lying liar that lies and all the 3rd party info (police reports, testimonials from family, bodycam footage reports, even Nick's own words and behavior) shows Aaron's recollection of events is far more accurate.
 
Any expectation of privacy goes out the window when you invite strangers into your home to have drug-fueled fuck and suck parties.

Particularly so when you show the group frolicking in the hot tub out of their skulls on MDMA, you give them a big wet kiss on camera and then you show yourself coked out of your mind, beating your meat while Aaron's wife watches from the cuck chair.

Nick's primary rule is this:

I get to say what the fuck I like about anybody.
Nobody gets to say fuck all about me.

Behold, free speech warrior, Nick Rekieta. How on earth did he fool so many for so long?
 
What the fuck is wrong with Nick that he thinks he's going to get that text message in and have the court view it as some admission that Aaron is literally always lieing. This is like a middle schooler plan.
I hope he also includes photos of Aaron with his shirt off to prove to the court Aaron is a liar and the stalking order of protection should be dropped

“He SAYS he’s a boxer but you can clearly see in this shirtless photo of him that he’s NOT a boxer. He’s just another chubby middle aged man that swallowed my GOO! People need to hear me talk about all the details in which he ate my GOO!”

🥃:really:
 
I understand and generally agree, but then I thought what defense does Aaron have? That he only signed up for the fun parts of homewrecking and drug use in a home with children? That alcoholism, narcotics dependency and swinging could be neatly partitioned from the other aspects of their lives? He's not responsible for the daughter taking cocaine but hedonistic and addictive people make each other worse. Part of Aaron's innocence might be he lacked opportunity.
I think the two main mitigating factors in Aaron's favor are that he has expressed remorse, and that the evidence he exposed children to danger on the same level that Nick did is weak to non-existent.

As I recall, a fair amount of digital ink has been spilled in this thread which suggests, at the levels Nick's daughter tested at, his daughter's exposure to cocaine occured after Aaron left the polycule.

A reasonable reading of what happened here seems to suggest that's Aaron's penchant for degeneracy isn't on the same level as Nick's. That he, unlike Nick, realized at some point that shit was getting out of hand.

I have long held that this wouldn't be nearly as big a shitshow if it was just sex and drugs (rock and roll optional), but that once Nick's daughter tested positive for cocaine, Nick lost the support of everybody with even a shred of moral decency.

Nick REALLY wants this to be Aaron admitting to having an addiction to lying and creating a facade so he can discredit Aaron's testimony about the Qover. That combined with his denial about his own cocaine addiction means he can't accept the real obvious interpretation that Aaron's talking about drug addiction.
What blows my mind about all this is that if Nick really wants to claim he doesn't or didn't have an addiction problem, and could stop using drugs at any time, that would mean he's just doing drugs because he's a hedonistic asshole.

People can be sympathetic to addicts. There's been a general shift away from seeing addiction as a criminal justice issue, and more of a public health one.

People tend to be less sympathetic to willful acts of being an asshole.

I don't know if Nick understands that. It's like he sees people with addiction problems as weak and beneath him, when most people with addiction problems I have encountered in my life are way better people than he is.

Worse, he also uses past addiction issues as a cudgel to try and discredit people. See i.e., Mamma K.

Nick thinks this text shows 2 things:

1. Aaron knows that he's a loser and that the Steel Toe show isn't popular, which is humiliating
If Faran is to be believed (and honestly, I have done a complete 180 on her, to where I think she tells the truth more than she's gotten credit for in the past), Nick was crying to her on the phone that he knows he's a shit lawyer and that his e-career has been irreparably damaged. I believe it was Andrew or Meme that related that story publicly.
 
Last edited:
He’s a jilted lover blinded by rage. His filter is gone because of the drug abuse so he can’t hide it.

You'd think that even through his drug-addled haze he might see that today he's even tagging Aaron in a thread reminding him not to tag Aaron:

Taggot5.webp
[X] [A]

At this point we might as well just accept it: by per curiam opinion, Polinsky v. Bolton and In Re A.J.B. have been unanimously overturned and replaced by The Rule in Balldo's Case, whereby a daily routine of tagging someone with an HRO against you is now 100% legal in the state of Minnesota. May this momentous sea change in First Amendment jurisprudence live on as Nick's lasting legacy.
 
Last edited:
Back