No, you first tell me why is it that GNU/Linux has multiple distros with multiple components where each component has it's own issues? There are at least five package managers, at least two display servers, and multiple desktop environments with each and every one of them having their own set of the most important basic elements such as a fucking control panel.
Not to mention the constant war about whether or not include systemd into a distro, and that all of those components aren't designed to work with each other, and their developers don't see a reason to do so.
A normal person does not want to spend their precious time learning all the pros and cons of each of those elements and then deciding on which distro to pick that meets their criteria. This is the first big reason why GNU/Linux elitists are delusional about the superiority of their system over Windows.
The second is the fact that GNU/Linux overly relies on the command line, due to it's nature of being GNU/Linux. And this is the reason I agree with Stallman's definition of it, because it perfectly shows the issue of it. The Linux part is what runs buttery smooth, but it's a CLI OS. GNU/ is what aims to turn Linux into a desktop OS to replace Windows.
However even back when Windows was still just an overlay for a CLI OS which was MS-DOS, Microsoft was an actual corporation that employed people who know what they were doing and the project was being managed from the top down, so even Windows 3.1 was designed to be as user accessible as possible, so that a regular user wouldn't have to go back to MS-DOS mode to do a basic function, and with Windows NT this need completely disappeared with the command line remaining as something that's completely unneeded for the regular user.
Again, a normal person will not waste their time trying to learn the command line to do basic things like installing a web browser. If at any point in a Linux experience you basically have to use the command line as your only option, where you can accomplish the exact same thing on Windows without ever touching a command line, your OS has failed at being a desktop OS, as it's CLI roots are popping up.
And the biggest culprit of your little dreams of Windows dying off is you. The GNU/Linux community is the biggest thorn in GNU/Linux's side, as they are unhelpful to newcomers that don't know the first thing about Linux. They make their OS insanely complicated because there isn't a coherent development vision that a regular user that's not a neckbeard will run into issues, but he won't get any help, as he will be laughed at for not knowing the most basic things related to GNU/Linux, while simultaneously the same people that laughed him off will bitch and moan about people still using Windows.
I know from my experiences with Linux that I had to constantly use the command line to set it up, while I only ever touch the command line in Windows when I want to do something very specific. GNU/Linux is a mess of an operating system and it's the sole reason I prefer to deal with Windows, because it has less issues that I can deal with much easier.
So you can stay in your little GNU/Linux circlejerk group and keep sabotaging the only alternative to Microsoft's hegemony by huffing your own farts over how great FOSS project are. I'd rather stay on a shittier OS that's actually being tardwrangled into being a cohesive mess.
Also next time thumbnail your images, if you're using GNU/Linux you have no excuse to act like a phoneposter.
