Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

What is with his face? He looks like a serial killer. Just pure dementia and psychosis.

What even IS that expression?

What drugs are causing this expression? What drugs is this faggot taking that he thinks won't show up on a screen?

Malignant narcissist obsession. It's a hell of a drug.

Well, yeah, probably also drugs, because he's sweating but it's not hot there.
But I don't know drugs well enough to say which. Except when it's meth, that one's really obvious. It doesn't look like how he looked on cocaine, or alcohol. Nor the whippets, or the adderall.
I dunno, something new.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

This faggot is clipping Nick's stream? I thought he was in mexico with a hooker
View attachment 7667747

He claimed on the Schmuel Buckman stream that he always reported “straight down the line” and has shown no bias whatsoever toward Nick, despite claiming two days ago that he’s been “standing up for Nick.”

Wil Herren is a pathetic piece of shit liar.

 

[AnOminous]

Well, yeah, probably also drugs, because he's sweating but it's not hot there.

No, he has a "heat allergy."

I think that's one of the hundreds of absolutely retarded, unbelievable excuses this faggot has for every dumbass thing he does.

Wil Herren is a pathetic piece of shit liar.

Wil Herren chokes on cocks.

What an absolutely useless alcoholic moron.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

I wouldn't even give him the benefit of the doubt of his reason being that honest. He's just angry and lashing out and the most generous I can give him, is he cuts a fine line about words and actions being so specific, that it's impossible to accept that there's any malice behind it. Like the shit Melton said about using Aaron's daughter as a cup holder; because Melton did not relay that message directly to the girl, the girl has no knowledge of it, and so there's no reason to get a protection order for his daughter against Melton; and if she does have knowledge of it, it's because Aaron said it to her. Because to chomo supporters like Nick Rekieta, a nepo baby who abuses his children and lets other men fuck his wife in their martial bed, making sexual remarks about someone's underage child isn't an action that may cause mental anguish. Melton didn't say it to the girl, therefore it shouldn't be considered for Aaron's Restraining Order against Melton. You can throw in some California Cock Sucking Brain Rot about jokes and free speech, but that's the main idea about making sexual comments about an underage child is not something that should be considered.

Nick may have a honest and coherent thought in his fried brain; but the way he presents it doesn't give me faith it's true. I'd say the only way Nick can be useful to society is worm food, but I wouldn't want to poison the ground.

NakadashiTomodachi threw in some excellent superchats on this stream. Here's an example:

"So Aaron's young kid has to testify that Melton saying he would use her like a cupholder? Are you listening to yourself?"

View attachment 7667715

Aaron, if you're going to prove mental anguish on behalf of your daughter, Nick says you're going to have to show the receipts for her therapist.

In fact, maybe Aaron is the real monster for telling his daughter that some greasy pedofuck is saying mean things on the Internet? Did you think about that?

I'm super looking forward to that argument in court..lol

 

[dustnight]

What is with his face? He looks like a serial killer. Just pure dementia and psychosis.

What even IS that expression?

What drugs are causing this expression? What combo of drugs is this faggot taking that he thinks won't show up on a screen?

Why whatever do you mean good sir? This is clearly the expression of a completely calm and collected individual who is in no way mentally disturbed whatsoever.


>tfw your favorite alog video is on youtube

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

I'm super looking forward to that argument in court..lol

Same, and we now know White is genuinely retarded enough to do what his drug addicted, malignant narcissist client tells him to do.

 

[Sneed Force One]

NakadashiTomodachi threw in some excellent superchats on this stream. Here's an example:

"So Aaron's young kid has to testify that Melton saying he would use her like a cupholder? Are you listening to yourself?"

View attachment 7667715

Aaron, if you're going to prove mental anguish on behalf of your daughter, Nick says you're going to have to show the receipts for her therapist.

In fact, maybe Aaron is the real monster for telling his daughter that some greasy pedofuck is saying mean things on the Internet? Did you think about that?

Aaron doesn't have to cause hearsay problems at all by making statements on his daughter's behalf.
All Montgomery has to argue "My client sought protection for his daughter because HE wants to protect from being sexually harassed."

 

[Oxyjen]

I tuned in for a few minutes and watched him fake-laugh at Kurt horrified and weirdly mesmerized

Same!
“Muah-hurr-hurr-hurr-hurr”

Hoarse. Strained. It’s a horrible, demonic, skin-crawling sound. This guy is not in a good place.

 

[Unimaginative Username]

Well, yeah, probably also drugs, because he's sweating but it's not hot there.
But I don't know drugs well enough to say which. Except when it's meth, that one's really obvious. It doesn't look like how he looked on cocaine, or alcohol. Nor the whippets, or the adderall.
I dunno, something new.

At least two rehab centers state on their websites that cocaine cut with fentanyl is more likely to cause sweating:

https://www.tranquilshores.org/blog/2024/january/cocaine-sweats/

https://pacificsandsrecovery.com/cocaine-sweats/

Nick claims he was testing his cocaine for fentanyl before, but I wouldn't be surprised if he isn't now because he can't buy test strips in person without the risk of getting reported (not that I think anything would come of such a report) and can't buy them online without leaving a paper trail.

 

[USAroXX]

I'm just going to say it. He wants to see Aaron's children humiliated and scared by his fat rockspider friend and it probably sexually arouses him. Asking a child to take the stand against some fat dipshit paedophile that called her a "little cupholder" is psychotic and a new low. Fuck this guy. He should neck himself.

AND
1. junkie child abuser assumes aaron told his own kid the cupholder comment?

But
2. Junkie also Wants the kid put on the witness stand?

So
3. How do you question a kid about the things the pedophile said about her

Unless
4. You tell her thru questioning what was said about her

Which
5. Is what HOLE-brained junkie is blaming aaron for in the first place? Like what is happening in this addict brain? [assuming anyone told a child such comments is wild or projection].

Circular logic of an ADDICT and the peddoh-dick suckers crew

Make it
Make sense

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

All Montgomery has to argue "My client sought protection for his daughter because HE wants to protect from being sexually harassed."

The concept of a parent protecting their child from something bad is an entirely new and foreign concept for Nick.
In his house illegal drugs are used to treat self-diagnosed ADHD in a minor.

 

[Kheapathic]

Aaron doesn't have to cause hearsay problems at all by making statements on his daughter's behalf.
All Montgomery has to argue "My client sought protection for his daughter because HE wants to protect from being sexually harassed."

Nick seems to be really caught up in the letter of the law, and pretending like anything and everything him and Melton did is completely fine due to how the law is worded. The shit Melton said about Aaron's daughter; Melton didn't say it to her, and if she learned of it, you need to show duress. Nick showing pictures of Aaron at Hackamania; well the pictures he shown did not meet Minnesota's definitions. The broadcasting of the letter Aaron wrote April; well he gave it to April, a third party, and thus it wasn't his to exercise control over. There is more, but just figured I'd outline a few of how he's going by the very strict definition of the statues; his excuse of course being the First Amendment and it being okay to laugh at people. I hate to say I understand and even partially agree that yes, this is what the law says; but at the same time, I'm not a fucking idiot and can recognize two retards working in concert with each other to antagonize another.

I'm not asking this legitimately, but with the evidence and God forbid if it's presented in a competent manner to show that Nick did access Aaron's email and communications; I find myself asking how much is too much and how hard is this shit gonna escalate and is it gonna spill over into a fucking real life happening. Free Speech and all that shit sounds good, until you have retards like Rekieta pulling this shit as often as he can while taking away a person's ability to challenge/duel. As much as Nick enjoys citing that First Amendment, he doesn't seem keen on the Founders were willing to fight and die over words; like Null said, (paraphrasing) the police keep retards alive by stopping others from rightfully killing them.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

"

Why whatever do you mean good sir? This is clearly the expression of a completely calm and collected individual who is in no way mentally disturbed whatsoever.

View attachment 7667765
>tfw your favorite alog video is on youtube

"I'm fun. I'm a fun guy"

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I stopped listening hours ago, but Nick streamed for nearly six hours. He is extremely fucking butthurt that Sean legitimately criticized his lawyer. Boo fucking hoo.

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

I'm not asking this legitimately, but with the evidence and God forbid if it's presented in a competent manner to show that Nick did access Aaron's email and communications; I find myself asking how much is too much and how hard is this shit gonna escalate and is it gonna spill over into a fucking real life happening. Free Speech and all that shit sounds good, until you have retards like Rekieta pulling this shit as often as he can while taking away a person's ability to challenge/duel. As much as Nick enjoys citing that First Amendment, he doesn't seem keen on the Founders were willing to fight and die over words; like Null said, (paraphrasing) the police keep retards alive by stopping others from rightfully killing them.

I think Nick's obsessed enough that if he ends up in jail from violating a HRO, he'll try to coordinate gay ops from inside jail and get into even more trouble. He doesn't know when or how to stop.

 

[Unimaginative Username]

I think Nick's obsessed enough that if he ends up in jail from violating a HRO, he'll try to coordinate gay ops from inside jail and get into even more trouble. He doesn't know when or how to stop.

If Nick ends up in jail, there's at least a 50% chance he'll start asking other inmates if they know a hitman he could hire to rub out Aaron and end up spending decades in prison for it.

 

[Folgers Can]

Someone needs to make a supercut of all the evidence.

Since the Zoom clerk will most likely cuck us out of content again, this exhibit supercut sorted into chronological order is about the closest* we'll ever get to what the judge will lay eyes on:

Spoiler: Chapter Breakdown and Source Timestamps

Date	Exhibit Number	Chapter Break	Source URL
6/10/24	19	0:00	https://youtu.be/Krz-TJ9zLP8&t=10727s
9/9/24	2	3:41	https://ghostarchive.org/archive/C6nuV https://ghostarchive.org/archive/lXNj6 https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Sj7Ok
11/13/24	6	3:51	https://ghostarchive.org/archive/2sQPS
2/28/25	16	5:19	https://youtu.be/QlDyVmLV5sg&t=157s
3/24/25	18	6:40	https://youtu.be/Xx2HNfco0sw&t=12961s
5/9/25	17	7:40	https://youtu.be/rVxNM0Bhcn4&t=2810s
5/10/25	3	7:46	https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Wfxs7
6/11/25	11	7:54	https://youtu.be/AszEf2JwA38&t=6108s
6/24/25	7	8:19	https://ghostarchive.org/archive/AOsdk https://ghostarchive.org/archive/oihXK https://ghostarchive.org/archive/mQE7k https://ghostarchive.org/archive/KhL8z
6/26/25	15	8:30	https://youtu.be/qpoNt3I16yA&t=1s
6/27/25	5	14:28	https://archive.is/x04bu
6/27/25	8	14:41	https://ghostarchive.org/archive/TsduQ
6/28/25	14	16:21	https://youtu.be/OF0Yi-tPR54&t=4139s
6/28/25	12	16:31	https://youtu.be/ZnIyArcJbFM&t=558s
6/29/25	4	17:20	https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939160340081606804 https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939357264592110015 https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939356985662546261 https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939356808923234318 https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939347056444993843 https://xcancel.com/RekietaLaw/status/1939320914153271619
7/1/25	20	17:36	https://youtu.be/4t6igHg4puk&t=2272s
7/8/25	10	22:16	https://youtu.be/zjNTywnJioY&t=6779s
7/11/25	9	22:50	https://x.com/pmelt/with_replies
7/14/25	13	23:12	https://youtu.be/Q73xmehoJ1Q&t=6499s
7/23/25	1	24:23	TBD

Spoiler: * - Caveat

Due to the exhibit list's annoying lack of exact dates in a few instances and use of ad hoc clips starting at "0:00" instead of the better practice of timestamps to original livestreams in many instances, some of these had to be an educated guess based on the date or month in question, what was getting attention ITT at the time, Filmot mentions, etc. and correlating that to whichever livestream segment changed topics with timing that best matched up with the duration between the exhibit list's stated timestamps.

For example I'm leaning toward Exhibit 20 being wrong since it looks like Aaron and his lawyer slapped it on in a rush at the last minute without putting a date like most exhibits did or even so much as a month like Exhibit 18 did, but going over relatively recent streams as well as older streams in especially eventful weeks, quite a few streams had Aaron-related stuff going on around 37:54-38:58 or 3:03:47-3:07:20, but July 1st was the only one with Aaron coverage going on in both timeframes, and there's no way to tell if the one exhibit was talking about two different livestreams, so July 1st was the best guess without going through every single stream spanning two years. Exhibit 18's a bit iffy too with a whole month to work with but a safer bet, and there's a much higher degree of confidence about the rest.

That said, if anything rings a bell that's a better fit for what a given exhibit description is probably talking about, please let me know and I can swap it into an updated version.

That might make @Folgers Can happy.

Not even close - going through the sourcing you can tell that his prep work relied heavily on third-party clippers as opposed to original timestamps, and some of the worst things Nick and Melton have said in clips and tweets archived ITT are left out entirely, and all YT chat logs ITT are left out entirely even though Nick said some of the wildest shit in those, and most shockingly, the underlying segments used in the @Third World Aristocrat edit are left out entirely. No "cupholder," no "way too tight," no "Onlyfans," no "where are your children," no "fuck 'em in their tight little asses," no nothing. Compared to what it could have been with all the information readily available, this truly is a pitiful effort if we're being honest.

Even so, there's something to be said for the need to be concise with only two half-hour hearings and even the selected exhibits are sure to consume almost an hour before even getting into any testimony. In that sense Montgomery probably just opted for whittling down to one tiny "representative sample" per key topic, while coaching the testimony to stress to the judge that each sample is just the tip of the iceberg and getting brownie points for "respecting the court's time" by not dumping everything in her lap. It still would have been better for each cherry-picked sample to be the absolute worst of the worst instead of this stuff that's pretty mid, but with Aaron being on a budget and a time crunch with a few days to go, we can't expect perfection, can we? He's now committed to his weapons of choice and alls we can do is wish him the best of luck as he walks headfirst into a windmill.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

I stopped listening hours ago, but Nick streamed for nearly six hours. He is extremely fucking butthurt that Sean legitimately criticized his lawyer. Boo fucking hoo.

View attachment 7667814

I got up early to check something to do with this. Rekieta is the gayest faggot who every took a dick up the ass. And this stream may not be cokestream level but it's close.

 

[cwkcwdwdcw]

Since the Zoom clerk will most likely cuck us out of content again, this supercut's about the closest* we'll ever get to what the judge will lay eyes on:

What a sick excuse for a human being.

 

[daffodils]

Fat Lawyer's SH*T Analysis - HROmg It's Bad​

473 unique chatters. $146.38 in 47 donations ($3.11 average/ ~$26/h). Close to a thousand live viewers till the end. Nick streamed until 4:40AM.
.
Beaten by Mersh (on Rumble!) and the puppet.