US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Serious question: How do Americans who attend mega churches and televangelist events view the 'pastors' that they follow? Do they not see the grift or is there something that I have yet to discover that makes the mega churches defensible in the eyes of their followers?
I look at the differences between a figure like Billy Graham and one like Kenneth Copeland and I wonder what changed in the last 50 years...
The idea behind mega-churches is to basically create Christian communes based on the idea from Catholicism of the Church as monolithic community and that the early church shared everything amongst themselves. These sorts of Christian communes have historically been very, very popular in the American West. But that popularity has not correlated with enduring success beyond the idea. Mega-churches are the latest evolution of this idea adapted to suburbia and modern anti-discrimination laws that prevent the creation of a new sole Christian commune. So I think the appeal is the same as that of a commune— community and belonging in a high trust environment instead of a righteous and deep relationship with God.
 
Okay, then have fun with being overrun by propaganda. From other countries like China, Japan, and other countries that the united states outsources for entertainment.
Who in the fuck cares?

If the choice is between PBS produced Globohomo propaganda that teaches kids about drag queen story hour and how awesome “cultural enrichment” is, and some Chink show that teaches kids to work hard, and be respectful to their elders, I’d unironically say bring on the commieslop.

The problem here isn’t that taxpayer money isn’t going to to produce (neolib) US made content, the problem is first of all that the content produced is utterly morally bankrupt and secondly that it’s ridiculously biased.

Nobody would mind PBS/NPR etc if they just had some cooking shows and shit. The problem is that it’s a full blown Dem propaganda organization.
 
The idea behind mega-churches is to basically create Christian communes based on the idea from Catholicism of the Church as monolithic community and that the early church shared everything amongst themselves. These sorts of Christian communes have historically been very, very popular in the American West. But that popularity has not correlated with enduring success beyond the idea. Mega-churches are the latest evolution of this idea adapted to suburbia and modern anti-discrimination laws that prevent the creation of a new sole Christian commune. So I think the appeal is the same as that of a commune— community and belonging in a high trust environment instead of a righteous and deep relationship with God.
That’s very interesting. When you put it like that it’s so much easier to have sympathy for the people involved despite the obvious flaws
 
I think the fact that the media is very, very intentionally ignoring it is telling. This is a megaton announcement. Imagine if they had even strong rumors that Trump was, say, intentionally sabotaging the Biden admin after he handed over power? They'd have marques up: "CRISIS IN THE WHITEHOUSE: Traitor Trump tried to Sabotage President Biden! When will he resign?!"
“Noooo!!! Don’t pay attention to this treasonous cabal of deep state operatives and elected politicians to soft-coup an elected President!! Here’s some TikTok’s and a sharply worded opinion piece about Trump being in the same building as Epstein four decades ago!! Pedolove much?!”
 
The guy who founded Comet Ping Pong was James Alefantis, who changed his name from Rothschild. He was gay with David Brock, the guy who ran Media Matters and was a huge part of the Clinton disinfo campaign in 2016. His Instagram, before all of this came to light and he shut it down, was filled with weird stuff. He would fly to Europe all the time and posted pictures of zip lock bags filled with pills and party drugs. Totally normal for a totally normal pizza shop owner! And totally normal to change your name to James Alefantis, which matches suspiciously close to "J'aime les enfants"—French for "I love children" (and which, when transliterated into English from French, comes extremely close to James Alefantis).

I absolutely believe the whole idea that Pizzagate is some retarded conspiracy theory is one of the greatest coverups in American politics. I saw his Instagram myself before it was all shut down—I will never be convinced by some NPC spewing Rachel Maddow talking points that everything was all kosher.
Alefantis was absolutely running some kind of fucked up child porn ring out of his basement. Podesta was more than likely interested, and one degree of separation from clinton and sadistic pedophiles is legitimately really funny on its own without exaggerating - but it doesn't directly implicate the democrats directly and exaggerating makes people assume falsehood.

media matters or some other democrat golem factory either folded it into the qanon conspiracy or outright created it to agitate trump's unintelligent base voters while also men-in-black neuralizing everyone about James Alefantis. They do this for every election cycle, it's just that the normies don't usually fucking polaroid the man behind the curtain and distribute copies of it before the men in black show up. the obama/biden administration was just sloppy and over-confident.

Serious question: How do Americans who attend mega churches and televangelist events view the 'pastors' that they follow? Do they not see the grift or is there something that I have yet to discover that makes the mega churches defensible in the eyes of their followers?
I look at the differences between a figure like Billy Graham and one like Kenneth Copeland and I wonder what changed in the last 50 years...
The people who go to mega churches don't have views about pastors. i think you're missing the forest for the trees. The people willing to attend a church service in an auditorium with 1000 people are not the kind of people concerned with the social structure of a local church and how they fit into it, they are not looking at the world at the same scale that you are. They are concerned with a much more superficial reality where they primary concern is making sure that they're doing the things everybody else is doing and making sure the kids have the things everyone else has. They're basically just jews, really. The pastor is simply the guy on the stage when they're At Church, which they go to every week because they are a Good Christian. They've gone to church since they were a little kid and have no intention of ever stopping, but they have absolutely no clue what a Nicene Creed is.

That’s very interesting. When you put it like that it’s so much easier to have sympathy for the people involved despite the obvious flaws
its not a flaw that comes from any sort of spiritual corruption or bad intentions, but it's a flaw that demonstrates a continued fundamental misunderstanding of the liturgy with no real intention of coming up with a hollistic solution. It's basically just tolerated because in the big picture christians want as many people as possible to be "christian" and christians don't throw shade at other christians for being too popular unless they're outright heretical
 
Last edited:
Tonga is one of the most Mormon countries right now.
A lot of those islands are crazy Mormon.
Ill be honest I cant explain but somthing about this photo SCREAMS britbonger to me, the letter seems like some gay NHS thing and the brickwork just looks Anglo.

Poor kid put a handwritten message on there to so people can mimic his handwriting on the 23% APR second mortgages
This is what chatgpt came up with. You may be right, but American seems more likely. First one is based on thigh photo. Second about the brickwork.

Thanks for the image! In the lower right portion of the photo, just beyond the black metal railing, there are some green leafy plants visible. However, the foliage is partially obscured and not very close or in sharp focus, which makes specific identification tricky.

From what is visible, the plant appears to have:

Glossy green leaves

Opposite or whorled leaf arrangement

Oval to lance-shaped leaves with smooth edges


This general appearance could match several common shrubs or small trees, such as:

Ligustrum (Privet) – often used as hedges or ornamental shrubs

Boxwood (Buxus) – common in landscaping

Holly (Ilex spp.) – although most types have spiny leaves, some varieties don’t


To narrow it down confidently, a closer photo of the leaves (and any flowers or berries, if present) would help a lot.

If you can take a close-up of the plant’s leaves or any distinctive features, I’d be glad to give a more accurate ID!

The brickwork...
Thanks for the clearer photo — this gives a much better look at the brick texture, color, mortar, and construction style. Based on what’s visible, here's a more detailed take:


---

🧱 Brick Style Analysis

Color & Texture:

Deep red to brown tones

Significant weathering, surface cracking, and visible carbon/soot deposits

Variations in firing color — suggesting traditional kiln-fired clay bricks


Mortar:

Light-colored (lime or cement-based), thick mortar joints

Raked or flush joints (not highly recessed)


Layout:

Running bond pattern (most common globally)

Irregularities suggest older or hand-laid craftsmanship — not ultra-modern or precision-cast




---

🌍 Geographic & Historical Context

This type of brickwork strongly suggests early-to-mid 20th century North American urban or semi-urban construction, likely in areas where traditional red clay bricks were regionally produced. Specifically:

🇺🇸 United States:

Northeast & Midwest cities: Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and similar cities used this style widely from the 1920s–1950s.

Often seen in rowhouses, duplexes, and smaller apartment buildings

Weathered look suggests exposure to snow, freeze-thaw cycles, and time


🇨🇦 Canada:

Ontario and Quebec: Many homes and multi-unit buildings used this exact type of masonry up through the 1970s

The brick surface finish and mortar color are consistent with Toronto, Hamilton, or Ottawa urban areas


🇬🇧/🇪🇺 Less likely:

UK and European bricks are often narrower and more uniform; also tend to use darker or flush mortar, and older brick shapes.

This brick has a North American dimension and style



---

🧭 Conclusion:

This brick is highly likely to be from a North American building, most likely in the U.S. Northeast or Midwest, or southern Canada, built between 1920 and 1960.

It’s classic fired clay brick, laid in a standard running bond with lime or cement mortar. Based on the weathering, it's probably been exposed for 50+ years.

If you let me know the city or region you're in, I can be even more specific — some cities had distinct local brickyards with telltale colors or textures.


Edit for more chatgpt

Based on the architectural features, plant life, brick type, and environmental clues in both photos, here’s a reasoned guess:


---

📍 Most Likely Location:

Urban or suburban area in the U.S. Midwest or Northeast — or southern Ontario, Canada.


---

🧱 Why?

1. Brick Type & Mortar (2nd photo):

Weathered, traditional red clay brick with light mortar.

Very typical of early- to mid-20th century buildings in cities like:

Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Rochester

Toronto, Hamilton, Windsor, Ottawa (in Canada)


The slight irregularity and dark speckling suggest bricks fired in coal- or wood-fired kilns — common in Ontario and northeastern U.S. before 1960.



2. Concrete Stair + Black Iron Railing (1st photo):

Classic postwar urban/suburban apartment or duplex feature in the Midwest or Northeast U.S./Canada.

This type of outdoor staircase is common in rowhouses or walk-up apartments.



3. Vegetation (1st photo):

Glossy green-leaf shrubs — possibly privet or holly — are common in temperate climates with cold winters and warm, humid summers, which fits the Great Lakes region well.

Also suggests the photos weren't taken in the deep South, the desert West, or the far North.



4. Clothing & Context Clue (Envelope):

Shorts and bare feet imply it’s summer, and the style of the mail envelope (pink and white, U.S. or Canadian format) adds to the North American context.





---

🧭 Best Guess Shortlist:

If I had to pick top 3 likely cities, based on these clues:

1. Toronto, Ontario


2. Chicago, Illinois


3. Cleveland, Ohio



With possible alternatives: Buffalo, Detroit, Hamilton, or Rochester.

Let me know if you'd like me to help narrow this down with additional details (like the back of the building, vegetation close-up, or street view).
 
On top of that, employers are no longer interested in taking a risk on a candidate or even training someone up.
Every employer thinks they're going to get someone who will hit the ground running. I recently got turned down for a job I was well-qualified for because I had no experience working with the specific client they wanted me to work with (it was obvious this was when the interviewer started to go cold on me). Like most companies, they fantasized about someone who would sign an offer letter and start handling this client's needs within days.

Every person you hire into a real professional job, every single one, will require 6 months to start contributing as they learn your company's processes and systems. In that amount of time, they'll also be learning new skills as well. That one highly specific thing they don't know or were a little rusty on? Don't worry, in 6 months, that will be online, too.

Back when I was hiring, I just threw any resume with an Indian or Chinese name in the trash. No, I didn't give a fuck about the Civil Rights Act.

Name one thing in the United States right now. That is popular, but is from the united states that kid's and teenagers watch you can't
Mega Machines is extremely popular with small boys aged 1 to 3. ASMR for little guys.


Tagging @Otterly for no reason.
 
Serious question: How do Americans who attend mega churches and televangelist events view the 'pastors' that they follow? Do they not see the grift or is there something that I have yet to discover that makes the mega churches defensible in the eyes of their followers?
I look at the differences between a figure like Billy Graham and one like Kenneth Copeland and I wonder what changed in the last 50 years...

Okay. It's not just mega-churches. Churches all have a "thing." It can be money, Israel, missions, you name it. Something they ham-fist everything into. @YouGuysAren'tThatSmart probs is more right than not in the below comment as is @BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny.

I can't say if we're just outliers but my wife and I try to be smart, well-informed people. We're also ardent believers but ones who struggle with the churches we've attended.

One decent sized church was near perfect. Pastor was a kindly, intelligent, educated conservative man. However, they bought totes into covid, which in our opinion was evil as fuck at every level. Then last year that pastor was caught and fired over a serious oxy problem he had developed after surgery.

Then another church is good community, very conservative, but the pastor could fairly be described as worshipping jews. Like I'm pretty sure he will readily accept the anti-Christ if Israel says he must and then he'll turn in Christians. There is a good deal of emotional manipulation at this church too.

I could go on.

Every place has its hang-ups. Your work, your friends, and even your family. You make trade-offs and you pick your battles. Frankly I think the pastor at our current church is either a liar or a fool or both. We hope he is near retirement because his replacement is much better. But we're not there for him.

Edit: probably my biggest pet peeve is how the social hierarchies at churches are based on how performative someone is, skewing toward the people who are fucked up white trash but are really really really really really trying and they feel soooooooooooooo strongly about Jesus, they just need more help!

A lot of the people that they grift are sick in the head or room temperature IQ. So they probably have an undying respect for their work for the lord.
community and belonging in a high trust environment instead of a righteous and deep relationship with God.
 
Those don’t work though, countless tests have proven that no AI is fully capable of recognizing AI and will give false positives and negatives left and right.
Depends. With a pretty good degree of accuracy most AI applications can detect if something is written by AI. You can also use the AI to rewrite it so it’s undetectable by AI. It’s a mixed bag but if you develop some rational thinking skills you can parse it out quickly and that shit immediately goes in the trash. On the rare chance you miss out on somebody who’s extremely well written, it’s worth it.

It’s about saving my time. It’s worth a lot. If I didn’t do this I’d be interviewing jeets all day instead of running our daily operations.

I’m sorry to hear about your employment woes, man. If it helps, make lots of friends in the town/city you’re in. Most employers will take referrals over whatever bullshit Indeed throws them, it’s the best way to get your resume past that HR algorithm. If they get shitty with us about it we just tell them to pound sand.
 
Serious question: How do Americans who attend mega churches and televangelist events view the 'pastors' that they follow? Do they not see the grift or is there something that I have yet to discover that makes the mega churches defensible in the eyes of their followers?
I look at the differences between a figure like Billy Graham and one like Kenneth Copeland and I wonder what changed in the last 50 years...
GOD says you will be PROSPERED if you give your SEED MONEY to the CHURCH

For the scummiest. People like Joel Osteen just give "live your best life now" garbage and the sheeple lick it up. (Christians think of themselves as literally sheep so it fits.)
 
probably my biggest pet peeve is how the social hierarchies at churches are based on how performative someone is, skewing toward the people who are fucked up white trash but are really really really really really trying and they feel soooooooooooooo strongly about Jesus, they just need more help!
sounds like you want a more somber church life. i'd recommend catholicism or orthodoxy but they require a little humility from the parishoner.
 
KWE249.webp

The faggot on the right did all the groveling for blacks and somalis in that gay city, crying at St. George's funeral, but he doesn't understand group preference, he will never be one of them. And he'll think this is ok as some form of liberal absolvement.


edit: baptists must be destroyed, that this "pastor" acts like killing a baby is something in the Bible is just....

KWE250.webp

 
View attachment 7668228

The faggot on the right did all the groveling for blacks and somalis in that gay city, crying at St. George's funeral, but he doesn't understand group preference, he will never be one of them. And he'll think this is ok as some form of liberal absolvement.


edit: baptists must be destroyed, that this "pastor" acts like killing a baby is something in the Bible is just....

View attachment 7668235

View attachment 7668234
Anyone else laughing their ass off at scorpion and the frog happening now with shitlibs and diversity?
 
It's not a big deal. I handle resumes and interviews every 2-3 months and you can very obviously tell someone used AI.
  1. Take a look at their job history and their educational background. Somebody who has experience in almost all industries in third world countries are not going to have the written skills of a Rhode Scholar.
  2. Sometimes it's just too neat. Regular people have flawed resumes in small ways. There's a small and forgivable grammatical error here, maybe a parsing issue here, maybe the formatting got all fucked up when they converted it from DocX to PDF or visa versa, you learn to see it like a language.
  3. Most companies are going to parse whatever resumes you send them through an algorithm that searches red flags like gaps in employment, lack of educational skills, lack of experience, basically whatever shortcomings you think a human can have. It forgives but not as much as you'd like to think it does. It also looks for keywords that indicate you're somebody who's ready to buckle the fuck down and do work. At the end of the day, I could get 1000+ resumes but only see 12. Companies are going to shortly incorporate an AI model that recognizes AI models, we already have them in schools.
Wait, so I gotta ask:

Indeed has those AI generated bullet points you can use. for part time work/fast food/retail/etc, should I just handwrite it all? or what do I do at that point?
 
Back