US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[GunCar Gary]

someone sound the @Fatpacks alarm. support for Trump among people that never, ever vote has plummeted. he's surely "cooked", as the zoomers, say this time
Tweet | Archive

 

[FieldPiece]

I thought KY jelly was supposed to reduce resistance?

I wish joke logic was a good legal defense because I'd just go around frying niggers with car batteries with the defense that they would be fine if they didn't resist.

 

[Bland Crumbs]

someone sound the @Fatpacks alarm. support for Trump among people that never, ever vote has plummeted. he's surely "cooked", as the zoomers, say this time
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 7675087

LOL CBS News Poll.

 

[Breadbassket]

George Mason University is currently facing a federal probe for allegedly discriminating against White people in hiring practices

Here’s the president of George Mason U talking about how important it is to promote DEI and hire "diverse and inclusive leaders."

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

someone sound the @Fatpacks alarm. support for Trump among people that never, ever vote has plummeted. he's surely "cooked", as the zoomers, say this time
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 7675087

That’s interesting because there was a Reddit thread about how zoomers and younger won’t answer the phone with a hello but wait for the caller to speak to avoid robocalls and people cloning their voices. I know polling is more than just phone banks now but I wonder how avoidant that age range is to any unsolicited contact out of paranoia and awkwardness.

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

The kokujin fears the samurai

God I hope so. Japan growing balls and actually prosecuting foreigners for the shit they pull would be great.

 

[Margo Martindale]

Since you insist on repeating the same old tired bullshit I will respond only through Grok from now on

Alright, let’s get into it. Imagine someone who can’t stop trashing President Trump, spewing negativity like it’s their full-time job. Here’s a sharp, no-nonsense takedown:

You know, it’s almost impressive how you’ve turned whining about Trump into an Olympic sport. Every time you open your mouth, it’s the same tired script—griping, moaning, and clutching pearls like you’re auditioning for a soap opera. What’s the deal? Did he personally steal your lunch money or something? Because the obsession is getting old. You act like you’ve got some profound insight, but all you’re doing is parroting the same lazy talking points everyone’s heard a thousand times. No nuance, no substance—just a broken record of complaints.

Here’s the kicker: you don’t even try to engage with what he’s done or why people might support him. Policies? Results? Nah, too much effort. You’d rather sling insults and call it a personality. Meanwhile, Trump’s out there living rent-free in your head, 24/7. Maybe take a breather, look at the bigger picture, and ask yourself why you’re so fixated on hating one guy instead of, I don’t know, coming up with something constructive? It’s not just boring—it’s embarrassing. Step up or pipe down.

The best use case of AI I've seen so far - countering doomers and demoralizers.

 

[Levitcus prime24]

someone sound the @Fatpacks alarm. support for Trump among people that never, ever vote has plummeted. he's surely "cooked", as the zoomers, say this time
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 7675087

I see the psypo when off without a hich

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

More low iq bad faith arguing.

You were told you knew nothing about the topic even tho you tried to claim you did. You asked for something to start getting a clue. I gave you a starting place, a book you didn't know existed, which is hilarious given the topic. You were told it was a starting place.

You pulled your page number demand out of your ass to try to claw back from your loss.

I mean, you do know I'm just going to link to the relevant posts, right? Why lie?

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 10, 2025

Bro, the fact you even have to ask that shows you have no idea what you're talking about and aren't really knowledgeable about this topic. The lawyer saying that also doesn't in anyway address what I said.

You don't get to make a claim like that and then flounce out when you're called on it. Who is debating these things? I can't educate my self if I don't know who to read, since you're clearly not going to answer any questions about it.

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 11, 2025

The irony in this statement. You straight up don't get who has the burden of proof here do you?

You. Your the one claiming that Trump's public statements are performative, as well as the victim's statements and their lawyer's statements. You are the one claiming there's a debate about it. I am asking you to prove that assertion or at least support it.

You dipshits literally can't read and love to strawman. I legit can't tell if you're this stupid or being paid. At no point did I say he was a pedo. We can talk about Clinton's intel links all day if you want. I said start...

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 10, 2025

You know I almost was going to tell you to fuck off and do your own work but I'm going to assume you're being genuine.

Altho I'd suggest being skeptical of her work, skim or read Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail. It is one of many conversations about, for example, whether there's any evidence Eppy was banned from Mar Lago or this was a later fabricated story to create distance, conversations in the community which follows Epstein as he relates to the history of intelligence.

So, funnily enough, I went and acquired a copy of said book, which actually does have an index...

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 
• 

Man, you're like a retarded version of Hulkster. He's at least good at this shit.

 

[GunCar Gary]

LOL CBS News Poll.

the only way MSM pollsters are able to reach people in their 20s is hooking up with them on grindr so i assume the numbers are wildly inaccurate for both data points

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

Man, you're like a retarded version of Hulkster. He's at least good at this shit.

I like Hulk. Even if we disagree on a lot of stuff I think he's at least entertaining and fun to have pop in.

 

[Pendulous Dong]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/gabbard-releases-long-classified-martin-luther-king-jr-assassination-files

Damn, of all the files I could possibly give a single fuck about the government releasing right now, the MLK files sure aren't any of them.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Damn, of all the files I could possibly give a single fuck about the government releasing right now, the MLK files sure aren't any of them.

I dunno, seeing the Trump admin dismantle one of the false idols of the left never gets old.

Now do Obama, Trumpster!

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Damn, of all the files I could possibly give a single fuck about the government releasing right now, the MLK files sure aren't any of them.

Seeing how the hero of the civil rights movement was a philandering plagarizing puppet is funny IG

 

[inetsone]

I mean, you do know I'm just going to link to the relevant posts, right? Why lie?

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 10, 2025

Bro, the fact you even have to ask that shows you have no idea what you're talking about and aren't really knowledgeable about this topic. The lawyer saying that also doesn't in anyway address what I said.

You don't get to make a claim like that and then flounce out when you're called on it. Who is debating these things? I can't educate my self if I don't know who to read, since you're clearly not going to answer any questions about it.

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 11, 2025

The irony in this statement. You straight up don't get who has the burden of proof here do you?

You. Your the one claiming that Trump's public statements are performative, as well as the victim's statements and their lawyer's statements. You are the one claiming there's a debate about it. I am asking you to prove that assertion or at least support it.

You dipshits literally can't read and love to strawman. I legit can't tell if you're this stupid or being paid. At no point did I say he was a pedo. We can talk about Clinton's intel links all day if you want. I said start...

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 

US Post in thread 'US Politics General 2'

Jul 10, 2025

You know I almost was going to tell you to fuck off and do your own work but I'm going to assume you're being genuine.

Altho I'd suggest being skeptical of her work, skim or read Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail. It is one of many conversations about, for example, whether there's any evidence Eppy was banned from Mar Lago or this was a later fabricated story to create distance, conversations in the community which follows Epstein as he relates to the history of intelligence.

So, funnily enough, I went and acquired a copy of said book, which actually does have an index...

• More AWS-8Q Than You

• 
• 
• 

Man, you're like a retarded version of Hulkster. He's at least good at this shit.

Reread those closely, big brain. Very slowly. Then go look up what Webb has written about the banning myth. It will take you a 2 second search to find the info. Literally top results.

Now, please, can you relax and realize you know nothing about Epstein other than the propaganda you've slurped up?

 

[autistic dog]

I'm not sure because it would be a world where our logic likely wouldn't be applicable.

In tautology terms not is denoted as ~ so asking for a hotdog that is also not a hotdog is impossible logically because the inclusion of not ~ to an or makes it an exclusive or (xor) instead of an inclusive or. To create the described world you would have to remove the existance of not ~ as a concept or at least make it such that it does not cause or to become exclusive. That would have implications on every other concept on Earth and physics like computer programming and RAM couldn't exist as they rely on existance of xor. It would be the removal of something and it would not only delete free will but a lot of other concepts.

Now the real mind fuck is maybe god already did that with other similar tautology modifiers but we dont know it because they dont exist. So in conclusion god choose for this contradiction to exist therefore it's not proof of his non-existentance or his lack of powers.

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

Malcolm X > MLK

 

[BallsMcLongDong]

In tautology terms not is denoted as ~ so asking for a hotdog that is also not a hotdog is impossible logically because the inclusion of not ~ to an or makes it an exclusive or (xor) instead of an inclusive or. To create the described world you would have to remove the existance of not ~ as a concept or at least make it such that it does not cause or to become exclusive. That would have implications on every other concept on Earth and physics like computer programming and RAM couldn't exist as they rely on existance of xor. It would be the removal of something and it would not only delete free will but a lot of other concepts.

Now the real mind fuck is maybe god already did that with other similar tautology modifiers but we dont know it because they dont exist. So in conclusion god choose for this contradiction to exist therefore it's not proof of his non-existentance or his lack of powers.

Yo hold up, this fuckin' dog can talk, guys.

Proof.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

Reread those closely, big brain. Very slowly. Then go look up what Webb has written about the banning myth. It will take you a 2 second search to find the info. Literally top results.

Naw, give me a direct link or pay me for my time. No more stupid source games from you, you already lied about one.

Now, please, can you relax and realize you know nothing about Epstein other than the propaganda you've slurped up?

Get in the burger.

 

[StudMccool]

no, because if you break the law you forfeit certain rights and privileges - for example not getting incarcerated.
same way if you illegally enter sovereign territory there doesn't have to be anything that says you have to get back where you came from, you just have to get out.
bonus: if you claim danger in case you get put back, there's also no rational reason you have to stay. middle of bumfuck nowhere in africa is probably safer from the cartels than north america.

I think your making the argument the elite are HOPING you will make.

IDK man this thread seems very bent on wanting maximum human suffering sometimes and I just dont know how to engage with that on a useful level.

important questions like "If the state decides who is and isent a citizen on a whim then what defines a ACTUAL citizen?" get tossed out as "argumentative" or "dooming". All rules need to be examined under the lens of how they might be used to oppress not their "optimistic forum poster assumption" of how it gets implemented.

I think trump is through the looking glass at this point in SO many ways. If your supporting him it just feels like a wacko mode of Biden at this point, mindless shilling for a puppet that is often more sad to listen to than anything else, you guys actually suffered through one of this fuckers 2 hours snooze rants recently? He just rambles these days.