US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is it there exists a certain kind of person whose answer to every problem is more subsidization.

It doesn't work any better on the back end than it does on the front end. For the same reasons.

I was going to leave it at that but I want to point-blank ask you what you think money, that is, currency, even is as an entity.
He's a Marxist, be gentle
 
Word is she's making a deal to get out of prison. That would be a huge mistake since everyone knows that she'll say anything they tell her to and without the docs it just furthers the coverup narrative.
She wants to get out of prison because the Trump admin just fucking told everyone that the person she was charged as an accomplice with dindu nuffin. She's openly claiming she dindu nuffin.

I was kicking around the idea this morning they let her out and she gets up at the mic and goes "there was no list, thank you."

I'd lol so fucking hard.

He served 13 months in prison.

Ever read what his "prison" sentence consisted of? It's hilarious. Could literally come and go as he pleased, have anyone there he pleased, was never under watch, nothing. The facility was also like the lowest maxx imaginable where i swear i think I remember it being basically a house or some shit. He was on less than house arrest. Anyone saying "prison" is so full of shit.
 
It's okay to not understand economics, I'm certainly not an 'expert'. But this isn't 'expert-level' economic theory we're discussing. Subsidization and nationalization do not work and only exacerbate the issues if not make issues that are an entire echelon worse such as outright famine or shortages in the case of nationalization.
Can you actually complete your messages instead of posting them too early and adding shit in afterwards?
 
You have a problem with not elaborating, you can't just say that something is wrong and not provide an explanation.
I absolutely can and do so frequently for my own amusement.

But I did give one, this shit doesn't work fundamentally for the same reason that it doesn't work on the 'front end'. You are not somehow putting your finger on the scales and 'balancing' the monetary 'mis-match'. To explain the problem as succinctly as I can without typing up a fifteen paragraph dissertation on why this shit is stupid and doesn't work, the basic economic reasoning as to why it doesn't work is that you're effectively expecting a fluid to not conform to its container. Subsidization does not 'alleviate costs', and the suppliers don't sell for 'cheaper'.
Can you actually complete your messages instead of posting them too early and adding shit in afterwards?
No.
 
Well, it's a top issue, because if elected officials are passing certain laws because they're being blackmailed, that's a serious problem.

The anti-American Democrats who hate MAGA ignore the fact that, they too, could've released the files. How they see this as an own is beyond me.
They'll call MAGA a cult, while said cult is hating on the so-called leader.
I am not arguing that it is not A top issue, i am simply saying it is not THE top issue.Meaning while this single issue is the reason some people voted for him, for others it was not necessarily the same for others.

But yeah i do agree that this list issue needs to be pushed, regardless of who the pedos might be or how the market might react.
Maine Representative Deqa Dhalac (D) says her goal is to help "our country of Somalia"

View attachment 7682354
May such cases.
Aliens before the client list
View attachment 7682361
Did they not do this already?
 
Well, it's a top issue, because if elected officials are passing certain laws because they're being blackmailed, that's a serious problem.

The anti-American Democrats who hate MAGA ignore the fact that, they too, could've released the files. How they see this as an own is beyond me.

They'll call MAGA a cult, while said cult is hating on the so-called leader.
If they had dirt on trump regarding Epstein they could’ve released it years ago, yet never did.
 
But I did give one, this shit doesn't work fundamentally for the same reason that it doesn't work on the 'front end'. You are not somehow putting your finger on the scales and 'balancing' the monetary 'mis-match'. To explain the problem as succinctly as I can without typing up a fifteen paragraph dissertation on why this shit is stupid and doesn't work, the basic economic reasoning as to why it doesn't work is that you're effectively expecting a fluid to not conform to its container. Subsidization does not 'alleviate costs', and the suppliers don't sell for 'cheaper'.
I like reading the paragraphs people dump on me sometimes, go ahead I wanna hear it all.
Aliens before the client list
How many times have they pulled the alien card at this point?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: browserbowser
All people need to understand the problem is Manna by Marshal Brain.
But the fast food industry had a problem, and Burger-G was no different. The problem was the quality of the fast food experience. Some restaurants were run perfectly. They had courteous and thoughtful crew members, clean restrooms, great customer service and high accuracy on the orders. Other restaurants were chaotic and uncomfortable to customers. Since one bad experience could turn a customer off to an entire chain of restaurants, these poorly-managed stores were the Achilles heel of any chain.
The software would speak to the employees individually and tell each one exactly what to do. For example, “Bob, we need to load more patties. Please walk toward the freezer.”

Or, “Jane, when you are through with this customer, please close your register. Then we will clean the women’s restroom.”

And so on. The employees were told exactly what to do, and they did it quite happily. It was a major relief actually, because the software told them precisely what to do step by step.
It took about 3 months to work all the kinks out, and as they did the Manna software totally changed the restaurant. Worker performance nearly doubled. So did customer satisfaction. So did the consistency of the customer’s experience. Trash cans never overfilled. Bathrooms were remarkably clean. Employees always washed their hands when they needed to. Food was ready faster. The meals we handed out were nearly 100 percent accurate because Manna made us check to make sure every item in the bag was exactly what the customer ordered. The store never ran out of supplies — there were always plenty of napkins in the dispenser and the ketchup container was always full. There were enough employees in the store for the busy times, because Manna could accurately track trends and staff appropriately.
this author seems to fall into the white libertarian male trap of imaging that if only we were able to treat workers like robots then the world would work out perfectly. that every bad store is is management problem, not a racial or cultural problem

unfortunately for every wannabe libright CEO, non-white people exist. in order to have this future what they really need to accomplish is forcibly remove white people's ability to live away from non-white people, which they've been trying to do since the 60s. remove access to single family houses, access to payment processors, jobs, personal transport, and the ability to express perfectly normal viewpoints like niggers are dangerous

luckily for all of us a pretty big dent was put in those plans during covid, but i agree they'll keep trying
 
I like reading the paragraphs people dump on me sometimes, go ahead I wanna hear it all.
Not tonight dear, I have a headache.

I seriously don't feel like typing up the long version but the short version really is just that you're missing the scope of what you're saying. Subsidizing the industry isn't any different from subsidizing the consumer because the industry aspect you're subsidizing itself is run on costs that you're subsidizing that will similarly to the consumer, have the prices raise to meet the subsidization. It's the 'turtles all the way down' of economics. You cannot simultaneously subsidize every aspect of an industry from every single supply point to every single consumer point unless you want to bankrupt the country and in doing so you'd only serve to tax to death the entirety of the tax base you rely on.

Itself, I'll remind you, is more akin to a forest you regrow for trees rather than an ATM. Tax bases are something to be managed and tended to like a logger's crop of trees.
 
Back