Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.5%

  • Total voters
    420
Imagine you pick a guy to fuck your wife and then it turns out he's an atheist! Awkward!
View attachment 7682712
A nonbeliever is better than someone who pretends they care, and that's better than someone who actively blasphemes The God they claim to believe in. Only a Redditor atheist that's 13 would come up with "Jesus is just a dude and he's a Sinner, he also went to whorehouses".

Clearly skelly cares about God's word.
Hebrews 13-4 states that "let the marriage bed stay undefiled".
So does letting a homewrecking trollop and her smug shock jock husband sleep in the same bed as your wife count as "undefiled"?
The verse carries on by stating that "God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous".
Swinging, St. Andrew's cross, balldos, various weird sex paraphernalia and peeping at your bull unleashing potent loads in your wife counts as adulterous and sexually immoral, right?

This skelly is far worse than any hedonistic atheist. Atheists believe that God doesn't exist and most are moral relativists. The objective moral code of God simply doesn't apply to non-believers. From their perspective, there's nothing Sinful or inherently wrong about sexual promiscuity. Conversely, the Christian (or Abrahamic) God explicitly decries sexual deviancy. Skelly is as bad as those groypers who typed "God groyped Mary's cunny (not even kidding) so it's okay to be a lolicon" and hit send on Twitter. There's a special place in Hell for all of these irredeemable scum.

Or maybe it's Nick's "god (lower case)" who is funny and weird, and visits whorehouses and even Gay 90s like he does. Nick's god is just like him. :really: "Fun-loving, wife-sharing".
 
Imagine you pick a guy to fuck your wife and then it turns out he's an atheist! Awkward!
View attachment 7682712
Sounds better than a man that goes full on cokehead during children's Sunday school and tries to teach my kid that Jesus actually sinned.

Also
HE ATE THE GOO OF THE GODLESS
 
At least he doesn't blaspheme God and spout heresy and Satanism on a daily basis.
Remind me what passage says "And thy faithful husband, bound by God and law, shall deliver unto you, his beloved wife, three men of the islands, skin dark as coal, with genitals the length of barn animals, that they may bed you, and this will please Him."
Asking for a Minnesotan bootlicker.
 
He didn't even contemplate the liability involved in this.

A state sanctioned taxi service, using probationers with their personally owned vehicles, would be a disaster in the making.
He hasn't contemplated anything to do with his probation. Literally every comment, suggestion and complaint about his probation has basically boiled down to "This would be easier for me, and me alone, and give me more time to talk about my ex-boyfriend and bitch at people online ergo they should immediately do it"
 
Remind me what passage says "And thy faithful husband, bound by God and law, shall deliver unto you, his beloved wife, three men of the islands, skin dark as coal, with genitals the length of barn animals, that they may bed you, and this will please Him."
Asking for a Minnesotan bootlicker.
Balldo 14:88.
 
It really sounds like he’s trying to retcon having a sexual relationship with April here. Which if we take him at his word (big if), means that Kayla had sex with Aaron, but Nick didn’t with April…
Has he seriously forgotten the period when he and "April" were slobbering and pawing at each other on Xitter for days on end like they were horny 14 year olds?
 
Has he seriously forgotten the period when he and "April" were slobbering and pawing at each other on Xitter for days on end like they were horny 14 year olds?
It was just Nick with April's phone/accounts. He was masturbating, on X, in public. Just like he did with the message about April bleeding (from his balldo).
 
In an amazing coincidence, this clip was found exactly one year ago
I'll never get over that clip. Believer or not, discussing Jesus cumming into a jar - WHAT? NOT OKAY! America doesn't have a lot to hold onto, as a people, but we do not believe Jesus came in jars.

Also, why does everything "important" about Nick relate to cum and his relation to it? Men ITT, please explain.
 
I'll never get over that clip. Believer or not, discussing Jesus cumming into a jar - WHAT? NOT OKAY! America doesn't have a lot to hold onto, as a people, but we do not believe Jesus came in jars.

Also, why does everything about Nick relate to cum and his relation to it. Men ITT, please explain.
It's very simple. Nick could never make Kayla cum. Aaron could. (As well as about 1800 men at Hedonism II, that hobo in the Mall of America parking structure, Q, Drexel, half the football team in college, the masseuse with the groupons, Captain Kirk...)
 
One point to Nick for remembering Ashcroft v. Iqbal but minus several million for forgetting it's about federal pleading standards and the case is in a Minnesota court, and plus several million RETARD points for not knowing the Minnesota Supreme Court has REJECTED adopting that standard.
Not gonna lie, I skip all the screen shots nowadays, but holy shit he is retarded
 
Back