- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
He's drafting that lawsuit for the Judges clerks, Tina, as we speak. It's sure to be well sourced and cited.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aren't we closing in on the one year anniversary of that initial IFP filing? This has to be a record for slowest IFP consideration.I think we are still waiting for the District judge to rule on the findings of the Magistrate for the In Forma Pauperis application by Stabby. The court is apparently treating this case with the alacrity its merits deserve.
I'm sure another writ of mandamus will fix thatAren't we closing in on the one year anniversary of that initial IFP filing? This has to be a record for slowest IFP consideration.
Eventually, the Court will get its balls in order.
stabby will read the posts and get mad about it though. worth.I hate when you guys shitpost in this thread
I see a nice notification about a new Mr Stabby post, get all wet and excited about more crazy Stabby lolsuit filings going up but it turns out it's just a bunch of numbnuts trying to be funny.
Son I am disappoint!
It’s going to be really funny when the judge reads those and ultimately concurs with Null.Here's all 7 of the alleged libel claims.
View attachment 7690528
View attachment 7690527
View attachment 7690526View attachment 7690525
View attachment 7690532
View attachment 7690524
View attachment 7690523
They all sound true to me.
And, once again, time travel appears in a federal court case.
View attachment 7690541
I don't see how a judge can see two courts slapping Ace with vexatious litigant status, and conclude "Ace files frivolous lawsuits" is anywhere near libelous. Even if Josh was wrong and Ace really is an innocent justice seeker, it's a very reasonable conclusion for Josh to draw.It’s going to be really funny when the judge reads those and ultimately concurs with Null.
This is some top tier law lolcowdom. This is obviously not going to work. Acerthorn put time and effort into amending his complaint and he is just going to get slapped with a we didn't give you permission to do this denied lol.FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TIME, BABY
I mean you can't just file an amended complaint. The court has to give you permission.I noticed something... there's no proof of service that I can see in the docket, was Moon ever even served? For that matter was Lolcow LLC even served? I mean he may have waived that by having his lawyer reply for "Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC"
The funniest thing is I'm pretty sure defendant gets their home jurisdiction as preferred jurisdiction. Also funny that he isn't even citing the most egregious part of Greer v Moon but the fucking weird as jurisdiction shenanigansGreer v Moon racking up those citations, baby!
TLDR: Acerthorn files paperwork that reads like it was written by a grandmother on Facebook where he bitches about Null complying with a DMCA takedown request and encouraging his userbase to utilize Fair Use when criticizing a gobbling face stabber.Please let the District Court Judge wake up and rule on the IFP recommendation.
Anyway.
Single PDF and Images
View attachment 7690453View attachment 7690454View attachment 7690455View attachment 7690456View attachment 7690457View attachment 7690459View attachment 7690462View attachment 7690463View attachment 7690465View attachment 7690467View attachment 7690469View attachment 7690470View attachment 7690471View attachment 7690472View attachment 7690473View attachment 7690474View attachment 7690475View attachment 7690476View attachment 7690477View attachment 7690478View attachment 7690479View attachment 7690480View attachment 7690481View attachment 7690482View attachment 7690483View attachment 7690484View attachment 7690485