Lolicon is factually LEGAL in the US. There are no laws that make it illegal,
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
www.law.cornell.edu
(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(c) Nonrequired Element of Offense.—
It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.
(d) Circumstances.—The circumstance referred to in subsections (a) and (b) is that—
(2) any communication involved in or made in furtherance of the offense contemplates the transmission or transportation of a visual depiction by the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
Any follow-up questions, retard anime avatar nonce?
If you want to take a moment to re-read that paragraph I wrote, please do. I'll break it down even smaller for you.
The company is not the court. I
AGREE WITH YOU that before a person have
THEIR BUSINESS DESTROYED that it should be
DECIDED BY THE COURT SYSTEM,
but the
problem is that the laws
AS THEY ARE WRITTEN FOR THE FINANCIAL SERVICE COMPANIES creates
STRICT LIABILITY any time they facilitate a crime, i.e. by allowing
PEOPLE TO BUY AND SELL LOLICON AS DESCRIBED IN 18 U.S. Code § 1466A.
You
could argue that 18 U.S. Code § 1466A is unconstitutional. Prevailing opinions are that it is. However, it is
still a law in effect, and the law for
FINANCIAL SERVICES (private companies) is that they must enforce the law
AS IT IS WRITTEN, otherwise they risk the Federal Government crawling up their ass. So unless the
FINANCIAL SERVICES want to sue to overturn their current legal status quo, then they will continue to enforce the law
AS IT IS WRITTEN and you
CAN NOT APPEAL because they are a PRIVATE COMPANY and
NOT a COURT SYSTEM, which is why Ron Paul said they were "DEPUTIZED" to enforce the law despite not actually being a government entity.
And the funny thing is? If they wanted to, they can just ban lolicon independently. LOL. You don't get a say in it because they're a private company! Do you think that's a BAD THING? We agree!!! There should be no discretion given to the backbone of the world's consumer spending that allows them to do that!!!
If your next post isn't "I'm sorry for being a retard" I'm banning you btw.
