US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why the F is Trump carrying water for the eurocucks?

There is an AMERICAN auto industry. Why cut tariffs on things like cars that will literally cost American jobs?

Maybe American companies should make cars worth a damn if they want people to buy them. Not everyone wants or needs a 50K plus Crossover/F150.

Access to affordable cars for Americans is more important than jobs for niggers in Detroit.
 
But yeah that's one major reason why I think there's no currently running COPS series despite that show basically printing money back in the day. There's no way in hell they'd allow normie America to get an unrestrained glimpse into the nigger problem in 2025.
Cops is still going actually, it's just on Fox Nation and no one has that streaming service. There's tons of other different cop shows out there that are way better than Cops anyway.

I genuinely wonder, what if ABC or something just advocated for trump to be assassinated on all their national news. obviously they'd get shut down (although with the internet they could just broadcast streaming wise), but what happens to their sister channels..
I don't think anyone could shut down any TV network for calling to assassinat Trump if they literally all do it at the same time. What are they going to do cancel every station at once? I don't think so, wanting to murder Trump would just become the new standard for TV news (it already is and always be)
 
Wtf?!?

Why is Don acting like such a cucked faggot lately?

Remember when he used to mock people like this?

“Bu-but Fapcop! Total 5D chess! He’s using his amaaaazing negotiating skills!”

Lmao! Nevermind that his “negotiating skills” have resulted in fuck all, you don’t need to.

You just tell the Eurocrats: “100% tariffs unless you do what we say. Watch your chemical, auto and wine industries implode!” And that’s basically it.

Instead he’s fucking sucking up to these faggots, while they mock him, look down on him and screw him over?!

Gay. Did Trump get a brain transplant or something?
It's because he just secured his no compromise trade deal with the EU. They'll buy our weapons, invest 1.2 billion dollars in our economy, pay 15% tariff, and we now get full access to the EU market at a 0% tariff rate. The compliment IS the insult, since it rubs that they couldn't secure a better deal for themselves in their face.
 
It's because he just secured his no compromise trade deal with the EU. They'll buy our weapons, invest 1.2 billion dollars in our economy, pay 15% tariff, and we now get full access to the EU market at a 0% tariff rate. The compliment IS the insult, since it rubs that they couldn't secure a better deal for themselves in their face.
1753643515529.webp
Ha!
 
Despite having advocated the abolition of private property, Zohran Mamdani says he’s not a communist. He calls himself a democratic socialist
Is there any sort of difference between a "Democratic Socialist" and a communist, or is that yet another example in wordsmithing that take place to obfuscate the truth?

I've been thinking a lot about the natural born citizen thing and wonder if that did get overturned what would make any of us citizens?
If SCOTUS decides birthright citizenship shouldn't be given to the children of non-citizens, I'd suspect the ruling would only be effective moving forward because retroactive application would create an ex post facto situation not allowed under the law.

When Reagan did away with involuntary commitment there had been a few high-profile cases of wealthy people who were secretly committed by family members after their money. Some had been held against their will for years.
This form of elder abuse has always been rampant - especially when it was easy to get a relative committed just to take their wealth. Even now, it's easy to keep them drugged up and locked in their bedroom; there was even an Law & Order CI episode where Doris Roberts played the elderly matriarch being drugged into giving away her wealth until a grandchild was murdered trying to blow the whistle on her family.

Surprised no one is talking about it yet, but Internet Archive is now apparently a federal library
The same IA who bent the knee to demands demanding the deindexing of this very site...

Well it turns out those who needed it the most are the NGO's who handled the event. As the 120 million dollars has pretty much just up and vanished!
Too many "charities" are notorious for having more of their money going to some combination of fees, advertising, and executive wages than to actually helping people in need. It's generally better to support a local charity doing hands-on work or offering desperately needed items and supplies.

This was the most brilliant backfire ever to blow up in the nigger lobby's face. Holy fucking shit, nothing peaks a person on the nigger problem like watching their antics on police encounter videos. I absolutely adore the fact that, as you say, criminals (niggers mostly, let's be honest) weaponized the media to pressure police departments to fully document all encounters to avoid claims of racism and excessive force, only to backpedal frantically as said footage gets released publicly in droves proving just how violent, stupid, selfish, arrogant, greedy and vicious niggers are when they commit crimes. And how uncooperative they are. And how frequently they run away to avoid arrest, regardless of the danger they put others in (high-speed pursuits, reckless driving, etc.).
I'm pretty sure you and I, @moocow, have discussed this point and our agreement in the past. More in a moment after I include a relevant quote from a later post:

Omg tell me more please
My favorite example is from the 2020 summer of love when activists insisted Detroit Police filled an innocent black man full of bullets for no good reason. Then Chief Craig immediately released what raw body cam footage was available - possibly against usual department procedure - to show everyone that the activist narrative was incorrect and the perp in question had taken shots at both random citizens and the police before he was shot by return fire and he was not used as a shooting gallery training dummy as alleged.

TL; DR - Activists engage in misinformation against the local police. Police chief immediately releases body cam footage contradicting every allegation being made in the ultimate BTFO response.

The same activists demanding the body cams as a way to combat "police brutality" tend to dislike them now because the cams usually confirm that the police behaved appropriately or in a justifiable manner in their encounters with suspects.

Then I got out of the bubble and realized they're showing all the black criminals cause that's almost all the fucking criminals and definitely most of the ones that are comically stupid during stops. If anything they go out of their way to show more white trash than blacks whenever possible.
Not only that, the white trash on classic Cops episodes almost always did stupid shit that could have stayed under the radar had they known how to interact with police. I seem to recall an episode where the police pulled over white trash for a typical traffic stop that would have been no more than ticket had it not been for stupid behavior leading to the discovery of drugs and a warrant that the cops weren't even looking for. Meanwhile, the black perps tended to be the ones committing more serious crimes - even if "not always" was true to some extent.

Was there any specific thing said to incite all this Ghislaine pardon talk? I saw a reporter ask Trump if he would pardon her, but now everyone is acting like he's going to? What the fuck going on?
It's just the media's latest fixation on screeching about Trump. If he made an announcement that today is Sunday, the media would still find something about that statement to take issue with in their attempt to make him look like the epitome of evil.

Asked what he thought a Harris run would mean for his own reelection prospects, Min repeated, “I have no comment on that, sorry,” and bolted onto the House floor, away from reporters.
Without digging deeper I wonder if Min is Asian. If so, it might be why he'd rather not say anything about Harris. I forget how long ago it was that social media was abuzz about violence against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) - especially in the western US. That buzz abruptly halted once it was discovered black people were largely the perpatrators of the AAPI violence. If it's true blacks and Asians don't get along for that reason - especially out west - his response would totally make sense.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for sperging about black hawk down Im just learning so much I dident know about that OP

Did you guys know the rangers took women and children hostage to survive?
View attachment 7695844

The Somalis had them dead to rights with mortars zeroed in on there postion but the family of those held hostage BEGGED the commander to spare there familys
View attachment 7695853
and the officer LISTENED
View attachment 7695856

IDK what point im trying to make with all this its just weird to learn that our elite troops did such reprehensible things to save there own ass and then to be spared by the very people you sought to kill,
If I'm in a running fight for my life and vastly outnumbered and the building I hole up in has a bunch of civilians in it then fuck it. I'm going to find my self fresh out of morals and use those civvies to buy time. The rangers weren't running a rape train on them, they were using them as a bargaining chip for their lives. Blame the brass and the glowniggers that got those rangers into the mess in the first place.
 
If SCOTUS decides birthright citizenship shouldn't be given to the children of non-citizens,
What determines the citizenship of the parents? Their parents? What about their parent's parents? Following that logic only the direct descendants of people who were already here in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified would be legal citizens.

The only way that begins to work is if you start by declaring that every person on US soil in this moment a US citizen and these are the new rules going forward. No thanks.
 
Last edited:
It's very telling how many people are saying Trump using that image of Vance is proof that there's some internal feud between them. The ability to find humor and laugh at yourself is a completely alien concept to these people.
From what i remember when those images were all over the place, Vance actually retweeted one of them. I know a lot of folks hate Vance, but that sort of thing goes a long way towards endearing him to people. It's madness how few people grasp this.
 
If I'm in a running fight for my life and vastly outnumbered and the building I hole up in has a bunch of civilians in it then fuck it. I'm going to find my self fresh out of morals and use those civvies to buy time. The rangers weren't running a rape train on them, they were using them as a bargaining chip for their lives. Blame the brass and the glowniggers that got those rangers into the mess in the first place.
This and also Somalians are subhuman. "Is it wrong to swat a fly?" is a more interesting moral quandary than "Is it wrong to take a Somalian hostage?".
 
Sorry for sperging about black hawk down Im just learning so much I dident know about that OP

Did you guys know the rangers took women and children hostage to survive?
View attachment 7695844

The Somalis had them dead to rights with mortars zeroed in on there postion but the family of those held hostage BEGGED the commander to spare there familys
View attachment 7695853
and the officer LISTENED
View attachment 7695856

IDK what point im trying to make with all this its just weird to learn that our elite troops did such reprehensible things to save there own ass and then to be spared by the very people you sought to kill,
I bet you are one of those people who believe vetianam veterans were in the wrong for shooting kids with suicide bombs on them. Our troops are trained to kill and hopefully survive and that's it. Life isn't some Hollywood Captain America movie.
 
Sorry for sperging about black hawk down Im just learning so much I dident know about that OP

Did you guys know the rangers took women and children hostage to survive?
View attachment 7695844

The Somalis had them dead to rights with mortars zeroed in on there postion but the family of those held hostage BEGGED the commander to spare there familys
View attachment 7695853
and the officer LISTENED
View attachment 7695856

IDK what point im trying to make with all this its just weird to learn that our elite troops did such reprehensible things to save there own ass and then to be spared by the very people you sought to kill,
There is absolutely no credible evidence that any of this happened whatsoever. You're taking all of that from a 30 year old wapo article written by some literalywho.


If you think the militia that was killing tens of thousands of its own civilians would care about hostages you have brain damage.
If I'm in a running fight for my life and vastly outnumbered and the building I hole up in has a bunch of civilians in it then fuck it.
I bet you are one of those people who believe vetianam veterans were in the wrong for shooting kids with suicide bombs on them
Just ignore that faggot, he's pulling things out of his ass.
 
But yeah that's one major reason why I think there's no currently running COPS series despite that show basically printing money back in the day.
There is -- it's just not aired in the US. There's been at least three seasons of it broadcast elsewhere so far since it went off-air in the US. There's a more sanitized "family friendly" version of it called "Live P.D." that's aired in the US now, though like you described it also goes out of its way to include white trash encounters to balance out all the black criminality. They embed camera crews with police and follow them around on patrols (i.e. livestreamed police ride-alongs), which lends itself to certain types of encounters (they don't follow shoplifters, trudge through airports, break up drug deals, etc.). Not the same, though, which is why it's "allowed" to air.
 
The thing is: Supporting own industry is EXACTLY what tariffs are for.

But instead of slapping a nice, fat 30% tax on German cars, and making some tax breaks for ICE cars (or whatever, to get more ICE engines) he cucks out and gives them a measly 15% tariff.

And when they get back to Brussels, the euro fags are going to toast in champagne that they got one over on Trump. (Again!)

Lame.
I still won't buy an electric chevrolet.
 
Leno really retired at the perfect time. I wouldn't want to be involved in this bullshit if I were him.
View attachment 7699257
Source | Archive
Dude saw this shit coming a mile away and ducked out while he could escape unscathed.

What determines the citizenship of the parents? Their parents? What about their parent's parents? Following that logic only the direct descendants of people who were already here in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified would be legal citizens.

The only way that begins to work is if you start by declaring that every person on US soil in this moment a US citizen and these are the new rules going forward. No thanks.
Huh? You don't need to "determine" citizenship of the parents. We already know the citizenship of the parents. You're either a citizen or you're not. If you're not, neither will your children be. If you are, your children will be. If you can't prove your own citizenship at the time of your child's birth, that's your fucking problem. Go pester some other random bureaucratic nightmare of an office to get the paperwork fixed once you find your passport or birth certificate later to prove it.
 
What determines the citizenship of the parents? Their parents? What about their parent's parents? Following that logic only the direct descendants of people who were already here in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified would be legal citizens. The only way that begins to work is if you start by declaring that every person on US soil in this moment a US citizen and these are the new rules going forward. No thanks.
My friend, this is just a dumb take. The 14th states "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." What determines US citizenship is being born or naturalized here AND being subject to the jurisdiction of the US government. The argument against birthright citizenship is that these anchor babies, birth tourism babies, and the like are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US government because their parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US government - they're subject to the jurisdiction of whatever government controls their origin country. It's that simple. There's no need to dig back decades/centuries and, as pointed out several times already ITT, if God willing the Supremes overturn birthright citizenship it's guaranteed that those who had it prior to the Court's decision will be grandfathered in.
 
Back