Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

apparently there's more to it than meets the eye, that there's an actual story to tell when it comes to stuff like child abuse and the psychological damage it does to them
I remember reading the final chapter when it ended. The teacher leaves the school and there's a 10 year time skip. He waited until the girl was 15 years old and then took her to a love hotel to pop her cherry.
 
Immediately caught the Freudian slip.
As a weeb, WE
Then turns out

As you can see, @Maeis is quite the character. Got anything to say buddy?

Well, all I can say is that all of this is true and I have never ERP'd with minors once I became an adult
:story:



Then, random 764/COM nigger as well?
The man you are replying to is associated with 764 btw

I knew the thread was getting too goddamn peaceful:woo:
 
I remember reading the final chapter when it ended. The teacher leaves the school and there's a 10 year time skip. He waited until the girl was 15 years old and then took her to a love hotel to pop her cherry.
15 in the epilogue sounds most likely, but isn't Rin anywhere between seven and ten in the main story-proper, though? A ten-year time skip is gay and lame.

At least the cousin (now her guardian) didn't molest her as I was fearing. ...Right?
 
764 shill said:
Ok so if someone is like 20 and fucks a 16 year old would that make them a pedo even though both of them are basically biological adults..?
I feel like saying something about this, so I will. What is a pedophile? A pedophile is someone who is lustfully or sexually attracted to children. What is a child? Child can be taken in two senses: in the strict sense as someone yet to reach the age of puberty, and in the broad sense as someone under the age of majority, or someone who is a minor. Similarly, pedophile can be taken in either the strict sense as someone attracted to prepubescent children, or in the broad sense as someone attracted to minors, and therefore a 20 year old who fornicates with a 16 year old is a pedophile. Now, there are three categories of pedophilia: pedophilia in the strict sense, pedophilia which is attraction to early pubescent children (hebephilia), and pedophilia which is attracted to older minors (ephebephilia). These are not equally bad, and they are not bad for the same reasons. Pedophilia in the strict sense is the worst, because prepubescent children are not really sexual beings, and is intrinsically sodomitical or at least very violent because children do not have functioning vaginas. Hebephilia is bad because children who are going through the process of puberty are still significantly physically immature and, in the case of women, childbirth is very dangerous at that age. Ephebephilia is not bad because older minors are physically immature, and although you can usually tell when someone is a minor, there's not a whole lot of physical difference between a typical 16 year old and a typical 20 year old, but because humans are not like dogs, we are rational creatures and we must act according to the rule of reason. The category of minor exists because a man is not immediately mentally mature upon reaching the age of puberty, and therefore certain protections must be given to minors because, basically, they are stupid, for example they cannot sign contracts. The category of minor is not something which exists simply from human nature as such, but is rather created by the force of reason, and is a very real category determined by our laws which now set the age of majority at 18. A person who statutorily rapes a minor is guilty of a sex crime against a minor, even if he was acting under the presumption that the minor was above the age because fornication is immoral, and therefore he has no excuse to not have made sure he was on the right side at least of the civil law before fornicating. If he had instead attempted to sign a contract with the minor, the contract would be void, but he would not be guilty of taking advantage of the minor because signing a contract is an indifferent act. To be clear, the fornication he committed is aggravated by the fact that it is statutory rape. Furthermore, if a man does not have sex with a minor, but simply has a sexual fetish for high schoolers, he does something immoral, and similarly a man who has a fetish for secretaries does something immoral. However, the man with a fetish for high schoolers does something worse, because high schoolers are, of their nature, unsuitable for marriage, and therefore it is similar in some way to sodomy. I hope that helps.
 
15 in the epilogue sounds most likely, but isn't Rin anywhere between seven and ten in the main story-proper, though? A ten-year time skip is gay and lame.
Right, so I went back out of curiosity. Probably more like 3 years. They graduate elementary and then skip to 1st year high school.
1754011321202.webp
At least the cousin (now her guardian) didn't molest her as I was fearing. ...Right?
Apparently he gets with one of her friends.
98f89e04f315063ad5bb1a9fa484ffe3.webp
70d482756d8b73a1f758d9cbecdf4626.webp
 
How does anyone, even here, on this thread, seeing all the posts wishing lolicons a nice quick murder, still come out and try to carry the torch for them? You'd think they'd have a self-preservation instinct to be able to keep talking on this website, but apparently not.

Saying that lolicons aren't as bad as full-on offending pedophiles is like saying that Jeffrey Dahmer is not as bad as Hitler. Yeah, I guess, if you absolutely had to pick one to allow for some godforsaken reason, the lolicons are one millimeter less offensive but that doesn't mean I want either of you within 1000 feet of a kid. (or anyone)

"You shouldn't look down on me, at least I don't cause sexual trauma to real children!" Gold star for you, cunnydrooler! You're one spot further away from Satan in Hell's parking lot, come grab your "I'll only screw a fictional 5th grader" t-shirt and show all of us in society the courageous stand you are taking. Please do wear it at all times so that everyone else can tell just how good of a person you really are.
 
Last edited:
How does anyone, even here, on this thread, seeing all the posts wishing lolicons a nice quick murder, do they still come out and try to carry the torch for them? You'd think they'd have a self preservation instinct to be able to keep talking on this website, but apparently not.

Saying that lolicons aren't as bad as full-on offending pedophiles is like saying that Jeffrey Dahmer is not as bad as Hitler. Yeah, I guess, if you absolutely had to pick one to allow for some godforsaken reason, the lolicons are one millimeter less offensive but that doesn't mean I want either of you within 1000 feet of a kid. (or anyone)

"You shouldn't look down on me, at least I don't cause sexual trauma to real children!" Gold star for you, cunnydrooler! You're one spot further away from Satan in Hell's parking lot, come grab your "I'll only screw a fictional 5th grader" t-shirt and show all of us in society the courageous stand you are taking. Please do wear it at all times so that everyone else can tell just how good of a person you really are.
Lolicon: At least it’s not real children!

CP Possessor: At least I didn’t actually groom a child!

Child Groomer: At least I never molested the child!

Child Molester: At least I only molested one child!

Child Predator: At least I didn’t do worse to the children!

The logical conclusion of saying “Group X isn’t as bad as Group Y therefore we should leave Group X alone.” is that you can not criticize anyone who didn’t kill and torture millions of people.
 
Good riddance, he should castrate himself.
I mean, if it was me, i'd bring every anime figurine I own (non loli related, of course) to point out how censorship hurts everyone. There's no point pretending that a few models are too far over the line when mass censorship is being promised/exists.
Nigga, you own loli figures?
The logical conclusion of saying “Group X isn’t as bad as Group Y therefore we should leave Group X alone.” is that you can not criticize anyone who didn’t kill and torture millions of people.
Pedophiles of any kind contribute to an industry that harms children. If Person A sells a gun to Person B, knowing Person B is going to commit murder using said gun, Person A is legally held liable. Anyone who spreads CP, promotes the sexual abuse of children, or commits similar crimes is responsible for the abuse of children and deserves death. Anyone even mildly interested in "cunny" should be drawn and quartered.
 
We caught on to this with the cub porn long before lolicons got noticed in the States, so just how was it this branch of the same degenerate tree got ignored for so long?
There are two explanations for different groups: the anime community, and the wider Internet. The anime community was accustomed to seeing tamer depictions of lolicon because it is an extremely common part of anime, and even many of the more "respectable" anime like Evangelion feature sexualization of high schoolers (granted that western network television is not extremely better in this regard, but of course the much more tame stuff we have like iCarly feet is made by people like Dan Schneider, so give some thought about what kind of person would make lolicon animations), so it isn't generally seen as weird unless it's really young looking characters, with high schoolers basically being accepted as "just what anime girls are". Lolicons were always seen as pedophiles, as has been shown in this thread by example from the Lucky Star dub, but anime characters are cartoonish and do not look exactly like real people, so just as otakus in general view a difference between anime girls and real women (often preferring anime girls), it was easy to accept that lolicons only like cartoon children and not real children. The wider Internet was introduced to the concept of lolicon in 2018 by Digibro, but this was at a time when people were more accepting of free speech extremism and goonerism, and more willing to see Digibro's perspective when he said "and if I'm not doing anything wrong [molesting children], and I'm looking at the shit, that means I've gotta be on the front fucking lines." It's interesting to mention here that Dax Herrera is completely uncomfortable while Digibro explains himself, but he now sweeps for someone who admits he's a pedophile that likes real children.
 
Found this interesting account under a RoCatchers xeet.
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-40-47 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) based seethe and weep award 💎...webp(A)
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-34-41 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp(A / A)
>Groyper
>allthefallen

Unsurprising.
He's also the guy that asked some girl out to prom with a Chudjak poster which became a meme. Unsure if this is a larp.
Also, unexpected Manny Pardo cameo lol.
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-34-48 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webpScreenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-47-32 'Soyjak Party' User Asks A Girl To Prom With A 'Chudjak' Po...webp
He's also an incel lol.
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-35-32 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-37-20 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-35-23 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-35-42 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-36-44 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-42-52 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Uhhhhh...
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-36-34 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-38-40 Posts with replies by lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) _ X.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 01-37-49 lvan NiIsen (@lrklvanSoyProm) nitter.webp
 
Can somebody explain this to me? Lolicons can't be trusted around children, but also they aren't pedophiles and would not molest children?
That’s easy, it’s cope. They’re in denial, most of them

The worst are the ones who KNOW they’re in the wrong and do it for shock factor. To me there are certain lines that even edgy comedy shouldn’t cross, especially if there isn’t an actual joke and just going “UOOGGGGGH I’M A CHILD MOLESTER BLUE ARCHIVE TOURIST FILTERED” and then immediately turning around and going “heh it was all ironic, triggered much?” That’s not comedy, that’s just acting like a faggot
 
Last edited:
Found this interesting account under a RoCatchers xeet.
View attachment 7721141(A)
View attachment 7721155(A / A)
>Groyper
>allthefallen

Unsurprising.
He's also the guy that asked some girl out to prom with a Chudjak poster which became a meme. Unsure if this is a larp.
Also, unexpected Manny Pardo cameo lol.
View attachment 7721154View attachment 7721174
Fake and gay apparently, from the real Ivan on soyjak.blog (schlog)
 
Back