US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • MLemieux.webp
    MLemieux.webp
    24.8 KB · Views: 13
its precisely why I was objecting to calling the decision for that "secular" nation's flag to have it on it in the first place
Attacking the Israeli flag is an antisemitic hate crime but burning, stomping on or wiping your ass with the American flag is protected speech.
 
Why would you? They're not even important enough for the humiliation rituals. AOC is a state rep for New York, for fuck's sake. Have you seen Cecil Bell Jr. kissing the wall? How about Kelly Armstrong? You'll never see AOC or Newsom doing Israeli photo ops, because neither of them will ever hold any power outside of the commie shitholes of New York and California. You have seen Obama and Biden kissing the wall, but you don't seem to mind. I wonder why?
The spics must go. Piss and moan all you want, vote however you want. The spics will be forcefully removed. There is nothing you can do about it. Enjoy.
Pajeets need to go as well.
 
They're not even important enough for the humiliation rituals. AOC is a state rep for New York, for fuck's sake.
Rubio pledged his loyalty to Israel as a state rep.

It’s not that they’re not important enough, it’s that Israel has either failed to control them or wouldn’t pay them enough.

In any case, they didn’t participate in the humiliation ritual that everyone in the Trump admin, including Trump, did.
 
Trump being on the Epstein list, refusing to release the suicide footage, and refusing to release the unredacted list is good enough for anybody to consider him a pedophile. Because if he wasn't, why would he be making the decisions he's making?
“I can’t think of any reason for this person’s actions other than X. Therefore this person’s actions must be motivated by X. This is not because I am too stupid to think about other possible motivations, it’s because this person is clearly guilty, given the narrow scope of my intellect and seething bias.”

This leads us to two inescapable possibilities: one, that you’re a complete TDS spaz whose opinions on Trump can be disregarded as motivated by spite, or two, you’re an idiot, in which case your opinions on Trump can be disregarded as the product of a, shall we say, limited mental capacity.

Good day to you, sir.
 
I can’t think of any reason for this person’s actions other than X. Therefore this person’s actions must be motivated by X. This is not because I am too stupid to think about other possible motivations, it’s because this person is clearly guilty, given the narrow scope of my intellect and seething bias
what’s more likely? That Trump is playing 8d under water chutes and ladders or that he’s protecting himself.

Sure, I could tie myself into knots like a retard to find a viable reason for why he’s holding back the things he promised to release, but why should I?

What do I gain from refusing to confront the most likely reality other than another fell for it again award?
 
what’s more likely? That Trump is playing 8d under water chutes and ladders or that he’s protecting himself.
C: There are people in the files that had nothing to do with child raping but were on the island to do business with epstein (which was his entire strategy for getting dirt on people) and trump knows that spastic retards on internet forums will not understand the different and that bloodthirsty monsters in DC who are out for blood will intentionally pretend not to understand the difference.
 
C: There are people in the files that had nothing to do with child raping but were on the island to do business with epstein (which was his entire strategy for getting dirt on people) and trump knows that spastic retards on internet forums will not understand the different and that bloodthirsty monsters in DC who are out for blood will intentionally pretend not to understand the difference.
D) If it’s public it’s inadmissible as evidence.
 
C: There are people in the files that had nothing to do with child raping but were on the island to do business with epstein (which was his entire strategy for getting dirt on people) and trump knows that spastic retards on internet forums will not understand the different and that bloodthirsty monsters in DC who are out for blood will intentionally pretend not to understand the difference.
He didn’t seem to have those misgivings on the campaign trail, now did he?

Sorry, but your theory that Trumps association with Epstein was innocent and Trump is a good boy who dindu nuffin doesn’t hold up to serious scrutiny.

That’s why his polling has tanked. Because normal middle Americans smell the bullshit.
 
He didn’t seem to have those misgivings on the campaign trail, now did he?

Sorry, but your theory that Trumps association with Epstein was innocent and Trump is a good boy who dindu nuffin doesn’t hold up to serious scrutiny.

That’s why his polling has tanked. Because normal middle Americans smell the bullshit.
Says the guy who believes UK sources. Let’s face it you want to think he’s a pedo because Reddit told you he is. I mean it’s rather sus that all the NPCs started calling him a pedo all at once.
 
Says the guy who believes UK sources. Let’s face it you want to think he’s a pedo because Reddit told you he is.
Never mind that we've had, in this very thread, videos of Trump in interviews, saying that he'd look into releasing the Epstein stuff after making sure everything was on the up and up. He was never anywhere near as gungho as these niggerfaggot retards say he was and they ignore every single shred of evidence or proof that they're wrong. And don't ask them for proof, they don't have any, but demand you disprove their unsupported bullshit. They're either plants, socks, or retards, or all of the above.
 
He didn’t seem to have those misgivings on the campaign trail, now did he?
This gaslight isn't working bud. He barely talked about the fucking things, the guy says a hundred things a day, there's probably 400 other "promises" he made on that campaign trail that he hasn't kept, we know that's how he works and you do too. Yes he said he would do it but you act like it was his campaign slogan.

If you actually his promise to release the files held more value to the average voter than his promises on
-Deportations
-Tariffs
-Law and order
-Iran
-Russia
-China
-Swamp Draining
-Jan 6 pardons
-Tax cuts

Then you need to touch grass.

That’s why his polling has tanked. Because normal middle Americans smell the bullshit.
Nobody believes this. The average normie doesn't know who Epstein is beyond the meme, and doesn't care. The polls that he's tanked in are no more reliable than any of the other polls we've heard about him for the past 4 years ie: not at all.
 
Never mind that we've had, in this very thread, videos of Trump in interviews, saying that he'd look into releasing the Epstein stuff after making sure everything was on the up and up. He was never anywhere near as gungho as these niggerfaggot retards say he was and they ignore every single shred of evidence or proof that they're wrong. And don't ask them for proof, they don't have any, but demand you disprove their unsupported bullshit. They're either plants, socks, or retards, or all of the above.
it’s always hearsay when asked to show proof. The one making the accusation has to prove it.
 
Says the guy who believes UK sources.
You’re more than welcome to do the same google search I did and pick the source you prefer.

Not sure why UK sources are less reputable than American ones but I put literally zero effort into finding whatever source you find most reputable.

Either way, the polling numbers exist whether you like the person telling you about them or not.
 
Back