- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Ooh, it was a bit too far out to get the explanation. I think posters need to remember that not everyone is as autistic as them in the Twitter TERF wars (probably a thread onto itself).
💼 Careercow Glinner / Graham Linehan - Disgraced Comedian, Mentally Ill to the point of worrying his Family, Hypocritical Misogynist, TERF ANTIFA Quasimodo Doppelganger w/ One Ball & Hateboner for GAMERS/Trump/Brexit/Count Dankula; #ThanksGraham
- Thread starter Feline Darkmage
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Then don't go back. Pretty simple. If you have a court case, tell them to fuck off and take it up in your new country. There is zero reason to go to the UK even if it's a fly over. Do not stop in that shit hole for any reason if you lean Center or Right.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2021
This is the Grandma that fat spastic was shoving his phone in the face of in that video, as he smirks about her assault.
Again, credit where due; Linehan roughing up that fat "teen" and spiking his phone into the concrete was incredibly based of him.
Fortunately he didn't steal a pride flag while he was in America since that comes with a 15 year prison sentence.
Spare us the larp please. You can grandstand about free speech when you stop putting teenagers in maximum security federal prison for "in minecraft" jokes.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2018
I think it is because they thanked James Dreyfuss (gay British actor, hated by troons) for a donation in early June, 2025
This is the earlier attack a 7 years ago on Maria MacLachlan (60 at the time). It is difficult to see in the video, bad angle.
But if I recall, there was SUPPOSED to be a gathering of women in London to talk about women's rights vs troon's demands, but it was canceled last minute because troons blocking it, & the women didn't yet get the final address to meet at. So women went to Hyde park to stay together, and try to get more info. So of course, troons invaded that.
Link https://youtu.be/o7Ah-NJ8CA0?si=eccPA0ghuoq91fjs
The attacker, Tara Wolf, was eventually found guilty but only charged £430.
From the trial: archive
Tara Wolf for reference.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2023
He does have kids there though. Perhaps they could visit Arizona periodically with their mother’s permission but these things can be tricky.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
I thought she was a complete bitch and made it so he can't see them.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2023
N
Well he has definitely had the kids over since the divorce back when he was in England. He was doing a livestream when one was trying to get his attention.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2021
the way he talks about the cops makes me so MATI:
dude, at what point do you tell your boss to fuck off? these fucking cops were literally, no exaggeration, sent to drag a guy to jail for posting wrongthink on the internet. but they're just doing their jobs! real civil all around. right bruv, me and these four blokes are here to nick ye for that reckless tweetin ye've done, sorry for the bovva mate, I know it's bleedin bollocks but I'm just doing me job guv, innit? let's go and have a pint over it after we interrogate you like a fucking terrorist. just stay off the mobile for a bit yeh? here's something the UK's ridiculous internet nannies can really work themselves into a froth over: Britain desperately needs another Blitzkrieg to weed these shitheads out. if Churchill knew what lamers they'd all turn out to be, I imagine he would have surrendered to the Germans and jumped off a fucking cliff. but while we're waiting for that blessed day, here's something simple every UK bureaucrat and their clowns-in-uniform can do to improve the world today:
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
He would have more that likely have had the British government try to extradite him. If America has to deport you to face a criminal trail elsewhere good luck trying to get back in.
If the government was sensible and just waited for him to return for something like seeing family he’d be arrested.
Both of the above scenarios turn a run of the mill assault that would get a small fine at best into a guaranteed prison sentence just for how much you have inconvenienced the state.
He’s facing his problems like a white man (despite being Irish and not really white) and not running away to another state and hoping things sort themselves out like a cowardly American.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2021
She's turned the weans against us!
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2025
I just wanted to say that Maria MacLachlan is awesome. She's consistently posted excellent content calling out this insanity and I credit her along with Magdalen for helping peak me early on. Seeing her get battered by these assholes was enraging. God, I hate these troons.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Are you taking the fucking piss? Trannies have been threatening women and children with violence for decades. JK Rowling initially tweeted about women being erased from language and troons called her a cunt and threatened to punch her and ram their *girldicks down her throat.
*Male penis.
JaanTaam
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2025
So how are trannies calling Jo a cunt any different from Graham calling trannies various names? It's all just "free speech" right?
You can't have it both ways. If TERFs and Graham are to be allowed to "have free speech and tweet what they want without arrest" then the same would need to apply to the fags and trannies. And if it's to be legal for white racist women to tweet "burn down all the hotels with bastard migrants in them" then it would also need to be legal for all of those migrants to threaten to burn her house down. Whatever the law is it needs to apply to everyone equally.
Here's Graham again laughing at prison rape. He's the least self-aware man on the planet. He really thinks it's the fault of "trans activists" for his life being ruined when he acts like a fucking idiot over and over.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2021
This isn't Reddit. You're not going to get any upvotes for repeating the same racing car bed or divorce joke for the 1000th time. Not even if it's your cake day.
Graham calling male sex-pests rude names is fine because they are all men.
Those same sex-pests harassing women is different. "Pick on someone your own size" follows through to adulthood and people don't like it when 6 foot man-hulks with linebacker shoulders go on organised harassment campaigns of silver-haired women.
Graham calling male sex-pests rude names is fine because they are all men.
Those same sex-pests harassing women is different. "Pick on someone your own size" follows through to adulthood and people don't like it when 6 foot man-hulks with linebacker shoulders go on organised harassment campaigns of silver-haired women.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2023
Nick Wallis' live tweets from day 2 of the trial. | Thread Reader | Archive
Be advised Thread Reader cuts off a substantial number of early tweets from this thread and Twitter is being very temperamental. The most reliable way to see all tweets seems to be to start at the end of the thread and scroll back up.
Acting Detective Sergeant Thomas Wells told the court that the phone incident was initially recorded as a robbery, later changed to criminal damage and confirmed the police received a call from Lynsay Watson regarding online harassment (remember, this is a different case to the whole "punch them in the balls" Heathrow arrest tweet which was almost certainly also reported by Watson). An online report was also made by a man called Michelle Louise Burrows regarding an interaction at the Battle of Ideas.
The police closed the case and it was reopened after Brooks threatened to "complain to prof standards, IOPC and seek Judicial Review" on 14th November 2024. Wells said it is police policy to treat people as whatever sex they say they are and that he should have described Linehan as gender critical rather than having "strong anti-transgender views" in his write-up.
The defence made a submission of no case to answer, but the judge disagreed and did not strike out the case.
The defence tried to introduce an additional piece of video evidence, which Wallis reports was this video of Brooks and Freda Wallace at a 2023 Let Women Speak event playing a recording of Sarah Jane (Alan) Baker saying "if you see a TERF, punch them in the fucking face". The judge viewed the footage and decided it was not admissible as it falls into the category of bad character evidence.
Graham was cross examined and came across as rambling and irrelevant at times because of course he can't make things easy for himself. There was confusion as the prosecutor tried to talk about the claimant using feminine pronouns while Glinner referred to him as male. Glinner was at least steadfast about how unreasonable he believed Brooks was being, that Brooks was following him and others at the Battle of Ideas and other women's events and he maintained that throwing the phone was an instinctive reaction and he didn't mean to damage it.
Good example of Glinner sperging which was probably not relevant but will be interesting to those interested in the gender wars. He told his defense counsel:
Mainstream media coverage slightly better than on the first day but they have missed a lot of relevant info. They are under no obligation not to report the Lynsay Watson stuff or Brooks' "acid attack" tweets. Case in point:
Archive of BBC report, 4:34pm UTC
Archive of BBC report, 11:49pm UTC
You can see where mainstream coverage falls short as the average Twitter "lol divorced" guy's take seems to be that Glinner "assaulted a minor" (did it happen on the sidewalk, Yank?), is paranoid and creepy. There was a convicted sex offender at the court supporting the claimant, at least on the first day! This is the UK - you should need a license to call Glinner divorced.
Glinner is now tweeting freely and the Free Speech Union says staying off Twitter has been dropped as a bail condition.
Be advised Thread Reader cuts off a substantial number of early tweets from this thread and Twitter is being very temperamental. The most reliable way to see all tweets seems to be to start at the end of the thread and scroll back up.
Acting Detective Sergeant Thomas Wells told the court that the phone incident was initially recorded as a robbery, later changed to criminal damage and confirmed the police received a call from Lynsay Watson regarding online harassment (remember, this is a different case to the whole "punch them in the balls" Heathrow arrest tweet which was almost certainly also reported by Watson). An online report was also made by a man called Michelle Louise Burrows regarding an interaction at the Battle of Ideas.
The police closed the case and it was reopened after Brooks threatened to "complain to prof standards, IOPC and seek Judicial Review" on 14th November 2024. Wells said it is police policy to treat people as whatever sex they say they are and that he should have described Linehan as gender critical rather than having "strong anti-transgender views" in his write-up.
The defence made a submission of no case to answer, but the judge disagreed and did not strike out the case.
The defence tried to introduce an additional piece of video evidence, which Wallis reports was this video of Brooks and Freda Wallace at a 2023 Let Women Speak event playing a recording of Sarah Jane (Alan) Baker saying "if you see a TERF, punch them in the fucking face". The judge viewed the footage and decided it was not admissible as it falls into the category of bad character evidence.
Graham was cross examined and came across as rambling and irrelevant at times because of course he can't make things easy for himself. There was confusion as the prosecutor tried to talk about the claimant using feminine pronouns while Glinner referred to him as male. Glinner was at least steadfast about how unreasonable he believed Brooks was being, that Brooks was following him and others at the Battle of Ideas and other women's events and he maintained that throwing the phone was an instinctive reaction and he didn't mean to damage it.
Good example of Glinner sperging which was probably not relevant but will be interesting to those interested in the gender wars. He told his defense counsel:
Mainstream media coverage slightly better than on the first day but they have missed a lot of relevant info. They are under no obligation not to report the Lynsay Watson stuff or Brooks' "acid attack" tweets. Case in point:
Archive of BBC report, 4:34pm UTC
Archive of BBC report, 11:49pm UTC
You can see where mainstream coverage falls short as the average Twitter "lol divorced" guy's take seems to be that Glinner "assaulted a minor" (did it happen on the sidewalk, Yank?), is paranoid and creepy. There was a convicted sex offender at the court supporting the claimant, at least on the first day! This is the UK - you should need a license to call Glinner divorced.
Glinner is now tweeting freely and the Free Speech Union says staying off Twitter has been dropped as a bail condition.
IglyUglyOh
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2024
He famously yelled at his kid to go away as he was streaming during his YouTube show with Helen Something & Arty Morty.
I think his kid was trying to give him a birthday present or something.
So we know Glinner is both a bad dad, and too dumb to put a sign saying ‘recording’ on his door
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
That's good, least his ex wasn't a complete bitch.
Hongourable Madisha
You see, some of us don't know English properly.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2019
Don't tip the cow. Especially if you're not doing anything funny or original.