Roketsune / Darosne / Christian Crawford / Field Marshal Crappenburg - Pedophile Activist Furry, Kiwi Farms Member, Verbose Cunt, Furry Drama Investigator

[Field Marshal Crappenberg]

I've been highly fixated on investigating the RMFC/FR lolcows and I tend to hyper-focus and limit distractions when I'm busy or overwhelmed. So, I'm just getting to these few replies now.

And, wow, I'm surprised my last response got only one rating. Is it just me or has activity on Kiwi Farms in general dropped off in the last 2-4 weeks?

Doubtful.

You would be surprised how much time I might expend crafting even a relatively short missive or response. I think the mega-post I created soon after my return ~15 days ago cost me 10-15 hours after revisions and contemplations were factored in, and excluding distractions and functions during. IIRC the series of responses and my return post consumed ~20 hours total, and another 10 lost because I'm a fucking spaz. I've reviewed everything in this ~5 times before sending.

[citation needed]

i do

I was going to quote my lutrine friend as one example but he already did it. The OP likes it when I respond. Probably a few who have read my responses silently support me to some extent. And also, while they won't admit it, many of the people antagonistically retorting value my responses because it's more fun when they can derogate the lolcow directly and in response to their own words.

Uh huh, have you ever considered chemical castration to alleviate the possibility of acting upon your degenerate desires?

Nope. Actually, my severe susceptibility to uneasiness and exhaustion, massive reliance on caffeine, fixation on projects, overwhelming preference for furry and anime aesthetics, and abject misanthropy, pretty much do the job. I paw off only 0.5-1.0 times a day on average, and it's always to furry (sometimes human anime) images and fantasies. But if some or all of those factors weren't at play, I wouldn't consider chemical castration anyway, even if there were no negative side effects from it.

Actually, my response raises a point I sometimes remorselessly and tactlessly hammer home to militant opponents of legalizing shota/loli/cub. I feel if that wasn't available because it was illegal and people were prosecuted for making it, the chance I would have sought out actual child porn at any point would be substantially higher. People such as myself (and everyone in general) should be given maximal opportunities to benignly and comfortably indulge their sexuality. Banning fictional smut is truly antithetical to society's morality regarding sexual relations with children, but God forbid the average person employ reason in choosing moral or political stances.

 

[Begemot]

I've been highly fixated on investigating the RMFC/FR lolcows and I tend to hyper-focus and limit distractions when I'm busy or overwhelmed. So, I'm just getting to these few replies now.

And, wow, I'm surprised my last response got only one rating. Is it just me or has activity on Kiwi Farms in general dropped off in the last 2-4 weeks?




You would be surprised how much time I might expend crafting even a relatively short missive or response. I think the mega-post I created soon after my return ~15 days ago cost me 10-15 hours after revisions and contemplations were factored in, and excluding distractions and functions during. IIRC the series of responses and my return post consumed ~20 hours total, and another 10 lost because I'm a fucking spaz. I've reviewed everything in this ~5 times before sending.






I was going to quote my lutrine friend as one example but he already did it. The OP likes it when I respond. Probably a few who have read my responses silently support me to some extent. And also, while they won't admit it, many of the people antagonistically retorting value my responses because it's more fun when they can derogate the lolcow directly and in response to their own words.




Nope. Actually, my severe susceptibility to uneasiness and exhaustion, massive reliance on caffeine, fixation on projects, overwhelming preference for furry and anime aesthetics, and abject misanthropy, pretty much do the job. I paw off only 0.5-1.0 times a day on average, and it's always to furry (sometimes human anime) images and fantasies. But if some or all of those factors weren't at play, I wouldn't consider chemical castration anyway, even if there were no negative side effects from it.

Actually, my response raises a point I sometimes remorselessly and tactlessly hammer home to militant opponents of legalizing shota/loli/cub. I feel if that wasn't available because it was illegal and people were prosecuted for making it, the chance I would have sought out actual child porn at any point would be substantially higher. People such as myself (and everyone in general) should be given maximal opportunities to benignly and comfortably indulge their sexuality. Banning fictional smut is truly antithetical to society's morality regarding sexual relations with children, but God forbid the average person employ reason in choosing moral or political stances.

So, you're saying you personally exist in a slippery slope within your sexuality? One that leads from drawn pictures to images of obviously non-consenting children. Okay. That's not a good place to be in.

I understand this is a hypothetical argument so I'm not going splutter and rage about it. The parameters here are about an idealisation of a lack of consent. Alison Rapp made something equivalent to this argument and was pilloried for it. People think this place is full of edgelords, but it's more likely it's filled with damaged former idealists. This statement will not go down well here and not because we're troglodytes but because this slippery slope can lead to something genuinely harmful.

 

[Pinhead Larry]

Is the attention whoring, would be kid fucker still defending himself over two months later? Damn, you must be desperate for the attention that those prepubescent kids aren't giving you.

 

[Tom Spring]

@Field Marshal Crappenberg - I'm not sure where to start but I'd like to talk to you as a person rather than focus on any "degenerate" behavior or antagonise you.

In your recent post you said that you've spent many hours working on and reviewing what you say here - I'm guessing you've also spent a lot of time just lurking. Forgive me for saying it... but I'm guessing that you're a pretty lonely person. Outside of the net what do you actually occupy your time with?

 

[Pointless Pedant]

So, you're saying you personally exist in a slippery slope within your sexuality? One that leads from drawn pictures to images of obviously non-consenting children. Okay. That's not a good place to be in.

I understand this is a hypothetical argument so I'm not going splutter and rage about it. The parameters here are about an idealisation of a lack of consent. Alison Rapp made something equivalent to this argument and was pilloried. People think this place is full of edgelords, but it's more likely it's filled with damaged former idealists. This statement will not go down well here and not because we;re troglodytes but because this slippery slope can lead to something genuinely harmful.

I thought Rapp suggested legalising real child pornography. Cartoon pornography is already legal under US federal law unless it's a representation of a real child, and I don't think @Field Marshal Crappenberg was arguing for the legalisation of the real thing, unless he's even more pathetic than I thought.

 

[Begemot]

I thought Rapp suggested legalising real child pornography. Cartoon pornography is already legal under US federal law unless it's a representation of a real child, and I don't think @Field Marshal Crappenberg was arguing for the legalisation of the real thing, unless he's even more pathetic than I thought.

'Maximal opportunities' is fairly broad, hard to tell how much that would mean, perhaps it is intentionally broad in meaning? This is a dark path we're taking, here.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

'maximal opportunities' is fairly broad, hard to tell how much that would mean, perhaps intentionally broad?

He said "fictional smut", so I'm guessing he's not talking about Peter Scully's oeuvre, but he could just be too autistic to tell the difference.

 

[r00]

You would be surprised how much time I might expend crafting even a relatively short missive or response. I think the mega-post I created soon after my return ~15 days ago cost me 10-15 hours after revisions and contemplations were factored in, and excluding distractions and functions during.

Well then it was a massive waste of time. Everything that you say could be said in a fraction of the word count that you use.

 

[Terror Rism]

I was going to quote my lutrine friend as one example but he already did it. The OP likes it when I respond. Probably a few who have read my responses silently support me to some extent. And also, while they won't admit it, many of the people antagonistically retorting value my responses because it's more fun when they can derogate the lolcow directly and in response to their own words.

[Citation Still Needed]

keksz doesn't count as a citation, but any recollection of this "mistake" you mentioned would work fine

 

[Jean Pierre Polnareff]

"Pawing off" are you for fucking real.

 

[Begemot]

Well then it was a massive waste of time. Everything that you say could be said in a fraction of the word count that you use.

Agreed, this is place to shitpost, mate, if you're overthinking this place you haven't been paying attention, though his advocacy for loli might show that was the case all along.

 

[An Ghost]

I've been troll shielding by investigating the Neonazi pedofurs lolcows (who are totally worse than autistic pedofurs) and I have nuclear tier autism

FTFY. Well, it's less true now cause you've been threadbanned from a few. People know who you are. Trying to use nazi furs to further your reputation on a cyber bowling site, after your own thread, is just autistic.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Agreed, this is place to shitpost, mate, if you're overthinking this place you haven't been paying attention, though his advocacy for loli might show that was the case all along.

This is also a place for not being a furry paedophile.

 

[Field Marshal Crappenberg]

I'll respond to other posts later, but I'm trying a new response strategy (place multiple responses to the same person in one post) and Chekovia brought up points that required large responses.

So, you're saying you personally exist in a slippery slope within your sexuality? One that leads from drawn pictures to images of obviously non-consenting children. Okay. That's not a good place to be in.

I'm not entirely sure what you intended to convey. Are you talking about my argument banning and vigorously stamping out fictional child porn will increase the demand for real child porn? I think that was the intention, but I'm not sure.

Assuming that's what you meant, that's what my general observations and my understanding of human behavior would indicate. If you're going to severely criminalize both fictional and real underage porn and people are horny and reckless enough to look for it anyway, they're going to be more likely to look for the real thing or both since the penalties and availability are comparable. If the status quo remains or obscenity laws (not including real CP, since that's a different legal concept from obscenity) are abolished entirely, people will be incentivized to look for shota/lolicon and cub. Of course, some are going to go for both or they have no interest in drawn stuff and will go just for real CP regardless of circumstances, but the same thing is true for every other crime.

I've also noticed that when a society tries to mercilessly and absolutely suppress sexuality or some other vice, worse and different problems manifest. Islamic cultures, Japanese society, and American society to an extent, have all had higher rates of perversions, maladaptations, and crimes of various sorts than a liberal culture would. When porn or prostitution are legalized, the rates of sexual assault decline. Of course, in general, when a culture sides with freedom of expression and sexuality, happiness is higher and frustration and dysfunction are lower.

So, in essence, those who demand the vigorous abolition of obviously fictional smut are actually advocating for reduced happiness and more crimes against children. I know they don't believe they are and have the opposite motivations, but this is the brutal reality that I like to undiplomatically apprise people of in those sorts of arguments. What they demand is antithetical to their goals and morality.

As for what we should do about/for those pedo/hebephiles who aren't furries or hentai enthusiasts, which admittedly are a higher-risk subset... There aren't any easy answers which are also mature and feasible. Summary execution or castration aren't feasible until we perfect mind reading, and that ignores any moral or legal considerations and ramifications. The exclusive types especially will quite possibly be very frustrated and unhappy, and they should also have mental health resources available to them. I think pedo/hebephilia should be given a special designation which wouldn't be considered an actual disability, but would alone be grounds for someone to receive socialized/subsidized psychological and medical care if they're low-income. I think we also should have a program comparable to the German Dunkelfeld initiative, which caters to those who have committed crimes but voluntarily are seeking help to stop.

I understand this is a hypothetical argument so I'm not going splutter and rage about it.

I do appreciate that. I should have been somewhat more precise and perhaps slightly less confrontational/edgy in my last post since this is an extremely adversarial environment, and I was afraid there would be a series of people screaming ragefully in response because they misconstrued one or more things I said. Of course, I also understand some Kiwis seem to like being morally affronted by lolcows and would have been upset even if they interpreted everything I said correctly, so if that's their MO/coping strategy (I know it wouldn't work for me), so be it.

Alison Rapp made something equivalent to this argument and was pilloried for it.

Can someone please explain to me whether she advocated legalizing child porn (I mean, ACTUAL child porn) and give an exact excerpt if she did? She is constantly accused of that and that's even in her lolcow thread title (actually her OP says, "She does not, or at least not openly, support creation or distribution of CP when it involves real children."). I read her entire thesis once, and I can't be bothered to do it again. But I remember she was opposed to criminalizing fictional child porn for practical and moral reasons, and saw the Western World pressuring Japan into criminalizing shotacon and lolicon as cultural imperialism (which I guess it is, though imperialism isn't automatically inherently bad). She also IIRC said actual child porn and offenses against children is "another matter all together".

Also, now that we're talking about Alison Rapp... I am not familiar with her case enough to know whether she's a genuine lolcow, and I'm not going to take Kiwis' condescending assumptions and misconstruances as evidence. Maybe she really is a degenerate and dysfunctional doofus. However, if the sole reason her thread started and the near-simultaneous crusade occurred was that she opposed criminalizing hentai in her thesis, that is absolutely fucking ridiculous. But I also suspect there were other reasons and factors in the initial uproars, though the thesis might have been the main impetus and rallying cry, which is still absolutely fucking ridiculous.

but it's more likely it's filled with damaged former idealists

That I can definitely imagine. Some people become very bitter, abrasive, and malevolent when they're disillusioned. I think I might fall into that category, honestly. I used to be more "idealistic", but as my experience with and knowledge of humanity increased, so did my general animosity and aggressive instincts towards people. Even 1-2 years ago I don't recall being so actively provocative and acrimoniously destructive. What's funny though, is if KF or I got our way and our society was reconstructed in our vision, the site would greatly decline due to less interest/need to denounce people amongst allies, and due to fewer lolcows.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Are all these "haha i love this thread let me now write massive paragraphs about nothing" responses an elaborate scheme to get rid of this thread or is he actually enjoying it? Hmmm..... really makes me think.

But seriously, no matter what the intent is, it's autistic as fuck and we've now had about 20+ pages spent running in circles with no real updates and getting "played liek a fiddle by the masterfu1 soci4l tact1c14n "

I'm glad this thread is slowing down even if he wants it to because it's just retarded period.

 

[Cato]

Also, now that we're talking about Alison Rapp... I am not familiar with her case enough to know whether she's a genuine lolcow, and I'm not going to take Kiwis' condescending assumptions and misconstruances as evidence. Maybe she really is a degenerate and dysfunctional doofus. However, if the sole reason her thread started and the near-simultaneous crusade occurred was that she opposed criminalizing hentai in her thesis, that is absolutely fucking ridiculous. But I also suspect there were other reasons and factors in the initial uproars, though the thesis might have been the main impetus and rallying cry, which is still absolutely fucking ridiculous.

1.) In addition to her thesis, her twitter was full of all kinds of apologism, and even advocacy, for pedophilia. She criticized the legal system over people being arrested for possessing child pornography, advocated for lowering the age of consent, and more. While she hasn't, to my knowledge, expressed personal sexual preferences towards minors, it has been a bizarre topic of interest for her. The thesis was one of many pieces reflecting this and was not something isolated.

2.) She is basically a parody of negative perceptions of millennials, possessing virtually every negative stereotype about them possible. Really this is the most lolcowish quality about her and definitely makes her qualify as one.

P.S. - Stop. Why the hell are you breaking down posts to single sentences and responding to each sentence with multiple paragraphs? I hate Microsoft Word's "clarity and conciseness" filter, but it must have been designed with people like you in mind.

 

[BillionBisonBucks]

Are you enjoying being our Vicktory Dog, CJ? Yes or no will suffice.

 

[OtterParty]

New Are you enjoying being our Vicktory Dog, CJ? Yes or no will suffice.

fuck you i want an essay

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Why the hell are you breaking down posts to single sentences and responding to each sentence with multiple paragraphs?

:autism:

 

[r00]

@Field Marshal Crappenberg You are a terrible writer. For the love of god, read your shit before you post it. Use some of that 15 hours to proof read and eliminate some of your many redundancies. It took me 15 minutes to trim your shit in half.
Getting rid of all your verbal gymnastics just makes it even clearer that you don't have a point. You are literally only defending pedos because you are one.

Spoiler: slightly less lengthy sperging

I'll respond to other posts later, but I'm going to be especially longwinded this time

(chekovia said

Do you mean my argument that banning fictional child porn will increase the demand for real child porn?
People are horny and reckless and will be more likely to look for real porn over fictional since the penalties and availability are comparable.

(citation needed, or is this anecdotal?)

When a society tries to suppress sexuality, different problems manifest. Islamic cultures, Japan, and America to an extent, have all had higher rates of perversions, maladaptations, and crimes than a more liberal culture would.

(I know you feel the fursecution, but America is one of the most liberal countries on the fucking planet, and Islamic Cultures love to fuck children. What point are you trying to make?)
When porn or prostitution are legalized, sexual assault declines. When a culture sides with freedom of expression and sexuality, happiness is higher and frustration and dysfunction are lower. (CITATION NEEDED)

Those who want to ban fictional child porn are actually advocating for reduced happiness and more crimes against children.
(lol. that's so retarded. You're the pedo, why not take responsibility for your own actions rather than trying to blame society?)

As for what we should do about pedophiles who aren't furries or hentai enthusiasts, which admittedly are a higher-risk subset...
(you are a dumb fuck for implying that being a furry or a hentai enthusiast somehow automatically makes pedos lower risk)

Summary execution isnt feasible (castration is though). Pedos should have mental health resources available to them. Perhaps something like the German Dunkelfeld initiative, which helps criminals that are voluntarily seeking help to stop. (the key word here being "stop")

(chekovia said...)

I should have been less confrontational/edgy in my last post...(cognitive dissonance warning ... I was afraid there would be a series of enraged people screaming in response because they misconstrued one or more things I said.
I don't understand why Kiwis get so morally affronted by pedos and am upset that they interpret my long-ass posts correctly, but still think i'm a retard.

(chekovia said...)

Can someone prove that she advocated for legalizing real child porn? She said actual child porn was "another matter all together". Maybe she is a dysfunctional degenerate but if her thread started just because she opposed criminalizing hentai then that is absolutely fucking ridiculous.
(no its not, because society as a whole thinks pedos are generally irredeemable. I'd have thought that someone so observant as you would have noticed this)

(chekovia said...)

Some people become very bitter when they're disillusioned. I fall into that category. The more I noticed that society hates childfuckers, the more I doubled down on my disgusting perversions.

What's funny though, is if KF or I got our way and our society was reconstructed in our vision....

(What is "our way"? dont try and lump yourself in with everyone else you inhuman, degenerate autist.)