Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
Everyone with a functioning prefrontal cortex know that Ro Khanna is right on this one.

Screenshot 2025-09-04 105205.webp
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Jeremy Dewitte, Soup Sammiches, Procopius and 3 others
garbage cake said:
The boys are back in town
View attachment 7802199
A classic Tony outfit choice of ugly dress with ugly shoes, now featuring black socks. Very nice, Tone! They go with your roots.
View attachment 7802200
Click to expand...
Another BRUTAL mogging for Zac, why hasn't the referee stopped this!?

On the subject of big tone's income I doubt it's as high as the initial estimate because like 5% of trannies have disposable income they don't immediately blow on instant gratification garbage. Probably more than a comfortable standard of living tho.

Still I really don't care about the swells and dips in the great hipster welfare trough because at the end of the day it's still retards getting bilked out of their neetbux and Tony displaying his fashion sense on the streets is the worst thing to happen to paris since WW2
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Palla Strozzi, GenderCop, Rudolf's Friend and 6 others
Not Dr. Evil said:
Everyone with a functioning prefrontal cortex know that Ro Khanna is right on this one.

View attachment 7870746
Click to expand...
I don't keep up with Graham Linehan's antics because his potato face and odd proportions unsettle me in a Lovecraftian manner, but did he actually call for violence or did he say men in women's bathrooms should be physically removed?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Palla Strozzi, GenderCop, Sir Chubbis the Turd and 3 others
Not Dr. Evil said:
View attachment 7863137
Click to expand...
In which Anthony defends the idea that chalking crosswalks cannot possibly be harmful because it isn't permanent.

I wonder if he would hold the same sentiment if people chalked 'total tranny death' on the crosswalk?

Oliver Onions said:
I don't keep up with Graham Linehan's antics because his potato face and odd proportions unsettle me in a Lovecraftian manner, but did he actually call for violence or did he say men in women's bathrooms should be physically removed?
Click to expand...
He said women should raise a fuss if a transwoman was in their bathroom and demand the man leave, and if he didn't, they should punch him in the balls.

Meanwhile, trannies carry signs and write Tweets saying 'decapitate TERFs' and they've never been arrested for it

The UK has made advances against tranny ideology but has regressed even more absurdly on its absolute intolerance of free speech.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Jeremy Dewitte, Moosebonker, expectant asshole and 17 others
Oliver Onions said:
I don't keep up with Graham Linehan's antics because his potato face and odd proportions unsettle me in a Lovecraftian manner, but did he actually call for violence or did he say men in women's bathrooms should be physically removed?
Click to expand...
What he said was in response to a question about what to do if a female found a tranny in their bathroom.
First options included complaining to staff though to calling the police.
Punching them in the balls was the last option.

Seems like a perfectly reasonable response to finding a man illegally invading a female space.

I still say that the only time a troon should be allowed into a court is for sentencing.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: expectant asshole, Palla Strozzi, GenderCop and 13 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Palla Strozzi, Rudolf's Friend, luigismanslave and 4 others
CEO of Gay said:
Credit where credit is due: at least he actually quotes the passages in question that will supposedly take away his right to healthcare or to participate in sports.
Click to expand...
MEDICAID
None of the funds made available by this Act may be used for any social, psychological, behavioral, or medical intervention performed for the purposes of intentionally changing the body of an individual (including by disrupting the body’s development, inhibiting its natural functions, or modifying its appearance) to no longer correspond to the individual’s biological sex.
Click to expand...
Tony's response:
The provisions would immediately strip Medicaid and Medicare coverage for gender-affirming care if passed by both chambers of Congress and signed into law. But their impact could stretch far beyond that narrow reading.
Click to expand...
SPORTSBALL
None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to provide financial assistance to an educational institution that allows an individual whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls. For the purpose of this section, the term "sex means the reproductive biology and genetics of an individual as determined solely at birth.
Click to expand...
Tony's response:
Such language would function as a de facto national transgender sports ban, forcing schools and universities into compliance. Even more troubling, the vague use of the word “activity” could give the administration sweeping latitude to strong-arm schools into broader restrictions—potentially extending to bathrooms, dorms, and virtually any gendered program or event, even if it may not be fully supported by some readings of the text.
Click to expand...
I've never read any of Tony's "journalism" before but from skimming this article he seems to do the thing a lot of hacks do where he lays out the plain text of what's being proposed then contorts himself into knots trying to come up with the worst possible ways it could be interpreted by bad actors.

The part about an "activity" being vague is a good example, because it's pretty clearly preceded by "athletic", but even if it wasn't A) what else could it apply to? and B) why shouldn't it apply to all womens-only activities?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lentil Soup, Marvin, glioblastoma multiforme and 7 others
Nero Fiddled said:
Can't see what this insipid little man is complaining about - everything he claims is going to happen should never have been allowed in the first place and the sooner this gender bullshit is outlawed, the sooner society will not only recover, but heal.
Click to expand...
11th CIrcuit said it is perfectly ok to ban taxpayer funding for troon care in an 8 - 5 vote.

Screenshot 2025-09-09 194344.webp
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Moosebonker, garbage cake, Oliver Onions and 12 others
Did Tony attempt to resolve his brow situation and fail miserably, or did an undercover TERF tend to him at a studio? Inquiring minds would like to know, but really don't care. Whatever the cause these are monumentally awful. Thank you for this. Troons equate makeup and purses with the root of the collection of behaviors they try to define as womanhood. So what does it mean that Tony fails so spectacularly at the first rule of being a woman?

tonybrowgouge.webp
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lentil Soup, Pedophobe, Moosebonker and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom