- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
Maria isn't really malicious about it
This is a fine example of what makes these games difficult to discuss: Though others can and will make a broad point many will agree with, the cases made for their assertions are liable to conflate villainous intent with characters incidentally serving as antagonists within particular story beats. People also give themselves room to attribute varying degrees of agency to certain secondary characters without first establishing whether they believe them to even exist as more than figments of the protagonist.
Maria might be the best example of how (deliberately) muddled the waters are: For many SH fans, their canon interpretation of Maria's motives, actions, and overarching role in James' story comes down entirely to whether they enjoy Born From a Wish or consider it non-canon filler (which Konami currently seems to; being as it remains excluded within the remake). Much of the discussion I've seen to do with interpreting how Maria behaves in the remake over the past year has been dictated by headcanon informed by BFAW, and how the person has chosen to interpret the visual easter eggs sprinkled throughout the remake. I'm still uncertain as to what the Baldwin mansion being acknowledged in the remake implies or signifies.
YOUVEBEENHEREFORTWODECADES
Last edited:







