Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

:story:
1758246369598.webp
Source (Archive)
 
Last edited:
Lammy said:
I don't think Dakwins has publicly said so directly, but all I recall seeing of him in recent years has been him seemingly regretting his activism and viewing the popularization of Atheism as a mistake that just made the general public worse for it.
Even before that, he's called himself a "cultural Christian" for many years, and I imagine probably isn't fond of the modern Atheist zeitgeist that actively promotes immoral and anti-moral values.
I think he might simply be apt to not want to go out and bat for a cause that's since become the antithesis of what he supports and values.
Click to expand...
He was smart enough to "not need a god" but there sure are a lot of stupid people who are worse off without one to provide morals. He was a secular humanist primarily and thought he was unshackling people to intellectual freedom and mutual understanding. Turns out selfish, lazy hedonism is what usually replaces God and there's a reason why religions teach chastity and continence.
 
Lammy said:
I don't think Dakwins has publicly said so directly, but all I recall seeing of him in recent years has been him seemingly regretting his activism and viewing the popularization of Atheism as a mistake that just made the general public worse for it.
Even before that, he's called himself a "cultural Christian" for many years, and I imagine probably isn't fond of the modern Atheist zeitgeist that actively promotes immoral and anti-moral values.
I think he might simply be apt to not want to go out and bat for a cause that's since become the antithesis of what he supports and values.
Click to expand...

Some people, including myself, have accused Dawkins of being a fairweather enemy, because he's realized belatedly that transgenderism and islam are far greater threats to the things he loves than Christianity is, and seems to be coming to terms with the fact that Christianity probably formed a bulwark to prevent the degenerate elements of society from mucking everything up.

But on the other hand, if he did have some kind of spiritual awakening and renounce his atheism not too long before his death...
 
Lammy said:
I don't think Dakwins has publicly said so directly, but all I recall seeing of him in recent years has been him seemingly regretting his activism and viewing the popularization of Atheism as a mistake that just made the general public worse for it.
Even before that, he's called himself a "cultural Christian" for many years, and I imagine probably isn't fond of the modern Atheist zeitgeist that actively promotes immoral and anti-moral values.
I think he might simply be apt to not want to go out and bat for a cause that's since become the antithesis of what he supports and values.
Click to expand...

MerelyAPlateOfSpaghetti said:
He was smart enough to "not need a god" but there sure are a lot of stupid people who are worse off without one to provide morals. He was a secular humanist primarily and thought he was unshackling people to intellectual freedom and mutual understanding. Turns out selfish, lazy hedonism is what usually replaces God and there's a reason why religions teach chastity and continence.
Click to expand...
Dawkins crying over the death of Christianity is like Brutus crying over the civil war he caused.
 
Aero the Alcoholic Bat said:
But on the other hand, if he did have some kind of spiritual awakening and renounce his atheism not too long before his death...
Click to expand...
He has made solemn oaths that his friends all vehemently bully him if he starts having a deathbed conversion so he remains his whole life an atheist. We'll see how that one goes.
 
Wikipedia must have gotten tired of being shit on for the double standard, because they finally changed the name of the damn article:

Screenshot_20250918-185339~2.webp

Was "Killing of Charlie Kirk" up until a few hours ago.

Screenshot_20250918-190617~2.webp
 
Last edited:
Captain Manning said:
Wikipedia must have gotten tired of being shit on for the double standard, because they finally charged the name of the damn article:

View attachment 7935750

Was "Killing of Charlie Kirk" up until a few hours ago.

View attachment 7935769
Click to expand...
Assassination was always a more fitting term. Killing doesn't even sound right in that context anyways. It's an informal word that should be replaced by murder if the person involved isn't someone in an important position.
 
Last edited:
Captain Manning said:
Wikipedia must have gotten tired of being shit on for the double standard, because they finally charged the name of the damn article:

View attachment 7935750

Was "Killing of Charlie Kirk" up until a few hours ago.

View attachment 7935769
Click to expand...
The whole wikipedia arc has felt like a child refusing to eat the vegetables and does everything in its power to no eat them from outright refusing to give a small bite to finally eating the damn thing after 3 hours of scolding.
 
Jose Beaner Luna said:
The whole wikipedia arc has felt like a child refusing to eat the vegetables and does everything in its power to no eat them from outright refusing to give a small bite to finally eating the damn thing after 3 hours of scolding.
Click to expand...
watch as wikipedia changes it back while no one is looking and we end up with the same shit all over again.
 
IMG_0415.webp
This was on that Tucker Carlson video someone posted. And I'm like… who's gonna tell them the gays and the trannies have been horrifying this entire time, by their own doing?

also are people really buying this stuff as fact? I mean I understand MK Ultra… but people would believe the oogie-boogie scary neo-MK Ultra than the fact that lefties are psycho and never had America or Americans in mind? Really?

(Also does anyone have a source to read about MK Ultra shit that isn't a bunch of weird creepypasta sounding stuff or does that exist?)

neger psykolog said:
I mean who ever even watched this slop since getting broadband internet?
Click to expand...
My grandparents.

W00K #17 said:
View attachment 7933956
Click to expand...
They need us more than we need them. They're the useless eaters.
Dumbledore's Onlyfans said:
goatse, tubgirl, and shoveling
Click to expand...
I've never heard of shoveling and im sickened and curious
John Shedletsky said:
View attachment 7935244
Tweet | Archive
Click to expand...
Good. The View is actually what my mom to stop talking to my grandma for a couple weeks. My mom was just saying "what if they're saying isn't true" and wanting to hear her out and my grandma wouldn't talk to her after that…

Giga Brainlet said:
Holy shit. Did he catch aids or something? He looks like shit.
Click to expand...
ozempic, probably. He was always ugly af but now he just looks like Brian griffin without the fur. Gross

Edited to add: The first thing I thought was that they better not pussyfoot around this being an assassination. Call it what it was, by definition.
 
ExplodedWhale said:
I've never heard of shoveling and im sickened and curious
Click to expand...
It was supposed to be "shovel dog" but autocorrect fucked me over again. Please, for all that's good and holy, you don't want to see a dog beaten to death with a shovel. It was a 4chan/8chan gore spam and I only save it for the very worst offenders who aren't impressed with gross fetish material. I have only resorted to shovel dog once, usually goatse, tubgirl, or meatspin gets the job done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom