- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
I like them making fun of him from a distance. Keep ignoring him and laughing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah it was just after Ralph got banned and I think he was trying to bait Jim or throw in with Sargon's crew or some shit like that, IIRC they were trying to get Warski banned using the same tactic as well.I thought jeremy wanted to yell "nigger" on Metokur's stream to get him banned. Or was that and $14.88 chats some other faggot's idea?
(also if someone could archive this that’d be great)
I've cut back on the amount of clips I take from any given episode. After doing a few, I noticed I'd have anywhere from 50-70 clips, and that was just too many to deal with. My process is to actually watch the episode, listening to something I think might be worth saving, finding the timestamps and saving the clips, and then trying my best to construct my actual post with clips organized by theme as best I can. I actually listen to the entire episode, which has a benefit that I don't miss anything, but the consequence is that I might make a judgment call in the moment and not take the clip, because I don't see it fitting into one of those themes. I do it this way because for some of the episodes I clip, there's not much work to do because they're super boring, and I can assemble the next Warhammer guys I'm going to paint, which helps keep me sane. Episodes like this, where there's lots and lots of snippets I want to take, it makes it very time-consuming and miserable. If you have any suggestions for improving that process, I'd like to hear them.I skimmed through that stream too I think I had a couple notes you didn't clip so I might go back for those.
100%. I am also around this same age bracket, and I remember how the world was very well. I started playing Magic in 3rd grade, but had quit by the time I was in high school. Ignoring that it was actually a mechanically very fun game, the social circumstances you described are 100% applicable to my environment as well (which is probably geographically as far as possible from both you and him, which means that the general sentiment wasn't constricted to any particular geographical area). Jeremy is exactly the kind of guy that has intertwined himself into a number of things I used to find enjoyable, but those things have been degraded because of people like him being massive pieces of shit and ruining it for everyone else. I find his claims that he was a pussy magnet cool-kid social butterfly to be very, very unbelievable. There was a clip I don't think I ended up posting, where he talked about chugging Mountain Dew all day, that backs up this skepticism. I bet he was already starting to get noticeably fat by the end of high school, which didn't bode well for one's chances at attracting girls back in that era (again, times seem to have changed on that, based on what I see in the area I live in now).I was in school the same era as Jeremy and I am willing to go on the stand under threat of perjury and testify that anyone who sat at the lunch table where kids played Magic The Gaythering in high school between the years 1998-2002 was 100% not one of the popular kids and was in fact a fucking loser.
Most things he says are just simply retarded, but this is the part that's the most transparently dishonest. He claims to be both rich and poor, simultaneously. It's undeniable he had a large and sustained revenue stream from his YouTube (undeserved, but that doesn't change the reality of it), and I strongly doubt he's going to be actually broke ever again in his life. I suspect that many of his material possessions are on credit, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was savvy enough to have been investing for a while. I wouldn't be surprised if he has to liquidate some of his investments if he wants to keep EVERYTHING he has, but I also doubt that all of it is in danger of getting repo-ed.I feel the most ridiculous part of the grift of the hambeast is the simple lie that he's poor. I could believe he was cash poor. He is asset rich by a country mile.
Thing I'd I don't think he's on credit. His youtube channel is fully monetized and he has a full back catalog to watch. Even in worst case, he's making passive income off the old shit. In reality he is still at escape velocity. Each video doesn't make many views. But he makes a lot, and each gets a consistent amount of views. He is making millions. I don't believe a word he says.Most things he says are just simply retarded, but this is the part that's the most transparently dishonest. He claims to be both rich and poor, simultaneously. It's undeniable he had a large and sustained revenue stream from his YouTube (undeserved, but that doesn't change the reality of it), and I strongly doubt he's going to be actually broke ever again in his life. I suspect that many of his material possessions are on credit, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was savvy enough to have been investing for a while. I wouldn't be surprised if he has to liquidate some of his investments if he wants to keep EVERYTHING he has, but I also doubt that all of it is in danger of getting repo-ed.
Despite all of that, the real pain he will suffer is when his health deteriorates to its inevitable steep decline leading to his end. Not only will that be physically and mentally torturous for him to go through, but his wife is obviously going to outlive him, and she will be spending the rest of her days vacationing and fucking younger, more virile men to fill the void in her soul that Jeremy has created with his un-Godly way of living. And no amount of Rolexes, luxury cars, orange groves, arcade cabinets or Funko Pops can make up for how hard he's going to be cucked in his afterlife, which is going to be 1000x more than how hard he gets cucked in his actual life.
The facts you laid out are true, but I just have a hard time believing people go back and watch any Quartering episode older than a week. Maybe to 'catch up' on any specific topic, but that just doesn't seem like it'd account for any significant amount of views, relative to his baseline. Does anyone know of a way to track updated views on old videos, without manually monitoring them?Thing I'd I don't think he's on credit. His youtube channel is fully monetized and he has a full back catalog to watch. Even in worst case, he's making passive income off the old shit. In reality he is still at escape velocity. Each video doesn't make many views. But he makes a lot, and each gets a consistent amount of views. He is making millions. I don't believe a word he says.
Yeah this disappoints me. If he is offering to go on then it looks bad for KC to keep their shit up without taking him on. It's a pussy look. I say that as a guy who fucking despises Jeremy now. He is the definition of a grifter. I remember when he used to be anti SJW and anti censoring so to see him throw himself in with fake Christian's like melonie mac is wild. Now he wants games censored just like The SJWs he once got viral off of.Kino Casino should really invite Quartering on. IDK what they are worried about because he will completely fold under the pressure of being asked to pick a lane on the record.
The Quartering viewer is not smart. He is desensitized to the slop and craves the lowest quality content possible. They will rewatch his stuff. That is what a fanboy does. Which is the audience he has cultivated: manchildren. Everything else can be a loss,but as long as his views are steady, he's still in the black.The facts you laid out are true, but I just have a hard time believing people go back and watch any Quartering episode older than a week. Maybe to 'catch up' on any specific topic, but that just doesn't seem like it'd account for any significant amount of views, relative to his baseline. Does anyone know of a way to track updated views on old videos, without manually monitoring them?
Besides views, I doubt his other monetization (sponsorships, DC server, etc) methods even come close to covering his expenses, and he really, really, really relies on the first-week views of his new videos every day. There was another poster who said he's still making good money, just not as much as he's used to, which makes him feel poor, and I think I agree with that assessment.
I'm aware my opinion on this will probably be unpopular, but after spending some amount of time clipping Jeremy more days than not this month and prioritizing episodes that contain Hannah and Melonie, my opinion on them has changed quite dramatically. As far as Melonie is concerned, she's obviously not even close to living up to the standards of her 'religion' that she doesn't quite seem to even understand, but I genuinely think that's because she's actually retarded and completely non-self-aware. I have a hard time getting overly mad at that, especially when every time I see her it's alongside Jeremy, who I believe is consciously lying about his newfound 'Christianity', which does piss me off and is the reason I'm clipping him. I've seen moments where I honestly think that Melonie would like to push back on Jeremy's religious bullshit, but is too cowardly to confront the possibility of consequences for doing so. This clearly doesn't make her a 'good' person or beyond criticism by any means, but I just wanted to say that Jeremy deserves 1,000,000x the amount of shit for Christian LARPing than anything I've seen Melonie doing. Granted, I have not and will not watch her 'Bible time' garbage, so it's possible I'm talking out my ass. I just think that by my understanding of Christian standards, Melonie is a sinful heretical harlot, while Jeremy blasphemes against the Holy Spirit.I remember when he used to be anti SJW and anti censoring so to see him throw himself in with fake Christian's like melonie mac is wild.
That... certainly seems possible, but wouldn't that imply his weekly views would be exponential rather than linear, assuming his newer videos are maintaining audience?The Quartering viewer is not smart. He is desensitized to the slop and craves the lowest quality content possible. They will rewatch his stuff. That is what a fanboy does. Which is the audience he has cultivated: manchildren. Everything else can be a loss,but as long as his views are steady, he's still in the black.
No. His views stay at a constant level. There will be peaks when something happens, but there is a baseline he is always going to be at. That's what we've seen over the past year really. A few spikes, but really just a straight line as the same people watch his videos 24/7 like a fucking droneThat... certainly seems possible, but wouldn't that imply his weekly views would be exponential rather than linear, assuming his newer videos are maintaining audience?