Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

[repentance]

Tommy is claiming on AMB that he has sent a request to ED asking that they remove their article on him.

 

[MistressCaridad]

I love how he thinks he's found a new platform at /cow/. He's going to spew all the same shit he spewed when he turned up here.

Oh man...
After all the bullshit he pulled with Miss Jen, /cow/ will have his metaphorical head on a pike.

 

[sbm1990]

did you fail reading comprehension or something? this is an utterly ridiculous statement with little resemblance to what's really going on. i would dare say the one with the drug melted brain is you. what kind of meds have they got you taking?

staying off these sites does not stop the abuse of my intellectual properties or gang trolling everywhere else on the web. maybe there's somebody here who knows how to read?

I just love how you got @jenffer a jay's video taken down simply because you're a butthurt spaz that can't handle the truth which was all she was stating, plus she gave you really good advice that you should really follow for YOUR sake.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

I just love how you got @jenffer a jay's video taken down simply because you're a butthurt spaz that can't handle the truth which was all she was stating, plus she gave you really good advice that you should really follow for YOUR sake.

actually, i couldn't understand much of her mumbling, but she did make one very good point. you are all insignificant idiots nobody pays any attention to, so your "opinions" of me won't be seen by anybody but other dysfunctional dolts.

you're trolls; mean, stupid, self loathing children on psych drugs smack talking people to bolster your self esteem and fill your empty lives playing video games in mommy's basement or fucking around in your school's computer labs. pretty pathetic actually.

We live in the age of the virtual pillory. Across communities like YouGotPosted, the revenge-porn hub/blackmailing scheme, or 8chan’s doxxing and raid board, whose server Fredrick Brennan conveniently formatted after its admin was caught selling Social Security numbers, or Gamergate, the “cringe-worthy breakup story” that became a self-sustaining witch hunt against women in tech, a highly recognizable positive feedback loop of abuse and harassment plays out: A target gets dragged into the public eye, more people begin to abuse them, and that abuse escalates as individual trolls try to one-up each other. In the eyes of the mob, the target’s life is a game, and the object is to screw it up as much as possible.

The largest virtual pillory, and the one that best exemplifies its ethos, is Kiwi Farms, a loose community — centered on a forum and two wikis, with some activity on Tumblr, Twitter, Steam, and “lolcow” chan boards — that specializes in harassing people they perceive as being mentally ill or sexually deviant in some way.

...

The Kiwi Farms community is obsessed with its own warped ideas about mental illness. Its justification for picking on Chandler, such as it is, has always been her perceived mental illness — first, for being autistic, and, in later years, for being transgender. That her disability is severe enough to qualify her for SSI benefits is, to her detractors, just another reason to hate her. Everyone KF targets is “crazy” to them, and everything KFers find funny or worthy of disdain is justified as evidence of this perceived mental illness. “Crazy” is both a catchall justification for anything they feel like paying attention to, and the reason KFers will indulge themselves with lengthy armchair diagnoses about their targets. Their deep and abiding scorn for people with mental illnesses leads them to classify anyone they target as mentally ill, and to focus their energy on those who appear most vulnerable. Those people tend to be minorities, women, LGBT people, or kinksters. Victims who exhibit mental strain as a result of being hounded by KFers are subject to a redoubling of efforts, in the hopes they can precipitate a breakdown. To date, one target has killed herself after being featured on Kiwi Farms, after which KF’s admin posted a note exonerating the users and forum from any responsibility for her suicide.

The doth-protest-too-much tone of obsessive stalkers scornfully describing their victims as crazy isn’t lost on Kiwi Farmers. There’s a term for those who embarrass the larger community by revealing their own eccentricities: “A-Logs.” It’s named after a former member, Anthony “A-Log” Logatto, who drew attention to himself by furiously comparing Chris-chan to Hitler. Logatto’s malicious diatribes about Chandler got him banned and rebranded as a fit mark for trolling, with those most annoyed with him leading the vanguard. After finding and investigating Logatto’s furry-porn collection and My Life As a Teenage Robot fanfiction, KF’s consensus was that A-Log hated Chris-chan because she reminded Logatto of himself — or, to put it in their terms, A-Log was “the second Chris-chan.” Consequently, KF harassed their A-Log using the same methods they perfected on Chandler, including a spinoff “Logattopedia.”

The truth is, I think it might be A-Logs all the way down. It isn’t a stretch to imagine that KF members are acting out of the same insecurity that motivated A-Log; that by ridiculing those they perceive as mentally ill or sexually deviant, KFers feel functional and successful by comparison. By putting these people up on their forums, they reject the notion that they themselves might share anything in common with their targets. And that works, so long as everyone remains anonymous and pretends not to care too much either way. A-Logs put the lie to the rationalizations that make Kiwi Farms a comfortably consumable entertainment product.

Consider that across the forums there are multiple warnings to members to conceal their identity. For KFers, anonymity isn’t a choice but a necessity — they know what they’re doing is probably illegal, and that their anonymity insulates them from any consequences. They know their “entertainment” harms vulnerable people, which is why some of them felt bad when that one target hanged herself. But, most important, they know that if their anonymity were compromised, their own community might eat them alive.

http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/07/kiwi-farms-the-webs-biggest-community-of-stalkers.html

 

[sbm1990]

actually, i couldn't understand much of her mumbling, but she did make one very good point. you are all insignificant idiots nobody pays any attention to, so your "opinions" of me won't be seen by anybody but other dysfunctional dolts.

you're trolls; mean, stupid, self loathing children on psych drugs smack talking people to bolster your self esteem and fill your empty lives playing video games in mommy's basement or fucking around in your school's computer labs. pretty pathetic actually.


http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/07/kiwi-farms-the-webs-biggest-community-of-stalkers.html

1. Nice projection, fam! You really have no room to talk, all things considered......

2. lol calm down. We're only laughing at you.

3. How's that lolsuit against us working out for you?

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

So now the lolsuit which was going to be filed "by June" for sure is going to be filed "in the next few months".

AMB will be pleased they can now add another failed deadline.

I love how he thinks he's found a new platform at /cow/. He's going to spew all the same shit he spewed when he turned up here.

doubt it , but you go ahead and keep deluding yourself about me through your psych med fog, child.

Welcome back, @Thomas Jay Wasserberg , when will you actually sue us?

Or you prefer to keep this merry-go-round for the rest of your life?

you're not getting sued at all. the police and site hosts are getting sued and i'm petitioning the court to order a RICO investigation on LOLCOW LLC and SPYROS CONSULTING (the only legal entity that connects to AMB).

1. Nice projection, fam! You really have no room to talk, all things considered......

2. lol calm down. We're only laughing at you.

3. How's that lolsuit against us working out for you?

you seem to be oblivious to the fact that there are laws being broken to provide you with your chuckles, fool.

CYBERSTALKING
Cyberstalking refers to the crime of using the Internet, email, or other types of electronic communications to stalk, harass, or threaten another person. Cyberstalking most often involves sending harassing emails, instant or text messages, or social media posts, or creating websites for the sole purpose of tormenting the victim. To explore this concept, consider the following cyberstalking definition.


Definition of Cyberstalking
Noun

1. The use of electronic communications to persistently harass someone.

Origin

Early 21st century Americanism

What is Cyberstalking
Cyberstalking involves using electronic means, including the Internet, to stalk or harass a person or group of people. Cyberstalking can include many things including threats, solicitation for sex, false accusations, defamation, slander, libel, identity theft, and vandalism. Cyberstalking is often used in conjunction with offline stalking, as both are an expression of a desire to control, intimidate, or manipulate a victim. A cyberstalker may be someone the victim is familiar with, or a complete stranger, and is a criminal offense.


Cyberstalking Laws
Laws governing stalking, harassment, and slander, as well as specific “cyberstalking” laws, vary by state, and might include a series of acts that might not be considered illegal under other circumstances. Stalking is a form of emotional assault, and cyberstalking, also referred to as “cyberbullying,” is a high-tech method of inflicting more pain.

The Violence Against Women Act of 2000 placed cyberstalking under the prevue of federal law in the U.S. While many people find cyberstalking laws to be inadequate, state and federal legislatures point out that cyberstalking laws are fairly new and, as technology continues to grow and improve, so do the laws. Although specific laws vary, cyberstalking laws make it clear that this type of harassment is a criminal offense. A conviction for cyberstalking may result in a restraining order being issued, imprisonment, probation, fines, and restitution.

Forms of Cyberstalking
Cyberstalking cases differ from regular stalking in that it is technologically based, though some cyberstalkers escalate their harassment to include physical stalking as well. A cyberstalker acts of out of anger, or a need to control, or gain revenge over another person through threats, fear, and intimidation. There are several forms of cyberstalking, including:

• Harassing the victim
• Embarrassing and humiliating the victim
• Exerting financial control by emptying the victim’s bank accounts, or by ruining his credit
• Isolating the victim by harassing his family, friends, and employer
• Frightening the victim by using scare tactics and threats

Identifying Cyberstalking
It is sometimes difficult for a person who is being harassed or stalked to realize the situation is a criminal act that should be reported to the authorities. In deciding whether a situation is truly stalking, the victim should consider whether the perpetrator is acting with malice and premeditation. Stalking activities are often a repetitive, obsession-based vendetta, directed personally at the victim. This behavior continues even when the victim has personally warned the perpetrator to stop.

Key factors to identifying cyberstalking cases include:

• False accusations. A cyberstalker often tries to damage the reputation of his victim by posting false information on social media websites or blogs. A perpetrator may even create fictitious websites or other accounts for the purpose of spreading false rumors and allegations about the victim.
• Gathering information about the victim. A cyberstalker may try to gather as much information as possible about the victim by interacting with the victim’s friends, family, and colleagues. In serious cases, a cyberstalker may hire a private investigator.
• Monitoring victim’s activities. A cyberstalker may attempt to trace his victim’s IP address, or hack into the victim’s social media accounts and emails to learn about his online activities.
• Encouraging others to harass the victim. The offender may encourage the involvement of third parties to harass the victim.
• False victimization. It is not uncommon for a cyberstalker to claim the victim is harassing him, taking the position of victim in his own mind.

Protecting Yourself Against Cyberstalking
The U.S. Department of Justice has issued recommendations for people who believe they are victims of cyberstalking. The first step should be to demand the stalker to stop all contact, and stop the harassing actions. Additionally, in order to facilitate prosecution of the perpetrator, the victim should:

1. Save all emails, messages, and other communications for evidence. It is vital that these are not altered in any way, and that the electronic copies are kept, rather than only printouts.
2. Save all records of threats against the victim’s safety or life. This includes any written or recorded threats, and logs of the date, time, and circumstances of verbal threats.
3. Contact the perpetrator’s internet service provider. Internet service providers (ISP) prohibit their users from using their service to harass others. Contacting the ISP may result in discontinuation of the harasser’s internet service, and will put the ISP on notice to maintain record of the harasser’s internet use.
4. Keep detailed records of contact with ISP and law enforcement officials. It is important to keep a log of all reports made to any agency or provider, and to obtain copies of the official reports when available.

Examples of Cyberstalking

• A woman contacted police in 2003, claiming someone had given her private information, including her location and her description, to men through a dating service. The woman discovered the act when she was contacted by two different men, each of whom stated they had previously talked with her, and arranged a personal encounter.
• Claire began being harassed by strangers after someone made a post on the Internet offering sexual services in her name. The post included private information, including her phone number and home address.
• After John and his girlfriend broke up, he began stalking her by planting a prepaid GPS-enabled cell phone under her car. John tracked his ex-girlfriend’s movements, and followed her by logging into the cell phone account online. John also called his ex upwards of 200 times a day.

Cyberstalking Cases
Cyberstalking and Production of Child Pornography

On January 23, 2013, James S. Allen of Baltimore, Michigan was indicted by a federal grand jury on 18 counts of cyberstalking, and 5 counts of production of child pornography. Between April and August of 2012, the defendant used the Internet and his cell phone to stalk 18 female victims in New York, some of whom were minors at the time of the abuse. Allen threatened the victims by telling them he had found nude pictures of them on the Internet, and told them where to find the photos. The website he sent the victims to was actually a phishing site, where he sought to obtain the victims’ email addresses and passwords, allowing him to take control of their email accounts.

In addition, Allen threatened his victims with publication of their photos if they did not have a Skype chat session with him. Once the victims entered into the chat Skype, Allen demanded they take their clothing off and engage in sexual acts. If they refused, he would distribute the nude photos. One by one the girls contacted police. Because some of the girls were minors, Allen faces child pornography charges in addition to cyberstalking charges.

Cyberbullying and Text Threats

From 2012 to 2013, Republican activist Adam Savader hacked online accounts belonging to 15 women, to obtain nude photos of them. He was charged with cyberstalking of these mostly college age victims who he knew personally from school and work. Savader threatened to send the nude photos to the victims’ friends and family unless they cooperated in sending him more photos. In one text, Savader threatened, “Let’s make this simple. … You have until noon. I am not bluffing. Don’t be stupid. Once I send pics of you they cannot be unsent.” Although Savader apologized publicly when he was charged, the judge said he knew right from wrong, and sentenced him to 30 months in prison.

Cyberstalking Statistics

As people begin to rely more and more on technology, the incidence of cyberstalking increase. Law enforcement and government agencies continue to study the crime in order to learn how to better deter criminals from engaging in this crime of control, fear, and intimidation. The national advocacy group Survivors in Action admit that cyberstalking statistics are often difficult to come by, as a great deal of this activity goes unreported.

• The majority of cyberstalking victims are between 18 and 29 years of age.
• Roughly 56 percent of cyberstalkers are male
• Women make up 60 percent of victims
• In over 70 percent of cyberstalking cases, the victim and perpetrator live in different states
• Nearly 50 percent of cyberstalkers are the victim’s ex, and 15 percent are an online acquaintance of the victim
• More than 30 percent of cyberstalking attacks begin on Facebook, or through email
• Over half of cyberstalking victims are single, and 31 percent are married
• Caucasian people are 10 times more likely to be targeted for cyberstalking than people of other ethnicities

Related Legal Terms and Issues

• Defendant – A party against whom a lawsuit has been filed in civil court, or who has been accused of, or charged with, a crime or offense.
• Defamation – An intentional false statement that harms a person’s reputation, or which decreases the respect or regard in which a person is held.
• Jurisdiction – The legal authority to hear legal cases and make judgments; the geographical region of authority to enforce justice.
• Perpetrator – A person who commits an illegal or criminal act.
• Stalking – The act of pursuing game, prey, or a person by stealth; the act of harassing an individual in an aggressive, threatening, or illegal manner.
• Trial — A formal presentation of evidence before a judge and jury for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence in a criminal case, or to make a determination in a civil matter.
• Victim – A person who is injured, killed, or otherwise harmed as a result of a criminal act, accident, or other event.

• 
  
  i'm sure you will discover just how well this "LOLSuit" is working out when this site goes dark and null's mom starts whining about her boy being in prison.

So Tommy popped into an ancient skype group to bravado at us for a bit. Nothing really worth posting, the usual "mental midget" this and "I've got hackers, bro" that, but here's the only caps of note:

Spoiler: Ranting

In response to news of his return:
View attachment 227822

In response to being teased about his his repeated failures to make progress on his lolsuit:
View attachment 227825

It appears his idea is to return to lazy shitposting.
Yeah, okay, no.
Tommy, you stormed out, yelling about how you'd return with an army of feds to destroy us all. You told multiple people about how "Golden's Rule" was gonna be the big reveal, the grand move that would finally take us all out. You spent months posturing about how we would all rue the day we crossed you, that you'd show us we'd been wrong all along and you'd follow through on your threats, all with a single broad stroke.
And you botched it, Tommy.
You alienated the tard wrangling squad, you made zero headway, and nothing changed in the slightest.
So now you're back. You come wafting back in like a sad drunk the morning after, and you think you're just going to go back to smugly posting about how silly we are and nobody will say shit about what an incredible ass you made of yourself.
And that's not going to happen. Because we watched the whole thing. We were here. You lost. And I'm going to pour salt on that wound until you fuck off or die of old age.
Welcome back to the Farms, Tommy. I eagerly await hearing the same legal bullshit and excuses about how you're thiiiiiis close to finally doing literally anything.

keep waiting, moron.

 

[sbm1990]

you seem to be oblivious to the fact that there are laws being broken to provide you with your chuckles, fool.

• 
  
  i'm sure you will discover just how well this "LOLSuit" is working out when this site goes dark and null's mom starts whining about her boy being in prison.

It's not cyberstalking when you make your information publicly known, jackass, especially when you come here in a hopeless attempt to try and defend yourself.

 

[MistressCaridad]

doubt it , but you go ahead and keep deluding yourself about me through your psych med fog, child.

Someone didn't take their happy pills this morning.

Spoiler

and it's not @repentance lol

 

[Jaded Optimist]

Tommy gets some new insults. It seems like projection when you go on about us all being on psych meds. Your the only one here who's had a handler because of how nuts you are.

Since he hasn't posted it here, this is the letter from his handler saying that they have given up on trying to help him and to stop bugging them with his delusions of lawsuits.

Hello Ms. Wasserberg,

I wanted to give you a quick update as to the status of your cases at the Tucson Police Department. Currently we do not have any active or pending cases involving you; the historical cases you filed have been closed.

As we've spoken about before, it may be a good idea for you to avoid websites where you are feeling harassed. We simply do not have the ability at the Police Department to control the online behavior you have been forwarding to us.

You can call me at 837-7988 if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Jason

Sergeant Jason Winsky

Tucson Police Department

Mental Health Support Team

270 S. Stone Tucson, AZ

520-837-7988

Twitter: @TPDMentalHealth

Jason Winsky really needs a fruit basket or something for having to deal with Tom as long as he did.

 

[Smutley]

actually, i couldn't understand much of her mumbling, but she did make one very good point. you are all insignificant idiots nobody pays any attention to, so your "opinions" of me won't be seen by anybody but other dysfunctional dolts.

you're trolls; mean, stupid, self loathing children on psych drugs smack talking people to bolster your self esteem and fill your empty lives playing video games in mommy's basement or fucking around in your school's computer labs. pretty pathetic actually.


http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/07/kiwi-farms-the-webs-biggest-community-of-stalkers.html

You've been back less than a day and are already having a big autistic meltdown. Did it hurt your feelings when the police told you that nothing we do is illegal and you should just move on?

You should also apologize for triple posting Thomas or you'll be put back on moderation queue sooner than later.

 

[José Mourinho]

you're not getting sued at all. the police and site hosts are getting sued and i'm petitioning the court to order a RICO investigation on LOLCOW LLC and SPYROS CONSULTING (the only legal entity that connects to AMB).

Is this really what you want to do for the rest of your life? Making empty threats trying to sue Lolcow LLC and site hosts and then ended up not doing it? (Why would sue the police though, idk lol)

If all you want to do in your life is just threatening us without taking any action and just keep up with this merry go round, I really have nothing else to say.

P.S. Admit it if you actually gave up threatening, we won't laugh at you and if anything you could be a notable member in the forums.

 

[Yellow Yam Scam]

you seem to be oblivious to the fact that there are laws being broken to provide you with your chuckles, fool.

• 
  
  i'm sure you will discover just how well this "LOLSuit" is working out when this site goes dark and null's mom starts whining about her boy being in prison.

Sorry, I don't really give a shit about you so I don't follow this thread, but whatever happened to us being CIA spooks?

 

[Asperchewy]

you're trolls

Actually I'm just a patron at a zoo, and you're one of the caged animals.

 

[jenffer a jay]

http://miss-j-and-the-am-videos.vidmeup.com/view?q=5930c99c2be45.flv

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

http://miss-j-and-the-am-videos.vidmeup.com/view?q=5930c99c2be45.flv

apparently the communications between AMB and KF are not up to speed, ms. jay. i have no idea why you want to wage war on me because i totally can't understand your videos. put it in writing here and i'll consider it reasonably. open attacks on you tube are intolerable. videome isn't going to put up with it either and the last thing i need is another vindictive fruitcake hating on me, especially one with the kind of following you have. you and those people are not of the world i inhabit. i do not want to come over to that reality nor do i want it intruding on my reality any more than it already has.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Akamatsu [IMG]http://www.anothermessageboard.com/images/misc/backlink.gif
Why does Tom hate trannies so much? First he stalks and repeatedly misgenders one and now he tries to take down the youtube channel owned by another. All because they poked fun at him online.

i don't hate "trannies" and more transgender people hate the word than hate me, you can be sure. i'm very much aware of my audience and don't use the word much around transgender people who may have been harmed by it and any "tranny" misgendering me is going to get it right back. sneasel is clearly not transgender, but a white supremacist male posing as one.

i don't think i misgendered jennfer and if i did, i apologize for that and as a further olive branch to her, i really could not understand her video and didn't listen to the whole thing. all i saw was somebody spewing the kiwi farms line out to the public and reported it. if she wants to post her

critique

of me in writing here or KF, i'll respond to it. you people have a completely false picture of my offline life that you're working from. [/img]

 

[AnOminous]

Keep this gif in mind when watching the last 30 seconds

I love how this gif perfectly captures Tom's nastiness, insanity and ugliness, toothlessness, and stupidity. There is no more perfect picture of Tom.

You don't even need the sound to hear the frothing insane gibbering and foaming.

 

[GS 281]

apparently the communications between AMB and KF are not up to speed, ms. jay. i have no idea why you want to wage war on me because i totally can't understand your videos. put it in writing here and i'll consider it reasonably. open attacks on you tube are intolerable. videome isn't going to put up with it either and the last thing i need is another vindictive fruitcake hating on me, especially one with the kind of following you have. you and those people are not of the world i inhabit. i do not want to come over to that reality nor do i want it intruding on my reality any more than it already has.

Tom, you keep flagging her videos when her videos are only a critique, not an attack. You're 100% running head first into that reality, fam, just chill out and accept she said somethings you don't like.

 

[Jaded Optimist]

i totally can't understand your videos.

I think that speaks more against you then it does for the lovely Miss J. You are so filled with hate, senility and reminiscents of drugs from the 70s that I'm surprise you can tie your own shoes at this point. Although, to be fair, it's clear you've lost the parts of your brain that control bodily function, logic, and musical talent.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

NEW VIDEO

Also a gif from the previous one

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Tom, you keep flagging her videos when her videos are only a critique, not an attack. You're 100% running head first into that reality, fam, just chill out and accept she said somethings you don't like.

blow me, alt right frat boy cuck. what you call a critique looked enough like an attack for you tube to block her and it's quite possible videome will see it the same way.

NEW VIDEO

another stalker? and here i was being nice and saving you toxic toddlers the trouble of copying it.