💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Watching Rekieta]

Sovcit levels of argument from Rekieta here.

He definitely needs to push this line of reasoning.

Nick: "If I'm not a lawyer, I'm not bound by your rules."
Bar: "Correct. In that case we move from professional discipline to felony. It's against the law to hold yourself out as eligible to practice law if you are not. We will also disqualify you from ever returning to the bar. Aren't you on probation?"

 

[demicolon]

This man lives in an existential hell, completely incapable of raw-dogging reality without something altering his chemistry. When I look at him, all I see is the sheer terror of simply existing.

Nick 2025 has a nervous system of a prey animal.

Nick 2025 is like the key witness who put a whole crime family behind bars. Sure, he's been spared prison but every hour of each day for the rest of his life might be his last. He can never know if or when Star Trak II: the Wrath of Quan drops proof that, for example, Aaron did raped Nick and made him suck his own poo poo from that D.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

View attachment 8259697

I thought people were exaggerating about the woman in the top right corner, but holy shit. What mental institution did she escape from? She exudes an insufferable level of nonsense with every action.

 

[PrestonHolt]

She is a farmer, she even has 'lunacy' ear rings.

Average beauty parlour poster

So has he abandoned the Christian grift or does he telecommute to a church in Hawaii?

I was thinking about writing something funny about Nick writing new gospel where you don't need to go to church, but truth is he never was Christian, and since he stoped keeping appearances in so many aspects of his life, he clearly don't give a fuck about attending church.

 

[JamFlowMan]

I was thinking about writing something funny about Nick writing new gospel where you don't need to go to church, but truth is he never was Christian, and since he stoped keeping appearances in so many aspects of his life, he clearly don't give a fuck about attending church.

If he goes back to church those pricks will rat him out again the second they see those twitchy eyes.

 

[thebluestvoid]

On 12/7 during a members stream, Kurt addresses Nick and his obsessive live steams as of recent. Kurt is responding to a chat that reads as follows:

Kurt how does it feel having a junkie live stream about you daily as if you’re responsible for their life being blown up?

 

[Bean Sidhe]

It's such a frivolous HRO that it's been in force for ~6 months (I think I remember it beginning in June but I may be wrong) and the court doesn't seem in a rush to throw it out or even tell Nick/Melton what is going on. Sounds frivolous to me.

What I think is pretty funny, not to mention weird, is that it has stretched out this long solely because of Nick's dipshittery and delays. I wonder if Melton was able to finally talk to the judge at the hearing, or if he is just still being dragged along behind Nick willy nilly.

 

[dustnight]

Legos aside, I genuinely don’t remember this particular chat Nick sent to Pedoton - my life doesn’t revolve around Nick, thankfully - but our heroine @elb saved it.

Nick chatting about Aaron’s daughter, name redacted. I THINK SOMEONE NEEDS TO HANG ON THE WALL.

Someone get the woodchipper for this faggot ASAP. Yes, I’m MATI.View attachment 8258795

Sir, please. Settle down!

That shit is craaazy WTF? Good luck on that HRO now Balldo.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Someone's has taken a frivolous HRO against me. Until the matter is not resolved, we're under sequestration order."

It's been said a million times, but it's clearly not frivolous, as most of the frivolous HROs are out of court in 15 minutes. Now, one could argue that Nick's argumentative stance has prolonged this ongoing hearing, but 'round these parts, we call that... Another Win for the Toe.

I agree—but mostly because it's been almost nine fucking hours, and he still hasn't been able to complete a set with only 1,508 pieces! That's not a lot!
How is he still working on it?

Lego sets are a way she can ignore her family. Why speed that up? ( But let's do the math. 9 hrs x 60 min / hr x 60 sec / min = 32,400 seconds. 21.6 seconds per brick, or not even 3 bricks per minute. The set is split into numbered bags of roughly 100-200 parts, so it's not like you have to go digging through 1500 parts at the start. She's toward the remedial end, or just doing it to avoid the kids. And typically to avoid Nick, although wtf this theater of a healthy family is, isn't working.)

Nick: "(...) Shut up! You're a nobody online like everybody else, but you're even more of a nobody. That's legal advice, baby. Take it in vain."

"I am giving 100% legal advice for all my clients, and this is protected by attorney-client privilege. And the Minnesota Board of Law Examiners, they actually approved and demanded that I say this specifically. That's what happened. (...) They've got this conundrum right now, some dork is telling them that I'm holding myself out as a lawyer representing clients, because I say, hey, I'm Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a small law firm in central Minnesota. Those are all true statements, right? Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law. And I am a lawyer. I'm not currently licensed to practice in Minnesota because my license is suspended, but I am a licensed attorney. I am licensed, but my license is suspended. I am not disbarred. My license is not gone or obliterated in any way. It's just on suspension. So they're telling me that they have a problem with me saying I'm a lawyer. I'm holding myself out as a lawyer. It's like, well, that's really interesting, because if I'm not a lawyer, if I'm not a lawyer, then the model rules of professional or Minnesota rules of professional conduct for lawyers cannot apply to me. It's like, if I'm not a lawyer, you can't hold me responsible under the rules. And if I am a lawyer, then I'm telling the truth. So if I'm bound by your rules, then I am a lawyer. I do not represent myself as licensed, but this is a weird artifact of how they do it. You can't apply the rules of professional conduct to non-lawyers. It doesn't work."

More expert tier logic from Balldoman. I wonder if MLS could catch some flack for having a non-lawyer present himself as a lawyer on one of his streams?

Others have said it, but staying up all night to build a LEGO set you've probably had for 2+ years? Real trad-dad shit.

I love the strays coming through the chyat, and how thin-skinned Nick is. What a complete bitch.

 

[Captain Manning]

Finally all the favorite captain speculation gets confirmation tonight, as Kayla's first chance to monopolize the conversation jumps straight to the most predictable topic imaginable:

Your browser is not able to display this video.

Jesus woman... you could have lied, said "Janeway," and felted everybody.

But no, you just had to confirm the meme.

 

[AltisticRight]

It's such a frivolous HRO that it's been in force for ~6 months (I think I remember it beginning in June but I may be wrong) and the court doesn't seem in a rush to throw it out or even tell Nick/Melton what is going on. Sounds frivolous to me.

He's just malding over it. Utterly pathetic behaviour.

Host: "Lady Rackets, I have a question for you. What has been the best day of your life so far?"
Nick: "If her answer is wrong, I'll just trust her out of the will."

It's just jokes.

View attachment 8259589

It has to be when they got engaged because Matt 1.0 gave her the orgasms she wished her soon-to-husband could be capable of.
The second capable male was Aaron Imholte who fucked her so hard, he went to jail for it.

He's still using Aaron even during an HRO?
Wow, Minnesota really doesn't give a shit.

Minnesota has priorities. They only go after serious crimes:
1. Sharing a single topless photo of a known whore (who shared her own publicly) with a friend, it was never distributed or shown to anyone else.
2. Fucking this whore so hard it became criminal.

 

[Steve Seagull]

View attachment 8259697

"If there's ever been like a victimizing the victim situation, I think this is it. Right? That's fucking crazy." - Valhalla on Nick's HRO.

That's an impressively stupid take.

 

[Pentamidine]

I saw earlier in the thread someone mention Kayla isn't wearing her ring but didn't see it mentioned that Nick is.

My schizo theory is that the marriage has fallen apart and they are separated, hence Kayla being ringless. Nick is wearing his because he has to make it seem like everything's fine when he streams. I think that's actually genuinely more likely than alternative explanations like "she took it off to build legos" or "it's at the jeweler getting repaired/resized" etc.

 

[Sneed on Cloud 9]

Nick: "(...) Shut up! You're a nobody online like everybody else, but you're even more of a nobody. That's legal advice, baby. Take it in vain."

"I am giving 100% legal advice for all my clients, and this is protected by attorney-client privilege. And the Minnesota Board of Law Examiners, they actually approved and demanded that I say this specifically. That's what happened. (...) They've got this conundrum right now, some dork is telling them that I'm holding myself out as a lawyer representing clients, because I say, hey, I'm Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a small law firm in central Minnesota. Those are all true statements, right? Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law. And I am a lawyer. I'm not currently licensed to practice in Minnesota because my license is suspended, but I am a licensed attorney. I am licensed, but my license is suspended. I am not disbarred. My license is not gone or obliterated in any way. It's just on suspension. So they're telling me that they have a problem with me saying I'm a lawyer. I'm holding myself out as a lawyer. It's like, well, that's really interesting, because if I'm not a lawyer, if I'm not a lawyer, then the model rules of professional or Minnesota rules of professional conduct for lawyers cannot apply to me. It's like, if I'm not a lawyer, you can't hold me responsible under the rules. And if I am a lawyer, then I'm telling the truth. So if I'm bound by your rules, then I am a lawyer. I do not represent myself as licensed, but this is a weird artifact of how they do it. You can't apply the rules of professional conduct to non-lawyers. It doesn't work."

Thank you @Steve Seagull for the timestamp.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I saw earlier in the thread someone mention Kayla isn't wearing her ring but didn't see it mentioned that Nick is.

My schizo theory is that the marriage has fallen apart and they are separated, hence Kayla being ringless. Nick is wearing his because he has to make it seem like everything's fine when he streams. I think that's actually genuinely more likely than alternative explanations like "she took it off to build legos" or "it's at the jeweler getting repaired/resized" etc.

View attachment 8260074View attachment 8260077

I don't think they'd be casually online chatting and playing Legos if they were that frosty as to be separated. But more importantly, her top is absolute trash, I hate the way she does her hands over-expressively for the camera, and wtf with those nails.

 

[Swole McPole]

To Nick, drugs are cool (they aren't), therefore, drug dealers are cool (they aren't), therefore Nick is cool (he isn't) if drug dealers like him (they don't).

I'm sure this is exactly how I thought when I was 16. Most people tend to grow out of it by the time they reach 18 or so.

Who can say. He almost certainly is taking those prescription stimulants for ADHD and whatever he takes for his supposed narcolepsy. Plus he has mentioned trying to get ketamine treatment. I wouldn't be surprised if he tries for marijuana also. He obviously has a new nicotine issue also.

Nick's range of prescribed medications is classic drug seeking behaviour. Sure, it's legal. But they aren't being prescribed for genuine need. He just wants a range of psychoactive drugs he can get high on.

If he was suffering serious clinical depression, he might try ketamine. If he had glaucoma, he might get weed. Same for narcolepsy and stimulants. But someone who is getting the full range, all at once is just a fucking drug addict and the doctors who prescribe to them are just less cool drug dealers who'll sell dope to addicts for money.

 

[Vibralldo]

This "Drugs they convince your brain what you do is correct" part is interesting because he contradicts himself and proves we were right and everything he claimed so far about how drugs are harmless, should be legalized etc is just him being oppositional and accepting no accountability.

And the other part also about drugs and addicts "This stuff is lying to them telling them that it's all fine and good and all great and that's what they're dealing with. It's not conscious, it's a chemical shift."

Edit: I rewrote my post because thanks to daffodils' video I could pull the quotes.
Edit2: Not that blaming the drugs is taking accountability, but it's at least admitting it tricked his perception of the situation and destroyed his brain chemistry.

Nick's basically become a slave to substances so everything he does now is an attempt to get more at the expense of everything else

When he's saying "drugs are harmless and should be legalized" he's really saying "please rearrange society so I can have more drugs, I'm hopelessly addicted, I need them!"

 

[Swole McPole]

It's 3 reasons:

There's a fourth. He knows that Kurt looks down on him. "How can this lawyer, a man that I once looked up to, be cheating on his wife by banging Mr and Mrs Aaron Imholte, and be so incautious about the mountains of cocaine that he's using that his seven year old kid has tested positive at a massive rate? What an embarrassment he is!"

Nick will never get over the fact that somebody as uncool as Kurt can look down on him, and the majority of the world will look at the two of them and agree that Kurt is correct to do so.

 

[Potentially Cat Mom]

He definitely needs to push this line of reasoning.

Nick: "If I'm not a lawyer, I'm not bound by your rules."
Bar: "Correct. In that case we move from professional discipline to felony. It's against the law to hold yourself out as eligible to practice law if you are not. We will also disqualify you from ever returning to the bar. Aren't you on probation?"

It is nice if that is how it would happen but I’m not holding my breath.

 

[dustnight]

He definitely needs to push this line of reasoning.

Nick: "If I'm not a lawyer, I'm not bound by your rules."
Bar: "Correct. In that case we move from professional discipline to felony. It's against the law to hold yourself out as eligible to practice law if you are not. We will also disqualify you from ever returning to the bar. Aren't you on probation?"

What part of "I'm Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a small law firm in central Minnesota" did you not understand bish? I AM Nick Rekieta and I DO have a very small law firm if you wanna know the truth about it!