Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

linchan said:

Any thoughts on the Netflix Documentary "Nobody speak?"
Click to expand...

So the people who illegally published Hulk Hogans sex tapes and implied in a court of law that they would be fine with publishing child pornography get portrayed as martyrs for Free Speech. What a horrifying timeline we live in.

Speaking of people who aren't self aware, Hillary Clinton decided to compare herself to Wonder Woman
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Transvaalan, vertexwindi and 9 others
Wonder Woman actually was successful though both in culture, comics, and movie now, while that crone failed against an inexperienced black man, almost lost to a socialist Jew who spent time in the Soviet Union, and lost to a man with no political experience after bribing the establishment hard.

And any documentary who is out to virtue signal for gawker and other "fake news" can go lose money. There's a reason why only like a third of all people even trust news now.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Transvaalan, vertexwindi and 14 others
Mika: Not saying its because of Drumpf that this guy got shot, but you know, IT IS REEEEEEEEEE




John Nolte fucking wrecks CNN

If You Need Proof CNN Wants Trump and His Supporters Assassinated — Here It Is

The question over whether or not words and images can provoke violence is a stupid one. Of course they can. Why do thousands of companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars on advertising? Why do politicians spend billions of their own? Because words and images have the power to alter human behavior, and not only in small ways, like which toothpaste they will purchase.

The image of Clark Gable not wearing one in Frank Capra's It Happened One Night (1934) almost put the t-shirt industry out of business. Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver (1976) inspired a presidential assassin. Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight (2008) inspired a Joker-like movie theater massacre. David Fincher's Fight Club (1999) inspired its own Project Mayhem. Need I go on?

The question is not whether or not words and images inspire violence. We know they do. The question is whether or not living in a free society is worth that cost. Of course it is.

The other question — and this is the only important one — is one of intent.

Did Capra intend to put the t-shirt industry out of business? Did Scorsese intend to inspire an assassination attempt, and so forth? No, of course not. These men did absolutely nothing wrong.

The same, however, cannot be said for CNN.

In the wake of Wednesday's attempted shooting massacre of dozens of Republican lawmakers, we know for a fact that CNN intends to provoke and inspire this kind violence, and intends to do so specifically against Donald Trump and his supporters (including Rep. Steve Scalise, who was gravely wounded yesterday).

We know this for a fact because throughout the years, CNN has admitted that the very behavior the network now aggressively engages in, provokes and inspires political violence.

Some examples…

We know for a fact that CNN believes that symbols as innocuous as crosshairs on a political map can result in a political assassination. We know this because for weeks after 2011's horrific Gabby Giffords shooting, CNN blamed Sarah Palin for this shooting. Palin put usual-usual crosshairs on a political map (a normal practice at the time) and CNN revealed to us again and again that they believed those symbols provoked this assassination attempt.

And so, because CNN believes this, we know without any uncertainty what CNN's intent is when they point what looks like a sniper scope at the Oval Office and then broadcast that symbol worldwide. We know what CNN's intent is when they blast out photos and videos that compare a symbolic political pledge to a "Hitleresque" Nazi salute.

Another example… We know for a fact that CNN believes images inspire political violence. We know this because CNN told us so in the wake of that godawful 2015 church shooting in South Carolina. For weeks CNN told us the image of the Rebel Flag provoked this violence.

And so, because we know what CNN believes, without any uncertainty we know what CNN's intent is when they defend, praise, recommend, and stand by their parent company's decision to sponsor an assassination porn play that depicts the bloody murder of President Trump.

Another example… We know for a fact that CNN believes rhetoric inspires violence. We know this because in the wake of the terrible 2015 Planned Parenthood shooting, CNN told us that abortion rhetoric inspired this violence.

And so, because we know what CNN believes, without any uncertainty we know what CNN's intent is when CNN compares Trump and his supporters to the Ku Klux Klan. We know what CNN's intent is when CNN ties Rep. Scalise to the KKK.

Another example… We know for a fact that CNN believes unsubstantiated and reckless conspiracy theories provoke violence. We know this because in their coverage of the 2016 "Pizzagate" shooting, CNN told us they believe this.

And so, because we know CNN believes this, without any uncertainty we also know what CNN's intent is when CNN continues to push the false Russian conspiracy, the thoroughly-debunked lie that Trump mocked a reporter's disability, and the even more absurd lie that Trump has admitted to serial-sexual assault.

Let's boil this down…

CNN firmly believes that certain behavior inspires, provokes, and causes political violence — including assassination attempts.

Therefore, when CNN itself consciously engages in this exact same behavior, we know for a fact that their intent is to inspire, provoke, and cause political violence — including assassination attempts.

You may choose not to blame CNN for Wednesday's near massacre. You may choose not to believe that words and images and rhetoric and conspiracy theories can be blamed for violence. Whatever. That is not my point.

The point is that if CNN believes those things result in violence and then does those things, the network's intent is not in dispute.

Now will you cut the cord?


The same applies to MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc...
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lizard Pope, spiritofamermaid, Transvaalan and 21 others
Coconut Gun said:
I guess their strategy is just to play up the fact that Trump is under investigation, but down play the fact that they haven't actually found any evidence. I'm really skeptical that any of those people believe that they have any chance of finding anything criminal, since the previous investigations have all failed to turn up anything. I think they're just playing to the court of public opinion at this point.
Click to expand...

This guy has had business opponents analyzing every bowel movement he takes, then he gets the FBI looking at him, probably all kinds of private investigators...point being, the amount of people investigating Trump likely exceeds the population of some states. Everyone of importance, and many people without importance, are searching, hunting, looking for any kind of blood in the water, so what makes anyone think that we wouldn't find every single nasty detail about him? He is under the most scrutiny they can throw at him and they still can't find shit. Take the hint and realize you're not going to throw him out due to him committing crime, and mount up for the standoff in 2020.

Of course, if they realized this, we wouldn't have 666 pages of salt. Preaching to the converted and all...
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Anonimo, wifflypuff and 12 others
And already we've forgotten that Gawker was given a chance to escape penalty by just taking it down... they chose to die on that hill, and they died there.

They told a Judge "Fuck off", not "We'll take this down and then fight to put it back up" but "Fuck you"

They did not get sued into oblivion out of the blue by mean ol' white rich guys who were bored and needed an innocent progressive victim to eviscerate for sport.....
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, vertexwindi, Dynamite Ninja and 7 others
I don't know if you remember this crazy SJW bitch who used a fake comment from a sock account (she probably made) to bash all whites as Trump supporting racists


Well Steven Crowder hilarious took her down


If you don't want to watch the whole thing, at least jump in 7 minutes in when he goes on a tangent about pajeets shitting in the street
 
  • Winner
  • Late
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, vertexwindi, Dynamite Ninja and 10 others
upload_2017-6-15_20-41-42.png
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, vertexwindi, tehpope and 1 other person
China and Crystal said:
Yeah tell those third party fuckers how dare they express their opinions instead of yours

View attachment 151189
Click to expand...

Sorry for quoting such an old post, but I wasn't around at the time and I had to comment:

I'm glad MY vote actually meant something, then. To think, voting for someone who had no chance still sabotaged Hilary. That's the best.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Dynamite Ninja, Ineedahero and 3 others
Internet War Criminal said:
I don't know if you remember this crazy SJW bitch who used a fake comment from a sock account (she probably made) to bash all whites as Trump supporting racists


Well Steven Crowder hilarious took her down


If you don't want to watch the whole thing, at least jump in 7 minutes in when he goes on a tangent about pajeets shitting in the street
Click to expand...
You can see her all of her pupils.

That's what you call "crazy eyes".
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Dynamite Ninja, The Nothingness and 7 others
linchan said:

Any thoughts on the Netflix Documentary "Nobody speak?"
Click to expand...

Horrifying and part of Netflix's continued decline that makes me glad I'm not the one paying for our Netflix account these days.

Anyone being even mildly pro-Gawker is a sign they are an unrepentantly awful human being.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, The Lawgiver, Transvaalan and 9 others
Well, it's obvious, if Trump reaches the "people" through Twitter, and has blocked Stephen King, then Stephen King isn't really a person! He's a hideous Eldritch abomination temporarily in human form until his kind can finish the blood ritual to rise them all from the depths of the Earth. You surely don't think he thought up ALL those horror stories on his own? Right? They were his memoirs!

How I missed this for years I'll never know!
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Donny Cheese, spiritofamermaid, Hawker Hurricane and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back