📚 Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

I had people I loved baby me every time I opened my eyes, I understood what was medically happening to me, the drugs they were giving me etc. But even so. . . I remember one bad night, where I couldn't pass urine, the exhausting pain, and constant effort to remain awake, I said in my head "Mother Mary please hear me, please make this stop and send me to Heaven", it's terrifying remembering this now. But I was so ground down, the pain of existing weighed more than the love and obligation I felt for everyone in my life.
I can relate. Had necessary back surgery and my cerebrospinal fluid wouldn't stop leaking, had other 4 surgeries in close proximity just to fix that. After the last surgery my mind was in a really dark place, I was thinking I ruined my life. The severe pain of the first surgery + psychological effect of having so many procedures + lying down for days upon days + risk of infections... it was really bad.

I can't imagine that, but also knowing you mutilated your body and it's beyond repair. Troons really don't take the risks seriously.

I might be giving TIMS and TIFs too much credit, but I cannot imagine the willpower required to not only elect for this surgery, but to endure years of post operative therapy, quite frankly it's remarkable most of them last as long as they do, and it explains their bizarre pseudo-religious culture of self-affirmation.
Yeah, there's a religious like fervor in them. Their bodies are destroyed, but in their minds they are having "life-saving surgeries". It takes long for someone to admit they've been duped by a cult.
 
Why do FTMs always hold their faux cocks by the meatus? Any real man would find that unpleasant.
Because it's a numb chunk of flesh. It might as well be one of these:
1771079084540.jpeg
Stapled to their crotch.
 
Remember, you can never trust a still photo of trannies. You can see him in the “after” tucking his chin, hiding his adam’s apple, and god only knows how many filters were used.
OK yes, this is true, BUT… that is also the baseline for everything else we have to compare.

I guess what I’m saying is almost all of what we see here are things they’ve posted themselves. Like on purpose. To show off. So they have recomposed shots n times and carefully selected the best possible angle and applied all the filters and they STILL look like Lurch from the Addams Family after a horrific accident.

So when I finally see that incredibly rare picture that doesn’t look toooooooooo bad (again, not good just not shocking) I do have to extend a little credit…

Don’t get me wrong - TTD etc - but this particular picture is not giving my dog night terrors.
 
Heavily tattooed KatoB23 is back to show us her poultry in motion, as the floppy little psuedo-ding-dong she got saddled with simultaneously lacks in beef and has the color - and texture - of boneless, uncooked chicken. The real joke here, though, is that she wants us to be staring at her stupid little fakeballs, so make sure you look extra close at those and try not to get distracted by her fauxnis, okay?

Dear god, that is the most womanly hand ever. I mean like picture it holding a bar of Dove soap instead of a rotdog... it'd look like an advertisement. The feminine rings definitely don't help.

(Hope I got the quote right, the "highlight a section and get quote/reply automatically" doesn't seem to be working.
 
I have been regularly having sex with it for a while, mostly with cis women; none have ever raised an eye at anything, especially because other women tend not to ask questions when asked not to penetrate.
If that statement is even true, how many of those "cis women" were repeat customers after getting intimate with that ghastly thing between his legs? And they "tend not to ask questions when asked not to penetrate"? No kidding. If I were drunk and horny and duped into touching that mess under false pretenses I wouldn't prolong any of it by getting chatty. I'd do the job and get the fuck outta there ASAP. And I'd have a big Come to Jesus moment about my drinking in the Uber on the way home.

And really Dude, no questions were asked because they weren't necessary. All was revealed right there.
 
I wish I had one of these stapled to my crotch, I would be much more fun.
Staple gun and one of those is probably less than 20 bucks on amazon, no one is stopping you

What revolts me the most is how fucking floppy they are. You never really appreciate how much internal structure a natal penis has until you see one of these ghoulish fucking jokes of an attempt to make one.

Like, moids in thread, if you stepped on a landmine in Cambodia and your dick got blown off. Would you rather have one of those put on you or just learn to live without a cock?
 
I would never trust a phalloplasty to hold up while I do the helicopter to get the last drop out. The answer is no.

Men tend to have better results than pooners as the basic configuration is still there instead of having to try and reroute the entire urinary system, and salvageable tissue can often be encouraged to grow with temporary saline implants to create more healthy tissue to work with.

For me it would depend on how much was left to try and reconstruct a working "unit". If it was something like a resection or amputation from injury, I would want to at least try and save it or what was left as I would at least like to urinate without a catheter. If it was completely destroyed, I would not even bother with trying to make a new one because it would just end up in failure with nothing left for surgeons to try and reconstruct as pooners can attest to.

I would actually be interested in seeing different phalloplasty and reconstruction efforts in actual men from disease or injury, but the problem is that if you try and look up something like that online in our current era, 99% of the "men" in your search results are going to be pooners who have undergone rotdog surgery.
 
I would actually be interested in seeing different phalloplasty and reconstruction efforts in actual men from disease or injury, but the problem is that if you try and look up something like that online in our current era, 99% of the "men" in your search results are going to be pooners who have undergone rotdog surgery.
Same, I imagine there is a huge gap between what the surgery for a male looks like vs a pooner, they must be 100% lying that this is what they do for men whose dicks fall off. I'd really like to see some kind of informed study comparing the results but I don't know how common it is for men to get their bait and tackle fully ripped off these days to the point of needing the same level of full reconstruction of the organ. Definitely would like to see comparisons between flat chested mastectomies and zippertit surgeries as well.

I'd say I'd like to see the same for stinkditches but to my knowledge nobody has ever had to perform an operation like that on a natal woman? I'm trying to think of a situation where it would be medically necessary but all I'm coming up with is either an intersex condition or maybe a horrific full body burn?
 
Same, I imagine there is a huge gap between what the surgery for a male looks like vs a pooner, they must be 100% lying that this is what they do for men whose dicks fall off. I'd really like to see some kind of informed study comparing the results but I don't know how common it is for men to get their bait and tackle fully ripped off these days to the point of needing the same level of full reconstruction of the organ. Definitely would like to see comparisons between flat chested mastectomies and zippertit surgeries as well.

I'd say I'd like to see the same for stinkditches but to my knowledge nobody has ever had to perform an operation like that on a natal woman? I'm trying to think of a situation where it would be medically necessary but all I'm coming up with is either an intersex condition or maybe a horrific full body burn?
I think it’s Bowers who also does corrective surgeries for FGM victims, no idea how those turn out for the women involved though.
 
Do people who support trans movements, but aren't trans themselves, view bottom surgery as the gross abomination it is? Like, I feel like you could support trans people and still have the thought of "Don't cut your cock off, that's disgusting."
They mostly don't know what is actually involved.
 
Same, I imagine there is a huge gap between what the surgery for a male looks like vs a pooner, they must be 100% lying that this is what they do for men whose dicks fall off. I'd really like to see some kind of informed study comparing the results but I don't know how common it is for men to get their bait and tackle fully ripped off these days to the point of needing the same level of full reconstruction of the organ. Definitely would like to see comparisons between flat chested mastectomies and zippertit surgeries as well.

I'd say I'd like to see the same for stinkditches but to my knowledge nobody has ever had to perform an operation like that on a natal woman? I'm trying to think of a situation where it would be medically necessary but all I'm coming up with is either an intersex condition or maybe a horrific full body burn?
I think it’s Bowers who also does corrective surgeries for FGM victims, no idea how those turn out for the women involved though.

You also have rare cases where women have to have partial or total vaginectomies from vaginal cancers, or women who are simply lacking a fully-formed vagina as a birth defect like this case that we have a thread on. Even then, this is far beyond what troons can hope for as the fact that vaginal epithelial cells can be convinced to proliferate and regenerate vaginal tissue is something that troons can only dream about as they do not have the corresponding tissue types in male anatomy.

Coming back to the subject of penile reconstruction in men as opposed to pooners, I think the vast majority of cases are usually a result of cancer or Fournier's gangrene.

From a surgical standpoint, it is a lot easier to build upon something that was there or should have been there in the first place as opposed to something that never was and never can be.
 
@Magic Pickle

Is it normal to feel sort of like I have a penis still when aroused post SRS??

I’m almost 4 years post op and wayyy happier with what I have now. However, I get quite upset because when I’m aroused, it’s like I can still feel the same feeling I had when my dick would twitch when I was turned on. It’s like those same muscles are there and it feels like it’s happening but obviously I don’t have a dick. When I flex the muscle it feels like my dick is moving but again there’s nothing there (thankfully).
Is this normal?? I love every other aspect of my vulva. I’m wondering if maybe I need some more erectile tissue removed or something else? Or is this just something that comes with the territory in that it’s not gonna ever feel totally different??
Seems that your Phantom Penis is unusual, but not the only one.
Here is a case study of a man who had phantom penis after 'gender affirming' surgery. It went away after they got rid of more erectile tissue and other peeny-parts, so I'm not sure if this really is 'phantom penis phenomenon' or just plain ol' lazy surgery...
 

Attachments

Seems that your Phantom Penis is unusual, but not the only one.
Here is a case study of a man who had phantom penis after 'gender affirming' surgery. It went away after they got rid of more erectile tissue and other peeny-parts, so I'm not sure if this really is 'phantom penis phenomenon' or just plain ol' lazy surgery...
Is there "phantom vagina" post-vaginectomy in pooners?
 
Back
Top Bottom