Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Autphag]

Here's an accurate depiction of @Autphag having his sorry ass kicked out of Kiwi Farms:

Bon Voyage!

No, that was you getting kicked out of the NHS.
They saw right through you, Carribean SRS boy.

 

[Begemot]

ahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahhahahahaha you just want to shitpost more tirades

aspergia would be a shithole with your neotranssexualist matriarchal communalism or whatever it is you have delusionally in mind for the dystopic matriarchal future befacing us

Better than your perverse version, you malingering cuck.

 

[Autphag]

I'm not going quite yet, but I'd like to clarify, it's nothing to the extent made out by Cuntster:

Autogynephillia is a cop-out and frankly a stupid one made by sex theorists who themselves couldn't delineate the difference between sexuality and gender to begin with. This is hence why the Female Embodiment Fantasy phenomenon was theorized. Somebody who envisages themselves in the gender they wish to be doesn't necessarily have to be equated to someone sexualizing that phenomenon. Indeed, sexuality is as overcomplicated as it is oversimplified. On the one hand, sexuality does most certainly correlate with gender on lines of dominance, submissiveness, activity, and passivity of behaviour, but correlation does not mean linear relationship, and so, it would be idiotic to make all these sorts of backwards categorical imperatives that Cuntster does in dismissing my gender dysphoria.

Cuntster has done little digging into the matter and even deliberately ruinous wrecking of research, suc as the removal of several autism studies related to connection to transgender identity by pulling them from their respective journals, and references to those journals offline from search engines.

Cuntster's is entirely a sexually motivated case. Blacks tend to have earlier developing libidos than Whites, more consciously aware of the significance of their masturbatory behaviour from a young age. Cuntster had the advantage of managing to obfuscate his childhood history owing to the lack of a gatekeeping precedent even if it was, as such, more difficult to obtain treatment when the phenomenon itself had drained on the mental health of the trans individual involved (such that Cuntster has the relationship backwards, the cart before the horse, on the matter of 'conditions to deal with pre-emptively', horse-shit; they had emerged the other way round, because in being denied ascription of identity, motivation is more easily depleted); thus, individuals like him are effectively responsible for the phenomenon of gatekeeping, as I'd insinuated in FR.

RLE does not accord with the actual experience of a person who has never needed to transition in order to obtain recognition in the desired identity status. Of the verifiability we have nothing other than Cuntster's word and successful manipulation of the system prior that he wasn't merely a precocious Black boy with strange emotions he wanted to translate into something 'comfortable' for himself. The Black's mind is not one of introspection, but quite the opposite; his ardent insistence on projecting this onto autistics is troubling, but thankfully, the methodology of the few available studies on this is shit anyway -- who in their right mind would want to relate to the queen?

It falls perfectly within my arguments of autistic social identity. Autistics only have other imbecilic retards as role models, or sellouts to neurodiversitarian academia. Neither have an interest other than the seemingly vested one of propelling a system which perpetuates the dependency of the former on the latter; autism is something upon which neurodiversity has as a convenient medium to parasitically draw from whatever it appeals to institutionally, under the pretense inclusionism of this sort is doing anything other than allowing acquiescence of themselves to psychiatric doctrinarianism.

Psychiatrists have an ultimately parasitic purpose in any socio-economic set-up. Gender dysphoria was intentionally abstracted as a concept such that it's perfectly conceivable that simply due to the practitioner's preferences, a self-confessed cognitive super-"empathic" psychopath like Amber can obfuscate, retroactively reminisce, and outright lie, whilst the honest autobiographical recounts of an autist without a filter, especially on certain substances, are dismissed by a narrative concocted by said neurotypical archetype as is per their inherent nature: one of socially reptillian pathological liars, appeasers, and crumb-throwers to everyone whilst they delight in such resource cuckery.

I wished to retool Aspergianism for one purpose, one sole purpose. To create a Juche equivalent for ourselves which would've answered the question put forward by David himself, "Who are the ones who should control the Aspergian?", in a much better way than his shitty plagiarism of third-rate pseudo-philosophers, in that I was trying to carry it more or less on the weight of just my logical reasoning alone, not caring to read much other than the philosophical literature I regard the most systematically logical in the world: the Juche corpus.

It is through Juche that Aspergians can extend their creative independence, but Amber wishes to deny any sort of ascription whilst trying to phrase his unlikely predicament, which he had lied was in response to the studies on children and adolescents but had actually pertained to himself, whilst he expects the declaratives of neugrotypical arbitration to paint every drop of the canvas of the motivations of Aspergian destiny and will, as if the homosexual was literally a telepath of Ritchie Ritch proportions.

Sexual motivations must have been the reason for Amber's malignant search of surgery abroad or else there would've been no need to further extend his identity beyond hormonal means. The emotional connotations of crossdressing are a similar cop-out; those emotional connotations can only occur when there is verisimilitude between the physiological and the clothed presentation, and when that verisimilitude is broken, of course, who could reasonably take seriously such a disgusting wretch? A twinkish insult to mankind with a vagina, a boorish hypermale faggot like Amber whose figure is still all too obvious, supple or not.

That is why we should more considerately examine the situation beyond the thought-termination cliches continuously offered by somebody who thought delusion and pathological distortion of the facts, including the statements of his adversaries, was sufficient enough to bring about my expulsion from the board.

You're welcome.

 

[Begemot]

I'm not going quite yet, but I'd like to clarify, it's nothing to the extent made out by Cuntster:

Autogynephillia is a cop-out and frankly a stupid one made by sex theorists who themselves couldn't delineate the difference between sexuality and gender to begin with. This is hence why the Female Embodiment Fantasy phenomenon was theorized. Somebody who envisages themselves in the gender they wish to be doesn't necessarily have to be equated to someone sexualizing that phenomenon. Indeed, sexuality is as overcomplicated as it is oversimplified. On the one hand, sexuality does most certainly correlate with gender on lines of dominance, submissiveness, activity, and passivity of behaviour, but correlation does not mean linear relationship, and so, it would be idiotic to make all these sorts of backwards categorical imperatives that Cuntster does in dismissing my gender dysphoria.

Cuntster has done little digging into the matter and even deliberately ruinous wrecking of research, suc as the removal of several autism studies related to connection to transgender identity by pulling them from their respective journals, and references to those journals offline from search engines.

Cuntster's is entirely a sexually motivated case. Blacks tend to have earlier developing libidos than Whites, more consciously aware of the significance of their masturbatory behaviour from a young age. Cuntster had the advantage of managing to obfuscate his childhood history owing to the lack of a gatekeeping precedent even if it was, as such, more difficult to obtain treatment when the phenomenon itself had drained on the mental health of the trans individual involved (such that Cuntster has the relationship backwards, the cart before the horse, on the matter of 'conditions to deal with pre-emptively', horse-shit; they had emerged the other way round, because in being denied ascription of identity, motivation is more easily depleted); thus, individuals like him are effectively responsible for the phenomenon of gatekeeping, as I'd insinuated in FR.

RLE does not accord with the actual experience of a person who has never needed to transition in order to obtain recognition in the desired identity status. Of the verifiability we have nothing other than Cuntster's word and successful manipulation of the system prior that he wasn't merely a precocious Black boy with strange emotions he wanted to translate into something 'comfortable' for himself. The Black's mind is not one of introspection, but quite the opposite; his ardent insistence on projecting this onto autistics is troubling, but thankfully, the methodology of the few available studies on this is shit anyway -- who in their right mind would want to relate to the queen?

It falls perfectly within my arguments of autistic social identity. Autistics only have other imbecilic exceptional individuals as role models, or sellouts to neurodiversitarian academia. Neither have an interest other than the seemingly vested one of propelling a system which perpetuates the dependency of the former on the latter; autism is something upon which neurodiversity has as a convenient medium to parasitically draw from whatever it appeals to institutionally, under the pretense inclusionism of this sort is doing anything other than allowing acquiescence of themselves to psychiatric doctrinarianism.

Psychiatrists have an ultimately parasitic purpose in any socio-economic set-up. Gender dysphoria was intentionally abstracted as a concept such that it's perfectly conceivable that simply due to the practitioner's preferences, a self-confessed cognitive super-"empathic" psychopath like Amber can obfuscate, retroactively reminisce, and outright lie, whilst the honest autobiographical recounts of an autist without a filter, especially on certain substances, are dismissed by a narrative concocted by said neurotypical archetype as is per their inherent nature: one of socially reptillian pathological liars, appeasers, and crumb-throwers to everyone whilst they delight in such resource cuckery.

I wished to retool Aspergianism for one purpose, one sole purpose. To create a Juche equivalent for ourselves which would've answered the question put forward by David himself, "Who are the ones who should control the Aspergian?", in a much better way than his shitty plagiarism of third-rate pseudo-philosophers, in that I was trying to carry it more or less on the weight of just my logical reasoning alone, not caring to read much other than the philosophical literature I regard the most systematically logical in the world: the Juche corpus.

It is through Juche that Aspergians can extend their creative independence, but Amber wishes to deny any sort of ascription whilst trying to phrase his unlikely predicament, which he had lied was in response to the studies on children and adolescents but had actually pertained to himself, whilst he expects the declaratives of neugrotypical arbitration to paint every drop of the canvas of the motivations of Aspergian destiny and will, as if the homosexual was literally a telepath of Ritchie Ritch proportions.

Sexual motivations must have been the reason for Amber's malignant search of surgery abroad or else there would've been no need to further extend his identity beyond hormonal means. The emotional connotations of crossdressing are a similar cop-out; those emotional connotations can only occur when there is verisimilitude between the physiological and the clothed presentation, and when that verisimilitude is broken, of course, who could reasonably take seriously such a disgusting wretch? A twinkish insult to mankind with a vagina, a boorish hypermale faggot like Amber whose figure is still all too obvious, supple or not.

That is why we should more considerately examine the situation beyond the thought-termination cliches continuously offered by somebody who thought delusion and pathological distortion of the facts, including the statements of his adversaries, was sufficient enough to bring about my expulsion from the board.

You're welcome.

All of this is specious nonsense. The bigger question is why would David Chac start shitposting on Kiwifarms?

 

[Autphag]

All of this is specious nonsense.

Like your favourite malingerer Amber, then?

 

[Begemot]

Like your favourite malingerer Amber, then?

Nah, mate, Cuntster is real, she's exasperated with you, but real. The idea of Davids Chac rejecting you is just delicious. Pity it's not real and it's a pity it's just another one of your delusions. We tried to help you and you rejected us.

 

[Autphag]

Nah, mate, Cuntster is real, she's exasperated with you, but real. The idea of Davids Chac rejecting you is just delicious. Pity it's not real and it's a pity it's just another one of your delusions. We tried to help you and you rejected us.

I don't need your help. I can help myself fine by critiquing Amber on anything and everything he ever has to say, regardless of week, month, or year.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

@LagoonaBlue

I'm jealous how? I had no knowledge of your music compositions or background. I just knew most spergs couldn't write music for shit anyway.

I mentioned in passing ages ago I had my Advanced Higher music. If you knew anything about the way SQA music courses are run, you'd know that they require you write compositions on Sibelius based on a music style you've studied in class.

 

[Begemot]

I don't need your help. I can help myself fine by critiquing AOn anything and everything he ever has to say, regardless of week, month, or year.

Nah, you're a cuck. Sorry, mate. You've fallen into a swamp of degradation. You're a slave to your passions and you like your chains too much.

 

[Autphag]

I mentioned in passing ages ago I had my Advanced Higher music. If you knew anything about the way SQA music courses are run, you'd know that they require you write compositions on Sibelius based on a music style you've studied in class.

Consider me uncaring.

 

[Begemot]

Consider me uncaring.

Well, we always knew you were a rank narcissist, Chris. So your puerile snide attempts leave us bemused if nothing else.

 

[Autphag]

Well, we always knew you were a rank narcissist, Chris. So your puerile snide attempts leave us bemused if nothing else.

why are you always here if australia is such a great country?

 

[LagoonaBlue]

Consider me intrigued.

FTFY.

If you're honestly so interested in music then why didn't you at least do Standard Grade?

 

[Begemot]

why are you always here if australia is such a great country?

My life is fine except its cold as balls here, now. I'm here because I like to talk about lolcows. If you weren't a gibbering narcissist you'd notice you're not the only lolcow I analyse. I'm in plenty of other threads and am doing other stuff online. Touching that this is the first time you've noticed my presence here.

 

[bertram's]

@Autphag: It is I, the great Aspergian revolutionary Chac.

 

[Autphag]

FTFY.

If you're honestly so interested in music then why didn't you at least do Standard Grade?

I dropped it in second year because I was ashamed of perceived effeminate connotations being linked to latent tendencies about me, and I was always paranoid about that; I even skipped English a lot initially.
I dropped Art for the same reason, and because it was too curricularly constrictive on my creativity.

I also stopped going to Home Ec. for exactly the same reason, and because I, literally, couldn't stand the heat in the kitchen as I was always hyperthermic back then (that was probably the start of my antibody swings).

 

[LagoonaBlue]

I dropped it in second year because I was ashamed of perceived effeminate connotations being linked to latent tendencies about me, and I was always paranoid about that; I even skipped English a lot initially.
I dropped Art for the same reason, and because it was too curricularly constrictive on my creativity.

Music's compulsory in first and second year so don't you mean you dropped it after second year?

 

[Cuntster]

I dropped it in second year because I was ashamed of perceived effeminate connotations being linked to latent tendencies about me, and I was always paranoid about that; I even skipped English a lot initially.
I dropped Art for the same reason, and because it was too curricularly constrictive on my creativity.

What an utter load of shit. Again, you retroactively rewrite the past to fit in with your current persona to make it seem more legitimate. Music has never had any kind of "effeminate connotations" linked to it, in fact most music classes are quite mixed as far as gender is concerned (in fact during my schooling, music classes tended to learn more heavily toward a male student population).

I can see right through your very obvious veneer; @LagoonaBlue mentioned music during her schooling, she's female, so you've now awkwardly tried to force an association with gender and music like an idiot. You really have no personality or meaningful identity, do you? I bet you spit back with your usual projection bullshit and say what I just said back at me like the unoriginal, inspiration-devoid automaton you are.

EDIT: I know this is sounding like a broken record now, but you're not transgender, you've never been transgender and you're never going to be transgender. You can throw as many tantrums, threaten as many people as you want but the fact remains.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

I dropped Art for the same reason, and because it was too curricularly constrictive on my creativity.

So important basics like light direction, shading, figure drawing from live models etc. were cramping your style in painting or sculpting some extremely urgent message to the world? How are you meant to do socialist realism without the basics of realism? You surely don't want to do abstract art like some degenerate (and in fact you can't do it well without a working knowledge of color theory, even).

 

[Autphag]

@Autphag: It is I, the great Aspergian revolutionary Chac.

Yes. And part of that duty will be to become a lesbian, Deborah.

What an utter load of shit. Again, you retroactively rewrite the past to fit in with your current persona to make it seem more legitimate. Music has never had any kind of "effeminate connotations" linked to it, in fact most music classes are quite mixed as far as gender is concerned (in fact during my schooling, music classes tended to learn more heavily toward a male student population).

I can see right through your very obvious veneer; @LagoonaBlue mentioned music during her schooling, she's female, so you've now awkwardly tried to force an association with gender and music like an idiot. You really have no personality or meaningful identity, do you? I bet you spit back with your usual projection bullshit and say what I just said back at me like the unoriginal, inspiration-devoid automaton you are.

EDIT: I know this is sounding like a broken record now, but you're not transgender, you've never been transgender and you're never going to be transgender. You can throw as many tantrums, threaten as many people as you want but the fact remains.

No, it literally happened you stupid fuck.

Occam's razor. Sometime a spade's a spade and now you're just getting schizophrenically angry to push an agenda.

Another thing: I didn't remember it, even though it was posted about a few pages ago, because I just don't care that much for her autobiographicals. I can memorize important people's one. She isn't important.

I only know yours because I genuinely hate you. With Lagoona it's more just a passing grudge.

I should add:

Missing the obvious connotation (not that there was a direct link to music and gender, you fucking idiot), it proves that Amber was projecting her '[she] doesn't understand the emotional connotations of blahblahblah...' trope through Haselgrove all along.
I won't mention it because it's PROOF POSITIVE THAT HE'S A SOCIOPATH AND COULD NEVER FEEL A THING IN A MILLION YEARS.

THIS IS DELIGHTFUL. THANKS AMBER MANSON

Also:

We can judge by verisimilitude of times that Cuntster and LagoonaBlue are the same person.

Wangjaesan should make a song entitled "Why is Cde. Sophie Always So Correct?"

So important basics like light direction, shading, figure drawing from live models etc. were cramping your style in painting or sculpting some extremely urgent message to the world? How are you meant to do socialist realism without the basics of realism? You surely don't want to do abstract art like some degenerate (and in fact you can't do it well without a working knowledge of color theory, even).

youre a harpie lol