Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
PLEASE tell me there's some push back on this nonsense?
It pays to look in the "hidden replies" tab of any post john makes, he hides a lot of shit. I only found two replies with any push back, one was hidden.

1.jpg

But that is the normal time line of stories that are ultimately uncovered as being hoaxes, right? Everyone is sympathetic for a couple of days before uncomfortable questions crop up. Very few people called out even obvious bs, like jussie smollet, the day it happened.

I'm personally hoping that this story gets big enough to hit catholic twitter, and maybe even result in some kind of official statement by whatever branch of the church he is slandering. Even something like 'adoption records do not contain dialogue or list the motivation for adoption" would devastate his narrative without breaking any privacy laws.
 
“She looks shockingly like I did before plastic surgery.“ — John on Mom

Know who else looks shockingly like John before plastic surgery?
John

This is obviously total bullshit.

None of this would be transcribed in hospital records.

And the Cathoic church would not have access to any of this.

View attachment 8667808
Catholic Services or similar would not tell a married couple to give up a child for adoption. Ever. It didn’t happen. It’s as ludicrous as John’s father having no insurance despite being a Navy vet (or was he supposedly active?). John’s lies suck and make him sound fucking stupid, which for better or worse isn’t how his trannysperging or politisperging come across.
 
Last edited:
“She looks shockingly like I did before plastic surgery.“ — John on Mom

Know who else looks shockingly like John before plastic surgery?
John


Catholic Services or similar would not tell a married couple to give up a child for adoption. Ever. It didn’t happen. It’s as ludicrous as John’s father having no insurance despite being a Navy vet (or was he supposedly active?). John’s lies suck and make him sound fucking stupid, which for better or worse isn’t how his trannysperging or politisperging come across.
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall studies that showed that giving trannies estrogen had a measurable impairment on their brain functions. John was never the sharpest tool in the shed, but if that is the case, then it might explain why his lies are getting dumber. Thanks to his increasing brain damage, he legitimately thinks this is a plausible story that will get him all the asspats he wants, even though it takes only a few seconds to realize it makes absolutely no sense.
 
How much of the crazy shit is actually from John and how much is from gay screaming chinese husband who was found to be abusive in previous marriage?
 
It’s interesting this fantasy that he has come up with.

It seems to be a combination of little boy and little girl dreams.

It’s common for little boys to dream about being themselves but better, like being Superman or Spiderman.
Spiderman is pretty apt here as Peter Parker is constantly struggling in his daily life, balancing school, part time work, social life commitments and helping his kindly but poor aunt who took him in after his parents died.

John wants to be perceived as talented and physically capable, all while having been held back by this crippling illness of gender make believe, excuse me, real dysphoria.
The spirituality coming from poverty adds another layer of adversity to that.

Little girls often have fantasies and dream worlds of secretly being princesses, raised by lovely people, but their real parents were forced to give them up for tragic reasons.

Obviously this story ties right into that. With John’s spin on it obviously.
While his mythical birth parents are not secret royalty (so far), they are this poor but pure and honest couple driven to a desperate situation.

Also, it just occurred to me? Didn’t John pretend to be Jewish at some point? Or is his family actually Jewish?

I could be wrong on this, but if I am not, why would the Left footers prioritize a family of Hebrews for a freshly bought adopted baby?

Surely they would place such a crotchfruit with a good god fearing catholic family?
 
could be wrong, but I seem to recall studies that showed that giving trannies estrogen had a measurable impairment on their brain functions. John was never the sharpest tool in the shed, but if that is the case, then it might explain why his lies are getting dumber
I reckon he is just spiralling. This is personality disorder/mental illness territory, not plain stupidity.

Remember, he has alienated virtually everyone at this point.
 
Also, it just occurred to me? Didn’t John pretend to be Jewish at some point? Or is his family actually Jewish?
He might have delusional hopes that somehow he had some jewish ancestry because of how deeply he feels connected to israel. It's like he paid money hoping to prove his jerusalem syndrome.
 
He might have delusional hopes that somehow he had some jewish ancestry because of how deeply he feels connected to israel. It's like he paid money hoping to prove his jerusalem syndrome.

Aha.

I looked back in the thread and that seems to be it. My mistake.

It’s hard to keep track of all of his lies.

But anyway, still doesn’t negate my doubt.

The church transcribing down that they took advantage of a struggling couple so the baby could be adopted, then just giving those records to the now adult child in question.

Considering that the church has had a lot of problems with pedophiles in the ranks, I would gather that they would have ensured that other situations involving sketchy behavior and children would have been covered up.
If not least that cash for adoption would be a way of obtaining children specifically to abuse.

And of course, others pointing out that if his alleged father was working for the navy, then he would get assistance for childbirth at the very least.
Not also to say that surely the navy would be interested to know that the Catholic Church was running this kind of scam.
I know they are not social workers but they are still expected to be responsible for the servicemen and civilian staff.
There would be naval commanders and such who would raise questions further up the chain in the church and other institutions like child and social services, surely.
 
"Cannot wrestle with the truth"

Says the man whose entire life is spent playing make believe.

View attachment 8671937
John really can't comprehend the fact that nobody sees him as a woman. Just because a person isn't pointing at you and yelling "TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY" doesn't mean they actually believe you're not a man playing make-believe. Most people try to be polite and not raise a stink, especially when it involves a clearly deranged man in a dress, for fear of his freaking out and hurting them. Trannies have taken advantage of this for years now, continually pushing boundaries and feeling heckin euphoric when they've been allowed to do as they please.

The difference now is that they've done it for so long, and so many people have seen their behavior, that they've used up any remaining good will they might have had. The general public is more confident in calling a spade a spade due to trannies' own overreach, and they're sick and tired of these assholes running roughshod over spaces they don't belong. Again, they might not yell at them IRL, but they're certainly more likely to call out trannies online, especially now that troon jannies aren't able to mass delete any criticism of their actions.

You only have yourself to blame, John. No amount of "reasonable tranny" schtick will change that.
Aha.

I looked back in the thread and that seems to be it. My mistake.

It’s hard to keep track of all of his lies.

But anyway, still doesn’t negate my doubt.

The church transcribing down that they took advantage of a struggling couple so the baby could be adopted, then just giving those records to the now adult child in question.

Considering that the church has had a lot of problems with pedophiles in the ranks, I would gather that they would have ensured that other situations involving sketchy behavior and children would have been covered up.
If not least that cash for adoption would be a way of obtaining children specifically to abuse.

And of course, others pointing out that if his alleged father was working for the navy, then he would get assistance for childbirth at the very least.
Not also to say that surely the navy would be interested to know that the Catholic Church was running this kind of scam.
I know they are not social workers but they are still expected to be responsible for the servicemen and civilian staff.
There would be naval commanders and such who would raise questions further up the chain in the church and other institutions like child and social services, surely.
There is absolutely no way any of his adoption story is true. An adoption facilitator is not allowed to pay for a child in any way, outside of basic childcare services to the mother. If the church were found out to be doing this (because surely John wouldn't have been the only case), they would have been in serious legal trouble, and that would have definitely made the news, and probably brought up countless times since then by fedora-tippers with an axe to grind. Of course, no record of this happening exists.

There is also no way that his parents wouldn't have been able to pay for the birth. Surely his dad would have had to have talked to someone about it at some point, who would have pointed him in the right direction to get assistance. Even if they didn't have insurance (which they would have through the Navy), if they showed up at the hospital with the mother in labor, it's not like they would be turned away. And the sob story about how they were forced to give up their perfect little angel Johnny is so ludicrous, as though some church official was transcribing every conversation they had about how this was ruining their marriage in detail, even including how his mom was crying over letting him go. And then they just hung on to all that for fifty years until John came back, despite the fact it makes them look like mustache-twirling villains?

And of course, conveniently enough, John doesn't know how to get in touch with his dad and his mom just so happened to have been dead for years. Aw jeez, guess John can't prove they exist after all! Oh well, so much for that story! We'll never hear about his fake parents again, outside of the odd mention when he needs to play victim.

The sad part is that there are people that actually will believe this, people that are not familiar with how much John lies, people that couldn't fathom the idea that a man would fabricate that much about his life for no logical reason.
 
Back
Top Bottom